Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Converting 1980s Campy SR with SOMA Nuovo Retro Cage and "wrap"

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Converting 1980s Campy SR with SOMA Nuovo Retro Cage and "wrap"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-16, 11:44 PM
  #1  
vintagerando
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,858
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 457 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 33 Posts
Converting 1980s Campy SR with SOMA Nuovo Retro Cage and "wrap"

What I am trying to do is get a gear combination which will allow me to keep using the 80s Campy Super Record RD and be able to climb the hills in my area. One solution is just to buy a IRD Claissica 13-28. Campy SR is supposed to work with 28t. So, I could leave it at that; live with 28t. A more ambitious route would be to buy the SOMA Fab Nuovo Retro RD cage plate which will allow the Campy RD to go up to 32t.
One thing I don't understand is "wrap". I know the formula, but what are the implications of the "wrap" number. The SOMA Nuovo Retro cage is described as having the "capacity of 38t chain wrap." If I had a IRD classica, 14-32, and my rings are 53-42, the wrap is 30t. So, what does that tell me? The Soma Retro cage setup would work? I guess that last option is to dump the Campy SR and use some other RD. I don't know if any RD from that era, 80s can do 32t.
Your input is appreciated.
vintagerando is offline  
Old 02-05-16, 01:04 AM
  #2  
oldsmobum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Implications...
Chain capacity, or chain wrap capacity has to do with how much chain length the derailleur can accommodate. since the derailleur acts as a chain tensioner. Wider difference in gearing, means more chain length. It is determined by finding the difference in between high and low cogs and chainrings, and adding them up. Chain wrap refers to the amount of contact the chain makes with the cassette. Literally how much it wraps around the cassette. Having the proper amount of chain wrap will allow for optimal shifting and better cassette life. As long as you stay within the maximum cog size spec (which you are) you shouldn't have a problem with this. It becomes an issue when the b-tension adjustment is brought out too far to clear large cogs.

So, with an 14-32, and a 53-42:
32-14= 18 rear difference
53-42=11 front difference
11+18=29 tooth capacity required

Basically that lets you know that with your setup, your chain won't be way too long, or too short in any gear combination. Which in either circumstance can be bad, but the safe practice would be to run the chain long and avoid a small/small ring combination, which doesn't make sense anyway. Usually these specs are pretty conservative from the manufacturer, and there is a little leeway. but at the same time you should execute caution when you approach or exceed manufacturers spec's. I've seen Setups that were within drivetrain spec but didn't work well because the derailleur hanger was too short. Hope this helps and I didn't ramble too much.
oldsmobum is offline  
Old 02-05-16, 12:04 PM
  #3  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Its a Knock Off of a Campag Rally Cage .. minus the threaded Brass Insert of the Original.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 02-05-16, 01:02 PM
  #4  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,778

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times in 1,929 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Its a Knock Off of a Campag Rally Cage .. minus the threaded Brass Insert of the Original.
+1 this. Thus it will have the same chain wrap capacity as the Rally: 38T
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 02-05-16, 01:18 PM
  #5  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
The <C> 3450* used a spring loaded upper Pivot, (So did Shimano) after that they Just changed The Cage.

* I'm still using the one I got in the 70's on a 50,40,24_ 13~28 freewheel ,,
fietsbob is offline  
Old 02-05-16, 02:50 PM
  #6  
oldsmobum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Its a Knock Off of a Campag Rally Cage .. minus the threaded Brass Insert of the Original.
Didn't notice that. I was curious why that derailleur/capacity... Forgot all about the Rally, even though I just sold one. Neat concept!
oldsmobum is offline  
Old 02-10-18, 12:33 PM
  #7  
evets11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is your setup maxed out?

Originally Posted by fietsbob
The <C> 3450* used a spring loaded upper Pivot, (So did Shimano) after that they Just changed The Cage.

* I'm still using the one I got in the 70's on a 50,40,24_ 13~28 freewheel ,,
That's 41t capacity vs. Soma's stated 38t. I've noticed you can usually "push" true capacity a bit from 3-6t depending on RD. You pushed it 3t. You think my setup with a "Soma Cageized" Campy Nuovo Gran Sport RD with a 13-32t 7sp Sachs FW, and "Triplizerized" Campy 144bcd 52/42/28t crank setup (43t capacity) will work without chain sag in sm./sm. + no catasrophic chain pull on RD cage in big/big with a Soma cage? I haven't bought the Soma cage, 144bcd triplizer nor longer BB spindle yet? This is the gearing I'm planning on riding the 90 mile route in L'Eroica Ca. in April 2018. I don't want to spend the $200+ for this conversion until I'm SURE it will work. P.S.- I MAY just drill out #5 74bcd CR bolt holes on each crank spider arm. The arms on the NGS crank are flat, so this idea should work easily.

