Titanium or Steel
#102
Decrepit Member
I agree; I haven't babied my 953 Waterford, and even with 0.3mm wall thickness in the non-butted section of the top tube, there isn't the smallest dent anywhere. With a Rockwell hardness of 44, this is very tough material and the 953 alloy (Carpenter Technology Custom 455) is used in armor plating applications.
#103
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,982
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11954 Post(s)
Liked 6,611 Times
in
3,469 Posts
Have we sufficiently answered the OP's original query?
@BoomerTheWeim have we provided enough helpful information?
@BoomerTheWeim have we provided enough helpful information?
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#105
Senior Member
You said "Ti frames are more expensive than stainless ones". That's a very different from an assertion about quality, and I'm not sure I believe it is true.
EDIT: OK reading your post you seem to be saying that a survey of local framebuilders revealed that you could get a Stainless frame built cheaper than a Ti frame, or at least you got "more for your money" for stainless, whatever that means.
EDIT: OK reading your post you seem to be saying that a survey of local framebuilders revealed that you could get a Stainless frame built cheaper than a Ti frame, or at least you got "more for your money" for stainless, whatever that means.
For reference, in looking at the Moots pricing on their website, I was able to get a custom stainless frame and build it into a comparably equipped bike for a considerable discount over Moots pricing.
I'm not trying to suggest that my less expensive bike is better than a custom built for you frame, that expensive never buys you anything. Going custom, I certainly would not buy from overseas. But I am saying that the attitude of many that it cost less, or imported from Asia, therefore it must be inferior is often simply not the case. The same attitude prevailed with Toyota and other Japanese car makers in the 70's, Sony, Taiwan built Al bike frames etc. The list goes on and on.
My Ti frame was built in Taiwan and compares very favorable to US standard built Ti frames at a fraction of the cost. The bike I bought would have been 3.5-6 times more expensive for nearly comparable bike from one of the US Ti builders without nearly as much tube shaping as the Taiwanese frame etc. Would have loved to have bought US made, but literally multiple thousands of dollars difference in price
Side note. I love the ideal of a Stainless Steel bike. I have not seen one to my knowledge, and would love to ride one for a couple of weeks for comparison.
My Ti frame was built in Taiwan and compares very favorable to US standard built Ti frames at a fraction of the cost. The bike I bought would have been 3.5-6 times more expensive for nearly comparable bike from one of the US Ti builders without nearly as much tube shaping as the Taiwanese frame etc. Would have loved to have bought US made, but literally multiple thousands of dollars difference in price
Side note. I love the ideal of a Stainless Steel bike. I have not seen one to my knowledge, and would love to ride one for a couple of weeks for comparison.
Stainless steel exhibits pretty much the ride characteristics of steel to the extent that the material matters or impacts the ride quality. In general, and from having built several bikes from a variety of frame materials, I think it is pretty much possible to get any ride characteristic you want from any any material and that fit, geometry and design matter more. For example, I have one steel frame that can knock your fillings out because it's so stiff. I also have a stainless steel bike that has just outstanding ride quality (for me) - and both have similar forks and have used the same wheels so the difference is the frame. Material matters a lot less than a whole lot of other stuff. BTW, the same is true for Ti. You can get a bike with sublime ride quality or you can get one that is awful - both made from Ti.
I'll leave that up to you. I don't care. I wasn't looking for a cheap stainless bike and I'm not interested in that now. The ask wasn't for a cheap bike but for a "forever" bike.
J.
#106
Senior Member
Moots are purely at dentist levels of pricing though. Everything will look cheap compared to them.
#107
Decrepit Member
I'm guessing here, but I wouldn't be surprised if a stock KVA MS2 frame for $2,000 without fork is just too much money to attract a lot of buyers when custom steel framesets (frame and fork) can be purchased for significantly less. For example, a custom made-to-measure Gunnar Roadie OS2 frame is $1,300 and a Gunnar steel fork another $300. That's $1,600 for a really nice custom steel frameset.
I commend SOMA for selling stock stainless frames for $2,000, but I just don't believe the market is there.
I commend SOMA for selling stock stainless frames for $2,000, but I just don't believe the market is there.
Likes For Scooper:
#108
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 11
Bikes: Kish
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have we sufficiently answered the OP's original query?
@BoomerTheWeim have we provided enough helpful information?
@BoomerTheWeim have we provided enough helpful information?
Lots of info. With the price of the Moots, I could possibly purchase a less expensive steel or TI with nicer components. Now I have no idea what to do...
#109
Senior Member
J.
#110
Senior Member
So is my stainless bike (it is my forever bike if there is such a thing). It's Di2, carbon wheels, etc... Even then the discount is multiple thousands of dollars and the bike is better equipped than the equivalent Moots. Same was true for other Ti frames I looked at or custom Ti. Like I said, not even close and it's workmanship is better by a lot and I'm pretty sure I beat the equivalent Moots bike for weight too.
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: North West Arknasas
Posts: 575
Bikes: Allez/Motobecane 427HT & Ti/Soma Custom Build
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
Allot of it is just what do you want. I personally have always had an itch for the Titanium, so that is what I did. Also have an interest in some steel bike, others have an itch for carbon fiber, and I am curious as to long term riding a CF bike is like. But for me the Ti itch was far worse. I do not regret it. For you, if you just love the ideal of Ti because it seems high tech since it's aircraft grade etc, you like the look of brushed Ti or whatever, or do you like the old time nostalgic thought of steel, modern history etc, or whatever each material feels like emotionally to you. Maybe if you can answer that you will know which way to go that is right for you. Then proceed from there accordingly with which ever material is your preference. Doesn't really matter what other preferences are. As long as you go with someone well known, you should be happy.
