Thoughts on ride quality
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thoughts on ride quality
I picked up my first modern road bike this past fall. It's a switch up from the mountain and hybrid bikes I have. The bike was a lightly used Felt F85.
With limited experience on road bikes I've little basis for comparison but the ride quality of this bike has really exceeded my expectations to the point that I wonder how good these carbon bikes must ride.
I bought this from a triathelete friend how upgraded so when I took ownership it had 18mm tires. Even with those tires the bike was very nice. My only issue issue is at 6'4" tall this bike is a little too small which has me thinking I may want something larger.
For as much as I have searched the Internet for direct comparisons I have yet to see a head-to-head ride quality shootout of Al vs. Carbon. Has anyone experienced the difference between two similar bikes of the two materials and was it a noticeable difference in vibration damping and ride quality?
With limited experience on road bikes I've little basis for comparison but the ride quality of this bike has really exceeded my expectations to the point that I wonder how good these carbon bikes must ride.
I bought this from a triathelete friend how upgraded so when I took ownership it had 18mm tires. Even with those tires the bike was very nice. My only issue issue is at 6'4" tall this bike is a little too small which has me thinking I may want something larger.
For as much as I have searched the Internet for direct comparisons I have yet to see a head-to-head ride quality shootout of Al vs. Carbon. Has anyone experienced the difference between two similar bikes of the two materials and was it a noticeable difference in vibration damping and ride quality?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western PDX
Posts: 210
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, Focus Izalco, Focus Mares CX, BMC GF02, Giant VT3 MTB (upgraded), Felt Brougham SS
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've had both aluminum and carbon, the biggest difference I feel is the road "buzz" from aluminum. Carbon forks and carbon seat posts are often used for higher end aluminum bikes to try and minimize the buzz (road vibration). I know there are other differences like stiffness and weight but for me that's harder to notice.
There are a lot of articles about carbon vs aluminum if you google but here is one:
https://roadcyclinguk.com/gear/what-...gGGSuJDrYbK.97
There are a lot of articles about carbon vs aluminum if you google but here is one:
https://roadcyclinguk.com/gear/what-...gGGSuJDrYbK.97
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
Good modern aluminum has taken care of road buzz. I've had a caad9 and caad10 and could barely detect ride difference from carbon. My friend has an emonda aluminum and another has an allez and same thing
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western PDX
Posts: 210
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, Focus Izalco, Focus Mares CX, BMC GF02, Giant VT3 MTB (upgraded), Felt Brougham SS
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Here's a good video about it:
#7
Senior Member
The smoothest ride is from a lightweight steel frame with a carbon fork. The material inherently has good qualities whereas the others need lots of engineering to achieve the same. Aluminum wouldn't have anywhere near the dampening of carbon or steel.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,502
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,487 Times
in
1,841 Posts
How about a Ti cruiser with a sprung saddle and balloon tires?
#9
Achtung!
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
Posts: 1,673
Bikes: 60.1, Marvel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 268 Times
in
161 Posts
Another vote for tires. You can read as much as you want on the internet, but my guess is that you'll be more confused than when you started. My suggestion is to take one of each out for an extended amount of time (not the bike shop parking lot 15 minute ride) and make the decision based on your experience.
#10
Non omnino gravis
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,502
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,487 Times
in
1,841 Posts
Only ride smooth pavement.
#13
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,943
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 976 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
352 Posts
Bike tests
Tire pressure is critical
If you test ride bikes, get the tires topped off with the same pressure. Don't just pull a bike off the rack and ride it. It's very hard to compare with wildly different pressures.
The front tire should be 10 psi to 15 psi lower than the back.
25c tires can use about 10 psi lower pressure, front and back.
The newer wide rims can drop it another 5 psi at least.
Some frames can now fit 28c tires. If your roads are very rough, I'd want those. You can run quite low pressures and not be any slower. (There's a slight aero disadvantage and a small weight penalty to larger tires, but they are still worth it.)