Last edited by evets11; 02-10-18 at 12:49 PM.
evets11 is offline  
Old 02-10-18, 01:20 PM
  #8  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
you can also buy a 144 bcd triplizer with a 2nd 74 bolt circle About Triplizers - Red Clover Components

https://www.redclovercomponents.com/s..._42_Teeth.html





..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 02-10-18, 01:50 PM
  #9  
Ghrumpy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by vintagerando
What I am trying to do is get a gear combination which will allow me to keep using the 80s Campy Super Record RD and be able to climb the hills in my area. One solution is just to buy a IRD Claissica 13-28. Campy SR is supposed to work with 28t. So, I could leave it at that; live with 28t. A more ambitious route would be to buy the SOMA Fab Nuovo Retro RD cage plate which will allow the Campy RD to go up to 32t.
One thing I don't understand is "wrap". I know the formula, but what are the implications of the "wrap" number. The SOMA Nuovo Retro cage is described as having the "capacity of 38t chain wrap." If I had a IRD classica, 14-32, and my rings are 53-42, the wrap is 30t. So, what does that tell me? The Soma Retro cage setup would work? I guess that last option is to dump the Campy SR and use some other RD. I don't know if any RD from that era, 80s can do 32t.
Your input is appreciated.
"Wrap" or Total Gear Capacity (TGC) and maximum rear cog capacity often land on the same number for a given derailleur, but they are not closely related. You need to deal with them separately, for the most part.

The maximum rear cog capacity (for a drop para rear derailleur like the late SR) is a function mostly of the parallelogram length, but also of the cage and pulley geometry. The latter is how the late SR specs a 28t max rear cog instead of the 26t of the Record, Nuovo Record, and early Super Record. All four have the same parallelogram length and TGC. The late SR has a different pulley cage that puts the upper pulley slightly lower relative to the lower pivot. The SOMA/Rally long cage adds teeth to the max rear cog capacity by placing the pulley even lower relative to the pivot than the SR. A longer derailleur hanger will do the same thing, but at the expense of slightly lower shift quality to the smallest cog.

@oldsmobum described wrap or TGC well. Nothing really to add there. The SOMA/Rally long cage increases the TGC by allowing more chain to be run.

So if you had a long cage with the same pulley geometry as the Nuovo Record, it would still have the same max rear cog, but more TCG.

You can often "cheat" the max rear cog in a couple ways. One, if you have long horizontal dropouts, is to move the axle as far rearward as possible. This has the same effect as a longer hanger, but allows the chain to wrap more so the small cog shift quality isn't quite as compromised. For a given chain length, it also causes the pulley cage to rotate "backwards" slightly, which pulls the upper pulley slightly farther away from the largest cog.
You can also run the chain one link short, which also pulls the upper pulley back and away from the cogs, increasing the clearance. However, this makes big-big cross-chaining more likely to overwind the derailleur springs. You'll have to studiously avoid that if using this hack.
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-11-18, 07:48 AM
  #10  
speedevil 
I never finish anyth
 
speedevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Western KY
Posts: 1,114

Bikes: 2008 Merckx LXM, 2003 Giant XTC mtb, 2001 Lemond Alpe d'Huez, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1989 Cannondale ST, 1988 Masi Nuovo Strada, 1983 Pinarello Turismo

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 294 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times in 86 Posts
You might consider a Roadlink, if you want to handle a larger rear cog than usual. Note that this does not increase the RD capacity, just moves the RD away from the cassette a bit so that the upper guide pulley doesn't hit the larger cog. This also avoids using the B screw to space the derailleur to a different position or moving the axle around in the dropouts.
__________________
Dale, NL4T
speedevil is offline  
Old 02-11-18, 08:21 AM
  #11  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
There are period correct derailleurs that can handle this much wrap. A long cage suntour cyclone will shift better than a campy NR RD. A shimano long cage crane (essentially a first generation dura ace) is a fine looking derailleur that will do the job as well. Or you could go with a "compact" vintage crank like a stronglight 99 and run something like 47/32 rings. Here is one for sale in CV

https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post20163199

Personally I'd shrink the crank and pick up something like a stronglight 99 since that lets you run a campy NR RD short cage and is likely to give you better gearing since the freewheel cogs will be more closely spaced with say a 13-26 than a 13-32.

Last edited by bikemig; 02-11-18 at 08:26 AM.
bikemig is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vintagerando
Bicycle Mechanics
8
03-08-16 12:09 PM
Campag4life
Road Cycling
18
07-15-12 03:26 PM
Yaniel
Bicycle Mechanics
4
01-29-12 10:12 PM
Epicus07
Bicycle Mechanics
2
10-10-10 08:08 AM
zacster
Bicycle Mechanics
3
03-11-10 12:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.