Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Big Front Disc on a Gravel Bike?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Big Front Disc on a Gravel Bike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-19, 04:51 AM
  #1  
RicePudding
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RicePudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 62

Bikes: Giant Toughroad SLR GX 1 (2018), Giant Talon 2 (2010, RIP)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Big Front Disc on a Gravel Bike?

Been looking into whether or not it's worth running a larger front disc on the front of my Toughroad GX1. The bike is currently equipped with the stock 160mm front and back.

I just want a bit more confidence when on trails and rocky descents as well as improving modulation and was wondering if this would make much of a difference.

Has anyone got a 180mm on their gravel bike?
I know most CX riders prefer 140mm or 160mm to save a bit of weight.
RicePudding is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 05:33 AM
  #2  
srode1
Gravel Rocks
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 298

Bikes: Trek Domane and Crockett, BH G7, Niner RLT9, RLT9 RDO

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 29 Posts
Might be some advantage with Mechanical Discs - not needed with Hydraulic IMHO.
srode1 is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 10:06 AM
  #3  
86az135i
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154

Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Probably not needed. But if you're experiencing pad fade, then maybe a little more thermal mass in terms of a larger rotor would help. Also going bigger then stock could stress your fork more since now you have more braking torque.
86az135i is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 10:25 AM
  #4  
Elvo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 369 Times in 206 Posts
Also depends if your fork can support 180mm
Elvo is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 10:36 AM
  #5  
Marcus_Ti
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
 
Marcus_Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331

Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by Elvo
Also depends if your fork can support 180mm
^That^

Most road/CX forks are not rated for 180mm. And unless you're touring or weigh a great deal and are bombing down hills, there's no need for the rotor diameter. Odds are on a gravel tire, off-road, the wheel will lose traction before you run out of braking power with a 160mm rotor.
Marcus_Ti is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 12:16 PM
  #6  
TimothyH
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
I'd go with 180 mm or larger if my bike supported it.

Always go with the biggest brakes your vehicle supports. It's the number 2 upgrade after tires.

But yes, most gravel bikes only support 160's.
TimothyH is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 12:27 PM
  #7  
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
Are you guys crazy. Anytime that that you are in anything slippery, like gravel, Sand, Grass oh, you never used front brake hard because it will immediately lock up and now you're down on the pavement or gravel.
You always use the rear brake As much as possible.Learn to ride a bicycle you don't know what you're doing. Go ahead and spend lots of money on new components because you think that that is what's going to make you a better bicyclist.It's knowing how to ride a bicycle and technique that makes you go fast.
San Rensho is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 12:40 PM
  #8  
86az135i
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154

Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Are you guys crazy. Anytime that that you are in anything slippery, like gravel, Sand, Grass oh, you never used front brake hard because it will immediately lock up and now you're down on the pavement or gravel.
You always use the rear brake As much as possible.Learn to ride a bicycle you don't know what you're doing. Go ahead and spend lots of money on new components because you think that that is what's going to make you a better bicyclist.It's knowing how to ride a bicycle and technique that makes you go fast.
I didn't know OP was asking for biking lessons.
86az135i is offline  
Likes For 86az135i:
Old 02-08-19, 12:45 PM
  #9  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
I plan on going from 160mm to 180mm on the front. I'm 220 lbs. and I think the extra braking power + cooling would be useful. And it's cheap.
tyrion is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 01:17 PM
  #10  
RicePudding
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RicePudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 62

Bikes: Giant Toughroad SLR GX 1 (2018), Giant Talon 2 (2010, RIP)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 86az135i
I didn't know OP was asking for biking lessons.
Maybe I should put stabilisers on my gravel bike instead...

Last edited by RicePudding; 02-08-19 at 01:36 PM.
RicePudding is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 01:21 PM
  #11  
RicePudding
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RicePudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 62

Bikes: Giant Toughroad SLR GX 1 (2018), Giant Talon 2 (2010, RIP)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
I plan on going from 160mm to 180mm on the front. I'm 220 lbs. and I think the extra braking power + cooling would be useful. And it's cheap.
Yeah I'm not sure why it's just been touted as expensive and crazy. I was just wondering what people thought of it and if anyone has done it to their Gravel bike. I know it's the norm with XC bikes but I wasn't sure if it's a bit overkill for gravel.

It would be cheap, the post to post adapter is £6 and I can get a Shimano SLX rotor for £12. Cheap as anything.
RicePudding is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 01:31 PM
  #12  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by RicePudding
I know it's the norm with XC bikes but I wasn't sure if it's a bit overkill for gravel.
I think it depends on your weight and how much downhilling you do. You don't want it too easy to lock up the front wheel, but at my weight I don't think I'm close to that.
tyrion is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 02:05 PM
  #13  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
I plan on going from 160mm to 180mm on the front. I'm 220 lbs. and I think the extra braking power + cooling would be useful. And it's cheap.
what fork?
redlude97 is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 02:06 PM
  #14  
86az135i
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154

Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Originally Posted by RicePudding
Yeah I'm not sure why it's just been touted as expensive and crazy. I was just wondering what people thought of it and if anyone has done it to their Gravel bike. I know it's the norm with XC bikes but I wasn't sure if it's a bit overkill for gravel.

