Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Help calculating differences with changing cogs

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Help calculating differences with changing cogs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-15, 07:10 AM
  #1  
wvrick
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 45

Bikes: TerraTrike Rover , Giant Boulder SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Help calculating differences with changing cogs

I need a little help calculating differences with changing cogs and the increase in speed on my recumbent trike. I'm trying to use a phone app and not sure if it's correct. What I'm looking at is if I change my rear cog from a 20t to 16t the increase in speed. Specs... chainring 42t (170mm arms) 20t cog (current) 20x1.75 tires I get 15.2 mph max with my cadence. The app says 19.1 mph with a 16t. Does this sound about right?

Thanks!
wvrick is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 09:02 AM
  #2  
welshTerrier2
Full Member
 
welshTerrier2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Let's start at the beginning so you'll understand this better. There's a piece of data missing with the numbers you provided.

First, you need to understand the concept of "gear inches". Gear inches (also called development), is how far the bike will travel with each revolution of the pedals. The distance varies based on the following formula:

gear inches = wheel diameter * teeth in front chainring / teeth in rear sprocket

So, given your 20t setup, you would have 20 inches * 42t/20t = 42 gear inches

On edit:
This means that for each revolution of the pedals (in those gears), the bike will move forward 42 inches times pi (use the circumference of the wheel (pi * d)).

Now, changing the 20t sprocket to 16t, you would have 20 inches * 42t/16t = 52.5 gear inches

This means that changing from the 20t sprocket to the 16t sprocket, for each revolution of the pedals you would travel 10.5 inches times pi further.

When you add the element of speed to the discussion, you have to know your cadence which is the rate at which your are spinning the pedals. Given your app's statement that you would be traveling at 15.2 mph (it has to know your cadence to provide this information), changing from the 20t to the 16t sprocket would yield a speed of 15.2 * 52.5 gear inches / 42 gear inches. This would yield 19 mph. This means that making the switch, if you maintain the same cadence, would increase your speed from 15.2 to 19 mph.

You cannot convert gear ratios to speed without considering cadence. Without extra effort, you would not see any increase in speed at all. Going from 20t to 16t, without extra effort, will increase your distance per pedal revolution (i.e. gear inches) but it would correspondingly decrease your cadence because it would be harder to pedal.

By the way, there are more things to consider when changing a single sprocket. You should also consider the jumps between the next higher and lower gears. There's something to be said for keeping a consistent relationship from one gear to the next.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by welshTerrier2; 05-16-15 at 04:53 AM. Reason: corrected development to use circumference instead of diameter
welshTerrier2 is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 12:22 PM
  #3  
hueyhoolihan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
the faster you pedal (cadence), the faster you go, no matter the gearing. you need to decide what cadence is max for you. they vary from individual to individual, a lot . and there is a time interval involved in your 'max' to consider too.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 12:32 PM
  #4  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Plug in your numbers and let someone else do the math:

Mike Sherman's Bicycle Gear Calculator
caloso is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 12:56 PM
  #5  
Little Darwin
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
If you can maintain the same cadence with the higher gearing the speed is relevant. On a recumbent, you are fighting less wind resistance than most cyclists, so it could be doable.

However, it sounds like you are riding a single speed, you need to remember that the smaller cog will make starting from a stand still (or accelerating from low speed) more difficult, and also any hill climbing could be more difficult.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 03:31 PM
  #6  
wvrick
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 45

Bikes: TerraTrike Rover , Giant Boulder SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for supplying the formula, I found the result from Sheldon Brown's site after posting but will remember how to work it now.
Yes I'm riding a recumbent and with a internal hub (Nuvinci N360) and I think I'll not have a problem maintaining my cadence since when I max out my speed I spin out as well... like I'm looking for more overdrive.
wvrick is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 03:43 PM
  #7  
wvrick
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 45

Bikes: TerraTrike Rover , Giant Boulder SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by welshTerrier2
There's a piece of data missing with the numbers you provided.
cadence
This was an unknown while I was riding(I never counted), while I was using the android app I used the known data I had from the cheap meter: Max speed (15.2), and from the hardware specs: wheel(20x1.75),crank size(170mm),chainring(42t),cog(20t) and with this entered in the app the slider for cadence I moved until my speed showed 15.2 and this is where I got cadence. I'm not sure that worked like that but when I changed the cog to 16t from 20t I got 19.1 mph.
wvrick is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 03:47 PM
  #8  
GhostSS
Senior Member
 
GhostSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 638

Bikes: 2012 Switch Performance BlackSkin LE Urban, 2013 Leader 725, 1975 Fuji America, 1990 Giant Cadex 980c, 1986 Peugeot PH10LE, 1995 Trek 2120 Carbon ZX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Use Sheldon Browns calculator

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Gear Calculator
GhostSS is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 04:09 PM
  #9  
groth
astro
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pennington, NJ
Posts: 355

Bikes: Raleigh Sports, '72, Bianchi Volpe, '97 (no more, it died), Greenspeed GTVS6, '05, Trek 520, '13

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times in 25 Posts
You guys are making this too hard. If the cog is changed from 20t to 16t and everything else, including the cadence, stays the same, the speed goes up by the ratio of the teeth: 20t/16t = 5/4. 5/4 x 15.2mph = 19.0 mph.

