Clipless Pedals: RS500 vs R7000
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Clipless Pedals: RS500 vs R7000
Anyone have actual experience between the Shimano RS500 and the R7000 pedals? Seems like a big price difference and wondering if anyone has noticed any big difference in use. Thanks.
Likes For colnago62:
#3
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,949
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6177 Post(s)
Liked 4,794 Times
in
3,306 Posts
About a 100 grams difference.
Price differences usually among the different Shimano stuff that looks the same is usually the tier group is it intended for. Higher tier stuff being made from more expensive materials with weight being one of the things they are looking to reduce.
Also, price differences come from one being an older product model that is about out of production or about to be. Don't know if that's yours though.
Or are you just strictly wanting a how well does one work over the other answer?
Price differences usually among the different Shimano stuff that looks the same is usually the tier group is it intended for. Higher tier stuff being made from more expensive materials with weight being one of the things they are looking to reduce.
Also, price differences come from one being an older product model that is about out of production or about to be. Don't know if that's yours though.
Or are you just strictly wanting a how well does one work over the other answer?
Likes For Iride01:
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
About a 100 grams difference.
Price differences usually among the different Shimano stuff that looks the same is usually the tier group is it intended for. Higher tier stuff being made from more expensive materials with weight being one of the things they are looking to reduce.
Also, price differences come from one being an older product model that is about out of production or about to be. Don't know if that's yours though.
Or are you just strictly wanting a how well does one work over the other answer?
Price differences usually among the different Shimano stuff that looks the same is usually the tier group is it intended for. Higher tier stuff being made from more expensive materials with weight being one of the things they are looking to reduce.
Also, price differences come from one being an older product model that is about out of production or about to be. Don't know if that's yours though.
Or are you just strictly wanting a how well does one work over the other answer?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,750
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4365 Post(s)
Liked 3,000 Times
in
1,853 Posts
I have older model RS5000s, 105s, and Dura Ace 9000s. Apart from the differences in weight, I find that the balanced weight of the R9000s is a little better - this means that when clipping in without looking down, the R9000s are more likely to be sitting in the exact correct position. The lower end Shimanos aren't bad in this way (my Favero Assiomas are a royal pain in this regard), but the pedal ends up upside down more frequently, requiring that little maneuver to turn them around.
Also, the composite pedals are a little less slippery when wet than the steel pedals - which again only matters when clipping in.
But these are quibbles. They are all good pedals.
Also, the composite pedals are a little less slippery when wet than the steel pedals - which again only matters when clipping in.
But these are quibbles. They are all good pedals.
Last edited by MinnMan; 03-14-21 at 02:55 PM.
Likes For MinnMan: