Watt bike
11-09-18, 01:48 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Watt bike
Hi Guys,
I’ve been doing some additional sessions on the watt bike to get fit in preparation for my first session on the velodrome tomorrow (accreditation)
Ive stuck to more fitness end and lower heart rate initially but decided to have a test on the 6 second test. Based on my weight (200IBS) it set the difficulty setting to 10 and 5 and I managed 1200 watts and 193 rpm. I just wanted to understand more about what the numbers mean and is it any good? It’s early days for me, just trying to understand more about the data and whether that shows what type of track event might suit me better. Thanks Chris
I’ve been doing some additional sessions on the watt bike to get fit in preparation for my first session on the velodrome tomorrow (accreditation)
Ive stuck to more fitness end and lower heart rate initially but decided to have a test on the 6 second test. Based on my weight (200IBS) it set the difficulty setting to 10 and 5 and I managed 1200 watts and 193 rpm. I just wanted to understand more about what the numbers mean and is it any good? It’s early days for me, just trying to understand more about the data and whether that shows what type of track event might suit me better. Thanks Chris
11-09-18, 03:44 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Hi Guys,
I’ve been doing some additional sessions on the watt bike to get fit in preparation for my first session on the velodrome tomorrow (accreditation)
Ive stuck to more fitness end and lower heart rate initially but decided to have a test on the 6 second test. Based on my weight (200IBS) it set the difficulty setting to 10 and 5 and I managed 1200 watts and 193 rpm. I just wanted to understand more about what the numbers mean and is it any good? It’s early days for me, just trying to understand more about the data and whether that shows what type of track event might suit me better. Thanks Chris
I’ve been doing some additional sessions on the watt bike to get fit in preparation for my first session on the velodrome tomorrow (accreditation)
Ive stuck to more fitness end and lower heart rate initially but decided to have a test on the 6 second test. Based on my weight (200IBS) it set the difficulty setting to 10 and 5 and I managed 1200 watts and 193 rpm. I just wanted to understand more about what the numbers mean and is it any good? It’s early days for me, just trying to understand more about the data and whether that shows what type of track event might suit me better. Thanks Chris
11-09-18, 03:54 PM
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
11-09-18, 09:55 PM
#5
Lapped 3x
11-12-18, 09:23 PM
#7
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,124
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,479 Times
in
1,454 Posts
Here is a paper from the Aussies trying to answer the question of characteristics of track cyclists. You may find it interesting. https://www.ridethetrack.com/pdf/character_of_track.pdf
12-30-18, 12:47 PM
#9
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Those athletes probably didn't become what they are by training on Wattbikes for years. Wattbike pays those athletes to promote Wattbike.
The Wattbike is probably a good product, but bear in mind that a lot of companies that make bad products sponsor great athletes
01-02-19, 05:34 AM
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi. Welcome to the forum.
Those athletes probably didn't become what they are by training on Wattbikes for years. Wattbike pays those athletes to promote Wattbike.
The Wattbike is probably a good product, but bear in mind that a lot of companies that make bad products sponsor great athletes
Those athletes probably didn't become what they are by training on Wattbikes for years. Wattbike pays those athletes to promote Wattbike.
The Wattbike is probably a good product, but bear in mind that a lot of companies that make bad products sponsor great athletes
At the track here our elite team has a collection of LeMond ergs (mostly for the pursuiters to warm up on, I gather), BT ergs, a Wattbike or two, and a customised contrabulous fantraption involving an old adjustable ergometer, a very big gear, and some stiff Alpina sprint bars. I don't think this is giving away too many state secrets...
01-02-19, 05:35 AM
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
01-02-19, 08:19 AM
#12
aka mattio
really, the answer is "collect a few years' worth of data."
i remember the first time i borrowed a power meter, collected data from a crit, and sent it to a power guy and said, "tell me what this says about me please." and he basically told me nothing, because one file says nearly nothing.
the more data, the better - because you can draw conclusions about change over time. a test of a relatively untrained or inexperienced person can tell you very little. it can tell you your baseline, but your baseline doesn't say much about what will develop fast based on stimulus. it doesn't say if your aerobic engine or your sprint will improve by leaps and bounds with some training. and unless you're one of the very few gifted people, your baseline will be really low, all around - just like the rest of us.
so if you spend a few years trying to get better in a few different areas, and then you test and see where you really improved (and you reflect on what you really focused on) then testing will say a lot more.
i remember the first time i borrowed a power meter, collected data from a crit, and sent it to a power guy and said, "tell me what this says about me please." and he basically told me nothing, because one file says nearly nothing.
the more data, the better - because you can draw conclusions about change over time. a test of a relatively untrained or inexperienced person can tell you very little. it can tell you your baseline, but your baseline doesn't say much about what will develop fast based on stimulus. it doesn't say if your aerobic engine or your sprint will improve by leaps and bounds with some training. and unless you're one of the very few gifted people, your baseline will be really low, all around - just like the rest of us.
so if you spend a few years trying to get better in a few different areas, and then you test and see where you really improved (and you reflect on what you really focused on) then testing will say a lot more.
01-07-19, 10:23 AM
#13
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,124
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,479 Times
in
1,454 Posts
I was looking over my videos and found these. Both videos are taken of Nate K who recently retired from 6 day track sprint racing.
On the Watt Bike - brutal.
On the track - flying 150
On the Watt Bike - brutal.
On the track - flying 150
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisRob01
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
50
01-02-19 11:28 AM