It would be cheap, the post to post adapter is £6 and I can get a Shimano SLX rotor for £12. Cheap as anything.
If you're already hydraulic I would just look at upgrading your pads. Stock resin pads generally aren't the greatest for large decents. See if that suits you before going to a larger rotor.
86az135i is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 02:12 PM
  #15  
tyrion
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
what fork?
It's a Breezer Radar with a rather clunky looking steel fork w/ IS mount. It "looks" strong enough.


tyrion is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 02:14 PM
  #16  
86az135i
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154

Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
It's a Breezer Radar with a rather clunky looking steel fork w/ IS mount. It "looks" strong enough.
Steel is weak. Everyone knows carbon fiber is the superior race lol.
86az135i is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 03:03 PM
  #17  
RicePudding
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RicePudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 62

Bikes: Giant Toughroad SLR GX 1 (2018), Giant Talon 2 (2010, RIP)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 86az135i
If you're already hydraulic I would just look at upgrading your pads. Stock resin pads generally aren't the greatest for large decents. See if that suits you before going to a larger rotor.
Thanks, I'll look into that, one of my pads is already showing a fair bit of wear so maybe a replacement upgrade would be better
RicePudding is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 07:45 PM
  #18  
TimothyH
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Are you guys crazy. Anytime that that you are in anything slippery, like gravel, Sand, Grass oh, you never used front brake hard because it will immediately lock up and now you're down on the pavement or gravel.
You always use the rear brake As much as possible.Learn to ride a bicycle you don't know what you're doing. Go ahead and spend lots of money on new components because you think that that is what's going to make you a better bicyclist.It's knowing how to ride a bicycle and technique that makes you go fast.
This simply isn't correct.

I would encourage anyone who wants to learn proper braking technique on gravel to watch the Skills with Phil flat turn video.



-Tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 07:53 PM
  #19  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
I think if I killed a white crowned sparrow like that, I would have a difficult time getting back on the bike. That was a real sad ending to the video.


I've thought about a 180 mm front disc, but I think the brake would become too grabby. (I put 160 mm ones on my mountain bike for that reason.)

Last edited by Cyclist0108; 02-08-19 at 07:56 PM.
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 08:08 PM
  #20  
TimothyH
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
Originally Posted by wgscott
I've thought about a 180 mm front disc, but I think the brake would become too grabby. (I put 160 mm ones on my mountain bike for that reason.)
I rode a Santa Cruz downhill bike with something like 208's and LOVED the brakes. I dream of having brakes like that on my gravel bike.


-tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 08:17 PM
  #21  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Originally Posted by TimothyH
I rode a Santa Cruz downhill bike with something like 208's and LOVED the brakes. I dream of having brakes like that on my gravel bike.


-tim-
My kid has that on his mountain bike (not a down-hill bike), and they are quad-piston. I had a hard time with it.
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 08:23 PM
  #22  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
I have about 18,000 miles with a 180F/160R setup-- split almost evenly between mechanical (Shimano CX77,) hybrid (TRP HY/RD,) and hydro (Hope RX4.) I love it. I have no desire to change.

A bigger front rotor is not "more grabby," regardless of what kind of caliper is squeezing it. It just makes it so the lever feel is the same for both hands-- and the pads wear out at around the same rate.

I mean, try to find a car that has the same size brake rotors front and rear-- and as a bicycle does the bulk of the braking with the front, why shouldn't that rotor be bigger?
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 08:26 PM
  #23  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
as a bicycle does the bulk of the braking with the front, why shouldn't that rotor be bigger?
I think many of the forks out there say 160 mm maximum rotor diameter (eg: Enve CX, which is what I have). I would hate to find out the hard way why that might be.
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 08:40 PM
  #24  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
In most cases it appears to be clearance-- the top edge of the rotor is usually about a millimeter away from the leg. But with full CF forks, there may be some other structural cause for concern. My fork is steel, and would easily clear a 203mm rotor.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 02-08-19, 10:37 PM
  #25  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
I have about 18,000 miles with a 180F/160R setup-- split almost evenly between mechanical (Shimano CX77,) hybrid (TRP HY/RD,) and hydro (Hope RX4.) I love it. I have no desire to change.

A bigger front rotor is not "more grabby," regardless of what kind of caliper is squeezing it. It just makes it so the lever feel is the same for both hands-- and the pads wear out at around the same rate.

I mean, try to find a car that has the same size brake rotors front and rear-- and as a bicycle does the bulk of the braking with the front, why shouldn't that rotor be bigger?
same reason I run 160f/140r for gravel and cross. What made you feel the need to go to 180 though?
redlude97 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.