Newbie Intolerant...
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,486
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1639 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 829 Times
in
538 Posts
Sometimes I find myself pausing when I compose replies to posts from new members new to C&V asking questions about bikes like Peugeots with Carbolite 103 or similar bikes with 1020 or 2040 high tensile steel frames. What bothers me is, we tend to use what might be perceived as "snooty" or "disparaging" terms when describing these bikes.
The usual terms used like "low level", "cheap", "gas pipe", "boat anchor" is not helpful at all when a new person to C&V is trying to understand and get a handle on this side of the hobby and sport.
So next time a new member comes on line and asks about bikes like the UO8, P6, basic Huffys or Ross or similar bikes, answer it within the context of what the bike was made for and it's useful best traits (and maybe its potential for modding up) and not immediately label it with subjective terms that is mostly just, in many instances, shutting down any useful, constructive" conversation with the poster before it can even begin.
Frankly, I had been guilty of doing this many times on his forum, but had been thinking about my actions related to this, as I realize the roots (which I enjoyed just as much as I enjoy my present bikes) of what I started with in the sport and hobby, to get me where I am now.
Maybe instead of the terms I listed above, we can consider using other terms like "entry level", "base model", "sport touring", "light touring", "town bike", "commuter".....etc..., instead?
Yes, we can call out "junk" when it is real junk, but it seems like some very decent, C&V bikes are getting swept up into that "junk category". Just because they do not have the "proper" Reynolds, Columbus, Vitus tubing or racing level components that a lot of us look for...
JMOs.....
The usual terms used like "low level", "cheap", "gas pipe", "boat anchor" is not helpful at all when a new person to C&V is trying to understand and get a handle on this side of the hobby and sport.
So next time a new member comes on line and asks about bikes like the UO8, P6, basic Huffys or Ross or similar bikes, answer it within the context of what the bike was made for and it's useful best traits (and maybe its potential for modding up) and not immediately label it with subjective terms that is mostly just, in many instances, shutting down any useful, constructive" conversation with the poster before it can even begin.
Frankly, I had been guilty of doing this many times on his forum, but had been thinking about my actions related to this, as I realize the roots (which I enjoyed just as much as I enjoy my present bikes) of what I started with in the sport and hobby, to get me where I am now.
Maybe instead of the terms I listed above, we can consider using other terms like "entry level", "base model", "sport touring", "light touring", "town bike", "commuter".....etc..., instead?
Yes, we can call out "junk" when it is real junk, but it seems like some very decent, C&V bikes are getting swept up into that "junk category". Just because they do not have the "proper" Reynolds, Columbus, Vitus tubing or racing level components that a lot of us look for...
JMOs.....
Likes For Chombi1:
#27
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times
in
1,254 Posts
If a new user stops in and can get their information in 1 post then they may be on their way shortly thereafter. If 10 posts over two days means there is some effort put into seeing other threads and sparks an interest in being a longterm user then it is doubly useful as a spam prevention and user collector mechanism.
#28
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
I happen to think that fly-by-night info seekers are inconsiderate when they:
- Provide little to no detail about the bicycle they have,
- Preface their posts with delusions of value,
- Ignore the subforum designed specifically for appraisals requests, and/or
- Pull a sales pitch in their valuation post, insinuating that a forum member- *ahem* "collector" - should buy their bike RIGHT NOW.
Case in point, @BFisher made an exceptional example out of the one new member who came into this thread. It is all about ME, I, WANT, and they're somehow hopeless without us...
...as if Google doesn't exist, Sheldon never wrote a word, and R. J. the Bike Guy never made a video.
Sorry, this is the Internet in the year 2019. If you have anything remotely more common than a Durkopp, you can find information on your bike, how to service it, and probably how much it's worth too. There's no excuse to play oh-woe-is-me-nobody-will-help over basic information. That's not to say that I think we shouldn't exist to help, but not to people who act like Google doesn't exist and we're disposable after they've used us.
Ten posts. Are people that damn impatient that 10 posts are too much to ask in exchange for one-on-one, specialized mechanical advice for free? Or appraisals from a group of people who have an exceptional grasp on the market?
