Anti-Alternative Energy Conspiracies
#1
Guy on a Bike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 249
Bikes: Chromoly Univega with Nexus Hub
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anti-Alternative Energy Conspiracies
This one made front page news today in Columbus Ohio.
https://www.dispatch.com/dispatch/con...1_4V77MOK.html
There was a documentary made about this one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Kil...e_Electric_Car
So. What do you think of these?
https://www.dispatch.com/dispatch/con...1_4V77MOK.html
There was a documentary made about this one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Kil...e_Electric_Car
So. What do you think of these?
#2
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by TreeUnit
So. What do you think of these?
The electric car story is more plausible, but it's hard to ascribe motives to the behavior of a corporation or even an individual. GM may have been trying to "buy time and profits" with the battery car, as the article claims. or they may have just over-hyped some lousy technology.
One things for sure. Practical alternative cars won't be developed until somebody figures out how to make them economical. And that may never happen. There are many solutions to peak oil and climate change that don't involve the use of any private motor vehicles whatsoever.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#3
Senior Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: no
Posts: 1,346
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The demise of the electric car was not a conspiracy in any way. Everyone owns everyone else these days, so since the same financial institutions that owned the majority of GM, also owned ten times as much in various oil companies, they sought to eliminate the threat the electric car posed to their long term profitability, and succeeded in doing so. We've had to use monumentally inefficient vehicles for damn near a century just to burn through as much oil as we have. If we start to see a drop in consumption right as the total amount extracted per time period drops, all that work would've been for nothing. Trillions, maybe even quadrillions of dollars lost. It's no conspiracy, just good business as usual in America.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I thought that an electrolysis motor like that would work. When I was in maybe second or third grade and didn't understand thermodynamics.
There's a few larger problems.
People think they need features out of their car that they really don't. For example, a person who goes off-road once or twice a year buys a SUV, just for those few times they go off-road. Even though it's far cheaper to just rent a SUV for that span of time.
Similarly, you only need one car that can do long-range driving.... so why not buy one electric vehicle and one gas vehicle? But people want to not have to charge either car.
So, the problem is that it's a common logical failure we're dealing with and you can't just flip a switch, deliver a set of products intended to be the future, and assume that culture will change around it.
Hence the promise of a plug-in hybrid. Even though you are carrying around some amount of deadweight, it provides a better way to evolve our culture towards a better goal.
The other problem is, of course, that we still have too many fossil-fueled power plants, so even were all cars to go electric tomorrow, it wouldn't solve anything without adjustments on that end.
There's a few larger problems.
People think they need features out of their car that they really don't. For example, a person who goes off-road once or twice a year buys a SUV, just for those few times they go off-road. Even though it's far cheaper to just rent a SUV for that span of time.
Similarly, you only need one car that can do long-range driving.... so why not buy one electric vehicle and one gas vehicle? But people want to not have to charge either car.
So, the problem is that it's a common logical failure we're dealing with and you can't just flip a switch, deliver a set of products intended to be the future, and assume that culture will change around it.
Hence the promise of a plug-in hybrid. Even though you are carrying around some amount of deadweight, it provides a better way to evolve our culture towards a better goal.
The other problem is, of course, that we still have too many fossil-fueled power plants, so even were all cars to go electric tomorrow, it wouldn't solve anything without adjustments on that end.
#6
I give up!
The Chevy Volt certainly speaks well for GM when it comes to EV's. As it can be made to be powered in nearly any configuration, including pure electric/fuel cell.
Be very careful with those who put a conspiracy behind every automotive decision. The automotive business simply produces what we purchase. If they didn't, they would go under.
Chris
Be very careful with those who put a conspiracy behind every automotive decision. The automotive business simply produces what we purchase. If they didn't, they would go under.
Chris
#7
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Nickel
I think the grid would collapse if there were mainstream electric vehicles.
#8
Sophomoric Member
Since we're on a carfree forum, I'll say it again;
There are many solutions to peak oil and climate change that don't involve the use of any private motor vehicles whatsoever.
There are many solutions to peak oil and climate change that don't involve the use of any private motor vehicles whatsoever.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's a fun story, but the probability that the guy built a car that ran on water is pretty darned close to zero. For more fun, imagine what would happen if it were true - water shortages would be inevitable, dams would be built all over the place, and the coming environmental collapse would still happen. Just maybe in a little bit different way. Keep the thought experiment going and imagine that the car could run on seawater and not just fresh water. Maybe no water shortages caused by car driving (unless inland drivers drained the lakes, rivers, and aquifers rather than import seawater) but then this "free" energy source would mean almost unlimited power that would result in massive overconsumption. The world would be a smoking, lifeless cinder within a few decades.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 147
Bikes: '07 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Check out this site: https://www.hytechapps.com/
Verrry interesting.
Verrry interesting.
#11
In media luce erro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 61
Bikes: Fun/Hack bike: 2008 Giant Rincon - Commuter: 2008 Trek Soho 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
There are many solutions to peak oil and climate change that don't involve the use of any private motor vehicles whatsoever.
#12
not a role model
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by wirehead
The other problem is, of course, that we still have too many fossil-fueled power plants, so even were all cars to go electric tomorrow, it wouldn't solve anything without adjustments on that end.
#13
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
#14
Recumbent Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: Rebel Cycles Trike, Trek 7500FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Highcyclist
Check out this site: https://www.hytechapps.com/
Verrry interesting.
Verrry interesting.
Paraphrase: "We describe it as HHO gas" Ahuh. Before you know it, the air will be polluted with dihydrogen monoxide! Oh no!
