Pantographing and component branding
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Pantographing and component branding
I've been wondering lately when the practice of pantographing began. There have been parts with the bike manufacturer's name engraved onto them (I'm thinking Legnano, Schwinn-Approved, stuff like that), but when did the aftermarket practice of engraving (mostly) alloy parts from, say, Campagnolo, with the framebuilder's name begin?
For that matter, it's been brought up a number of times in recent threads regarding Campagnolo and the way they put their brand on nearly every single piece of component hardware. On one brake caliper, for example, I counted 9 brandings (qr cam, barrel adjuster, brake pads and pad holders, serrated washers and of course the arms themselves). I imagine this was done to ensure a bike purchaser understood that the frame was built by one faction and the components by another. Any thoughts on this or the "dawn of pantographing"?
Of course, this thread would be useless without pics, so please share what you've got
DD
For that matter, it's been brought up a number of times in recent threads regarding Campagnolo and the way they put their brand on nearly every single piece of component hardware. On one brake caliper, for example, I counted 9 brandings (qr cam, barrel adjuster, brake pads and pad holders, serrated washers and of course the arms themselves). I imagine this was done to ensure a bike purchaser understood that the frame was built by one faction and the components by another. Any thoughts on this or the "dawn of pantographing"?
Of course, this thread would be useless without pics, so please share what you've got
DD
Last edited by Drillium Dude; 12-09-18 at 04:39 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,386 Times
in
3,671 Posts
I think you are onto something with Schwinn, they seem to be one of the very first as they seem to have put their brand on everything they made and then on most of the parts they used said Schwinn approved once they relinquished full control.
#3
Senior Member
For that matter, it's been brought up a number of times in recent threads regarding Campagnolo and the way they put their brand on nearly every single piece of component hardware. On one brake caliper, for example, I counted 9 brandings (qr cam, barrel adjuster, brake pads and pad holders, serrated washers and of course the arms themselves. I imagine this was done to ensure a bike purchaser understood that the frame was built by one faction and the components by another. Any thoughts on this or the "dawn of pantographing"?
Pantographing is a different process. It goes back to the 70s at least, but it peaked out in the mid to late 80s, to the best of my recollection. I mostly associate it with Italian bikes.
#5
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,801 Times
in
2,285 Posts
WRT Campagnolo, for a very long time, most well equipped pro bike shops kept a case full of Campagnolo replacement parts. Pretty much all parts were available. If you crashed out your brakes, you could buy the parts you needed instead of a new brakeset. It made sense to put the trademark on all of the parts, especially since there were numerous campy clones out there. That way you were assured of getting the real thing, not a knockoff by Sugino or Ofmega or whoever.
Pantographing is a different process. It goes back to the 70s at least, but it peaked out in the mid to late 80s, to the best of my recollection. I mostly associate it with Italian bikes.
Pantographing is a different process. It goes back to the 70s at least, but it peaked out in the mid to late 80s, to the best of my recollection. I mostly associate it with Italian bikes.
Image stolen shameless from Bikeville thoughts: Excavated! Campagnolo parts cabinet
I worked in two different shops that had one of these. Whoever was repping Campagnolo would breadman it, refilling what was used up.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#6
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
391 Posts
Raleigh, of course, was another master at putting their name on components. I brought home a late-70s Raleigh Sports and was amazed at how virtually every piece of the bike had 'Raleigh' (or just the 'R') on it in one form or another. Right down to the tubes.
I suppose silkscreen on a tube isn't, strictly speaking, what the OP was discussing. But it's a good example of just how far the practice of rebranding would go. And whatever else may be true, I had a pretty good idea which parts were original to the bike and which weren't.
I suppose silkscreen on a tube isn't, strictly speaking, what the OP was discussing. But it's a good example of just how far the practice of rebranding would go. And whatever else may be true, I had a pretty good idea which parts were original to the bike and which weren't.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Last edited by Fahrenheit531; 12-09-18 at 06:53 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,038 Times
in
1,876 Posts
I consider pantographing to be aftermarket milling of components, as opposed to the logos or symbols being engraved, stamped or cast in place by the component manufacturer. In that context, the earliest example of pantographing that I saw was the chainring on the Colnago for Merckx's hour record bicycle. The year after that, Colnago seemed to be pantographing just about every component and others soon followed
Edit: Regarding Campagnolo's branding of individual parts of a component, it is typically used to declare ownership of a patented design. If you look at things like the serrated washer, cam release, pad holders and barrel adjuster on their calipers, you'll also see "PATENT" or "BREV" to indicate that the particular feature is a patented design. This both discourages clones and sets precedence in a legal dispute. (during the patent term).
Edit: Regarding Campagnolo's branding of individual parts of a component, it is typically used to declare ownership of a patented design. If you look at things like the serrated washer, cam release, pad holders and barrel adjuster on their calipers, you'll also see "PATENT" or "BREV" to indicate that the particular feature is a patented design. This both discourages clones and sets precedence in a legal dispute. (during the patent term).
Last edited by T-Mar; 12-11-18 at 02:55 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SocalReOC
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
3
07-16-13 11:35 AM
WNG
Classic & Vintage
16
06-02-11 09:19 PM