Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Zipp Firecrest Wheelset

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Zipp Firecrest Wheelset

Old 05-07-12, 05:43 PM
  #1  
rangerdavid
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Zipp Firecrest Wheelset

So I'm looking at possibly getting a set of tubular wheels, and of course I've looked at Zipp. My lbs guy said the firecrest are far beyond the others, except for the warranty, in which case the Bontragers have a better warranty. He also said their Aeolus Wheelset is awesome!!

My question is, the "old" 404 wheelset is on sale at around $1500. The new firecrest wheels are about $2300 for the 303's and a bit more for the 404's (tubulars).

Question is, what do you guys think about the firecrest? is it just marketing? has anyone ridden them? What about the Bontrager Aeolus? I didn't even know about them.

Thoughts? Feedback? Opinions?

rangerdavid is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 05:51 PM
  #2  
gadabout007
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have both in clincher. 2011 404 clincher non-fc & aeolus 5.0ACC

the bontrager are not even in the same realm as the zipps. I'd put them in the same class as the cosmic carbone sl which I also have a pair of.
gadabout007 is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 05:53 PM
  #3  
JoelS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Enve......
__________________
-------

Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
JoelS is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 06:33 PM
  #4  
alexaschwanden
Bike rider
 
alexaschwanden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: san jose
Posts: 3,167

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh Clubman

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Ultegra 6700 wheels are more durable imho.
alexaschwanden is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 06:45 PM
  #5  
rangerdavid
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gadabout007
I have both in clincher. 2011 404 clincher non-fc & aeolus 5.0ACC

the bontrager are not even in the same realm as the zipps. I'd put them in the same class as the cosmic carbone sl which I also have a pair of.


Ok, thanks. I have those Cosmic Carbone's now, and I'd like the upgrade to be sufficient to tell the difference.
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 06:46 PM
  #6  
Triguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What are you looking for? Do you want no compromise speed?

The FC is really a faster wheel, especially for 23mm tires.
Triguy is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 06:49 PM
  #7  
rangerdavid
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yeah, speed, around the 1200 gr. I've heard that the FC is significantly better, and yes, in 23. not a high a profile as the cosmic carbones.
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 06:59 PM
  #8  
zigmeister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Picked up my new 303 FC tubies with new vittoria corsa evo cx 320 tpi tires mounted for $1700 off the bay awhile back.
zigmeister is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 07:04 PM
  #9  
rangerdavid
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zigmeister
Picked up my new 303 FC tubies with new vittoria corsa evo cx 320 tpi tires mounted for $1700 off the bay awhile back.
Holy cow dude!! that's a steal!!
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 07:13 PM
  #10  
pdedes
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
pdedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I would bet that if you rode the firecrest and some other carbon wheelset of similar rim depth, you couldn't get a useful measureable difference. Yes i have ridden them. I bought boyds.
pdedes is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 07:19 PM
  #11  
tjspahr
My leg made the cover!
 
tjspahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 459

Bikes: Trek, Arbourne, BMC, Orbea

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdedes
I would bet that if you rode the firecrest and some other carbon wheelset of similar rim depth, you couldn't get a useful measureable difference. Yes i have ridden them. I bought boyds.
Hard to say. I own several sets of Zipps, including the "old" torroidal 404s, and the Firecrest 808s. I also have a front torroidal 808. I can tell a huge difference between the FC and the regular Zipps in cross winds...like night and day difference. The FC 808's are better in crosswinds than the old 404 and 808. If you can afford to have wheels that are pretty much strictly race day/event wheels, the FC Zipps are hard to beat.
__________________
"If it first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no use being a damn fool about it." - W.C. Fields
tjspahr is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 08:26 PM
  #12  
Rob13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 772

