Make bikes on roof rack more aero?
#1
It'll be fine...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 92
Bikes: Scott CR1, Fuji Aloho 2, Giant Terrago Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Make bikes on roof rack more aero?
Hi folks,
I hope this is the right sub-forum to post in.
I'm about to drive 800 miles with three bikes on the roof of my Mazda 5. I've noticed quite a large drop in fuel consumption when the bikes are up there and was wondering how to reduce the air resistance. It's a Thule 591 mount for all three, so both wheels need to be on.
My thoughts:
1) Turn handle bars 90 degrees (all mountain bikes)
2) Remove pedals - zip tie a crank to chain stay to stop the bikes free-wheeling
3) Remove saddle
My questions then are 1) Are any of these bad ideas in themselves. 2) Will this make much difference?
It'll be interesting to see just how bad the MPG gets though when I'm at 70mph on the motorway....
John
I hope this is the right sub-forum to post in.
I'm about to drive 800 miles with three bikes on the roof of my Mazda 5. I've noticed quite a large drop in fuel consumption when the bikes are up there and was wondering how to reduce the air resistance. It's a Thule 591 mount for all three, so both wheels need to be on.
My thoughts:
1) Turn handle bars 90 degrees (all mountain bikes)
2) Remove pedals - zip tie a crank to chain stay to stop the bikes free-wheeling
3) Remove saddle
My questions then are 1) Are any of these bad ideas in themselves. 2) Will this make much difference?
It'll be interesting to see just how bad the MPG gets though when I'm at 70mph on the motorway....
John
__________________
Recess (aka John)
www.recess.co.uk
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day."
Frank Sinatra
Recess (aka John)
www.recess.co.uk
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day."
Frank Sinatra
Likes For Archwhorides:
Likes For Recess:
#4
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Hi folks,
I hope this is the right sub-forum to post in.
I'm about to drive 800 miles with three bikes on the roof of my Mazda 5. I've noticed quite a large drop in fuel consumption when the bikes are up there and was wondering how to reduce the air resistance. It's a Thule 591 mount for all three, so both wheels need to be on.
My thoughts:
1) Turn handle bars 90 degrees (all mountain bikes)
2) Remove pedals - zip tie a crank to chain stay to stop the bikes free-wheeling
3) Remove saddle
My questions then are 1) Are any of these bad ideas in themselves. 2) Will this make much difference?
It'll be interesting to see just how bad the MPG gets though when I'm at 70mph on the motorway....
John
I hope this is the right sub-forum to post in.
I'm about to drive 800 miles with three bikes on the roof of my Mazda 5. I've noticed quite a large drop in fuel consumption when the bikes are up there and was wondering how to reduce the air resistance. It's a Thule 591 mount for all three, so both wheels need to be on.
My thoughts:
1) Turn handle bars 90 degrees (all mountain bikes)
2) Remove pedals - zip tie a crank to chain stay to stop the bikes free-wheeling
3) Remove saddle
My questions then are 1) Are any of these bad ideas in themselves. 2) Will this make much difference?
It'll be interesting to see just how bad the MPG gets though when I'm at 70mph on the motorway....
John
#5
Banned
Lay them down sideways (less frontal area) .. Slow down , ( less air resistance , proportional to speed ) ..
#7
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Even the roof-rack itself gives you a mileage hit.
On my Rav4 hybrid, having a single mountain bike on the top of the car dropped the mileage from 32mpg to about 21 mpg, on a drive from the West Coast to Moab. I put the bike inside the car for the trip back, so I have a very good control.
Interestingly, on my old 2004 Sienna, it would get about 20 ± 2 mpg on the highway, whether or not we had bikes on top of the car.
On my Rav4 hybrid, having a single mountain bike on the top of the car dropped the mileage from 32mpg to about 21 mpg, on a drive from the West Coast to Moab. I put the bike inside the car for the trip back, so I have a very good control.
Interestingly, on my old 2004 Sienna, it would get about 20 ± 2 mpg on the highway, whether or not we had bikes on top of the car.
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 06-23-19 at 10:57 AM. Reason: spelling
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#8
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
This also is true. When driving around (slowly) in and around Moab, the mpg went up to about 34, even with a bike on the top. But it isn't terribly practical on an interstate highway.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#9
Non omnino gravis
Even the roof-rack itself gives you a milage hit.
On my Rav4 hybrid, having a single mountain bike on the top of the car dropped the milage from 32mpg to about 21 mpg, on a drive from the West Coast to Moab. I put the bike inside the car for the trip back, so I have a very good control.
Interestingly, on my old 2004 Sienna, it would get about 20 ± 2 mpg on the highway, whether or not we had bikes on top of the car.
On my Rav4 hybrid, having a single mountain bike on the top of the car dropped the milage from 32mpg to about 21 mpg, on a drive from the West Coast to Moab. I put the bike inside the car for the trip back, so I have a very good control.
Interestingly, on my old 2004 Sienna, it would get about 20 ± 2 mpg on the highway, whether or not we had bikes on top of the car.
