Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Do I Have the Right Rear Derailleur?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Do I Have the Right Rear Derailleur?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-24, 10:06 AM
  #1  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Do I Have the Right Rear Derailleur?

A while back I rebuilt my old Specialized Roubaix with an Ultegra R8000 11 speed compact groupset. It previously had an Ultegra 10 speed triple.

I selected the 50/34 compact crank.., and wondered about what cassette to get.

I read that the 11 speed 11-28 and 11-32 were pretty common choices, and then discovered that there is also an 11-30.

So, I went with the 11-30, and got the Ultegra medium cage rear derailleur.

It works fine, except when I am in the small front chain ring, and any of say the three smallest cogs in the back. Then, the chain sags, and in the smallest cog, the jockey wheel actually touches the frame.

now, in the smallest rear cog and the small chain ring, the cross chaining is pretty bad, so maybe that combo should be avoided anyway? but the next two smallest cogs out to be usable - right?

I think the B scew is correctly set, or maybe a bit tight - in the small chain ring, and the big cassette cog, the jockey wheel is no where near the cog.

I am wondering, if I should have the large cage RD.

I don't think I have too many links in the chain.

Here are two pics.

the first shows the bike in the big chain ring, and big cassette cog. I don't think I could have any fewer links.

the second shows the small chain ring, and the smallest cog. The chain is loose, and the jockey wheel is against the frame.

what am i doing wrong?



jgf310 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 11:19 AM
  #2  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,760

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5807 Post(s)
Liked 2,628 Times in 1,459 Posts
I'd make one or both of the following.

Adjust the B screw to push the RD lower.

Cut 1" from the chain (after confirming that it will still be long enough--- test by pulling the lower loop forward and hooking onto the bottom of the chainring).

Lastly, once you improve it slightly, accept that the small/small will have some sag as a compromise for everything else being good.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 11:31 AM
  #3  
soyabean
Senior Member
 
soyabean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: GMT-5
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times in 277 Posts
The 11-30 is messing it up with a chain too long because that is expecting a 1x up there.

You'd be able to remove one link with a smaller 11-28T, thus taughting the chain when it's on the 11T.

There exists aftermarket bolt-on dropouts that let's you place a RD even lower.
soyabean is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 11:34 AM
  #4  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I will try adjusting the B screw.

But, I look at that first pic and think; there's no way the chain can be shorter...

with the cage horizontal, isn't it already as short as it can be?

or, am I not understanding it correcly?
jgf310 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 11:42 AM
  #5  
soyabean
Senior Member
 
soyabean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: GMT-5
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times in 277 Posts
The 30x50T setup is making the chain too long.

11-30T is practically a mtb cassette.

My fastest commuter has a 12-26T and I'm going to soon swap it to 12-23T to get more smooth gearing.
soyabean is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 11:46 AM
  #6  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,760

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5807 Post(s)
Liked 2,628 Times in 1,459 Posts
There's an easy way to confirm as I described earlier.

Shift to big/big. Pull the lower loop forward 1" (2 links) and hook back onto the bottom of the chainring, letting the excess stick out the front for the moment. Push up on the RD cage and confirm that there's still some travel left.

Another option that may solve everything. Find a larger diameter idler pulley. That will slightly increase the RD take up capacity, and hopefully, combined with B screw adjustment will allow the existing setup work fine, except possibly in small/small.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 04-19-24, 11:57 AM
  #7  
grumpus
Senior Member
 
grumpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,262
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times in 344 Posts
Originally Posted by jgf310
I will try adjusting the B screw.

But, I look at that first pic and think; there's no way the chain can be shorter...

with the cage horizontal, isn't it already as short as it can be?

or, am I not understanding it correcly?
The chain length is correct for big/big, you shouldn't/can't shorten it. With luck cranking in the B screw will help clearance and tension on the small ring - if it doesn't go quite far enough you can reverse the screw so its head is hitting the frame.
grumpus is offline  
Likes For grumpus:
Old 04-19-24, 12:26 PM
  #8  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Does anyone think a long cage derailleur would help?
jgf310 is offline  
Likes For jgf310:
Old 04-19-24, 12:27 PM
  #9  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,883

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1798 Post(s)
Liked 1,278 Times in 882 Posts
This is how I do a quick check and keep the hands clean.
Put it on BIG:BIG and see how much "slack" you can pull.
Make sure you have "some".

