Stretched proof chain
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
32 Posts
As far as I know a stretch proof chain is nonexistent. And while there's no hard and fast number of miles that chains are rated for, general consensus seems to be about 1k-2k miles. For the majority of people that probably means replacing it once a year - not unreasonable for a part that you can get for ~ $10-15.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 255 Times
in
185 Posts
Yes, it is called a belt drive.
People talk about chain stretch, but the chain doesn't literally stretch. There is wear in the joints, which allows for a little more movement, and the chain becomes a little longer.
To have a chain that doesn't stretch, you would need a chain that doesn't wear.
In past decades, chains lasted much longer. I believe they are making things lighter now, which is an advantage to those racing. But to everyone else it means spending more on spare parts, and more profit for the manufacturers.
Because chains are not a very expensive item, it is easier to just replace them them when needed, rather than trying to get manufacturers to make them tougher.
For the inventors out there, someone could make a combination belt and chain, which fits bicycles normally using regular chains. It is a bit more complicated than it sounds, because you need it to be exactly the right length (so you would need various sizes), and the frame needs to be modified to fit it.
People talk about chain stretch, but the chain doesn't literally stretch. There is wear in the joints, which allows for a little more movement, and the chain becomes a little longer.
To have a chain that doesn't stretch, you would need a chain that doesn't wear.
In past decades, chains lasted much longer. I believe they are making things lighter now, which is an advantage to those racing. But to everyone else it means spending more on spare parts, and more profit for the manufacturers.
Because chains are not a very expensive item, it is easier to just replace them them when needed, rather than trying to get manufacturers to make them tougher.
For the inventors out there, someone could make a combination belt and chain, which fits bicycles normally using regular chains. It is a bit more complicated than it sounds, because you need it to be exactly the right length (so you would need various sizes), and the frame needs to be modified to fit it.
Likes For alo:
#4
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
I expect to run a chain at least 3000 miles and hopefully 4000 miles before replacing it. Replacement spec for SS is 1% lengthening, so 1/10” over 10 links.
I have at least 1500 single speed miles on the chains of both of my bikes and they have less than .5% lengthening. Those are $10 KMC chains but I’d expect similar lifespan for most any chain.
Otto
I have at least 1500 single speed miles on the chains of both of my bikes and they have less than .5% lengthening. Those are $10 KMC chains but I’d expect similar lifespan for most any chain.
Otto
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4791 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
I've been running Izumis on all my fix gears. 1/8" for all chains, cogs and chainrings. Two of my fix gears have 20,000 miles. I haven't kept count but I'd guess I've used maybe 4 chains on the winter/rain/city bike and 6 on the good bike.
I run one cog and chainring on the city bike and change the cog once then both ring and cog. Might be on its 2nd ring.
I have all the cogs for the good bike. That's enough of an investment that I change the chain every 1/16" of "stretch" and cogs when they run rough with a new chain (basically only the 17 and 16 tooth cogs). I'm keeping the old chains in bags and labeled with the stretch. When most of my cogs are worn past accepting new chains, I will choose between spending the bucks to replace the cogs (if they are available), going to a new "standard" of the worn cogs and stretched chains or retiring from fix gear riding. (I'm 68 years old. I have a few years to go running these cogs with new chains replacing just the 16 and 17 and maybe one other so the big decisions won't be happening until I'm what, 75 years old?)
All this to say: if you run 1/8" and good stuff, be reasonably good about lube and cleanliness (I am far from religious here) and a little systematic re: chain stretch, fix gear chains can last a long time.
I run one cog and chainring on the city bike and change the cog once then both ring and cog. Might be on its 2nd ring.
I have all the cogs for the good bike. That's enough of an investment that I change the chain every 1/16" of "stretch" and cogs when they run rough with a new chain (basically only the 17 and 16 tooth cogs). I'm keeping the old chains in bags and labeled with the stretch. When most of my cogs are worn past accepting new chains, I will choose between spending the bucks to replace the cogs (if they are available), going to a new "standard" of the worn cogs and stretched chains or retiring from fix gear riding. (I'm 68 years old. I have a few years to go running these cogs with new chains replacing just the 16 and 17 and maybe one other so the big decisions won't be happening until I'm what, 75 years old?)
