52cm too small? ~5'8", but short torso...
11-17-17, 10:38 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
52cm too small? ~5'8", but short torso...
I'm looking at a touring frame-set and they have a general recommendation of 52cm for someone 5'3"-5'7" and 54cm for 5'7"-5'10". I'm ~5'8", but have a short torso. I had a 55cm road bike(90 Miyata 916) that I ended up selling because I was too stretched out even with a very short stem. Should I go for the 52cm, or will that likely be too small? Are there downfalls of riding a smaller frame and having a fairly tall seat-post and steer-tube?
11-18-17, 11:18 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
I'm 5'7" and ride a nominal size 54 and as it happens, the top tube is also 54cm. The bike fits fine but I feel a 53cm top tube would be ideal as my position is not very low. In your case, with a short torso, the 52 cm is likely to be fine but you may need a seatpost with more than average setback.
11-18-17, 06:11 PM
#3
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee-Chicago (Last stop on the North Shore Metra Line)
Posts: 372
Bikes: 1975 Fuji 'The Finest', 1975 Fuji Super Road Racer S10-S,1980 SR 10-Speed, 1980 Fuji Newest, 1984 Araya 14-Speed, 1985 Bridgestone 500, 1986 Fuji 'Sekkei Series', 1995 Gary Fisher Kaitai MTB
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
I'm looking at a touring frame-set and they have a general recommendation of 52cm for someone 5'3"-5'7" and 54cm for 5'7"-5'10". I'm ~5'8", but have a short torso. I had a 55cm road bike(90 Miyata 916) that I ended up selling because I was too stretched out even with a very short stem. Should I go for the 52cm, or will that likely be too small? Are there downfalls of riding a smaller frame and having a fairly tall seat-post and steer-tube?
Bottom line I think a 52cm would be fine with a proper stem extension length.
Don
11-18-17, 07:43 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 720
Bikes: Road, mountain and track bikes and tandems.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times
in
15 Posts
It should be noted that bike frame sizing has dramatically changed in recent years. It used to be a frame size was (and still is) measured from the bottom bracket center. What has changed is most modern road bikes have a virtual measurement for the frame size, not the actual seat tube length. People are now riding with significantly more seat post out of the frame now. If you look at old (lets say 1938) road bike racer footage on you tube, most racers had 0ne, two maybe three inches of seat post out of the frame. Now there is the "compact' frame", with the slanted top tube. Now it is common to have 9-10 inches of seat/ post out of the frame. I am an old school roadie (40 plus years) I am 5'-6" short. I used to ride 52cm frames (seat tube length) Fast forward forty years, and now I will not consider riding a frame with more than a 44 cm seat tube.
11-18-17, 08:22 PM
#5
Senior Member
A lot depends on the bike-- Felt's Z-line didn't even have a 52. They went from 51 to 54 so... you'd get a 54 and with its downward sloping top tube you'd still probably have a lot of exposed seat post.
11-18-17, 11:53 PM
#6
Senior Member
I agree with the other posters that the 52 will be fine.
I'm 5'9" with a very short torso, and all I did was go from the stock 90mm stem to a 100mm stem.
I'm 5'9" with a very short torso, and all I did was go from the stock 90mm stem to a 100mm stem.
11-19-17, 01:04 AM
#7
Senior Member
As you have a short torso, I think the 52 would be fine: in the reach.
Just check the stack height is not too low, for your 'touring' position.
If it looks as if it would be, then I'd keep looking.
Just check the stack height is not too low, for your 'touring' position.
If it looks as if it would be, then I'd keep looking.
11-19-17, 02:03 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 855
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ribble Nero Corsa, Surly Karate Monkey, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Cannondale MT800, Evil Insurgent
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't find it strange at all. I'm 5'5" and I rode 50cm conventional frames. Color of those are even too big or have too much standover. A frame that is too big is a nightmare.
11-19-17, 11:40 AM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
Quite a lot depends on conditioning for optimum position on the bike. In Spring, before miles have accumulated significantly, I find my preferred position a bit more upright so I use a 75mm stem. By mid-summer when I'm in better physical condition, the preferred position is longer and lower so I use a 90 mm stem and drop the bar about 5 mm.
11-21-17, 05:10 PM
#10
Full Member
I'm 5'6" with a 29.5" inseam and ride a 52cm. Standover is about right and reach felt a tad long with a 100mm x 6deg stem. Went with a 90mm x 17deg stem and it feels better now. A bit more upright but a lot more comfortable. I like it...
Also smaller frames can use longer stem and seat post to get a good fit. But with bigger frames you are screwed. Can't cut up the frame to make it fit...
Also smaller frames can use longer stem and seat post to get a good fit. But with bigger frames you are screwed. Can't cut up the frame to make it fit...
11-27-17, 10:47 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,394
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
On the small side, but unless you need to sit upright like a bus driver you should be able to make this work with the right stem, handlebar, and seatpost.
12-05-17, 05:53 PM
#12
Senior Member
I'm 5'7" and ride a 52cm specialized tarmac, 54 would leave me a bit stretched out, it does depend on the brand/geometry though.
12-06-17, 12:01 AM
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I say go for it! I'm 5 11 and I ride a 54. I've tried 56 and 58s and just didn't like them, the reach was too far. 54 has a shorter reach which is perfect for me.
12-14-17, 09:43 AM
#14
Senior Member
Top tube length is just as important as seat tube length;
12-14-17, 12:26 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,052
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4399 Post(s)
Liked 1,556 Times
in
1,021 Posts
Seat tube length is pretty unimportant.
What is missing in the responses is acknowledgment that the OP is buying a touring bike. Touring bikes do not use the fit geometry or road racing bikes, and often have shortish top tubes compared to racing bikes of the same size as they are intended for a more upright position.
If the OP has a model in mind, please post it. Otherwise it is hard to say anything definitive about fit on a touring frame.
What is missing in the responses is acknowledgment that the OP is buying a touring bike. Touring bikes do not use the fit geometry or road racing bikes, and often have shortish top tubes compared to racing bikes of the same size as they are intended for a more upright position.
If the OP has a model in mind, please post it. Otherwise it is hard to say anything definitive about fit on a touring frame.