For example, I'm riding 23c tires on very wide 25mm rims, so the tires measure about 26.5 mm
I've been using 82 psi front, 95 rear, and I weigh 175 pounds.
Tires
The more expensive, thinner, flexible tires, like a Continental GP4000, will flex over rough roads better, for a smoother ride. So, cheaper, stiffer tires on the same bike won't feel as good. A lot of bikes come with these less expensive tires.
Frames
I find the carbon vibration advantage is fairly subtle, and tires make a bigger difference.
The carbon bikes are usually lighter, and may be stiffer for a little better handling and feeling more responsive.
I'd test both carbon and aluminum bikes.
Tire pressure is critical
If you test ride bikes, get the tires topped off with the same pressure. Don't just pull a bike off the rack and ride it. It's very hard to compare with wildly different pressures.
The front tire should be 10 psi to 15 psi lower than the back.
25c tires can use about 10 psi lower pressure, front and back.
The newer wide rims can drop it another 5 psi at least.
Some frames can now fit 28c tires. If your roads are very rough, I'd want those. You can run quite low pressures and not be any slower. (There's a slight aero disadvantage and a small weight penalty to larger tires, but they are still worth it.)
For example, I'm riding 23c tires on very wide 25mm rims, so the tires measure about 26.5 mm
I've been using 82 psi front, 95 rear, and I weigh 175 pounds.
Tires
The more expensive, thinner, flexible tires, like a Continental GP4000, will flex over rough roads better, for a smoother ride. So, cheaper, stiffer tires on the same bike won't feel as good. A lot of bikes come with these less expensive tires.
Frames
I find the carbon vibration advantage is fairly subtle, and tires make a bigger difference.
The carbon bikes are usually lighter, and may be stiffer for a little better handling and feeling more responsive.
I'd test both carbon and aluminum bikes.
Last edited by rm -rf; 08-07-16 at 01:57 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Great information so far. The article and the video are perfect.
As a super Clydesdale I already switched the tires to 28s. It's smooth with those on for sure. With many questionable roads around here I wasn't willing to continue with the 18s fitted when I bought it. Even if the ride quality was impressive.
A year ago I would have never thought carbon to be something available for me, but the more I keep learning about it the more I think from a strength and ride it would work. I suppose maybe the strength component still holds but the ride quality argument might be out the window.
As a super Clydesdale I already switched the tires to 28s. It's smooth with those on for sure. With many questionable roads around here I wasn't willing to continue with the 18s fitted when I bought it. Even if the ride quality was impressive.
A year ago I would have never thought carbon to be something available for me, but the more I keep learning about it the more I think from a strength and ride it would work. I suppose maybe the strength component still holds but the ride quality argument might be out the window.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 496
Bikes: Volagi Viaje (rando/gravel/tour), Cannondale Slice 4 (tri/TT), Motobecane Fantom PLUS X9 (plus tires MTB)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If ride quality is your thing, you can't do better than these guys:
Bikes | Volagi Cycles
I got one of the steel frame ones 3 years ago and love it. Word is the Ti and Carbon ones are even sweeter to ride.
Bikes | Volagi Cycles
I got one of the steel frame ones 3 years ago and love it. Word is the Ti and Carbon ones are even sweeter to ride.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266
Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Good ride quality is easy to get on smooth roads. On chip seal or cobbles is where it gets tricky. I've found the good combo to be 28mm tires, latex tubes, stiff frame and fork, and cushy seat.
#18
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
99 Posts
Have you ever ridden a carbon bike, or a modern top-end aluminum bike? I'm honestly curious.
#19
Junior Member
I had steel for a longest time now I have carbon/aluminium and there's staggering difference, it's like rolls royce vs gokart, on steel I could feel tiniest road imperfection which are plentiful where I live, whereas on the "new" bike it feels almost like it had suspension.