#112
Senior Member
Frame quotes around here were more for Ti from frame builders. Although I understand that may not be true in all geographies. I researched this carefully for months before I bought.
J.
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 329
Bikes: '04 Cannondale T800, '00 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Bingo! Frame material... is what it is.
A well made steel bike is a joy to ride and is going to serve the OP well.
A well made ti bike is a joy to ride and is going to serve the OP well.
Aluminum makes a really nice bike.
Carbon makes a really nice bike.
You guys get it.
A well made steel bike is a joy to ride and is going to serve the OP well.
A well made ti bike is a joy to ride and is going to serve the OP well.
Aluminum makes a really nice bike.
Carbon makes a really nice bike.
You guys get it.
#114
Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Tampa, Land O Lakes
Posts: 40
Bikes: 2016 Escape 1, Scott CR1 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dallas Cowboy Star
I am a "newbie" never heard of Moots or the other one. I have a Giant Escape 1 which I love. Most bikes today are made at the Giant plant and aluminum seems to be the best, most affordable
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
I'm guessing here, but I wouldn't be surprised if a stock KVA MS2 frame for $2,000 without fork is just too much money to attract a lot of buyers when custom steel framesets (frame and fork) can be purchased for significantly less. For example, a custom made-to-measure Gunnar Roadie OS2 frame is $1,300 and a Gunnar steel fork another $300. That's $1,600 for a really nice custom steel frameset.
I commend SOMA for selling stock stainless frames for $2,000, but I just don't believe the market is there.
I commend SOMA for selling stock stainless frames for $2,000, but I just don't believe the market is there.
#116
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
It is naive and misguided to include the components in the notion of forever bike. Only the frame can even come close to meeting that expectation. For high mileage cyclists wheels are a consumable. Why not carbon? Consumable is consumable.
#118
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Then we call it a forever frame. A bike is the whole shebang.. (is that how you spell it?)
#119
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
This is true. The only thing I can add is take a look at a Moots in person. The appearance, quality, and finish are in a class by themselves. But that comes with a high price
#120
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
This is true. The only thing I can add is take a look at a Moots in person. The appearance, quality, and finish are in a class by themselves. But that comes with a high price
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 147
Bikes: No.22 Great Divide Disc Custom Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Kent Eriksen Cycles
Firefly Cycles
Holland Cycles
No. 22 Cycles
Independent Fabrication
Seven Cycles (also popular)
Baum Cycles
So no, Moots are not on their own....
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Stainless steel exhibits pretty much the ride characteristics of steel to the extent that the material matters or impacts the ride quality. In general, and from having built several bikes from a variety of frame materials, I think it is pretty much possible to get any ride characteristic you want from any any material and that fit, geometry and design matter more. For example, I have one steel frame that can knock your fillings out because it's so stiff. I also have a stainless steel bike that has just outstanding ride quality (for me) - and both have similar forks and have used the same wheels so the difference is the frame. Material matters a lot less than a whole lot of other stuff. BTW, the same is true for Ti. You can get a bike with sublime ride quality or you can get one that is awful - both made from Ti.
J.
J.
Not saying carbon is bad, at all. Just that it has never felt right to me. Especially on that ridiculously expensive Niner I rode (that my buddy has since sold), it doesn't feel right. That said, if I ever want a full suspension MTB, I am sure I would go carbon, with that much suspension on either side I really doubt I would feel the frame material.
#123
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
Moots is the most commercial, most known of the ultra high quality Ti bikes, but its not alone and any of the following companies could give moots a run for their money, actually I prefer a frame from them than a Moots:
Kent Eriksen Cycles
Firefly Cycles
Holland Cycles
No. 22 Cycles
Independent Fabrication
Seven Cycles (also popular)
Baum Cycles
So no, Moots are not on their own....
Kent Eriksen Cycles
Firefly Cycles
Holland Cycles
No. 22 Cycles
Independent Fabrication
Seven Cycles (also popular)
Baum Cycles
So no, Moots are not on their own....
I personally think a Baum can't be beat but the wait is long. Moots has much higher production and are fantastic looking.
#124
Senior Member
#125
Senior Member
Referring to the bold, I personally disagree based on my experience, but am willing to hear counterthoughts. I do not think it is possible for a carbon frame to have that 'spring' that the Ti and Steel frames I have ridden have. This could be because I haven't ridden the right frame, but I thought that the 'dead' feeling carbon has is pretty much innate to the material. Likewise, not filling rattling stiff steel and Ti has a bit of spring to it, at least when really hammered on. Aluminium... can't say, never ridden a frame made from the material. But, the two Tarmac's and the Giant TCR I have ridden didn't have that wonderful, springy, lively feeling my Lynskey or custom steel roadie have. Even on an MTB, a Niner carbon 29er felt horrible to ride, and the Ti MTB's I have ridden seem to feel alive underneath me.
Not saying carbon is bad, at all. Just that it has never felt right to me. Especially on that ridiculously expensive Niner I rode (that my buddy has since sold), it doesn't feel right. That said, if I ever want a full suspension MTB, I am sure I would go carbon, with that much suspension on either side I really doubt I would feel the frame material.
Not saying carbon is bad, at all. Just that it has never felt right to me. Especially on that ridiculously expensive Niner I rode (that my buddy has since sold), it doesn't feel right. That said, if I ever want a full suspension MTB, I am sure I would go carbon, with that much suspension on either side I really doubt I would feel the frame material.
J.