My 920
#26
Senior Member
But wait! There's more! As an extra added bonus, here is a photo of a tent I claim to own being used on a tour I claim to have taken:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105349603@N05/19293357935/in/album-721576552637
whats the story with that beauti.great tent also.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105349603@N05/19293357935/in/album-721576552637
whats the story with that beauti.great tent also.
Last edited by cb400bill; 03-23-16 at 03:19 PM.
#28
Senior Member
Of course the 920 resembles the disc trucker more than the LHT, which I don't have, but kinda do have since I have a disc front. Anyways the 920 is much, MUCH closer to the disc trucker than for example my 29er XC bike. The only real difference is that the 920 takes slightly larger tires, which in my book isn't all that big a difference. And it's aluminum of course, which kinda should make the bike cheaper, not more expensive. Weird that.
I found the LHT unacceptable because of the handling. An extra $500 isn't much when it gets me a better frame and better components, proper handling . A top end road bicycle is $10K-$15. That puts a $5K Comotion and such mid range. It also puts $2.5 and such as low end. I didn't ask you to help fund me so it's really none of your business. Why do you care if I buy a $40 tire or a $20 tire. I'm glad you like your bicycle. So far I'm very pleased with mine, it's also 6 lbs lighter. And why would I need new wheels if I don't intend to carry 80 lbs of stuff I don't need.
Flame on !!!
Flame on !!!
Differences.
LHT has a steeper head angle = faster steering
LHT has less trail = faster steering
LHT has shorter chainstays = faster steering
LHT has shorter wheelbase = faster steering.
LHT has less BB drop = funnily more suitable for offroad in this regard.
This at least in the size 61, which is what I ride.
I also can't see why the 920 frame is so superior to the LHT. I'd wager the differences are really quite small, except that the LHT has more versatility in carrying stuff such as pump, extra spokes etc.
When considering the components, I was talking about my LHT, which is self built. It's well under 2k and has better components than the 920. Better wheels, better crank, better shifters, better brakes, better chain even. Actually, the rear derailer isn't as good, but a cheaper rear mech works just as well. I've noticed a good front mech is actually more important.
You needing new wheels is just an inkling I have. I doubt you have the experience for long ultralight tours so I suppose you'll do a few short ones and stop touring altogether and go trolling other forums (hopefully)
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,271
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18431 Post(s)
Liked 15,586 Times
in
7,340 Posts
Thanks. He made this just before he started manufacturing his own dropouts with his new mill. The ones he makes now have the Engin logo on them. On the left chain stay there is a mini LOVE statue decal. It's a Philly thing. And that's not paint but rather Cerakote, which is a ceramic coating primarily used to coat firearms. Tougher, lighter and cheaper than paint.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,271
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18431 Post(s)
Liked 15,586 Times
in
7,340 Posts
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,447
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4237 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
But of course:
But wait! There's more! As an extra added bonus, here is a photo of a tent I claim to own being used on a tour I claim to have taken:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105349...7655263744881/
But wait! There's more! As an extra added bonus, here is a photo of a tent I claim to own being used on a tour I claim to have taken:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105349...7655263744881/
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,271
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18431 Post(s)
Liked 15,586 Times
in
7,340 Posts
#33
Senior Member
It's been two days and squeezy hasn't figured out how to post pictures.
I'm beginning to suspect the bike doesn't actually exist.
(just kidding, I knew it the whole time)
I'm beginning to suspect the bike doesn't actually exist.
(just kidding, I knew it the whole time)
#34
Full Member
Looking at pictures on the trek website, is it really a combination of external and internal routed cables on a touring bike? Is it the brake cable (hydo fluid line) or the shifter cable that is internal?
#35
-
Amazingly, yes. The rear brake line is routed inside downtube, shifter cables are external, presumably to engage cable stop/minimize cable friction. If I had an aluminum touring frame, I would definitely cut big holes in the downtube just to hide a single housing. Cause we all know this will save 20g of weight, be super aero plus look cool. Besides, what could possibly go wrong from cutting holes at the ends of an aluminum downtube that will bend and twist thousands of times on every bike ride?
