Under 32 spoked alloy wheels for gravel bikes?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
24 Posts
Under 32 spoked alloy wheels for gravel bikes?
Anyone here has experience using the kind of road training wheels with 20/24 spoked wheels for gravel use?
I have a favourite cyclocross frame from 2008, wide clearance but limited to rim brakes - which I actually like. I have since used it as a road bike with 15C wheels (Shimano RS-010) with 32mm slick tires and all went well, veering off road occasionally with no problem. As I am planning to put in more aggressive thread there perhaps 37mm wide to take on more muddy surfaces in winter/early spring, I wonder how the heavier tires and harsher rides would trash the cheap road wheels, or not ...
I can see 17C wheels on sale now, but they would again be 20/24 spoked (RS-100). Is it worth lacing own 32/32 spoked wheels for gravel?
I am basically out of luck with modern gravel specific wheels because they are all sold with disc brake hubs, trekking ones are out of question because they come with 135 wide rear hubs which does not fit into 130mm road frame.
I have a favourite cyclocross frame from 2008, wide clearance but limited to rim brakes - which I actually like. I have since used it as a road bike with 15C wheels (Shimano RS-010) with 32mm slick tires and all went well, veering off road occasionally with no problem. As I am planning to put in more aggressive thread there perhaps 37mm wide to take on more muddy surfaces in winter/early spring, I wonder how the heavier tires and harsher rides would trash the cheap road wheels, or not ...
I can see 17C wheels on sale now, but they would again be 20/24 spoked (RS-100). Is it worth lacing own 32/32 spoked wheels for gravel?
I am basically out of luck with modern gravel specific wheels because they are all sold with disc brake hubs, trekking ones are out of question because they come with 135 wide rear hubs which does not fit into 130mm road frame.
Last edited by am8117; 01-12-20 at 04:24 PM.
#2
Non omnino gravis
I guess that would come down to what you weigh. Every wheelset I've used on my CX frame has been 24/24, and I ride it absolutely everywhere, at 200+ pounds.
If you're a more typical "cyclist weight" I don't see low spoke counts becoming an issue until you start trying to jump the bike off of things.
If you're a more typical "cyclist weight" I don't see low spoke counts becoming an issue until you start trying to jump the bike off of things.
Likes For DrIsotope:
#3
Really Old Senior Member
You can take a 135mm hub & remove 5mm of axle & spacer from the NDS.
Redish by incrementally loosing the NDS spokes.
It won't take much, so don't go over 1/4T the 1st time.
Sure you have ROOM for that large of a tire?
Redish by incrementally loosing the NDS spokes.
It won't take much, so don't go over 1/4T the 1st time.
Sure you have ROOM for that large of a tire?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
If you have the skills and inclination to build up a set of stout wheels I would suggest doing so. Or, if the frame is steel I wouldn't hesitate to cold-set it to 135mm and put a trekking wheelset on.
#5
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
It is all about how much you weigh, and how strong the rims are, and what hubset you mate (with associated bracing angles). Some rims are noodles or cannot take much tension, some hubsets don't have great bracing. Some people are too big, or too "heavy on the bike".
Likes For woodcraft:
#7
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Anyone here has experience using the kind of road training wheels with 20/24 spoked wheels for gravel use?
I have a favourite cyclocross frame from 2008, wide clearance but limited to rim brakes - which I actually like. I have since used it as a road bike with 15C wheels (Shimano RS-010) with 32mm slick tires and all went well, veering off road occasionally with no problem. As I am planning to put in more aggressive thread there perhaps 37mm wide to take on more muddy surfaces in winter/early spring, I wonder how the heavier tires and harsher rides would trash the cheap road wheels, or not ...
I can see 17C wheels on sale now, but they would again be 20/24 spoked (RS-100). Is it worth lacing own 32/32 spoked wheels for gravel?
I am basically out of luck with modern gravel specific wheels because they are all sold with disc brake hubs, trekking ones are out of question because they come with 135 wide rear hubs which does not fit into 130mm road frame.
I have a favourite cyclocross frame from 2008, wide clearance but limited to rim brakes - which I actually like. I have since used it as a road bike with 15C wheels (Shimano RS-010) with 32mm slick tires and all went well, veering off road occasionally with no problem. As I am planning to put in more aggressive thread there perhaps 37mm wide to take on more muddy surfaces in winter/early spring, I wonder how the heavier tires and harsher rides would trash the cheap road wheels, or not ...