No, it isn't unreasonable. But people are that damn impatient. Heck, if it wasn't for our login system, we'd be a wasteland of gimme posts even if spambots didn't exist. If you have some popcorn with you, take a look at this trainwreck of a thread started by very arrogant newbie who apparently knows better than the Bicycle Mechanics experts he asked in the first place. Perfect example of the crap that could litter this forum without our mod team and very reasonable requirements.
Also, @cb400bill's comment about spambots made this a non-issue on its own. BikeForums.net has a huge presence online. It is a magnet for everyone, including the spambots. If the 10 post rule cuts down on the robo junk, all the better.
-Kurt
P.S.: I'll take it a step further: There are a few members (one in particular) on this forum who seem to participate with their latest "finds," but they're surreptitiously getting information for flipping. One of these slimeballs tends to extract bits and pieces of what we tell him into his Craigslist/OfferUp posts...except when there's fork damage. Yea, seems like that bit of highly important information never makes the ad. It doesn't stop him from putting a sky-high price on his junk either. What makes it worse is that since he comes back to read everything we've written, that means he is selling his bikes with full knowledge of said mechanical hazards.
Last edited by cudak888; 09-02-19 at 10:19 PM.
Likes For cudak888:
#29
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
For me a simple trade off:
minimal spam or serving the needs of the very occasional user.
A newbie who wishes to participate beyond one or two questions likely should not be offended by 10 posts in 2 days.
The newbie who just wants an appraisal or bike fitting comments may object to the rules .
My opinion/position would be to favor users who wish more than a one/two question relationship.
i like today’s rules.
minimal spam or serving the needs of the very occasional user.
A newbie who wishes to participate beyond one or two questions likely should not be offended by 10 posts in 2 days.
The newbie who just wants an appraisal or bike fitting comments may object to the rules .
My opinion/position would be to favor users who wish more than a one/two question relationship.
i like today’s rules.
#30
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
That aside, couldn't agree more with your sentiments.
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-02-19 at 06:49 PM. Reason: First version didn't scan.
#31
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Actually that kind of does make us a charity, in a nice way -- a group of people who volunteer their time and knowledge within the constraints of what they think is reasonable for a personally meaningful and socially useful objective. (I just made that up on the spot, so feel free to nitpick.) What it doesn't make us is the government welfare office, where someone shows up and says, "I want money or services from you that I'm entitled to, regardless of what I'm willing to contribute myself (which is often nothing -- why would you even think such a thing??),...and hurry up with it already, the queue is too dam' long."
That aside, couldn't agree more with your sentiments.
That aside, couldn't agree more with your sentiments.
-Kurt
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times
in
609 Posts
@cudak888
I think everything you said above makes wonderful sense... Though I'm personally someone who has been using the internet for tedious research for the better part of two decades, and searching for answers to questions similar to those I've posed (to myself or others) in the past is relatively easy. However, anyone who is truly a "noob" at something usually won't even have an inkling about where to turn first in their quest for answers. This is especially true of people who do not regularly do research on the internet (which would include a majority of people in the world).
That just seems like something important to keep in mind. Finding a forum about a subject you know nothing about and may only wish to learn something specific regarding, joining and asking about that specific thing... Well, that might seem like the obvious answer for some, and I can't blame them if the alternative research methods are unfamiliar.
-Gregory
I think everything you said above makes wonderful sense... Though I'm personally someone who has been using the internet for tedious research for the better part of two decades, and searching for answers to questions similar to those I've posed (to myself or others) in the past is relatively easy. However, anyone who is truly a "noob" at something usually won't even have an inkling about where to turn first in their quest for answers. This is especially true of people who do not regularly do research on the internet (which would include a majority of people in the world).
That just seems like something important to keep in mind. Finding a forum about a subject you know nothing about and may only wish to learn something specific regarding, joining and asking about that specific thing... Well, that might seem like the obvious answer for some, and I can't blame them if the alternative research methods are unfamiliar.
-Gregory
#33
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I’m not sure if this is something we can vote on, but I agree - many people come here for the first time to ask about, or talk about, a specific bike, and I think the 10 post thing is a turn off for them.
I get why the rule exists, but I also think it really negatively impacts their experience and our recruiting. I’d be in favor of removing the requirement and asking for more moderator volunteers?
I get why the rule exists, but I also think it really negatively impacts their experience and our recruiting. I’d be in favor of removing the requirement and asking for more moderator volunteers?
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 09-02-19 at 07:31 PM.