IF you can't pull "enough", don't shorten.
It is what it is and you really don't want those extreme combinations anyway.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Likes For Bill Kapaun:
Old 04-19-24, 12:30 PM
  #10  
urbanknight
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,387

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1000 Post(s)
Liked 1,214 Times in 696 Posts
I don't understand all these "mtb gears" and "too short" comments. According to Shimano's website, the R8000 medium cage should handle up to a 34t cog with a chainwrap of up to 39. The OP's setup has a 35 chainwrap, so it should be well within reach. The picture makes me think the chain could be straighter, so take FBinNY 's advice and pull the chain tighter to see if it will work to take 1" out. If that doesn't work, I'd check the part number to make sure you didn't get a short cage in the wrong box or something.

https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ...-R8000-GS.html
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
urbanknight is offline  
Likes For urbanknight:
Old 04-19-24, 12:32 PM
  #11  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,738
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2156 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times in 1,210 Posts
Two suggestions from someone who runs 12-30 cassettes with 48/34 cranks on several bikes:
1) Chain is too short in big/big
2) Don’t use small/small. In fact, I don’t use the bottom half of the casette at all in the small chainring.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Likes For rccardr:
Old 04-19-24, 12:34 PM
  #12  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 865
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 321 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by jgf310
A while back I rebuilt my old Specialized Roubaix with an Ultegra R8000 11 speed compact groupset. It previously had an Ultegra 10 speed triple.

I selected the 50/34 compact crank.., and wondered about what cassette to get.

I read that the 11 speed 11-28 and 11-32 were pretty common choices, and then discovered that there is also an 11-30.

So, I went with the 11-30, and got the Ultegra medium cage rear derailleur.

It works fine, except when I am in the small front chain ring, and any of say the three smallest cogs in the back. Then, the chain sags, and in the smallest cog, the jockey wheel actually touches the frame.

now, in the smallest rear cog and the small chain ring, the cross chaining is pretty bad, so maybe that combo should be avoided anyway? but the next two smallest cogs out to be usable - right?

I think the B scew is correctly set, or maybe a bit tight - in the small chain ring, and the big cassette cog, the jockey wheel is no where near the cog.

I am wondering, if I should have the large cage RD.

I don't think I have too many links in the chain.

Here are two pics.

the first shows the bike in the big chain ring, and big cassette cog. I don't think I could have any fewer links.

the second shows the small chain ring, and the smallest cog. The chain is loose, and the jockey wheel is against the frame.

what am i doing wrong?



Something to double check is if the RD is installed correctly. The attachment of the bracket axle unit (the upper link) to the frame's hanger looks a little more vertical than common. And also the cable housing entry angle looks a little more horizontal than usual.

See the pic, the hanger tab should be in the green position. Sometimes it is erroneously installed in the red 'gap' position.

KCT1986 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 12:38 PM
  #13  
zandoval 
Senior Member
 
zandoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,499

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 1,638 Times in 1,052 Posts
Pretty common problem when changing out components. For me all to common as I never have matched components. The solution is easy?

Stop Cross Chaining
Get a Long Cage Derailleur if not already using one
Take out a few links

__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)

Last edited by zandoval; 04-19-24 at 12:41 PM.
zandoval is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 12:38 PM
  #14  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,760

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5807 Post(s)
Liked 2,628 Times in 1,459 Posts
Originally Posted by jgf310
Does anyone think a long cage derailleur would help?
Of course it would, but I thought you were trying to avoid spending more than necessary. You're so close, and can probably solve it for free with B screw adjustment, and/or for small $$$ with a bigger lower pulley.

In your shoes, I'd try to get it closer, then accept it since I don't ride small small, and the consequences of accidentally shifting to it are minor. My touring bike has a "bail out" granny which causes sag on all but the largest rear sprockets, but I happily accept it because all the combinations I actually use are fine.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 01:23 PM
  #15  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,760

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5807 Post(s)
Liked 2,628 Times in 1,459 Posts
Originally Posted by urbanknight
...I don't understand all these "mtb....
I'm with you. I take "can't work" and "won't work" as a challenge

I step back and consider what would be needed for it to work, ie. slightly more chain take up. Than figure out how to make that happen.

This comes more naturally to me because I started serious riding before the internet or product documentation, so every build involved working from a blank slate.

To the OP

Challenge yourself to tinker until it works for you. The only serious sin is cutting the chain too short so measure 3x first if considering that.

If you want to see if a larger idler will help before buying one, jam something between the chain and puller to increase diameter where the chain leaves. Test the effect at both ends of the idler cage arc.

Likewise with B screw. Jam a small wad of paper between the screw and tab and see if it helps. if so, buy a longer screw or modify the stop tab.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 04-19-24, 01:34 PM
  #16  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by KCT1986
Something to double check is if the RD is installed correctly. The attachment of the bracket axle unit (the upper link) to the frame's hanger looks a little more vertical than common. And also the cable housing entry angle looks a little more horizontal than usual.

See the pic, the hanger tab should be in the green position. Sometimes it is erroneously installed in the red 'gap' position.



Wow.., do I feel dumb...

I thought when I installed it that it looked weird.