- Ed
groth is offline  
Old 05-15-15, 07:06 PM
  #10  
dave42
Senior Member
 
dave42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: E TN MTS
Posts: 258

Bikes: 1989 TREK 400, Suntour accushift drivetrain. 80's Raleigh mtb all Suntour.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
not quite right regarding development

But close.

Gear inches refers to the wheel diameter you would have if you were riding a penny farthing.

Development...distance traveled, is gear inches times pi.

assume a 700x25tire...

So, 26.4x 42÷16x3.1416= =217.71288inches traveled.

/12x60/5280=.206

.206 x cadence= mph.


shorter formula is this:

Gear inches times 0.00297 times cadence=speed.

just remember the .00297 and yer good.

Last edited by dave42; 05-15-15 at 07:10 PM.
dave42 is offline  
Old 05-15-15, 07:09 PM
  #11  
dave42
Senior Member
 
dave42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: E TN MTS
Posts: 258

Bikes: 1989 TREK 400, Suntour accushift drivetrain. 80's Raleigh mtb all Suntour.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like this one real good... Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Gear Calculator
dave42 is offline  
Old 05-15-15, 07:53 PM
  #12  
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,483

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Originally Posted by welshTerrier2

So, given your 20t setup, you would have 20 inches * 42t/20t = 42 gear inches

This means that for each revolution of the pedals (in those gears), the bike will move forward 42 inches.
Nope, the gear inches are the equivalent diameter of a tire if it were using a 1:1 drive (tricycle wheel.) The development is how far you'd travel, which is the gear inches times pi.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 05-16-15, 04:48 AM
  #13  
welshTerrier2
Full Member
 
welshTerrier2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
Nope, the gear inches are the equivalent diameter of a tire if it were using a 1:1 drive (tricycle wheel.) The development is how far you'd travel, which is the gear inches times pi.
Thanks, that's correct. The development needs to use the circumference and not the diameter. I'm going to edit the original post to correct the error.
welshTerrier2 is offline  
Old 05-16-15, 12:22 PM
  #14  
dave42
Senior Member
 
dave42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: E TN MTS
Posts: 258

Bikes: 1989 TREK 400, Suntour accushift drivetrain. 80's Raleigh mtb all Suntour.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Welsh, it won't let me quote you...

Hope i didn't come across wrong. Long day, and text is a cold medium, anyhow.

I like your 336 number. Ill have to use it more.

easier than .00297
dave42 is offline  
Old 05-17-15, 12:38 AM
  #15  
CycleryNorth81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 875

Bikes: custom Cyclery North (Chicago), Schwinn Circuit

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 350 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 118 Posts
[QUOTE=shorter formula is this:

Gear inches times 0.00297 times cadence=speed.

just remember the .00297 and yer good.[/QUOTE]

The math doesn't work out:
Gear inches x 0.00297 x cadence= speed
(20 inch wheel *42T/20T as stated by @welshTerrier2) x 0.00297 x cadence= 15 mph (as stated by OP)
42 gear inch x 0.00297 x cadence = 15 mph
cadence= 15/42/0.00297
cadence= 120
cadence is quite high
CycleryNorth81 is offline  
Old 05-17-15, 08:52 AM
  #16  
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Sometimes I feel like an analog man who's been trapped in a digital universe. I think that you're working at this too hard.

1. Forget about speed for a minute. If you put a Ferrari transmission into some econo box car, it still won't go 150 MPH. You have to have the power to push it.
2. As you ride, when you feel like your feet are spinning too fast, shift into the next hardest gear. If that gear feels too hard, you need a cassette with closer gear spacing.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cen
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
40
09-26-18 03:54 AM
rgr555
Road Cycling
53
03-29-18 04:11 PM
Elysium32
General Cycling Discussion
8
10-23-14 03:43 AM
oneidabow1
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
4
08-20-14 01:58 PM
Howard
Classic & Vintage
3
10-01-12 07:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.