All this to say: if you run 1/8" and good stuff, be reasonably good about lube and cleanliness (I am far from religious here) and a little systematic re: chain stretch, fix gear chains can last a long time.
Last edited by 79pmooney; 04-08-21 at 09:07 AM. Reason: typos
#6
Live Healthy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 417
Bikes: Wabi Classic
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 183 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times
in
92 Posts
I expect to run a chain at least 3000 miles and hopefully 4000 miles before replacing it. Replacement spec for SS is 1% lengthening, so 1/10” over 10 links.
I have at least 1500 single speed miles on the chains of both of my bikes and they have less than .5% lengthening. Those are $10 KMC chains but I’d expect similar lifespan for most any chain.
Otto
I have at least 1500 single speed miles on the chains of both of my bikes and they have less than .5% lengthening. Those are $10 KMC chains but I’d expect similar lifespan for most any chain.
Otto
#7
Live Healthy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 417
Bikes: Wabi Classic
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 183 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times
in
92 Posts
I've been running Izumis on all my fix gears. 1/8" for all chains, cogs and chainrings. Two of my fix gears have 20,000 miles. I haven't kept count but I'd guess I've used maybe 4 chains on the winter/rain/city bike and 6 on the good bike.
I run one cog and chainring on the city bike and change the cog once then both ring and cog. Might be on its 2nd ring.
I have all the cogs for the good bike. That's enough of an investment that I change the chain every 1/16" of "stretch" and cogs when they run rough with a new chain (basically only the 17 and 16 tooth cogs). I'm keeping the old chains in bags and labeled with the stretch. When most of my cogs are worn past accepting new chains, I will choose between spending the bucks to replace the cogs (if they are available), going to a new "standard" of the worn cogs and stretched chains or retiring from fix gear riding. (I'm 68 years old. I have a few years to go running these cogs with new chains replacing just the 16 and 17 and maybe one other so the big decisions won't be happening until I'm what, 75 years old?)
All this to say: if you run 1/8" and good stuff, be reasonably good about lube and cleanliness (I am far from religious here) and a little systematic re: chain stretch, fix gear chains can last a long time.
I run one cog and chainring on the city bike and change the cog once then both ring and cog. Might be on its 2nd ring.
I have all the cogs for the good bike. That's enough of an investment that I change the chain every 1/16" of "stretch" and cogs when they run rough with a new chain (basically only the 17 and 16 tooth cogs). I'm keeping the old chains in bags and labeled with the stretch. When most of my cogs are worn past accepting new chains, I will choose between spending the bucks to replace the cogs (if they are available), going to a new "standard" of the worn cogs and stretched chains or retiring from fix gear riding. (I'm 68 years old. I have a few years to go running these cogs with new chains replacing just the 16 and 17 and maybe one other so the big decisions won't be happening until I'm what, 75 years old?)
All this to say: if you run 1/8" and good stuff, be reasonably good about lube and cleanliness (I am far from religious here) and a little systematic re: chain stretch, fix gear chains can last a long time.
which Izumi chain do you use? I maintain my chains weekly. I ride about 120 miles per week and I always wipe and wax the chain at the end of the week. Using wax for lubricant makes it easy to clean.
Last edited by jay4usc; 04-08-21 at 10:03 AM.
#8
Live Healthy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 417
Bikes: Wabi Classic
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 183 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times
in
92 Posts
Yes, it is called a belt drive.
People talk about chain stretch, but the chain doesn't literally stretch. There is wear in the joints, which allows for a little more movement, and the chain becomes a little longer.
To have a chain that doesn't stretch, you would need a chain that doesn't wear.
In past decades, chains lasted much longer. I believe they are making things lighter now, which is an advantage to those racing. But to everyone else it means spending more on spare parts, and more profit for the manufacturers.
Because chains are not a very expensive item, it is easier to just replace them them when needed, rather than trying to get manufacturers to make them tougher.
For the inventors out there, someone could make a combination belt and chain, which fits bicycles normally using regular chains. It is a bit more complicated than it sounds, because you need it to be exactly the right length (so you would need various sizes), and the frame needs to be modified to fit it.