And.., since i put on this RD, it has been _incredibly_ difficult to remove and replace the rear wheel - impossible without removing the quick release - the cogs just wouldn't go above the jockey wheel.

so, here is a pic of the way it was; looks just like the wrong way in your diagram - thanks!

i fixed it, and the interesting is that pretty much, the shifter indexing is still fine.

I think I need to look at the B-screw and the chain length again though


jgf310 is offline  
Likes For jgf310:
Old 04-19-24, 01:36 PM
  #17  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
And, I've ridden 1000's of miles with it wrong
jgf310 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 01:41 PM
  #18  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 865
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 321 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by jgf310
Wow.., do I feel dumb...

I thought when I installed it that it looked weird.

And.., since i put on this RD, it has been _incredibly_ difficult to remove and replace the rear wheel - impossible without removing the quick release - the cogs just wouldn't go above the jockey wheel.

so, here is a pic of the way it was; looks just like the wrong way in your diagram - thanks!

i fixed it, and the interesting is that pretty much, the shifter indexing is still fine.

I think I need to look at the B-screw and the chain length again though


Yes, just move it into the correct position. All else should be good.

Disregard all the other unhelpful posts, DONE.
KCT1986 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 01:47 PM
  #19  
smd4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,817

Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3529 Post(s)
Liked 2,940 Times in 1,783 Posts
Does that second, incorrect protrusion/stop on the RD do anything except confuse people?
smd4 is online now  
Old 04-19-24, 02:01 PM
  #20  
Atlas Shrugged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1250 Post(s)
Liked 1,329 Times in 678 Posts
The number of ridiculous responses from people who have no clue but weigh in regardless was amazing. Great you were able to fix it as well as filter out the garbage.
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
Old 04-19-24, 02:07 PM
  #21  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 865
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 346 Post(s)
Liked 321 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by smd4
Does that second, incorrect protrusion/stop on the RD do anything except confuse people?
Haha, don't know what is for, the MTB Shadow style RD that I've seen doesn't have it.

Guess that it would keep the bracket from rotating backward, but the bracket is supposed to be firmly attached to the hanger, with the proper tabs on each in contact.
KCT1986 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 02:10 PM
  #22  
kcjc
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 47 Times in 34 Posts
Originally Posted by soyabean
The 11-30 is messing it up with a chain too long because that is expecting a 1x up there.

You'd be able to remove one link with a smaller 11-28T, thus taughting the chain when it's on the 11T.

There exists aftermarket bolt-on dropouts that let's you place a RD even lower.
Originally Posted by soyabean
The 30x50T setup is making the chain too long.

11-30T is practically a mtb cassette.

My fastest commuter has a 12-26T and I'm going to soon swap it to 12-23T to get more smooth gearing.
11-30 is a Dura-Ace 9100 11-speed setup, https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ.../CS-R9100.html. 11-28/11-32 was/still a common setup for Ultegra 11-speed. Current 12-speed offering is 11-30 &11-34, https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ...-R9200-12.html & https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ...-R8101-12.html.

11-30 as an MTB range dates back to the 8-speed starting from the early 90s.
kcjc is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 02:11 PM
  #23  
smd4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,817

Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3529 Post(s)
Liked 2,940 Times in 1,783 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged
The number of ridiculous responses from people who have no clue but weigh in regardless was amazing. Great you were able to fix it as well as filter out the garbage.
People offering sincere suggestions to help a fellow cyclist is "garbage?"

Wow.
smd4 is online now  
Old 04-19-24, 02:24 PM
  #24  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
now, now...

I appreciate _everyone's_ efforts!

But, KCT1986 did spot the problem - so special thanks to him

funny thing is, i sort of always thought something was wrong - the angle was obviously different than the ultegra it replaced.., and the problem getting the wheel on and off was ridiculous.

But.., bikes are finicky, and it worked pretty well.., so I kind of figured it anything was really wrong, as in mounted incorrectly, it wouldn't work at all

anyway - after changing it i had to back out the B-screw a lot.., and I think the chain might be a little short.

There is a lot more tension in small/small, and the cage is still pretty horizontal in big/big, which causes resistance
jgf310 is offline  
Old 04-19-24, 02:28 PM
  #25  
jgf310
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 224

Bikes: Roubaix and StumpJumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by kcjc
11-30 is a Dura-Ace 9100 11-speed setup, https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ.../CS-R9100.html. 11-28/11-32 was/still a common setup for Ultegra 11-speed. Current 12-speed offering is 11-30 &11-34, https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ...-R9200-12.html & https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ...-R8101-12.html.

11-30 as an MTB range dates back to the 8-speed starting from the early 90s.
11-30 is an 11 speed Ultegra R8000 choice as well - I have the ultegra

https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ.../CS-R8000.html
jgf310 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.