SWB or LWB?
#26
Senile Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 506
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by oberon
Any seasoned bent riders our there who can help me with this dilemma? I'm really wanting a recumbent, and am leaning towards SWB model, but would like to hear how they are different from each other in riding.
I think the easiest thing to do if you want to try bikes is to ask on this here board if there are bent riders near you who might let you try their bike for a ride. I think you'll find most riders are okay with the idea. In my area, whenever someone shows up and expresses an interest in recumbents, we're usually quick to setup a ride with several different bents and the guy (or gal) tries each model in turn.
#27
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Vision R40 USS Convertible. Best of both worlds. Real easy to switch between SWB & LWB when needed. It's also very fast...
Last edited by Richlec; 01-13-08 at 01:45 PM.
#28
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stephenville, Tx
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I test rode the XP and really liked it. I was just about to pay for it when I asked if they had any SWB bikes in my size. I needed a large frame. I test rode a Bacchetta Giro 20 and man what a ride. The handling was much different than the Stratus, much more like a regular bike (DF). The seat laid back so far, that my recumbutt problem would not be a problem anymore. And the high BB was great. I had no problem with it at all. I bought the Giro and it is the best bike I have EVER owned. I absolutely love it.
I would agree with others that test riding is a must. Opinions are great to hear other's experiences, but not to decide which bike is right for you. For example, a lot of people think the 26/26 high racers are the greatest bikes ever made. I read all of these opinions and went back to the original bike shop to have some warranty work done on my Giro. While I was there, I test rode 2 different 26/26 high racers and did not like either as much as my 26/20 Giro.
#29
Full Member
The only sure conclusion is that you will want some changes, big or small, after you ride a year or at least a couple thousand miles. So, my advice is to make some research on an SWB/OSS and LWB/USS and determine a model of each that sells and resells at an extremely stable price, and then buy the one closest to home that looks good to you and ride it for a year. Only after that baseline should you build up or trade up to a machine that is almost everything you wanted in the first place, and the initial money spent won't be lost.
__________________
Longbikes Slipstream
Longbikes Slipstream
#30
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1
Bikes: Several bikes including 2 recumbents
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also own both a swb and lwb recumbent and enjoy them both. It took longer to feel comfortable on the swb though, since it had under seat steering and putting my feet down felt awkward with the handlebar there. It was also twitchier than the long wheelbase. I converted the steering to "praying hamster" style and am very pleased with it. The pedals are quite high on the swb so clips are essential- I had my feet jarred off the pedals several times going over bumps- not pleasant at all! My advice would be to test ride each type before you buy, and if you can, buy 1 each! I used the swb on my first century last year, and for longer training rides, but use the lwb with platform pedals for local spur of the moment rides, trips to the store, etc. Don't hesitate to approach the recumbent riders you may encounter, they are more likely than most to be helpful since we are always looking for new "recruits", lol.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 865
Bikes: Scott CR1 Team
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't have much to add, except to say that riding an LWB doesn't at all condemn you to going slow. There are very few riders on the road that I can't keep up with, if not pass easily.
#33
shaken, not stirred.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Shaky Isles.
Posts: 5,250
Bikes: I've lost count.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1412 Post(s)
Liked 971 Times
in
390 Posts
I don't have a LWB, but have briefly tried a couple. They were extremely easy to learn, particularly after riding a SWB. The only one I couldn't ride was a very long and low LWB with front wheel drive and underseat stearing.
I prefer the SWB design for the general sportyness of the ride. I ride a RANS Rocket with the flying hampster style bars. I use it for commuting and have just competed a 900km unsuported cycle tour. I have found it very comfortable and with the pedals at roughly the seat height, I have almost cured my numb feet problem.
If you can test ride, or beg and borrow rides in a variety of recumbents, including trikes, to see what you like.
I prefer the SWB design for the general sportyness of the ride. I ride a RANS Rocket with the flying hampster style bars. I use it for commuting and have just competed a 900km unsuported cycle tour. I have found it very comfortable and with the pedals at roughly the seat height, I have almost cured my numb feet problem.
If you can test ride, or beg and borrow rides in a variety of recumbents, including trikes, to see what you like.
__________________
Get a bicycle. You will not regret it if you live. ~Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
vBulletin: snafu
#34
Ride more, eat less
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philla PA, Hoboken NJ, Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,071
Bikes: Too many but never enough.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 713 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times
in
452 Posts
LWB take up storage room, harder to transport with other vehicle, more difficult to use public transportation (like bus or train).
SWB may be more difficult to ride at first, but once you learned to master it, you'll have a bike that take up less room than a LWB bike, easier to transport and getting on public transportation... parobably weigh less, also.
SWB may be more difficult to ride at first, but once you learned to master it, you'll have a bike that take up less room than a LWB bike, easier to transport and getting on public transportation... parobably weigh less, also.
#35
Pedaled too far.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
For me the defining difference has been that I can plunk my SWB recumbent on the front of a bus in the bike racks. That adds so much flexibility. An LWB just wouldn't fit.
#36
Strada, GTT2s, Hotmover
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I tend too agree that the LWB is harder to store and transport than a SWB but I also believe for some it's the best choice. It's kinda like having the High Racer with 700c, it's not for everyone, it's a personal choice and each has a specific use, that's why they make so many different models.
Last edited by Ric; 01-16-08 at 06:13 AM.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Posts: 3,770
Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Also, again just as a matter of personal opinion, it can be worth asking around about bike shops and perhaps giving one a second chance if they have a generally good reputation. Depending on the day they are having, even a good shop can seem less than interested in your business no matter what your level of experience.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Also--on SWB's shorter people tend to not be comfortable stopping and standing (because ground reach is difficult).
~