Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

C&V dropbar gravel/offroader?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

C&V dropbar gravel/offroader?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-19, 11:23 PM
  #1  
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
C&V dropbar gravel/offroader?


Drop bar off roader NAHBS

I've got a hankering for a bike like the one shown above. Except that is a new custom show bike and I want to make something from a c&v bike.

I'm thinking take a decent steel road frame that is too small for me, fit long post and stem, some flavor of narrow MTB rim, get brake mounts repositioned for cantis or add disc mounts, then a vintage MTB drivetrain?

Or would you start with a rigid MTB frame?
jyl is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 12:43 AM
  #2  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times in 356 Posts
The geometry on your example above looks almost identical to my (rather lightweight) Kona Lava Dome MTB from the mid-90's. The Kona's chain stays may be just a little bit longer.

The only reason I haven't gotten around to converting it to a drop bar bike is it's a little small for me. It's about your size, though.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 12:45 AM
  #3  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times in 3,354 Posts
Is this a frame that you have, or are you looking for one?

Many of the vintage MTBs are a little longer than their road bike counterparts. So, you might be able to achieve the tall/short effect you're wanting without compromising the actual fit of the bike too much.

I've done a skinny tire 26" to 700c conversion. But, you might be able to do a mid range tire size (35 or 40mm) 26" to 650b conversion.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 05:59 AM
  #4  
63rickert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 248 Posts
In the classic era every bike was a gravel bike. The road turned to gravel and you kept racing. Or riding. Same bike was used for Paris-Roubaix and for Paris-Tours.

This might mean that a 10 or 20 year old bike is not classic enough. Go back 50 years and most bikes will take 32mm tires and still have a centimeter of clearance all around for mud and rocks to pass through. Youngest bike in my collection is 59 years old. It rides very well on gravel.
63rickert is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 06:07 AM
  #5  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
Best bets:
-90s NORBA-style mtb like the Kona mentioned above. Short high stem and wide drop bars. If you are doing dirt drops make sure to get them high enough so that the primary position is in the drops. A lot of people angle them up so they can rest on the hoods, which defeats the purpose as the tops are narrow and have quite a lot of reach.

-70s Sports Touring bike with 650b conversion. A 42 or even 45mm tire might be possible if you don't use fenders.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 06:33 AM
  #6  
Spaghetti Legs 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,780

Bikes: Numerous

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1678 Post(s)
Liked 3,098 Times in 914 Posts
I don’t follow the latest gravel bike tech very closely but many look to me, like others noted, like early 90’s MTB geometry when the sloping frames first showed up. Kona, Univega, Gary Fisher, GT are some steel frame brands from that time that come to mind.

Me? I just put some 28 tires on a road bike and voila! , gravel bike!
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur

Spaghetti Legs is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 06:37 AM
  #7  
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
This Simoncini Cyclocross Special is used on firm gravel rails-to-trails and on pavement. It's a versatile bike, but it's not ideal for long days on minimally maintained rural roads.

Converting a hybrid from the nineties would allow for 700x35 tires, which are really the minimum for serious gravel roads. Also, you'll be well served by going tubeless. Tubeless tires allow for reduced air pressure without the risk of pinch flats.





​​​​​

A great bike for L'Eroica gravel routes would be this 1977 Grand Record. it can fit 700x35 tires. Again, its not ideal for the kind of really challenging gravel roads found in the rural corners of Midwestern states, but it does well on Strada Bianchi.





If you really want to be fast and efficient on any kind of gravel, there is really no substitute for a modern Gravel Bike. Hydraulic disc brakes, a thru-axle frameset, 46/33 crankset with an 11-36 cassette and room for 700x40 tubeless tires just can't be done on an older bike.

Last edited by Barrettscv; 03-21-19 at 07:01 AM.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 07:38 AM
  #8  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
I doubt an old road bike will have clearance for the tires you may want. Your starting options will likely be an older mountain bike or a hybrid. I recently acquired a 1991 Trek 750 (double-butted, fully lugged cromoly frame) in near showroom condition that I'm converting to a gravely..touring-ish bike.

While bikes have changed a lot over the years..they haven't changed much in many respects. Below is a comparison:


Peter Lombardi's 1992 Trek 750 conversion comes to mind:
fishboat is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:11 AM
  #9  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
One more from my files..not sure where I grabbed the pic from. After 40+ years of cycling, the 750 I picked up is my first Trek. One thing I will say in Trek's favor(on a project like this)..there's tons of documentation available online (annual catalogs and spec manuals going back to 1990-ish..edit..I checked & they go back to the mid 70's) and a TON of bikes available on the used market. The mtn bikes in the 930, 950, 970, 990 range or hybrids in the 750, 790, 7600, 7900 range are worth a look. While I agree there are arguably better starting points, or at least cooler (more unique) bikes out there, the problem is finding a used one, at the right price, in a locale you can get to, in good condition, in your size.


Last edited by fishboat; 03-21-19 at 08:09 PM.
fishboat is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:32 AM
  #10  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
@63rickert's point can't be overstated, especially here on the C&V forum.

__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:40 AM
  #11  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by fishboat
One more from my files..not sure where I grabbed the pic from. After 40+ years of cycling, the 750 I picked up is my first Trek. One thing I will say in Trek's favor(on a project like this)..there's tons of documentation available online (annual catalogs and spec manuals going back to 1990-ish) and a TON of bikes available on the used market. The mtn bikes in the 930, 950, 970, 990 range or hybrids in the 750, 790, 7600, 7900 range are worth a look. While I agree there are arguably better starting points, or at least cooler (more unique) bikes out there, the problem is finding a used one, at the right price, in a locale you can get to, in good condition, in your size.

That's my bike! 1993 930. Since sold. But it was a good drop bar conversion, once I got a short enough stem.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:45 AM
  #12  
HarborBandS
HarborBandS
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 57 Posts
If you go for a mid-90's MTB or Hybrid frame that takes a 1-1/8" steerer, you will have more options for fork upgrades, if the carbon fork in the original post is something that does indeed appeal to you. And you'll save weight with a threadless headset.
HarborBandS is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:47 AM
  #13  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
That's my bike! 1993 930. Since sold. But it was a good drop bar conversion, once I got a short enough stem.
Attribution! Good..thx for popping in. Very nice work on your part. An inspiration from Madtown (I'm south of Milw).
fishboat is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 09:25 AM
  #14  
Choke 
Disciple of St. Tullio
 
Choke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 743

Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times in 140 Posts
An old MTB does make a good starting point....

Choke is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 09:25 AM
  #15  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Piqued my interest, so I looked up the numbers for the 1996 Trek 950. Comparison of (mfg reported**) sizing/fit varies over the years, bike type, and mfgs, so I ~matched the top tube of the 54cm Straggler in the 16.5 inch 950 frame. As long as I had the comparison I thought I'd post them.



**In the 750 case..it's my understanding the 750 frame came from Trek's touring (road) frames..specifically the 520. Typically hybrid sizing follows mtn bike sizing..
fishboat is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 10:32 AM
  #16  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
Back when the forward-thinking hybrids were a thing, Performance had Giant produce a variant without canti bosses, to be used with large, dual-pivot calipers and a drop handlebar.
Geo was textbook period mtb, 73degr ST and 71-degr HT, same as an early-70's Super Course or Grand Sports (and some other sport-tourers out of Japan).

These bikes left little to be desired. I added modern auxiliary brake levers and a suspension post to mine, and did many mtb rides and a few CX races on it.

One thing about the handlebars is that the very best setup for off-roading is the aux brake levers in lieu of attempting to optimize any of the forward or drops positions for technical descending or for traversing extremely rough terrain. I've set up a few touring bikes for mtb riding and it was exactly the same, only I used the original "safety" auxiliary levers with modified (cut away in front) lever housings for increased lever travel. Technical descending then became practical even with the relatively narrow grip span at the top of the road bars.
This then is my gripe with hydraulic disc brakes. All of these really fine and expensive new "gravel" bikes all fall short in terms of providing a shorter reaching hand position for descending, detracting greatly from their off-road worthiness. You can't just give away inches of hand setback and expect a bike to be competent in tough and/or descending situations, so the chosen stem length ends up being a gross compromise between open-road performance and off-road control.

I would challenge riders on modern gravel bikes to descend/traverse the same terrain as I can manage using cheaper old bikes that have some/any variant of auxiliary/safety brake levers:





Last edited by dddd; 03-21-19 at 10:35 AM.
dddd is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 11:51 AM
  #17  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times in 336 Posts
@dddd I mostly agree with you about the lever ergonomics but I really do not like navigating technical terrain, whether descending or otherwise, with a very narrow hand placement that the interrupter levers or turkey levers would require. A wide stance on the handlebars gives me more leverage and helps me balance and shift my body weight over the bike, which is necessary for technical riding.

I used some dirt drop handlebars from Velo Orange (Dajia Far Bar) on my recent drop bar MTB that worked really well. The bar I got is 48cm C-T-C at the hoods and 62.5cm at the drops. I got the bars very high and set the brake levers so the primary position is in the drops. It worked far better than any traditional drop bar I've tried on technical terrain because my hands were nice and wide and plenty of bar to grip onto, not to mention a lot of leverage on the levers from the drops. And the multiple hand positions were really comfortable just riding long distances on the road.

TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 12:19 PM
  #18  
big chainring 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wilmette, IL
Posts: 6,883
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 752 Post(s)
Liked 730 Times in 353 Posts
I use this Mercier for my camping bike. It has really good handling and the tubular cyclocross tires really makes for a great ride with lots of control.
big chainring is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 12:29 PM
  #19  
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times in 642 Posts
199x Giant Iguana conversion. It does sacrifice a bit of speed on pavement over a dedicated road bike, and the handling is a bit twitchy, but try and stop it.

__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 12:42 PM
  #20  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,159
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,714 Times in 2,613 Posts
I would think that starting with a hybrid made for 700c wheels and with canti brakes would be a good platform. I owned a Trek 730 multitrack made with TrueTemper steel for a while and used it as a commuter. It wasn't too long in the rear or too slack in the angles, but is a native 700c wheel bike with lots of clearance for wide 700c tires. I'd go with linear-pull brakes and the Tektro drop-bar levers that work with those.
nlerner is online now  
Old 03-21-19, 02:33 PM
  #21  
katsup
Senior Member
 
katsup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,770

Bikes: 1995 ParkPre Pro 825 2021 Soma Fog Cutter v2 and 2021 Cotic SolarisMax

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 607 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times in 318 Posts
I have done a couple of drop bar conversions, but my favorite has been my 1990 520 which has room for 700x40, and maybe even 700x45, tires.

I used my modern Salsa Vaya as inspiration and it came out nicely.

Other bikes I have done was a 1992 Trek 950 and Stumpjumper, but the reach wasn't as nice on those. Here is the 950 with a too long of stem, no photos of the Stumpjumper as it's a newer build.
katsup is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 04:53 PM
  #22  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1746 Post(s)
Liked 1,376 Times in 721 Posts
In 1997 I took a Raleigh Tangent and converted to drop bar 700c commuter. The commute was 15 miles each way and the bike was great to ride. Used 37mm tires and any short cut available through the woods or fields was no problem.
TiHabanero is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 06:51 PM
  #23  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
I would think that starting with a hybrid made for 700c wheels and with canti brakes would be a good platform. I owned a Trek 730 multitrack made with TrueTemper steel for a while and used it as a commuter. It wasn't too long in the rear or too slack in the angles, but is a native 700c wheel bike with lots of clearance for wide 700c tires. I'd go with linear-pull brakes and the Tektro drop-bar levers that work with those.
+1 Multitracks are very nice riding frames and are easy to find. And versatile. I had a 720 and during the time I owned it, it was set up as an errand bike with flat bars and basket, a single speed with arc bars, then Porteur bars, drop bar fixed gear, and briefly was set up with drops and 2x6 drivetrain for loan to a local Boy Scout for a tour. Final config was flat bars and 1x6, when I gave it to a friend.
due ruote is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:12 PM
  #24  
Pompiere
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,421

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 1,007 Times in 516 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
Back when the forward-thinking hybrids were a thing, Performance had Giant produce a variant without canti bosses, to be used with large, dual-pivot calipers and a drop handlebar.
Geo was textbook period mtb, 73degr ST and 71-degr HT, same as an early-70's Super Course or Grand Sports (and some other sport-tourers out of Japan).

These bikes left little to be desired. I added modern auxiliary brake levers and a suspension post to mine, and did many mtb rides and a few CX races on it.

One thing about the handlebars is that the very best setup for off-roading is the aux brake levers in lieu of attempting to optimize any of the forward or drops positions for technical descending or for traversing extremely rough terrain. I've set up a few touring bikes for mtb riding and it was exactly the same, only I used the original "safety" auxiliary levers with modified (cut away in front) lever housings for increased lever travel. Technical descending then became practical even with the relatively narrow grip span at the top of the road bars.
This then is my gripe with hydraulic disc brakes. All of these really fine and expensive new "gravel" bikes all fall short in terms of providing a shorter reaching hand position for descending, detracting greatly from their off-road worthiness. You can't just give away inches of hand setback and expect a bike to be competent in tough and/or descending situations, so the chosen stem length ends up being a gross compromise between open-road performance and off-road control.

I would challenge riders on modern gravel bikes to descend/traverse the same terrain as I can manage using cheaper old bikes that have some/any variant of auxiliary/safety brake levers:



I have one, too, a 1992 Performance Parabola. It is a bit heavy, but has room for 40+ tires.
Pompiere is online now  
Old 03-21-19, 08:36 PM
  #25  
Goofball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 123
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 56 Times in 36 Posts


This here thang
Goofball is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.