People talk about chain stretch, but the chain doesn't literally stretch. There is wear in the joints, which allows for a little more movement, and the chain becomes a little longer.
To have a chain that doesn't stretch, you would need a chain that doesn't wear.
In past decades, chains lasted much longer. I believe they are making things lighter now, which is an advantage to those racing. But to everyone else it means spending more on spare parts, and more profit for the manufacturers.
Because chains are not a very expensive item, it is easier to just replace them them when needed, rather than trying to get manufacturers to make them tougher.
For the inventors out there, someone could make a combination belt and chain, which fits bicycles normally using regular chains. It is a bit more complicated than it sounds, because you need it to be exactly the right length (so you would need various sizes), and the frame needs to be modified to fit it.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 255 Times
in
185 Posts
You would probably not convert, but buy a bike with a belt drive. Most belt drive bikes use internally geared hubs, unless you are happy with single speed. They also use a modified frame. It seems they are becoming more common. In the future they may or may not become more competitively priced.
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
78 Posts
You would probably not convert, but buy a bike with a belt drive. Most belt drive bikes use internally geared hubs, unless you are happy with single speed. They also use a modified frame. It seems they are becoming more common. In the future they may or may not become more competitively priced.
Belt drives are increasingly common on motorbikes, with several manufacturers using them on very powerful machines. I had an 800cc bike with a belt drive that never needed adjustment or any form of servicing but needed replacing every 50,000 miles. It follows from this that a belt drive on a pedal bike could easily be made that was maintenance free for very long periods.
One problem with belt drive is that they can be cut if a stone is picked up and trapped between the belt and the cog, which is why they are unsuitable for bikes ridden hard off road.
For a clean, easy to use utility bicycle — commuting, shopping, short leisure rides — the convenience of belt drive and either single speed or internal hub gears would be ideal. It all depends on whether the manufacturers and marketing people decide to promote it, or whether they prefer to keep selling over specified, unnecessarily complex bikes to the gullible.
It is always sad to see a person labouring along a flat city road on a heavy twin-suspension mountain-style bike with about 30 gears when the rider probably never goes more than 3 miles from home on it, but people buy "features" over practicality almost every time. Would belt drive and an "old fashioned" hub gear sell?
#11
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,467
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4335 Post(s)
Liked 3,958 Times
in
2,646 Posts
https://www.mromagazine.com/features...chain-stretch/
If you maintain your chains by keeping them clean and properly lubricated on quality round chainrings and cogs that are smooth you will get a lot of life out of a chain especially a high quality one like say a Izumi Super Toughness KAI.
A belt will certainly last quite a bit longer but if you have brown streaks in your underwear you should wipe better number 1 and number 2 a belt is not for you as belts are not designed for skidding or using as a method to kinda slow down. You would want brakes for that anyway because unless you are on a track you cannot predict anything but what you do and you certainly wouldn't want to leave you not crashing in the hands of some distracted driver while you are doing "Swaaaaeeet skidzzzzz braaaah"
If you use a belt you will need a dedicated frame for it or if you have a steel frame someone to modify it to accept a belt because the Gates Carbon Belts which are well known and reliable don't break so the frame has too or it has to have elevated chain stays to clear the belt.
If you maintain your chains by keeping them clean and properly lubricated on quality round chainrings and cogs that are smooth you will get a lot of life out of a chain especially a high quality one like say a Izumi Super Toughness KAI.
A belt will certainly last quite a bit longer but if you have brown streaks in your underwear you should wipe better number 1 and number 2 a belt is not for you as belts are not designed for skidding or using as a method to kinda slow down. You would want brakes for that anyway because unless you are on a track you cannot predict anything but what you do and you certainly wouldn't want to leave you not crashing in the hands of some distracted driver while you are doing "Swaaaaeeet skidzzzzz braaaah"
If you use a belt you will need a dedicated frame for it or if you have a steel frame someone to modify it to accept a belt because the Gates Carbon Belts which are well known and reliable don't break so the frame has too or it has to have elevated chain stays to clear the belt.
Likes For veganbikes: