SWB -vs- LWB; USS -vs- OSS
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lafayette, Colorado
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: 1998 Co-Motion Co-Pilot, 2015 Calfee Tetra
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
SWB -vs- LWB; USS -vs- OSS
What are the advantages / disadvantages of SWB -vs- LWB? And for SWBs: the advantages / disadvantages of USS -vs- OSS?
A friend with an older Vision SWB converted it from USS to OSS. I have only ridden an SWB with USS. It felt very confortable and natural.
For USS: the slack span of the chain has to go over the bars & cables. Does this create problems?
A friend with an older Vision SWB converted it from USS to OSS. I have only ridden an SWB with USS. It felt very confortable and natural.
For USS: the slack span of the chain has to go over the bars & cables. Does this create problems?
#2
Ride more, eat less
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philla PA, Hoboken NJ, Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,073
Bikes: Too many but never enough.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
452 Posts
Just what I could think of:
SWB pro: Weight less, more compact, easier to transport, take up less room in the garage/house, more nimble in city traffic.
SWB con: Less stable, quick/sensitive steering, danger of the front wheel rub against feet during tight turns.
USS pro: Less likely to have arm fatigue for long distance riding, weight less than OSS (less cable/housing length).
USS con: wider profile, less capable in tight traffic situation.
SWB pro: Weight less, more compact, easier to transport, take up less room in the garage/house, more nimble in city traffic.
SWB con: Less stable, quick/sensitive steering, danger of the front wheel rub against feet during tight turns.
USS pro: Less likely to have arm fatigue for long distance riding, weight less than OSS (less cable/housing length).
USS con: wider profile, less capable in tight traffic situation.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lafayette, Colorado
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: 1998 Co-Motion Co-Pilot, 2015 Calfee Tetra
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Thanks -
Also, I notice that I feel more vulnerable (wider) along the shoulder of the road with the USS than I do on a DF bike. Is this something you get used to?
Also, I notice that I feel more vulnerable (wider) along the shoulder of the road with the USS than I do on a DF bike. Is this something you get used to?
#4
Ride more, eat less
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philla PA, Hoboken NJ, Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,073
Bikes: Too many but never enough.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
452 Posts
That's rather personal.. I much rather be narrower on a OSS and able to sneak between tightly parked cars at a traffic light. If I hit anything on my recumbent, it will be hit by my chainrings, preferably... not with my knuckles.
#5
Senior Member
SWB pro: the front wheel is protected by the boom so that you cannot touch it to someone's rear wheel in a crowded situation. Hitting your front wheel can put you down on the pavement right now; in fact it's probably the most common reason for pacelines going down. I've touched my foot to someone's rear wheel twice this year, with no bad results (both their fault.)