Bikes: 2013 Specialized S Works SL4 Keyline Red

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Get the Mavic Cosmic Carbone Ultimate...1185 Grams
Rob13 is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 08:45 PM
  #13  
Triguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdedes
I would bet that if you rode the firecrest and some other carbon wheelset of similar rim depth, you couldn't get a useful measureable difference. Yes i have ridden them. I bought boyds.
Measurable is different than noticeable. In this case, the speed difference is quite measurable even if not noticeable.
Triguy is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 05:13 AM
  #14  
pdedes
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
pdedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Triguy
Measurable is different than noticeable. In this case, the speed difference is quite measurable even if not noticeable.
A handful of seconds in a 40k tt might be measureable, or lost in the noise. If you're at the pointy end of races, the fc might help, if not, they do look nice. I got to ride the former cervelo test team's power tap equipped tubular 303 fc.
pdedes is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 05:20 AM
  #15  
ColorChange
3 seconds
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, NW burbs
Posts: 2,935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The speed difference is there (as proven by wind tunnel testing) but you can't feel it. The difference you can feel with firecrest is in the crosswinds. The FC are noticeably better in crosswinds like tjspahr said. My 808 fc's are easier to control than the old 404's. The 303 fc's are easy to handle in major crosswinds. If you live in a windy area, I highly recommend the FC profile but other manufacturers are using something similar, HED for one, not sure who else.
ColorChange is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 05:45 AM
  #16  
veganeric
Senior Member
 
veganeric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 335

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ Yep. The Hed Stinger 4 (40mm), 5 (50mm), or 6 (60mm) are worth looking at if you're in the 303 (45mm) or 404 (58mm) market, as are the Enve 3.4 and 6.7. You should also consider the 2010-2011 303s. At that depth your not going to notice the stability difference much, and the speed difference is negledgable. Since the Firecrests came out they've come down in price a bunch. I got a used set of Zipp built 2010s with a Powertap SL+ for 1300.
veganeric is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 06:15 AM
  #17  
ilovecycling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If they really are THAT good in crosswinds, then I'd be willing to give them a try one day. I always assumed that even the difference in crosswind stability wouldn't be noticeable and it was just part of their marketing story. If they are truly noticeable to where they make the difference between your bike feeling like a sail and staying in a straight line then they might be worth the cost in the end. I don't know about you guys but that's the one thing I hate with high-profile carbon rims. It would be nice to have my cake and eat it too.
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 06:17 AM
  #18  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd like to think I'm faster...but if that's not the case I definitely look cooler.


In all seriousness, everything I've read (and I did my research) the FC is hands down the better choice. Zipp literally dropped their design on the 2012 wheels to produce the FC because the results were undeniably better. I have the clinchers which come with a weight penalty but for my long rides, they are perfect. I'll be getting a pair of tubulars when I decide to race
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 06:20 AM
  #19  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ilovecycling
If they really are THAT good in crosswinds, then I'd be willing to give them a try one day. I always assumed that even the difference in crosswind stability wouldn't be noticeable and it was just part of their marketing story. If they are truly noticeable to where they make the difference between your bike feeling like a sail and staying in a straight line then they might be worth the cost in the end. I don't know about you guys but that's the one thing I hate with high-profile carbon rims. It would be nice to have my cake and eat it too.
The aero advantage of the 808 rear is so great that they dropped the full disc because of the crosswind advantage and stability without the loss of aero benefits.
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 06:31 AM
  #20  
veganeric
Senior Member
 
veganeric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 335

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think you mean they dropped the 1080. They still make the 900, Super 9, and Sub 9 discs.
veganeric is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 06:41 AM
  #21  
Adrianinkc
Senior Member
 
Adrianinkc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,551
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Shallower is faster
Adrianinkc is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 07:13 AM
  #22  
v70cat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,685

Bikes: S5 VWD & SL-7 S works Red.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unless you are racing why would you want any tubular tire/wheel?
v70cat is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 07:16 AM
  #23  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by veganeric
I think you mean they dropped the 1080. They still make the 900, Super 9, and Sub 9 discs.
correct...sorry
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 07:20 AM
  #24  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by v70cat
Unless you are racing why would you want any tubular tire/wheel?
was that roubaix at the end and wasn't it won on a 303fc?
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 08:06 AM
  #25  
zigmeister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by pdedes
I would bet that if you rode the firecrest and some other carbon wheelset of similar rim depth, you couldn't get a useful measureable difference. Yes i have ridden them. I bought boyds.
Sold my Boyds...yes, the difference is night/day between FC and regular deep V wheels. Regular deep V wheels are like weather vanes in a xwind. Zipps are noticeably more stable and stiffer. I also have a cheap pair of 50mm clinchers, Chosen hubs, Bladed spokes, they are smooth and roll wheel, but much more flexy, heavier, and you get blown all over the road when windy. I figure it a 6'4" dude can win Roubaix on a pair of 303s, they must be good enough for a pathetic Cat 4 like myself.
zigmeister is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.