#34
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I can see how the 10 post limit can be frustrating to a newbie, but as the modern parlance goes, "Use your words." I have early copies of John Muir's "How to Keep Your Volkswagen Alive" and they didn't have very many of those cool Peter Aschwanden illustrations yet. One person had to describe the hardware and problem as best as they could *in words* and the other person needed to make an effort to read those words and visualize what was going on. That skill seems to be on the wane since it's so easy to take and post pictures these days...
__________________
RUSA #7498
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 09-02-19 at 07:03 PM.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
#36
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Seriously, 99.9% of lawyers are not capable of doing the kinds of cycle assessments we do.
Likes For Road Fan:
#38
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#39
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times
in
1,254 Posts
If you have some popcorn with you, take a look at this trainwreck of a thread started by very arrogant newbie
Likes For clubman:
#40
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
DD
Last edited by Drillium Dude; 09-02-19 at 08:45 PM.
#41
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Has anyone checked the ratio of members to guests? Esp in C&V.
Many times the ratio is 10 guests to 1 member.
People are able to get TONS of info - and search as well, without ANY affiliation.
Maybe instead of 10 posts in 2 days, maybe 6 posts in 2 days. But there are some persistent spammers.
Many times the ratio is 10 guests to 1 member.
People are able to get TONS of info - and search as well, without ANY affiliation.
Maybe instead of 10 posts in 2 days, maybe 6 posts in 2 days. But there are some persistent spammers.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,949
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1303 Post(s)
Liked 1,911 Times
in
1,141 Posts
Cudak888,
I have finally found something I can put a like on! Your post #29 here strikes a chord with me. I went to the local bike co-op tonight and put the Dero pump back in place after replacing the $45 pump head that the local homeless dudes have once again torn apart. I feel like I waste my time on folks who want something for nothing and that they are entitled to, every time this happens. Which by the way is about every three weeks. At what time do I stop enabling the homeless/bums of the world. The folks who truly need the services I provide are thankful but the homeless feel entitled, and that really gets to me. Maybe that is why I don't mind the ten post rule. If it stops the entitlement mentality then I don't mind. Just my personal rant. Smiles, MH
I have finally found something I can put a like on! Your post #29 here strikes a chord with me. I went to the local bike co-op tonight and put the Dero pump back in place after replacing the $45 pump head that the local homeless dudes have once again torn apart. I feel like I waste my time on folks who want something for nothing and that they are entitled to, every time this happens. Which by the way is about every three weeks. At what time do I stop enabling the homeless/bums of the world. The folks who truly need the services I provide are thankful but the homeless feel entitled, and that really gets to me. Maybe that is why I don't mind the ten post rule. If it stops the entitlement mentality then I don't mind. Just my personal rant. Smiles, MH
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,043
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,382 Times
in
3,669 Posts
Cudak888,
I have finally found something I can put a like on! Your post #29 here strikes a chord with me. I went to the local bike co-op tonight and put the Dero pump back in place after replacing the $45 pump head that the local homeless dudes have once again torn apart. I feel like I waste my time on folks who want something for nothing and that they are entitled to, every time this happens. Which by the way is about every three weeks. At what time do I stop enabling the homeless/bums of the world. The folks who truly need the services I provide are thankful but the homeless feel entitled, and that really gets to me. Maybe that is why I don't mind the ten post rule. If it stops the entitlement mentality then I don't mind. Just my personal rant. Smiles, MH
I have finally found something I can put a like on! Your post #29 here strikes a chord with me. I went to the local bike co-op tonight and put the Dero pump back in place after replacing the $45 pump head that the local homeless dudes have once again torn apart. I feel like I waste my time on folks who want something for nothing and that they are entitled to, every time this happens. Which by the way is about every three weeks. At what time do I stop enabling the homeless/bums of the world. The folks who truly need the services I provide are thankful but the homeless feel entitled, and that really gets to me. Maybe that is why I don't mind the ten post rule. If it stops the entitlement mentality then I don't mind. Just my personal rant. Smiles, MH
Well because this is Classic and VINTAGE, oldschool baby, put in some time and effort as we have done, now get off my lawn.
Likes For merziac:
#44
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
DD
Likes For Drillium Dude:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
701 Posts
I didn't have time to scan this entire thread, but what about an "if you're new here" sticky to set some expectations. At least then the common refrain can be to point people to the sticky with common info, like why 10 posts are necessary, take pics from the drive side, say hi to others and comment on others' bikes to get to 10, etc.
