Trek's New Gravel Bike , 520 Grando
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For pakeboi:
#2
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
The aluminum fork is a head-scratcher.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#3
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
Late to the party, someone has already posted about this. https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/1...20-grando.html
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,857
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3221 Post(s)
Liked 2,043 Times
in
1,169 Posts
Might have saved some weight using aluminum. 31 lbs is a beast. Pass.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Late to the party, someone has already posted about this. https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/1...20-grando.html
Likes For pakeboi:
#6
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
Likes For shelbyfv:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Not my intention . I posted first before the release under touring as the 520 is a touring bike .
Seeing that it was released as a 520 "Gravel" variant , I then posted to that forum .
Seeing that it was released as a 520 "Gravel" variant , I then posted to that forum .
Likes For pakeboi:
#8
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
What are you currently riding and how does it compare to the Trek?
#9
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
BTW, the Soma Saga disc frame I bought late last year takes 55mm tires (2.17") with room to spare, and has a steel fork.
I had a 520 for many years, back from when it was a made-in-the US lugged frame, and it was a great bike. The Soma Saga is definitely a significant improvement, and the frame with fork was $500, and by building it up, I was able to put better components on it that trek now puts on the 520. So there are other options...
I had a 520 for many years, back from when it was a made-in-the US lugged frame, and it was a great bike. The Soma Saga is definitely a significant improvement, and the frame with fork was $500, and by building it up, I was able to put better components on it that trek now puts on the 520. So there are other options...
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
According to Trek on-line Chat Support the Grando is the same frame / fork as the 520 "Classic"
They said 29 x 2.0 without fenders is max tire size , 700 x 38 with fenders .
They said 29 x 2.0 without fenders is max tire size , 700 x 38 with fenders .
#11
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
Tire size is certainly a consideration. What are you running now?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times
in
229 Posts
Oh my gosh. This looks beautiful but sounds rather dreadful when you get to the details. You can get a steel Jamis Renegade with GRX 400 derailleurs AND shifters, carbon fork and 5 pounds lighter for less money. Is Trek trying to rip-off very poorly educated bike shoppers with this? At that price and just basic Chrome Moly, not even Reynolds 520... What is that monstrosity of a front rack and giant Ortleibs doing on a bike with no rear rack? What were they thinking? Was this designed by committee instead of people that ride bikes?
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegades3.html
The older 520s were great bikes, so I'd recommend grabing one on CL or ebay instead for $600.
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegades3.html
The older 520s were great bikes, so I'd recommend grabing one on CL or ebay instead for $600.
Last edited by dwmckee; 08-29-20 at 06:35 PM.
Likes For dwmckee:
#13
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Oh my gosh. This looks beautiful but sounds rather dreadful when you get to the details. You can get a steel Jamis Renegade with GRX 400 derailleurs AND shifters, carbon fork and 5 pounds lighter for less money. Is Trek trying to rip-off very poorly educated bike shoppers with this? At that price and just basic Chrome Moly, not even Reynolds 520... What is that monstrosity of a front rack and giant Ortleibs doing on a bike with no rear rack? What were they thinking? Was this designed by committee instead of people that ride bikes?
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegades3.html
The older 520s were great bikes, so I'd recommend grabing one on CL or ebay instead for $600.
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegades3.html
The older 520s were great bikes, so I'd recommend grabing one on CL or ebay instead for $600.
- The Trek comes with a versatile $90 high/low and top mount front rack. That is something to keep in mind with regard to pricing and weight. The front rack will weigh 2.25 or more pounds. Also, what size Jamis is weighed?...they dont specify.
- The trek's standard gearing is a bit better(wider range) for loaded touring and off-pavement bikepacking. 42/28 with an 11-36 cassette.
- You seem to think Reynolds 520 tubing is better than unbranded 4130 tubing. Why? They are the same thing as 520 is 4130 tubing made in Asia under contract for Reynolds. Both Trek's tubing and Jamis' tubing are butted. Maybe I am missing something here, or maybe you don't know what 520 tubing is.
- Many like cable disc brskes for touring setups due to the simplicity/ease of in field fixes.
- The last 6 times I have did loaded touring, I used a front rack with rear panties mounted to it. Half the time I had a rear rsck with just a compression dry bag strapped down and half the time I have nonrack and use a 7.5 liter wedge bag with the front panniers.
It is a proven setup that is simple and stable, given my preferred trail. It also isn't exactly unheard of, based on short tour setups I've seen online.
I would choose the Jamis because of the carbon fork, actual thru axles instead of the proprietary thru-skew, and hydraulic brakes.
Your post is riddled with questionable commentary though.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#14
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
That is actually a pretty good way to distribute the weight, except maybe for that red bag, unless it has your underwear and socks in it.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The banks of the River Charles
Posts: 2,027
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease, 2020 Seven Evergreen, 2019 Honey Allroads Ti, 2018 Seven Redsky XX, 2017 Trek Boon 7, 2014 Trek 520
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 694 Post(s)
Liked 910 Times
in
487 Posts
As a 520 owner there is something about that picture I just can’t like. My initial thought is it was envissioned by a focus group and speced out by a committee. Most companies show their bikes kitted out with their own brand bags not 3 separate brands including incorrectly folded Ortliebs.
