Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

good in theory bad in practice

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

good in theory bad in practice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-17, 12:45 PM
  #1  
squirtdad
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,543 Posts
good in theory bad in practice

San francisco put in parking buffered bike lanes. and of course the lanes are used for parking in addtion to where the parking is supposed to be.

IMHO parking buffered is bad design, as it limits visibility of cyclists at intersections, etc.

the implementation had problems, like no signage, parking meters not moved etc.

end result reduced safety

partial quote

The new design was touted by the SFMTA as “San Francisco’s first raised, parking-protected bike lane.”
“This bike lane combines two main physical design features aimed at making streets safer and more comfortable for people to bike on,” stated the SFMTA in a blog post announcing the project. “They help provide a clearer sense of separation between people walking, biking or driving and organize the street into a more predictable pattern.”
But the six-foot-wide bike lane and five-foot-wide buffer area are not being used correctly—showing a disconnect between The City’s plan and the drivers’ interpretation. There are no signs posted to explain how to use the bike lane, and the parking meters appear to be causing some confusion.



https://www.sfexaminer.com/oblivious-...ike-lane-cars/
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Old 03-02-17, 01:39 PM
  #2  
mr_bill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
May 2016 - conventional bike lane, curb parking.

September 2016 - parking buffered bike lane (but not raised).

There were a few days of confusion here - but even m*******s figured this out pretty damn quickly - without green paint.

Yes, they had to put signs telling you where to drive, park, bike, and walk.

(But not where to run, sigh.)

Yes, there were a few days of intensive informational enforcement.

And even a few tactical flowerpots.

But once a few people caught on, pretty much everyone caught on.

-mr. bill

Last edited by mr_bill; 03-02-17 at 01:48 PM.
mr_bill is offline  
Old 03-02-17, 02:11 PM
  #3  
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
San francisco put in parking buffered bike lanes. and of course the lanes are used for parking in addtion to where the parking is supposed to be.

IMHO parking buffered is bad design, as it limits visibility of cyclists at intersections, etc.

the implementation had problems, like no signage, parking meters not moved etc.

end result reduced safety

partial quote

The new design was touted by the SFMTA as “San Francisco’s first raised, parking-protected bike lane.”
“This bike lane combines two main physical design features aimed at making streets safer and more comfortable for people to bike on,” stated the SFMTA in a blog post announcing the project. “They help provide a clearer sense of separation between people walking, biking or driving and organize the street into a more predictable pattern.”
But the six-foot-wide bike lane and five-foot-wide buffer area are not being used correctly—showing a disconnect between The City’s plan and the drivers’ interpretation. There are no signs posted to explain how to use the bike lane, and the parking meters appear to be causing some confusion.



https://www.sfexaminer.com/oblivious-...ike-lane-cars/
And you expect ordinary people to understand engineering design why?
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-03-17, 08:55 PM
  #4  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1481 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
Just another example of the intelligence of motorists. And they are in control of deadly machines. Ever wonder why there are so many collisions and road fatalities?
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 03-04-17, 08:17 AM
  #5  
Moe Zhoost
Half way there
 
Moe Zhoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957

Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times in 527 Posts
They will figure it out eventually. I imagine there is some discomfort about parking so far from the curb. Goes against their conditioning. I don't know what sort of communication plan was used before it was implemented, but my experience is that even with the best communication, a large proportion of citizens never seem to get it.
Moe Zhoost is offline  
Old 03-04-17, 09:48 AM
  #6  
BobbyG
Senior Member
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
Those parking meters definitely don't help.
BobbyG is offline  
Old 03-04-17, 07:01 PM
  #7  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1481 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
Check out the idiot motorists in the videos of this thread.

https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-safety/1095312-city-puts-head-sand.html
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 03-06-17, 03:48 PM
  #8  
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 255 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4
Just another example of the intelligence of motorists. And they are in control of deadly machines. Ever wonder why there are so many collisions and road fatalities?

When cars drive themselves, only cars will kill other cars?
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Rollfast is offline  
Old 03-07-17, 08:33 PM
  #9  
Viich
Hack
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,265

Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), Yess World Cup race BMX, Pure Cruiser race BMX, RSD Mayor v3 Fatbike

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 190 Times in 132 Posts
After a few rides, I avoid bike lanes with parking between the traffic lane and bike lane. Cross streets are too deadly. Literally - several serious accidents. Signs saying 'right turning vehicles yield to bikes' don't do a lot when the bikes aren't very visible - drivers don't expect them, especially not at any kind of speed.

Having bikes (or any vehicle) passing a right-turning vehicle on the right is just a bad idea, and this lane configuration doesn't give anyone any other options.

We have one raised cycle track that does not have cars parked along it all the time - works OK. Only use it because the road was narrowed to build it, and sometimes ride on the road, as it often isn't plowed.
Viich is offline  
Old 03-08-17, 07:42 AM
  #10  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1481 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts
Originally Posted by Rollfast
When cars drive themselves, only cars will kill other cars?
I would rather have a car in the garage than another person in the hospital. So, yes, we hope the programmers of self-driving cars will be able to make that choice.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 03-12-17, 08:32 PM
  #11  
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 255 Posts
Dude, they'll simply find other ways to get there.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Rollfast is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TrojanHorse
Southern California
7
08-21-16 05:40 PM
CommuteCommando
Advocacy & Safety
87
11-19-12 09:18 PM
tarwheel
Commuting
15
10-12-10 10:52 PM
Rusty5329
Advocacy & Safety
14
10-08-10 08:18 PM
macdonwald
Commuting
20
08-13-10 09:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.