#46
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,626
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,485 Times
in
3,209 Posts
Last edited by SurferRosa; 09-02-19 at 11:51 PM.
#47
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
I didn't have time to scan this entire thread, but what about an "if you're new here" sticky to set some expectations. At least then the common refrain can be to point people to the sticky with common info, like why 10 posts are necessary, take pics from the drive side, say hi to others and comment on others' bikes to get to 10, etc.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Likes For Rollfast:
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Yes, a lot of users that post about their "issue", then vanish, but some join in with more discussions.
I'm not convinced that SPAM by photos is a big issue at this time, although that could become an issue in the future.
I have no problems with the 5+5 post limits, and the blocking links in general (other than the photo links). And, find it annoying when a single spammer dumps in dozens of spam messages.
In the Appraisals forum, those of us that venture there both like to look at the vintage bikes, as well as can tell a lot more about a bike from photos than a description.
I was participating in a thread about bent spokes last week when the OP posted a photo of the wheel showing the spokes bending side to side, when there was the assumption that the bends were front to back. It took the problem solving in a different direction.
#49
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
Wow! Though I do try to not be long winded, here goes...
First of all, I agree that spam must be prevented and tried to make that clear in my initial post (#1).
Second, I came to the Bike Forums initially, as many or even most do, to get information. How many potentially helpful and knowledgeable people has the ten post rule driven away? For example, though I like the Classic Rendezvous website, I cannot figure out how to use their forum so I do not go there anymore. Though this is a conceited statement, but none the less true, I am a helpful and knowledgeable person and Classic Rendezvous does not benefit from it. I just didn't go back.
When it comes to customers, it is really this simple - Customers get what I want or go elsewhere. And, if they do get what they want, finding value in visiting the website, chances are that some of them, like me, will visit again, and again and (good grief, I spend way too much time here).
Third, in addition to the information that I seek, I also come to the forums now for entertainment and, perhaps, companionship someday. I have met some pretty darn nice people here.
Finally, and for me this is a big one - I come here to help others though I do get bothered by some of the inane requests that the uninformed newbie might present, but I try to help anyway. Why? Because that is a big part of what this forum is all about and I used to be an uninformed newbie.
As for anyone insisting that I pee away two days to get to use a service..? Pooey-Stinko! As was the case, for me, with Classic Rendezvous. I just didn't go back because the forum was/is too difficult for me to figure out how to use their service. I think that to be Classic Rendezvous' loss, not because I am great, but because their policy might have pushed a great person away, never allowing him or her to share useful information.
To be honest and horribly critical, this ten rule thing is counterproductive to growing the BF website or the interest in preserving and riding vintage bicycles. It is also annoying, as long time members have mentioned, to not have access to the needed pictures when they are most important for us (long time member) if we are expected to help. And if you do something to help others, in this forum, that should be the reward in itself.
I can remember when I first came to the Bike Forums and some of the comments that veteran forum members offered. Then, I knew next to nothing and did not really know how to go about finding it. Today, I am one of the people who is lucky enough to have knowledge that I can pass on to help others and I expect nothing for it, other than the satisfaction that I get doing so. In fact, that is the exact reason I built and published MY "TEN SPEEDS".
My whole intention with this thread is to pick your brains. Surly, the bunch of us can come up with a better way to say Welcome.
First of all, I agree that spam must be prevented and tried to make that clear in my initial post (#1).
Second, I came to the Bike Forums initially, as many or even most do, to get information. How many potentially helpful and knowledgeable people has the ten post rule driven away? For example, though I like the Classic Rendezvous website, I cannot figure out how to use their forum so I do not go there anymore. Though this is a conceited statement, but none the less true, I am a helpful and knowledgeable person and Classic Rendezvous does not benefit from it. I just didn't go back.
When it comes to customers, it is really this simple - Customers get what I want or go elsewhere. And, if they do get what they want, finding value in visiting the website, chances are that some of them, like me, will visit again, and again and (good grief, I spend way too much time here).
Third, in addition to the information that I seek, I also come to the forums now for entertainment and, perhaps, companionship someday. I have met some pretty darn nice people here.