Even with the astronomical price of California gas, this worked out to about an extra $13 to take the bikes. 1.3¢ cents a mile.
#10
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
Power spent on drag and therefore fuel consumption scales with speed cubed
#11
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
#12
It'll be fine...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 92
Bikes: Scott CR1, Fuji Aloho 2, Giant Terrago Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Wow! Thanks for all the input here. I’ll just leave them as they are then, and suck up the cost. Slowing down is always a good idea...
Thanks
John
Thanks
John
#13
Senior Member
It seems obvious but maybe you should get an aero bike...
#14
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,001
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4334 Post(s)
Liked 2,977 Times
in
1,614 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 927
Bikes: Death machines all
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
63 Posts
Even the roof-rack itself gives you a mileage hit.
On my Rav4 hybrid, having a single mountain bike on the top of the car dropped the mileage from 32mpg to about 21 mpg, on a drive from the West Coast to Moab. I put the bike inside the car for the trip back, so I have a very good control.
Interestingly, on my old 2004 Sienna, it would get about 20 ± 2 mpg on the highway, whether or not we had bikes on top of the car.
On my Rav4 hybrid, having a single mountain bike on the top of the car dropped the mileage from 32mpg to about 21 mpg, on a drive from the West Coast to Moab. I put the bike inside the car for the trip back, so I have a very good control.
Interestingly, on my old 2004 Sienna, it would get about 20 ± 2 mpg on the highway, whether or not we had bikes on top of the car.
In terms of cost, let's say for the sake of discussion that the bare Mazda gets 30 mpg over 800 miles and burns about 27 gallons of fuel at $3/g = $80. A 10 mpg hit with bikes on top would result in 40 gallons being consumed for $120, a premium of $40 for the extra drag.
If modifying the bikes reduced the hit to 8 mpg, the expenditure would be 36 gallons and $109 (a savings of $11 compared to worst case). So perhaps the small mods could save a few bucks, but is it worth the time?
Also, let's say the rear hitch rack setup cost $400 and resulted in zero extra drag (somewhat unlikely) after cleaning up the roof. With $3/gallon fuel cost, it would still take 10 trips @ 800 miles/trip with the bikes on board for the fuel savings to pay off the more efficient setup.
__________________
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Oscar Wilde
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Oscar Wilde
Likes For Archwhorides:
#16
It'll be fine...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 92
Bikes: Scott CR1, Fuji Aloho 2, Giant Terrago Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When I had a VW TDI, the rooftop Thule box was a 5 mpg hit on mileage (40mpg down to 35 mpg), agreed that bikes on the roof would be worse.
In terms of cost, let's say for the sake of discussion that the bare Mazda gets 30 mpg over 800 miles and burns about 27 gallons of fuel at $3/g = $80. A 10 mpg hit with bikes on top would result in 40 gallons being consumed for $120, a premium of $40 for the extra drag.
If modifying the bikes reduced the hit to 8 mpg, the expenditure would be 36 gallons and $109 (a savings of $11 compared to worst case). So perhaps the small mods could save a few bucks, but is it worth the time?
Also, let's say the rear hitch rack setup cost $400 and resulted in zero extra drag (somewhat unlikely) after cleaning up the roof. With $3/gallon fuel cost, it would still take 10 trips @ 800 miles/trip with the bikes on board for the fuel savings to pay off the more efficient setup.
In terms of cost, let's say for the sake of discussion that the bare Mazda gets 30 mpg over 800 miles and burns about 27 gallons of fuel at $3/g = $80. A 10 mpg hit with bikes on top would result in 40 gallons being consumed for $120, a premium of $40 for the extra drag.
If modifying the bikes reduced the hit to 8 mpg, the expenditure would be 36 gallons and $109 (a savings of $11 compared to worst case). So perhaps the small mods could save a few bucks, but is it worth the time?
Also, let's say the rear hitch rack setup cost $400 and resulted in zero extra drag (somewhat unlikely) after cleaning up the roof. With $3/gallon fuel cost, it would still take 10 trips @ 800 miles/trip with the bikes on board for the fuel savings to pay off the more efficient setup.
#17
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 927
Bikes: Death machines all
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
63 Posts
With petrol over twice the price in Scotland, the hitch rack installation is paid for in theoretically half the trips..... ;-)
__________________
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Oscar Wilde
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Oscar Wilde
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
113 Posts
I was gonna say the same thing
You know he is in Scotland, right? We Americans have be spoiled by cheap gas/petrol for years now...
You know he is in Scotland, right? We Americans have be spoiled by cheap gas/petrol for years now...
#21
Non omnino gravis
#22
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,243
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,416 Times
in
2,525 Posts
I wonder if you were to wrap the front of each bike with a tarp to create fairings of sorts. They'd have to be on there tight enough to not flap.
#24
Non omnino gravis
#25
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,243
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,416 Times
in
2,525 Posts
I would wrap the bars/stem/head tube in saran wrap.