#36
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,077
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Downtube internal shift cables. There's an interesting opening just above the BB about 2 cm x 0.5 where the cables come out and go to the deraileurs. Hopefully my son or his friends will help me post photos.
#37
Senior Member
Except of course they expect riders to use the massive front rack to carry a full tool set including surgical clamp tweezers, flashlight and rare earth magnets (that's what I use to route internal cables)
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times
in
435 Posts
Congratulations! Buying a bike can be an agonizing experience; more so when done by committee.
I hope you enjoy your bike. It will take you to new places, some may even be relatively close to home.
You received a lot of guff about your choice, some of it undeserved, but also some that you initiated. The 920 will handle most situations; and if it does not work out, it is not an irreversible or irrevocable decision.
Have fun, and use that bike. Your goal should be to wear it out!
I hope you enjoy your bike. It will take you to new places, some may even be relatively close to home.
You received a lot of guff about your choice, some of it undeserved, but also some that you initiated. The 920 will handle most situations; and if it does not work out, it is not an irreversible or irrevocable decision.
Have fun, and use that bike. Your goal should be to wear it out!
Last edited by Doug64; 03-17-16 at 10:46 PM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,271
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18431 Post(s)
Liked 15,586 Times
in
7,340 Posts
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,271
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18431 Post(s)
Liked 15,586 Times
in
7,340 Posts
He needs his son (One he has mentioned lives in NY) or his son's friends to help him figure out how to load photos even though the process for doing so has been explained in detail at least once in this very thread. How convenient.
#44
Senior Member
Wow are there a lot of haters on here. Enjoy your bike man. You don't have to prove anything to these clowns. Just ride it and have fun.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
Well, he did bring it upon himself somewhat by basically insulting almost everyone over the last couple of months at one point or the other.
That being said; I'm actually hoping he does have a bike and can get out and ride because I have always thought that practical application tends to temper theoretical ideology. Probably the biggest disconnect in this case has been a whole lot of supposing and not enough doing. At the end of the day I believe most people want others to be successful while touring and if that's what happens with Sq it will be a happy ending for all (or should I say beginning?).
Riding a bicycle is supposed to be fun!
That being said; I'm actually hoping he does have a bike and can get out and ride because I have always thought that practical application tends to temper theoretical ideology. Probably the biggest disconnect in this case has been a whole lot of supposing and not enough doing. At the end of the day I believe most people want others to be successful while touring and if that's what happens with Sq it will be a happy ending for all (or should I say beginning?).
Riding a bicycle is supposed to be fun!
Last edited by Happy Feet; 03-18-16 at 05:34 PM.
#46
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4371 Post(s)
Liked 4,010 Times
in
2,677 Posts
Shoulda had a V8
#47
Senior Member
What has also been slightly irritating in the case of Sq is that he asks questions which he already has his mind set on already, insults everyone who disagrees on the choice or have other suggestions, insults people who have made different choices and promotes his (still unrealized) choices over others and insults people who point out the faults in the bike Sq has already chosen to be the grand tourer of his life.
Honestly, the 920 is just riddled with issues. it IS a good concept, having 29er tires on a 700c touring rig, especially if you have fender clearance is a fantastic idea. More tire clearance doesn't mean you can't use thinner tires for tarmac tours. But the 920 just is not well implemented.
28 spoke wheels are the obvious issue, especially with the heavy duty racks implying you can carry 4 panniers through single track. Again, if the wheels were actually engineered for such stuff (deep vee, triple butted spokes, reinforced spoke bed and extra high spoke tensions) they might be really good for that intended purpose. But the wheels are just lower mid level 29er wheels, which have a lot of know issues such as cracking rims, broken spokes, etc etc (did a bit more research on this)
Gearing is a bit weird as it's a double so might be interesting on bigger hills. I'd go for a triple but whatever. The component set overall is very mid level stuff, which doesn't support the massive price tag.