Last edited by Ghazmh; 08-29-20 at 08:22 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 758 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 809 Times
in
471 Posts
Late to the party, someone has already posted about this. https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/1...20-grando.html
It's known as "buzz marketing".
Likes For fishboat:
#17
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
^^^ Yep. I gather from the guys frequenting the Touring section that OP does not ride, much less tour, but has been deluging that forum with posts about bikes and stuff he has no intention of using. When I saw he had double posted about this bike, I was concerned that he might see fresh victims in this sub forum. Hence the questions about his current bike, which he has ignored. Guess that confirms. We'll see....
#18
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Oh my gosh. This looks beautiful but sounds rather dreadful when you get to the details. You can get a steel Jamis Renegade with GRX 400 derailleurs AND shifters, carbon fork and 5 pounds lighter for less money. Is Trek trying to rip-off very poorly educated bike shoppers with this? At that price and just basic Chrome Moly, not even Reynolds 520... What is that monstrosity of a front rack and giant Ortleibs doing on a bike with no rear rack? What were they thinking? Was this designed by committee instead of people that ride bikes?
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegades3.html
The older 520s were great bikes, so I'd recommend grabing one on CL or ebay instead for $600.
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegades3.html
The older 520s were great bikes, so I'd recommend grabing one on CL or ebay instead for $600.
What they were thinking, is panniers up front plus a bumble-bee bag in back is a common configuration....and even if they did include it--you'd be here making references to it costing more compared to a bike that does less off the shop floor.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I fail to see the issue of posting news of this bike in two forums .
I think it’s big news when a modern classic like the Trek 520 releases a new variant .
And the 520 is now a gravel bike and a touring bike , thus the cross posting .
As far as my bikes , I currently have 3 .
I briefly owned a 2018 Trek 520 but it wasn’t exactly what I was looking for .
Below is a photo of my Brompton M6L on tour in Japan .
I think it’s big news when a modern classic like the Trek 520 releases a new variant .
And the 520 is now a gravel bike and a touring bike , thus the cross posting .
As far as my bikes , I currently have 3 .
I briefly owned a 2018 Trek 520 but it wasn’t exactly what I was looking for .
Below is a photo of my Brompton M6L on tour in Japan .
Last edited by pakeboi; 08-30-20 at 06:20 AM.
Likes For pakeboi:
#20
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
Good to hear. Guess they are all wrong over in Touring....
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#22
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
I just saw the marketing picture has resin toe clips on the pedals.
Thats...unique.
Thats...unique.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brazil, Londrina PR
Posts: 273
Bikes: Kona Unit, Kona Kahuna, Kona Dew DL, Scott Big Jon, Trek Checkpoint ALR4, KHS Urban Soul, Haro Team Issue, GT Force Expert Carbon, Bernardi Quadra.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times
in
25 Posts
Not having thru axles, and hydraulic brakes is a deal breaker to me, I love my hydraulic brakes, have had 0 issues with them over the years and at least here in Brazil upgrading from mechanical do hydraulic on a drop bar bike is incredibly expensive. I like Trek, love my checkpoint ALR but this bike is weird to me and misses the mark. If it was basically a Steel checkpoint with a full GRX group i'd be interested as I love the ride feel of my steel bikes and love the Checkpoint.
Likes For MAGAIVER:
#24
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times
in
229 Posts
Commentary is, well, yes commentary.
You can agree with it, question it, disagree with it, have your own opinions, ignore it and that all is welcome as well.
Unbranded chromoly tubing is, well who knows the quality... Reynolds, Columbus, Tange, etc. assures specific fabrication methods, PSI strength, precise metalurgical content wall thickness, tempering, butting quality etc. and assueres the buyer of the quality of the product. I have in fact seen a Trek steel frame bike (generic chromoly as a matter of fact) where the down tube failed with a fatigue crack all the way around about 1/4 of the way up from the bottom bracket at the internal butting. The frame looked like someone cut through it nice and neatly with a hacksaw. From experience it is my opinion that the quality of the tubing does in fact matter and name brand bicycle tubing is likely to be of better quality than generic tubing.
You are of course entitled to the opinion that generic tubing is just as good. Heck, Schwinn uses unbranded chrome moly so it must be pretty high quality stuff right?
You can agree with it, question it, disagree with it, have your own opinions, ignore it and that all is welcome as well.
Unbranded chromoly tubing is, well who knows the quality... Reynolds, Columbus, Tange, etc. assures specific fabrication methods, PSI strength, precise metalurgical content wall thickness, tempering, butting quality etc. and assueres the buyer of the quality of the product. I have in fact seen a Trek steel frame bike (generic chromoly as a matter of fact) where the down tube failed with a fatigue crack all the way around about 1/4 of the way up from the bottom bracket at the internal butting. The frame looked like someone cut through it nice and neatly with a hacksaw. From experience it is my opinion that the quality of the tubing does in fact matter and name brand bicycle tubing is likely to be of better quality than generic tubing.
You are of course entitled to the opinion that generic tubing is just as good. Heck, Schwinn uses unbranded chrome moly so it must be pretty high quality stuff right?
Last edited by dwmckee; 08-30-20 at 06:26 PM.