Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Interesting finds around the web

Old 08-23-17, 11:48 AM
  #1201  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by brawlo View Post
LA is billed as hosting the 2028 Olympics, although I can't find anything that I would consider concrete. Lots of "deals being done" stories. It sure would be a bonus to cycling in the USA if it's a definite, as the USA certainly has the sporting talent and the Olympics prospect could certainly draw people away from other sports that typically swallow up potential candidates due to money. Putting Sutton on the roster would certainly increase chances of much higher results
I think they are preparing a formal bid. As part of the bid process, they have to provide proof that if they win the bid, there is funding for the things that need to be funded.

Basically, "Hey, I'm gonna ask if we can host the 2028 Olympics. If the IOC says OK, will you guys pay for the stuff that needs to be built?"

Last edited by carleton; 08-23-17 at 12:25 PM.
carleton is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 06:09 PM
  #1202  
bitingduck
Senior Member
 
bitingduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,165
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton View Post
I think they are preparing a formal bid. As part of the bid process, they have to provide proof that if they win the bid, there is funding for the things that need to be funded.

Basically, "Hey, I'm gonna ask if we can host the 2028 Olympics. If the IOC says OK, will you guys pay for the stuff that needs to be built?"
I think it's a bit farther than that. They've got an agreement at the level of how much IOC is going to throw in and how much LA can keep of sponsorship they bring in (*much* more than usual). They'll be working out final contractual details for a while, but they're basically in negotiations to make it a done deal.

The formal bid was for 2024, and IOC is realizing that summer olympics have a tendency to destroy the host cities and countries and that cities are finally figuring that out, so they offered LA a very good deal to take 2028 without a separate competition if they'd let Paris have 2024.

Except for maybe a few of the water facilities (e.g. whitewater canoe) you could probably just walk into LA and put on an olympics without having to do much facility-wise. AEG has been building out LA for a couple decades as if they (AEG) were going to put in their own bid for the games.
__________________
Track - the other off-road
http://www.lavelodrome.org
bitingduck is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 06:39 PM
  #1203  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks for explaining!
carleton is offline  
Old 08-24-17, 06:23 AM
  #1204  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,270
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1229 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Yeah, I thought LA was a done deal. My understanding was that LA and Paris were both going for 2024, and they got together with the IOC and said, how about Paris takes 2024 and LA gets 2028. No one else wanted it, so the IOC didn't have many options.

And there are several cities in the US where they could easily put on the Olympics. Pretty much any city with a pro team or two and several colleges could do it. Boston is an example, given the wealth of athletic facilities and housing options provided by the professional teams and colleges. But the Boston residents didn't want it. They could go back to Atlanta pretty easily too.

The big issue is that the IOC demands all new stuff, which tends to bankrupt a lot of cities that cannot reuse the facilities. LA and Atlanta are great examples of how to use existing facilities and re-purpose new ones after the games.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 08-24-17, 09:53 AM
  #1205  
1incpa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A friend got these bars: Full Carbon Bicycle Handlebars 31.8mm Time Trial/Triathlon Bike Drop Bars Racing | eBay
Anybody here have any experience with them? I'm kind of leery, myself. He's had them a couple weeks now, and every time I see him I act surprised they haven't broken yet.
PI
1incpa is offline  
Old 08-24-17, 10:10 AM
  #1206  
queerpunk
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,502
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1incpa View Post
A friend got these bars: Full Carbon Bicycle Handlebars 31.8mm Time Trial/Triathlon Bike Drop Bars Racing | eBay
Anybody here have any experience with them? I'm kind of leery, myself. He's had them a couple weeks now, and every time I see him I act surprised they haven't broken yet.
PI
There are plenty of greymarket carbon parts out there. It's hard to tell how reliable they are. Rims are in common use, though there are some people who won't touch 'em.

I wouldn't buy these, but if somebody had them I'd be curious to test them out a little bit. i wouldn't expect them to just up and break or anything, but I wouldn't expect them to survive the abuse that Scattos can survive: curiously (concerningly) these are 100g lighter than Scattos. That's the biggest problem I have with em.
queerpunk is offline  
Old 08-24-17, 04:51 PM
  #1207  
taras0000
Senior Member
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 43.2330941,-79.8022037,17
Posts: 1,673
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I wouldn't trust those bars, unless you were riding a shallow track and you weigh 110lbs. They look like Scattos, but are 100g lighter. Take a product that is engineered to be as stiff and light as possible, then pare it down some more with questionable materials and methods...?

I'll pass.
taras0000 is offline  
Old 08-24-17, 09:08 PM
  #1208  
Clythio
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Scattos are heavy for a carbon handlebar - 400+g.
But road top brand handlebars handle big road impacts and big sprinters efforts for hundreds cycles without a problem, being much lighter than Scattos.
So, I believe it's possible to build such huge/compact geometry piece with 300g and keep it safe. But not in this case.
I wouldn't trust this copy. A friend of mine has one - low quality finishing, etc.
Clythio is offline  
Old 08-25-17, 03:42 AM
  #1209  
1incpa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm with you guys on this! I have no intention to get them, I was just curious about the general consensus. I like my handlebars to be made of metal!
For what it's worth, my buddy who has them loves them. He says they are really stiff and comfortable. I'll still pass!
Paul
1incpa is offline  
Old 08-25-17, 06:36 AM
  #1210  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,270
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1229 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
If you're interested, Planet X now offers a Scatto knock off. It's only available in the 37.

It may be the same bar as that one on eBay, but Planet X at least has a decent reputation.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 08-25-17, 06:49 AM
  #1211  
queerpunk
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,502
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by topflightpro View Post
If you're interested, Planet X now offers a Scatto knock off. It's only available in the 37.

It may be the same bar as that one on eBay, but Planet X at least has a decent reputation.
oh snap - interesting. it doesn't look like an ebay one - it's not quiiiiiiite a scatto knockoff. it looks a little rounder, a little bit more traditional - with reach and drop in between the 35 and 37cm scatto models.

it looks very desirable.



queerpunk is offline  
Old 08-25-17, 08:25 AM
  #1212  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The bars sold by Planet X are made by a company called Selcof, who seems to have a range of carbon products: Selcof
carleton is offline  
Old 08-25-17, 12:17 PM
  #1213  
sarals 
Idiot Emeritus
 
sarals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 60 Miles South of Hellyer
Posts: 6,738

Bikes: Yes.

Mentioned: 227 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FWIW, I have the Planet X five spoke front wheel. I've ridden it and raced it now for a couple of months. I have zero complaints.
__________________
"Can you add a signature line please? The lack of words makes me think you are being held hostage and being told to be quiet"
sarals is offline  
Old 08-25-17, 01:54 PM
  #1214  
rustymongrel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
looks more like the look sprint bar than the scatto.



I recently got a set in 40cm for enduro stuff because I wanted a very shallow drop to go with a long and low custom frame.
rustymongrel is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 07:54 AM
  #1215  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rustymongrel View Post
looks more like the look sprint bar than the scatto.
Good call.

Also, did you folks notice that LOOK has changed their bars again?

Originally Posted by rustymongrel View Post
I recently got a set in 40cm for enduro stuff because I wanted a very shallow drop to go with a long and low custom frame.
Yeah, I think a lot of people are going "long and low" with their frame choices, riding much longer top tubes that they'd ride on their road bikes...especially Sprinters. Or maybe it's primarily Sprinters that I talk geometry with.
carleton is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 08:29 AM
  #1216  
queerpunk
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,502
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've actually started to see "long and high" a bit more than long and low. Low and tight seemed to be the old order of the day. These days, longer is definitely in style - given that a lot of road bikes are set up to accommodate as much a hood position (longer than a drop position) as they are a drop position. Plus, with narrower bars, you can get even longer.
queerpunk is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 11:51 AM
  #1217  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by queerpunk View Post
I've actually started to see "long and high" a bit more than long and low. Low and tight seemed to be the old order of the day. These days, longer is definitely in style - given that a lot of road bikes are set up to accommodate as much a hood position (longer than a drop position) as they are a drop position. Plus, with narrower bars, you can get even longer.
Good point.

I think that having the arms make an angled "ramp" for the air to travel over instead of a vertical "wall" butt against is an improvement.
carleton is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 02:55 PM
  #1218  
SyntaxMonstr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton View Post
Good call.

Yeah, I think a lot of people are going "long and low" with their frame choices, riding much longer top tubes that they'd ride on their road bikes...especially Sprinters. Or maybe it's primarily Sprinters that I talk geometry with.
This! I ride a 51 on the road and bought a 53 DF4, thinking I was probably flirting with the upper limit of how big a bike I could ride. About a month in, my coach was watching me do an effort and goes "You need to go at least 2 sizes up; try a 57." Low and behold, a 57 fits like a dream (although I have a harder time standing over the bike).
SyntaxMonstr is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 08:58 PM
  #1219  
rustymongrel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I built a track frame for myself 2 years ago not long after I started racing. At the time I thought it was just right with the same stack as I ride on the road and about 2cm longer reach.

Ended up having to buy a 150mm stem after a year of training and racing to get it just right. Also found myself unable to get low enough when using aerobars for pursuit.