Internal routing on a tour bike is just not a good idea. It isn't. Fiddling with that stuff at a well stocked bike garage can be frustrating and usually requires at least some sort of fiddly tools (like i've mentioned before, I use strong magnets and surgical tools to deal with internal routings). Doing that stuff on tour in the wild would be an absolute nightmare. And cables do snap occasionally. And on a longer tour it might become relevant to swap the shifter cables just as a part of routine maintenance, especially not that Sq has supposedly put brifters of his bike, which are quite sensitive to good quality good condition cables. It would have been much smarter to pump the frame full of attatchment points so you'd get a full length gear cable housings. Not the easily contaminated thing the 920 now offers. You wouldn't need to make as many housing cuts, no fiddling, just one cut on housing, one cut on cable. That's it. More starts to require a cable cutter. Not to mention that while internal routing holes might not make the frame noticeably weaker, they certainly don't make it stronger.
It just is not a good bike in it's current form. It's overpriced for what it is, and it's not suitable for its marketed intended use. And all this forum did in the beginning was to try to convey that to Sq, who had already decided that the 920 was his dream bike, insulted everyone who criticized the bike and all the people who rode something else, like the LHT made from very low grade steel tubing and which rides very badly (although it's actually more nimble than the 920)
Honestly, the 920 is just riddled with issues. it IS a good concept, having 29er tires on a 700c touring rig, especially if you have fender clearance is a fantastic idea. More tire clearance doesn't mean you can't use thinner tires for tarmac tours. But the 920 just is not well implemented.
28 spoke wheels are the obvious issue, especially with the heavy duty racks implying you can carry 4 panniers through single track. Again, if the wheels were actually engineered for such stuff (deep vee, triple butted spokes, reinforced spoke bed and extra high spoke tensions) they might be really good for that intended purpose. But the wheels are just lower mid level 29er wheels, which have a lot of know issues such as cracking rims, broken spokes, etc etc (did a bit more research on this)
Gearing is a bit weird as it's a double so might be interesting on bigger hills. I'd go for a triple but whatever. The component set overall is very mid level stuff, which doesn't support the massive price tag.
Internal routing on a tour bike is just not a good idea. It isn't. Fiddling with that stuff at a well stocked bike garage can be frustrating and usually requires at least some sort of fiddly tools (like i've mentioned before, I use strong magnets and surgical tools to deal with internal routings). Doing that stuff on tour in the wild would be an absolute nightmare. And cables do snap occasionally. And on a longer tour it might become relevant to swap the shifter cables just as a part of routine maintenance, especially not that Sq has supposedly put brifters of his bike, which are quite sensitive to good quality good condition cables. It would have been much smarter to pump the frame full of attatchment points so you'd get a full length gear cable housings. Not the easily contaminated thing the 920 now offers. You wouldn't need to make as many housing cuts, no fiddling, just one cut on housing, one cut on cable. That's it. More starts to require a cable cutter. Not to mention that while internal routing holes might not make the frame noticeably weaker, they certainly don't make it stronger.
It just is not a good bike in it's current form. It's overpriced for what it is, and it's not suitable for its marketed intended use. And all this forum did in the beginning was to try to convey that to Sq, who had already decided that the 920 was his dream bike, insulted everyone who criticized the bike and all the people who rode something else, like the LHT made from very low grade steel tubing and which rides very badly (although it's actually more nimble than the 920)
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,271
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18431 Post(s)
Liked 15,586 Times
in
7,340 Posts
I don't see what purpose continuing this thread could possibly serve.
#50
Hey Squeeze, it's quite the drama you've created around the posting of pics.
I keep checking the thread to see the pics, but alas...none yet
I keep checking the thread to see the pics, but alas...none yet