Finally, and for me this is a big one - I come here to help others though I do get bothered by some of the inane requests that the uninformed newbie might present, but I try to help anyway. Why? Because that is a big part of what this forum is all about and I used to be an uninformed newbie.
As for anyone insisting that I pee away two days to get to use a service..? Pooey-Stinko! As was the case, for me, with Classic Rendezvous. I just didn't go back because the forum was/is too difficult for me to figure out how to use their service. I think that to be Classic Rendezvous' loss, not because I am great, but because their policy might have pushed a great person away, never allowing him or her to share useful information.
To be honest and horribly critical, this ten rule thing is counterproductive to growing the BF website or the interest in preserving and riding vintage bicycles. It is also annoying, as long time members have mentioned, to not have access to the needed pictures when they are most important for us (long time member) if we are expected to help. And if you do something to help others, in this forum, that should be the reward in itself.
I can remember when I first came to the Bike Forums and some of the comments that veteran forum members offered. Then, I knew next to nothing and did not really know how to go about finding it. Today, I am one of the people who is lucky enough to have knowledge that I can pass on to help others and I expect nothing for it, other than the satisfaction that I get doing so. In fact, that is the exact reason I built and published MY "TEN SPEEDS".
My whole intention with this thread is to pick your brains. Surly, the bunch of us can come up with a better way to say Welcome.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
Likes For randyjawa:
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 852
Bikes: 1903 24 spd Sunbeam, 1927 Humber, 3 1930 Raleighs, 2 1940s Sunbeams, 2 1940s Raleighs, Rudge, 1950s Robin Hood, 1958 Claud Butler, 2 1973 Colnago Supers, Eddie Merckx, 2 1980 Holdsworth, EG Bates funny TT bike, another 6 or so 1990s bikes
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times
in
185 Posts
Pub Bike
Sometimes I find myself pausing when I compose replies to posts from new members new to C&V asking questions about bikes like Peugeots with Carbolite 103 or similar bikes with 1020 or 2040 high tensile steel frames. What bothers me is, we tend to use what might be perceived as "snooty" or "disparaging" terms when describing these bikes.
The usual terms used like "low level", "cheap", "gas pipe", "boat anchor" is not helpful at all when a new person to C&V is trying to understand and get a handle on this side of the hobby and sport.
So next time a new member comes on line and asks about bikes like the UO8, P6, basic Huffys or Ross or similar bikes, answer it within the context of what the bike was made for and it's useful best traits (and maybe its potential for modding up) and not immediately label it with subjective terms that is mostly just, in many instances, shutting down any useful, constructive" conversation with the poster before it can even begin.
Frankly, I had been guilty of doing this many times on his forum, but had been thinking about my actions related to this, as I realize the roots (which I enjoyed just as much as I enjoy my present bikes) of what I started with in the sport and hobby, to get me where I am now.
Maybe instead of the terms I listed above, we can consider using other terms like "entry level", "base model", "sport touring", "light touring", "town bike", "commuter".....etc..., instead?
Yes, we can call out "junk" when it is real junk, but it seems like some very decent, C&V bikes are getting swept up into that "junk category". Just because they do not have the "proper" Reynolds, Columbus, Vitus tubing or racing level components that a lot of us look for...
JMOs.....
The usual terms used like "low level", "cheap", "gas pipe", "boat anchor" is not helpful at all when a new person to C&V is trying to understand and get a handle on this side of the hobby and sport.
So next time a new member comes on line and asks about bikes like the UO8, P6, basic Huffys or Ross or similar bikes, answer it within the context of what the bike was made for and it's useful best traits (and maybe its potential for modding up) and not immediately label it with subjective terms that is mostly just, in many instances, shutting down any useful, constructive" conversation with the poster before it can even begin.
Frankly, I had been guilty of doing this many times on his forum, but had been thinking about my actions related to this, as I realize the roots (which I enjoyed just as much as I enjoy my present bikes) of what I started with in the sport and hobby, to get me where I am now.
Maybe instead of the terms I listed above, we can consider using other terms like "entry level", "base model", "sport touring", "light touring", "town bike", "commuter".....etc..., instead?
Yes, we can call out "junk" when it is real junk, but it seems like some very decent, C&V bikes are getting swept up into that "junk category". Just because they do not have the "proper" Reynolds, Columbus, Vitus tubing or racing level components that a lot of us look for...
JMOs.....