Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Couplers' Location in Frame Design

Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Couplers' Location in Frame Design

Old 04-21-19, 08:27 AM
  #1  
Paluc52
Member
Thread Starter
 
Paluc52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Couplers' Location in Frame Design

In the construction of SS-coupled (or Z-coupled) tandems, are there disadvantages to locating all the couplers in the tubes between the captain's and stoker's seat tubes? An advantage, it seems to me, is that it is easier to pack two triangles, plus a couple of straight tubes. Is there a structural (stiffness) or durability price paid in using this design approach?
Paluc52 is offline  
Old 04-21-19, 11:09 AM
  #2  
Rick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,376
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 372 Times in 260 Posts
As long as you keep the couplers tight they are more structurally sound than the tubes they are connected to. I believe as long as you can put the uncoupled tandem in to 2 airline legal suitcases the location were the couplers are installed on the frame is correct.
Rick is offline  
Old 04-21-19, 01:32 PM
  #3  
reburns
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The valley of heart’s delight
Posts: 413

Bikes: 2005 Trek T2000; 2005 Co-motion Speedster Co-pilot; various non-tandem road and mountain bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 39 Posts
The advantage to having couplers in front of the captain’s seat tube is that it allows removal of the front triangle without having to remove the timing belt (or chain). This allows me to fit our tandem in the back of our small car by simply undoing the couplers and cable splitters.

Of of course if your rear brake is hydraulic, this point is moot.
reburns is offline  
Old 04-21-19, 01:54 PM
  #4  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 861 Posts
FWIW Rodriquez 6 pack travel bikes have S&S couplers on both ends of the main triangle tubes.
plus in the wishbone seat and chainstays
[ BTC are stronger than the tubes they go onto..]



looks like they use 14 of them.. (6 in the solo bikes)

Last edited by fietsbob; 04-21-19 at 01:58 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 04-21-19, 09:27 PM
  #5  
bikeinxs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 146

Bikes: Ibis Cousin It converted to a drop bar dirt road cruiser, True North Ti Tandem, garage full of half bikes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Paluc52
In the construction of SS-coupled (or Z-coupled) tandems, are there disadvantages to locating all the couplers in the tubes between the captain's and stoker's seat tubes? An advantage, it seems to me, is that it is easier to pack two triangles, plus a couple of straight tubes. Is there a structural (stiffness) or durability price paid in using this design approach?
I'm addition to easy partial breakdown to fit in a car you are able to pack the front section in an S&S case without removing the fork.
bikeinxs is offline  
Old 04-22-19, 07:43 AM
  #6  
scycheng
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 171

Bikes: Merlin Road, Rivendell Road, Arvon custom tandme, Hi-Light G-7

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
If those are 2" couplers, that's a lot of $$$. Certainly will pack well.
scycheng is offline  
Old 04-30-19, 06:39 AM
  #7  
bakerjw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917

Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times in 62 Posts
Lolly, our mountain tandem, only has 4 couplers. We're doing our first flight trip with her 8 weeks from today. Since all of our housings are full length, it will present some challenges I am sure.

bakerjw is offline  
Old 04-30-19, 08:26 AM
  #8  
OneIsAllYouNeed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seacoast, NH
Posts: 756

Bikes: Chinook travel/gravel/family tandem, Chinook all-road, Motobecane fatbike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 25 Posts
I've built and packed up a handful of tandems with both coupler arrangements. In general, I find having couplers in front of the captain seat tube to be the superior approach. However, some tandems can't be made to fit into an S&S hardcase with that arrangement. Here are the pros of of the front-of-seat-tube couplers:
1. Small head tube / front triangle: very easy to fit in case without fork. Sometimes possible to leave fork installed.
2. (as others have noted) Bike can be partially disassembled for cars/trains without adjusting the sync chain/belt. We occasionally put the tandem inside our hatchback by disconnecting the cable splitters and front couplers. Wheels, seats, fenders, etc all remain installed.
3. Reassembly of the frame tends to be easier.
Cons of loose tubes:
1. Loose tubes can be installed at any orientation or flipped front-to-back. Bottle cages or cable guides could be located incorrectly. For those bikes, it's handy to put some match marks on the couplers.
2. Front triangle and rear triangle are both very large chunks. It can be difficult to nest them together.
Pros of loose tubes:
1. Allows tandems with especially long stoker compartments to fit into S&S suitcase.

In both coupler arrangements, a captain crankarm sometimes has to be removed or reversed.
OneIsAllYouNeed is offline  
Old 04-30-19, 09:52 AM
  #9  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,072

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,577 Times in 910 Posts
Originally Posted by scycheng
If those are 2" couplers, that's a lot of $$$. Certainly will pack well.
That's their 2014 model. Both the year & model name on account of the year introduced & it's 14 couplers.

I think it's around $12-$13,000 dollars. I've met the owners of that commissioned the original. Their bike has 50,000 miles currently and has been on 6 continents.

It fits in carry on luggage...in the overhead bin. Which makes sense. Anything at that price isn't worth being "lost" by baggage handlers or sloppy airlines!
base2 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Drtumolo
Framebuilders
5
01-13-12 08:48 AM
Virten
Road Cycling
3
07-13-11 11:55 AM
TnBama
Framebuilders
5
03-16-11 11:49 PM
wheelspeed
Tandem Cycling
12
11-08-10 06:13 PM
TejanoTrackie
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
6
10-15-10 12:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.