I can see 17C wheels on sale now, but they would again be 20/24 spoked (RS-100). Is it worth lacing own 32/32 spoked wheels for gravel?
I am basically out of luck with modern gravel specific wheels because they are all sold with disc brake hubs, trekking ones are out of question because they come with 135 wide rear hubs which does not fit into 130mm road frame.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Look at a classic Open Pro wheelset. Notice how low the section height is. Now look at a more modern low spoke count wheelset. See how much deeper the section height measures. The deeper rim is obviously stronger so it needs fewer spokes.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Likes For Retro Grouch:
#10
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
When I was much younger, I'd want everything optimized for weight and quality. Even though I weighed 100kg. Ooh! Ooh! 20 spoke wheels! Great! As I got older I realized that there were significant downsides to overoptimizing. I got suspicious about the strength of lower spoke-count wheels. Probably too much so.
That said, I think that there's a tradeoff here. You can choose between lower spoke-count (possibly lighter, and more en vogue) and higher spoke count (stronger and possibly heavier). But the decision is based upon several factors.
If you are a heavier rider, this favors higher spoke count. A lighter rider can consider fewer spokes.
If you are an aggressive rider on rough, rocky trails, this favors higher spoke count. A more cautious rider on smooth trails can consider fewer spokes.
If you are willing to futz around, trade out wheels, accept broken spokes and (possibly) a broken rim, this favors fewer spokes. If you want more reliability, this favors a higher spoke count.
I think that this last point is the one that may be most helpful. How much are reliability and avoiding having to fix things issues for you?
Having said all that, the fanciest (at least the highest price - $6K) Trek bike that is identified as a "gravel bike" uses 24 spoke wheels (if I'm counting correctly). And the level below that (3K$) uses 28 spoke wheels. And I weigh about 240 now, and have been riding on bontrager paradigm elite wheels without issue for a few years, and they use 20/24 spokes.
That said, I think that there's a tradeoff here. You can choose between lower spoke-count (possibly lighter, and more en vogue) and higher spoke count (stronger and possibly heavier). But the decision is based upon several factors.
If you are a heavier rider, this favors higher spoke count. A lighter rider can consider fewer spokes.
If you are an aggressive rider on rough, rocky trails, this favors higher spoke count. A more cautious rider on smooth trails can consider fewer spokes.
If you are willing to futz around, trade out wheels, accept broken spokes and (possibly) a broken rim, this favors fewer spokes. If you want more reliability, this favors a higher spoke count.
I think that this last point is the one that may be most helpful. How much are reliability and avoiding having to fix things issues for you?
Having said all that, the fanciest (at least the highest price - $6K) Trek bike that is identified as a "gravel bike" uses 24 spoke wheels (if I'm counting correctly). And the level below that (3K$) uses 28 spoke wheels. And I weigh about 240 now, and have been riding on bontrager paradigm elite wheels without issue for a few years, and they use 20/24 spokes.
Likes For WizardOfBoz:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I have the 10-speed version of those wheels (R-501) on my CX bike and raced them all season with 37mm tubeless (ghetto setup) and they've been rock solid. I would not hesitate.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
24 Posts
Thanks everyone for the quick replies, really appreciated!
Actually I am more like 80+ kg (around 180 pounds), but you got me thinking as this is secondary pair of wheels for winter and maybe touring if need be.
I have since looked at V-brake finished wheels and basically felt like it is easier to build a new one, no savings price-wise either.
I am running a 35mm tire there with good clearance, but that is on a 622x14 rim. I assume 19 one would not add that much to the tire width.
(Before someone tells me I am out of ERTO specs, this is how the original bike came in 2008 and is still showing in the archives of the manufacturer. I always wonder how it is possible that suddenly all those narrow rims that once shipped with CX tires became "not recommended.")
I do not mind building, funnily the Shimano RS-100 17C wheels publish recommended tire width up to 32mm even though ERTO charts happily go way above. I wonder why, but prefer 19C rim in the end anyhow I guess.
I am running a 35mm tire there with good clearance, but that is on a 622x14 rim. I assume 19 one would not add that much to the tire width.
(Before someone tells me I am out of ERTO specs, this is how the original bike came in 2008 and is still showing in the archives of the manufacturer. I always wonder how it is possible that suddenly all those narrow rims that once shipped with CX tires became "not recommended.")
