Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Question on history/design of cantilever brakes

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Question on history/design of cantilever brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-19, 05:14 PM
  #1  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
Thread Starter
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,616

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10969 Post(s)
Liked 7,495 Times in 4,191 Posts
Question on history/design of cantilever brakes

I use cantis, love em, and currently have em on my touring and gravel bikes. I've used dozens of different brands and models from diacompe, shimano and SunTour.

one thing that's always confused me was why did the right side of some sets have a washer that the spring pin would lock into instead of using the post mount pin holes.

what is the history behind it?
what is the benefit?

i am referring to the hex shaped washer in the pics below. That is then held with friction...just seems odd when there are holes on the stud mounts for the pins.


mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 06:29 PM
  #2  
Fat Tire Trader 
Junior Member
 
Fat Tire Trader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: San Quentin California
Posts: 107

Bikes: https://www.fattiretrading.com/collection.html

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 23 Posts
Its for balancing the spring tension between each side of the brake.
Fat Tire Trader is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 06:41 PM
  #3  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
Thread Starter
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,616

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10969 Post(s)
Liked 7,495 Times in 4,191 Posts
Originally Posted by Fat Tire Trader
Its for balancing the spring tension between each side of the brake.
would placing the pin in the middle(of 3) holes in the mount not balance tension? Both sides would be in the same location so there would be balance...right?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 08:39 PM
  #4  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
would placing the pin in the middle(of 3) holes in the mount not balance tension? Both sides would be in the same location so there would be balance...right?
Depending on how worn or not worn your springs are.

With those brakes you can set the "start" position anywhere you wish it to be- and you can tighten the spring tension to however you wish it to be.

Other cantis are dependent on where the holes are and hope the springs match each other (or you have enough adjustment to match) or force you to bend the spring with your fingers...

In reality- Shimano's solution of having one side have adjustment makes a whole lot of sense- No it's not infinitely adjustable, but you have the ability to match the other spring.

With the DiaCompe/Suntour infinite adjustment- once you figure it out- it's easy and it totally makes sense. Until then, it looks outrageously complicated.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 08:42 PM
  #5  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
Just because...



Grail Brakes by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 08:58 PM
  #6  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
Thread Starter
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,616

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10969 Post(s)
Liked 7,495 Times in 4,191 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
In reality- Shimano's solution of having one side have adjustment makes a whole lot of sense- No it's not infinitely adjustable, but you have the ability to match the other spring.

With the DiaCompe/Suntour infinite adjustment- once you figure it out- it's easy and it totally makes sense. Until then, it looks outrageously complicated.
The ones in the pic are SunTour and that's mostly what I use- the varying levels of XC(t/e/m). Only 1 side is infinitely adjustable, but you mention that is Shimano's set up.
maybe I misunderstood your comment.


regardless- I love the setup of the SunTour cantis as all I have used, regardless if year or model, were easy to set up.

follow up question- why not have both sides be infinitely adjustable and attach to the frame or fork with friction?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 09:45 PM
  #7  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
The ones in the pic are SunTour and that's mostly what I use- the varying levels of XC(t/e/m). Only 1 side is infinitely adjustable, but you mention that is Shimano's set up.
maybe I misunderstood your comment.


regardless- I love the setup of the SunTour cantis as all I have used, regardless if year or model, were easy to set up.

follow up question- why not have both sides be infinitely adjustable and attach to the frame or fork with friction?
The only ones with the "friction" attachment that I've used that I'm sure of- have been the champagne colored XC Pros. Those are definitely infinitely adjustable on both sides.

The MC-70 Shimano XT brakes had no provision for evening the spring tension- so it would be like the DC brakes of the time- bend the springs with your hand- but by the time the M-732 brakes were out- (perhaps an earlier version as well) had the spring tension adjustment on the right side brake (pictured the M-732 and MT-62 brakes)- but there was no adjustment for the left side brake.




M732MT62Bottom by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr



M732M62Front by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr


As far as the Suntour brakes... the Roller Cams I have also have that 13mm collar- but I don't recall if they mount to pins on the boss.


1987 Schwinn High Sierra by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr


As opposed to the XC Pro brakes which tighten wherever you tighten the Allen center screw- and the spring tension was controlled by the 13mm collar.



Superbe Pro Brakes by Dave The Golden Boy, on Flickr
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdefran
Classic & Vintage
11
04-08-13 02:06 PM
DOS
Bicycle Mechanics
4
10-13-12 04:29 PM
DBRPOD3
Bicycle Mechanics
6
08-13-12 08:16 AM
intelli78
Bicycle Mechanics
7
04-18-11 02:52 AM
southpawboston
Classic & Vintage
20
03-07-11 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.