New frame will be 3cm lower and 2cm longer. I will be able to use a more reasonable 130mm stem and bought the shallower LOOK bar to compensate for the lower stack.

rustymongrel is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 09:17 PM
  #1220  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
You will have a hard time finding a frame that makes a good fit for aerobars and one that's makes a good fit in drop bars. There will have to be a compromise somewhere.
carleton is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 10:20 PM
  #1221  
taras0000
Senior Member
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 43.2330941,-79.8022037,17
Posts: 1,673
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton View Post
You will have a hard time finding a frame that makes a good fit for aerobars and one that's makes a good fit in drop bars. There will have to be a compromise somewhere.
I believe with Scattos, this should be easier. It used to be that you had two track frames if you were serious. One low and short, for aerobars, the other full size for mass starts. The one bike compromise is what I think resulted in the "buy your track frame 2cm smaller than your road frame" advice. With a short and a long stem for aerobars and drop bars respectively, you could get away with one frame. Now, frames can be lower at the front with the advent of bars like Scattos, making aerobars easier to use with a short stem.
taras0000 is offline  
Old 08-26-17, 11:46 PM
  #1222  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by taras0000 View Post
I believe with Scattos, this should be easier. It used to be that you had two track frames if you were serious. One low and short, for aerobars, the other full size for mass starts. The one bike compromise is what I think resulted in the "buy your track frame 2cm smaller than your road frame" advice. With a short and a long stem for aerobars and drop bars respectively, you could get away with one frame. Now, frames can be lower at the front with the advent of bars like Scattos, making aerobars easier to use with a short stem.
I think with people adopting longer frames than in seasons-past, putting aerobars on those new frames will be tough, even if the head tubes are short.

I'm probably wrong. I haven't ridden aerobars since 2011
carleton is offline  
Old 08-27-17, 09:48 AM
  #1223  
jsk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 605

Bikes: Trek Madone, Blue Triad SL, Dixie Flyer BTB

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's possible to get a good fit with the right stem and bar choices. I actually sized up for my track frame (Dixie Flyer 58) compared to my road frame (56). But by using a -27 degree 85mm stem for the aerobars I can match my road TT fit (which is pretty agressive). For drop bars I use a +6 degree 110mm stem with shallow drop bars (Pro Vibe 7S). The drop bar setup is longer/lower than my road fit, but the more agressive position works well for on the track since I don't have to worry about being comfortable for 3-4 hour rides.

This approach wouldn't work with a lot of frames, I found all the cheaper frames the head tubes are way too tall for me to get a good fit for both. The BTB runs long/low though, so it worked out. The higher-end Felt frame also would have worked, but was more than I was willing to spend. Dolan DF4 also might have worked, but none of the sub-$1K frames I could fine had the right geometry.
jsk is offline  
Old 08-27-17, 10:18 AM
  #1224  
carleton
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,574
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jsk View Post
It's possible to get a good fit with the right stem and bar choices. I actually sized up for my track frame (Dixie Flyer 58) compared to my road frame (56). But by using a -27 degree 85mm stem for the aerobars I can match my road TT fit (which is pretty agressive). For drop bars I use a +6 degree 110mm stem with shallow drop bars (Pro Vibe 7S). The drop bar setup is longer/lower than my road fit, but the more agressive position works well for on the track since I don't have to worry about being comfortable for 3-4 hour rides.

This approach wouldn't work with a lot of frames, I found all the cheaper frames the head tubes are way too tall for me to get a good fit for both. The BTB runs long/low though, so it worked out. The higher-end Felt frame also would have worked, but was more than I was willing to spend. Dolan DF4 also might have worked, but none of the sub-$1K frames I could fine had the right geometry.
The problem is not simply getting the reach shorter for aerobars or longer for drop bars. The problem is that when you change the reach (for whatever bars) you change the handling of the bike because you are not changing the top tube length. Therefore you are simply adjusting where your bars are in relation to the front axle.

It's kind of hard to explain.

Take a photo of a bike then photoshop erase everything except the rider and everything from the headset forward (bars, stem, fork, front wheel). There is a sweet spot for the handlebars/aerobars above the front axle. The contact points on the bars, front axle of the wheel, and headset make a triangle. If you shorten/lengthen the stem, you are affecting that triangle.

Here are some pics from the internet to express what I'm trying to say. Imagine if these frames had the same geometry and TT length. Note where the stem/bar combos put the hands.





Remember, materials don't affect steering handling. Changing the geometry affects the steering handling. Changing the stem angle/length changes the geometry of the bike.

These bikes will handle differently.

This is why bikes handle awkwardly when people are first trying aerobars and use the same stem that they use with drop bars and they have a hard time handling the bike. Then they put on a much shorter stem and things improve tremendously...but a different frame with that shorter stem could be even better.

The Mass Start / Sprint riding position is very different than the Pursuit riding position.
carleton is offline  
Old 08-27-17, 01:04 PM
  #1225  
taras0000
Senior Member
 
taras0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 43.2330941,-79.8022037,17
Posts: 1,673
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
It would be interesting to figure out where that "sweet spot" for neutral handling is with aerobars. We have the usual guidelines like "elbows under the ears"... but what about the weight distribution? Where should the pads be in relation to the axle/steering column? My guess would be somewhere in between, but does anyone know this for sure? I haven't had aerobars on my bike for almost 15 years now, so I can't recall exactly how it related, nor do I have them around to check.
taras0000 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.