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481
Bikes: Too many to list!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by wirehead
For example, a person who goes off-road once or twice a year buys a SUV, just for those few times they go off-road. Even though it's far cheaper to just rent a SUV for that span of time.
... Brad
#16
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by bac
I would guess that 99.9999999999999999% of SUVs have NEVER been off the pavement - ever.
... Brad
... Brad
- feel safer
- more room
- status/style
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#17
Mister Goody Two Shoes
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bac
I would guess that 99.9999999999999999% of SUVs have NEVER been off the pavement - ever.
... Brad
... Brad
Anyway, I'd speculate that "conspiracies" at one level or another are inevitable. When there's that much money on the line, large corporations would be crazy not to invest in efforts to forecast and plan for future events and market swings. Including stuff like "retaining and extending market share", also known as, "monopolizing our segments and limiting or eliminating competition by any justifiable means". It's a fiercely competitive market out there, a real live life or death battle, separate entity vs separate entity, and none would hesitate at the opportunity to utterly destroy or enslave the competition. Pressing the limits of the rules is necessary to stay alive.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by lyeinyoureye
The demise of the electric car was not a conspiracy in any way. Everyone owns everyone else these days, so since the same financial institutions that owned the majority of GM, also owned ten times as much in various oil companies, they sought to eliminate the threat the electric car posed to their long term profitability, and succeeded in doing so. We've had to use monumentally inefficient vehicles for damn near a century just to burn through as much oil as we have. If we start to see a drop in consumption right as the total amount extracted per time period drops, all that work would've been for nothing. Trillions, maybe even quadrillions of dollars lost. It's no conspiracy, just good business as usual in America.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#19
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,026
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mtnroads
You plug them in at night when the grid is idling and there is a bunch of spare capacity. Most studies predict the overall impact on the grid, and fossil fuels burned, would be minimal. This is a concept that is very close to being practical.
The impact (if all personal vehicles switched) would more than double the demand on the grid. Shoot! our present grid is stretched to the limit when we have hot summer days! Even if all the recharging happened during "off peak", demand would outstrip present supply capacity of the grid. You underestimate the amount of energy used for cars.
Tailwinds to ya! ChipSeal
#20
-=Barry=-
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by jeff-o
If you mean entertaining pseudo-science, then you'd be right.
Paraphrase: "We describe it as HHO gas" Ahuh. Before you know it, the air will be polluted with dihydrogen monoxide! Oh no!
Paraphrase: "We describe it as HHO gas" Ahuh. Before you know it, the air will be polluted with dihydrogen monoxide! Oh no!
FWIW Trailer for who killed the electric car https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSBykAngDpY
#21
2 Wheel Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 352
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nickel
I think the grid would collapse if there were mainstream electric vehicles.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 222
Bikes: 2005 Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bac
I would guess that 99.9999999999999999% of SUVs have NEVER been off the pavement - ever.
... Brad
... Brad
You mean like the SUVs at the end of Disney's Cars?
Man I got dirt in my rims!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by ChipSeal
[FONT="Georgia"][SIZE="3"][COLOR="Navy"]The impact (if all personal vehicles switched) would more than double the demand on the grid. Shoot! our present grid is stretched to the limit when we have hot summer days! Even if all the recharging happened during "off peak", demand would outstrip present supply capacity of the grid. You underestimate the amount of energy used for cars.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 758
Bikes: 2002 Dahon Boardwalk 1, 2003 Sun EZ-Sport Limited, 2011 TerraTrike Path 8, 2018 Gazelle Arroyo C8 HMB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'll go with "this guy was a nutter."
And, the reason that the automakers don't want to make smaller and more efficient cars? Nobody wants them. Everyone wants somebody ELSE to be the one to buy them. (Except for some people - I'd love a diesel Geo Metro, or smaller, myself.)
Anyway, funny thing about the SUVs... minivans are more spacious (crawling back to the third row of an SUV SUCKS,) and they're safer too (unibody > body-on-frame for that.) Then again, they're soccer mom vehicles. Um, wait, thanks to soccer moms, SUVs are now soccer mom vehicles, too! (FINALLY station wagons are recovering from that stigma... give me a compact wagon for hauling all my junk any day over a pickup...)
And, the reason that the automakers don't want to make smaller and more efficient cars? Nobody wants them. Everyone wants somebody ELSE to be the one to buy them. (Except for some people - I'd love a diesel Geo Metro, or smaller, myself.)
Anyway, funny thing about the SUVs... minivans are more spacious (crawling back to the third row of an SUV SUCKS,) and they're safer too (unibody > body-on-frame for that.) Then again, they're soccer mom vehicles. Um, wait, thanks to soccer moms, SUVs are now soccer mom vehicles, too! (FINALLY station wagons are recovering from that stigma... give me a compact wagon for hauling all my junk any day over a pickup...)
#25
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,026
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TimJ
Where are you getting all of that?
OK. I just spent some time googleing this and crunching numbers, and here is what I found: the USA burns about 390 million gallons of gasoline a day, which we want to change into electrical energy from the grid, right?
So, convert daily usage to annual usage, gallons to btu's and btu's to watts to get equivalent energy. Our annual gasoline consumption equals roughly 4,759,756,900,000,000 watts of energy (4.7 billion KWH)
In 2003 our grid supplied 3.7 billion KWH.
Here is the problem: Petroleum is a very high energy substance. A good table is found here:
https://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=1&gl=us
So far, no alternative can replace the mass to energy ratio found in gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel. Until the natural market forces make petroleum more expensive than alternatives nothing will change. Even then, it will take time for the early adopters to create the necessary new infrastructure to make the new energy source convenient enough for mass appeal.