I do not mind building, funnily the Shimano RS-100 17C wheels publish recommended tire width up to 32mm even though ERTO charts happily go way above. I wonder why, but prefer 19C rim in the end anyhow I guess.
#14
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
24 Posts
That's pretty interesting! May I know what tires and at what pressure? I really like the RS-010 for the price on the road, but then noticed they do not recommend going above 32mm, not even on the RS-100 (which is 17C rim) - probably because they market them as road tires after all.
#15
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
24 Posts
After all I have the 20/24s for the summer and happy with the slicks on those.
#16
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
24 Posts
I was thinking about this, but I also wonder how much more the spokes suffer being shorter with the deeper rims and how much aero - I guess none - benefit does the deep rim provide with CX thread pattern wide tire. I want to stick with alloy wheels and I noticed the more spokes a deeper section rim allows me to skip the heavier it gets. So what's better then ... deeper rims and fewers spokes or shallower ones at 32/32? Some 24mm+ deep alloy rims get pretty heavy (650g+).
Last edited by am8117; 01-14-20 at 05:45 PM.
#17
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times
in
24 Posts
When I was much younger, I'd want everything optimized for weight and quality. Even though I weighed 100kg. Ooh! Ooh! 20 spoke wheels! Great! As I got older I realized that there were significant downsides to overoptimizing. I got suspicious about the strength of lower spoke-count wheels. Probably too much so.
That said, I think that there's a tradeoff here. You can choose between lower spoke-count (possibly lighter, and more en vogue) and higher spoke count (stronger and possibly heavier). But the decision is based upon several factors.
If you are a heavier rider, this favors higher spoke count. A lighter rider can consider fewer spokes.
If you are an aggressive rider on rough, rocky trails, this favors higher spoke count. A more cautious rider on smooth trails can consider fewer spokes.
If you are willing to futz around, trade out wheels, accept broken spokes and (possibly) a broken rim, this favors fewer spokes. If you want more reliability, this favors a higher spoke count.
I think that this last point is the one that may be most helpful. How much are reliability and avoiding having to fix things issues for you?
Having said all that, the fanciest (at least the highest price - $6K) Trek bike that is identified as a "gravel bike" uses 24 spoke wheels (if I'm counting correctly). And the level below that (3K$) uses 28 spoke wheels. And I weigh about 240 now, and have been riding on bontrager paradigm elite wheels without issue for a few years, and they use 20/24 spokes.
That said, I think that there's a tradeoff here. You can choose between lower spoke-count (possibly lighter, and more en vogue) and higher spoke count (stronger and possibly heavier). But the decision is based upon several factors.
If you are a heavier rider, this favors higher spoke count. A lighter rider can consider fewer spokes.
If you are an aggressive rider on rough, rocky trails, this favors higher spoke count. A more cautious rider on smooth trails can consider fewer spokes.
If you are willing to futz around, trade out wheels, accept broken spokes and (possibly) a broken rim, this favors fewer spokes. If you want more reliability, this favors a higher spoke count.
I think that this last point is the one that may be most helpful. How much are reliability and avoiding having to fix things issues for you?
Having said all that, the fanciest (at least the highest price - $6K) Trek bike that is identified as a "gravel bike" uses 24 spoke wheels (if I'm counting correctly). And the level below that (3K$) uses 28 spoke wheels. And I weigh about 240 now, and have been riding on bontrager paradigm elite wheels without issue for a few years, and they use 20/24 spokes.
I do not mind fixing things, but I had a spoke break on me with 32/32 wheels and barely noticed (the bike has cantis) until I got home. I don't think the 20/24 would allow me the same. And yes I can carry spare spokes for eg touring, but changing those on the rear DS which break the most often is not fun when middle of nowhere - I don't want to carry a chain whip.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
That's pretty interesting! May I know what tires and at what pressure? I really like the RS-010 for the price on the road, but then noticed they do not recommend going above 32mm, not even on the RS-100 (which is 17C rim) - probably because they market them as road tires after all.
Great for gravel and dry early season cross races, but definitely not mud tires. I generally rode them around 45 or 50psi. I weigh 170 and was concerned that they would be squirmy on off camber stuff, but it wasn't an issue.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,691
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
318 Posts
190lbs here, riding 20/24 road wheels on 40mm tires for gravel. Holds up fine, I don't baby my bike but I don't do jumps, drops, etc, either. Over the last 3-4 years I did have true them once or twice, nothing major.