Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Reverse-tread tire?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Reverse-tread tire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-17, 10:15 PM
  #1  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Reverse-tread tire?

Why are some mountain and CX tires reverse-tread? What is the advantage (if any)?
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 10-05-17, 12:34 AM
  #2  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Most are for grip in looser terrain
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 10-05-17, 09:48 AM
  #3  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
I am at a bit of a loss for understanding how that works (and if it does, why not have reverse-tread on all tires)?
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 10-05-17, 09:55 AM
  #4  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 37 Posts
Tread that appears reversed is usually made that way to make the tire a little more pavement friendly, and the trade-off is reduced grip on dirt.
JonathanGennick is offline  
Old 10-05-17, 03:17 PM
  #5  
Canker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,745
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 330 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times in 133 Posts
Or setup one way for the front and one for the rear.
Canker is offline  
Old 10-06-17, 01:50 AM
  #6  
bikeme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sunny so. cal.
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 31 Posts
The theory is that reverse chevrons on a rear tire will scoop more for climbing traction. While this may be true to some extent, I think that a well-designed tread with ramped, forward facing vee-treads will do just as well and roll much easier.
bikeme is offline  
Old 10-07-17, 02:26 AM
  #7  
Rocket Mouse
Junior Member
 
Rocket Mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 24

Bikes: modified '97 FS Klein Mantra Comp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bikeme
The theory is that reverse chevrons on a rear tire will scoop more for climbing traction. While this may be true to some extent, I think that a well-designed tread with ramped, forward facing vee-treads will do just as well and roll much easier.
I've got a set of WTB TrailBoss tires on mine right now and I flip the front around reverse direction and I personally notice much better cornering traction on hard and loose dirt trails. Don't know if they intended for people do that that with it, but it works for me so I stay with it.

There's also something to be said about tire designs like these that have a lot of siping built into them for extra traction too.
Rocket Mouse is offline  
Old 10-07-17, 09:31 AM
  #8  
bikeme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sunny so. cal.
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 31 Posts
Originally Posted by wgscott
Why are some mountain and CX tires reverse-tread? What is the advantage (if any)?
Ah, reread this and I think I get what you mean now...do you mean tires that have treads that appear to be flipped (scoop of Vs forward vs the point of the Vs?) even when the mfr.'s directional arrow points forward? I ask because I have Kinda Kwiks on my gravel bike and having the scoops forward (what they direct/recommend) seemed counter to what I was used to see on my mtb tires. I personally can't tell traction or rolling-resistance wise. If I reverse the direction against what the mfr. shows, the side knobs would be facing a weird way. I always just go with what direction the mfr. says--they're supposed to know best, lol.
bikeme is offline  
Old 10-07-17, 09:45 AM
  #9  
Shimagnolo
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,081
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3372 Post(s)
Liked 5,494 Times in 2,846 Posts
I still have a pair of old 1.9" Ritchey Cross-Bites on a mtn bike.
They are fantastic!
On pavement, they roll and corner like slicks.
But on unpaved surfaces, there is enough tread to be useful.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
k1kk_crossbite_tread.jpg (16.0 KB, 39 views)
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 10-07-17, 10:13 AM
  #10  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Originally Posted by bikeme
Ah, reread this and I think I get what you mean now...do you mean tires that have treads that appear to be flipped (scoop of Vs forward vs the point of the Vs?) even when the mfr.'s directional arrow points forward? I ask because I have Kinda Kwiks on my gravel bike and having the scoops forward (what they direct/recommend) seemed counter to what I was used to see on my mtb tires. I personally can't tell traction or rolling-resistance wise. If I reverse the direction against what the mfr. shows, the side knobs would be facing a weird way. I always just go with what direction the mfr. says--they're supposed to know best, lol.
Yes.

>>>>> vs. <<<<<<
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 10-07-17, 10:26 AM
  #11  
kevrider
Senior Member
 
kevrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: northern nevada
Posts: 360

Bikes: way too many

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wgscott
>>>>> vs. <<<<<<
some motorcycle tires are designed this way. the front has a bigger traction demand on braking, the rear on acceleration, and these forces are obviously applied in opposite directions.
kevrider is offline  
Old 10-07-17, 02:25 PM
  #12  
Shimagnolo
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,081
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3372 Post(s)
Liked 5,494 Times in 2,846 Posts
Originally Posted by kevrider
some motorcycle tires are designed this way. the front has a bigger traction demand on braking, the rear on acceleration, and these forces are obviously applied in opposite directions.
+1
The photo is a matched pair of Dunlop Roadsmart II sport/touring tires, oriented exactly as they go on the bike.

(I had planned to be putting these on the bike this month, but 18 days ago an idiot cager in a truck chose to blow through a stop sign, knocking the bike out from under me, and trashing it.)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_0043.jpg (61.3 KB, 27 views)
Shimagnolo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thehammerdog
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
09-27-19 07:34 PM
Germanicus
Road Cycling
37
08-26-11 08:18 PM
Otowanda
Bicycle Mechanics
7
08-19-11 06:39 PM
RFC
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
9
03-06-10 02:18 PM
Raleigh71
Bicycle Mechanics
9
01-04-10 10:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.