Helix Update?
#652
Senior Member
Maybe he's counting on people becoming too old to ride and they'll forget they ordered a Helix.
#653
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
That's actually more than jest. Some backers' personal situation changed drastically that the bike wasn't needed any more. Who knows perhaps some became gravely ill or died. A fair few have moved to different addresses. In 1000 people you get all sorts of issues over 2 years. And for sure everybody got older, perhaps some to the point where the bike is totally redundant.
#654
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 783 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 233 Times
in
198 Posts
Like for all Kickstarter projects, Backers gave money to help to create the Helix, they will, maybe, eventually, receive a bike as reward for this help.
Look what happened with the Knog Oil bell project where the bell was first available in shops and backers eventually received a bell only after the actual bell commercialization.
#655
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It was a regular 2 week update
A brief chronology of Helix bicycle test bike schedule estimates…
February 17, 2017
Timeline shows testing is about to start and will be complete by April 1, 2017
March 31, 2017
Timeline shows testing starting in 3rd week in April, finishing in mid-June
May 31, 2017 Helix Update
“Production test bike builds are underway”
July 22, 2017
“…expect to have production level welding completed this week”
August 5, 2017
“I am expecting to send out the test bike in 2-3 weeks”
October 1, 2017
“In parallel, we are completing the test bike and we are confident that it will be sent out in the next 2-3 weeks.“
October 15, 2017
“The test bike is almost ready”
October 29, 2017
“Unfortunately we need a little more time”
November 11, 2017
“Another week has gone by without a completed test bike”. Actually it was two weeks…
November 24, 2017
“…I have full confidence that we will be able to show you the test bike in the next update”
Winter is about to begin here in the northern hemisphere. Perhaps after hell freezes over a test bike might be completed in just 2-3 more weeks.
A brief chronology of Helix bicycle test bike schedule estimates…
February 17, 2017
Timeline shows testing is about to start and will be complete by April 1, 2017
March 31, 2017
Timeline shows testing starting in 3rd week in April, finishing in mid-June
May 31, 2017 Helix Update
“Production test bike builds are underway”
July 22, 2017
“…expect to have production level welding completed this week”
August 5, 2017
“I am expecting to send out the test bike in 2-3 weeks”
October 1, 2017
“In parallel, we are completing the test bike and we are confident that it will be sent out in the next 2-3 weeks.“
October 15, 2017
“The test bike is almost ready”
October 29, 2017
“Unfortunately we need a little more time”
November 11, 2017
“Another week has gone by without a completed test bike”. Actually it was two weeks…
November 24, 2017
“…I have full confidence that we will be able to show you the test bike in the next update”
Winter is about to begin here in the northern hemisphere. Perhaps after hell freezes over a test bike might be completed in just 2-3 more weeks.
#656
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#657
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,460
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
As a non-backer, this is like a train wreck you just can't glance away from! I'm going to be sad when the bike finally gets delivered (assuming it does) because this is priceless drama.
#658
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Olney Illinois USA
Posts: 1,021
Bikes: to many
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
True to a point .... but in all reality I will be happy for all the folks who put money down and finally get their bike they have paid for so long ago. I feel bad for them as this pipedream is simply not possible to produce with the components promised, and sell and have some kind of aftermarket service, freight, custom clearing, etc etc etc ...
thor
#659
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Back in May I posted a link to this thread on Facebook with the following comment:
This is a very entertaining story, on par with "Harry Potter" and "The Lord of the Rings." It is about selling and (possibly) delivering a wonderful new bicycle, loaded with comedy and suspense. Right now we are at the cliff hanger...
I foolishly thought the cliff hanger was 7 months ago.
This is a very entertaining story, on par with "Harry Potter" and "The Lord of the Rings." It is about selling and (possibly) delivering a wonderful new bicycle, loaded with comedy and suspense. Right now we are at the cliff hanger...
I foolishly thought the cliff hanger was 7 months ago.
#660
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,460
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
True to a point .... but in all reality I will be happy for all the folks who put money down and finally get their bike they have paid for so long ago. I feel bad for them as this pipedream is simply not possible to produce with the components promised, and sell and have some kind of aftermarket service, freight, custom clearing, etc etc etc ...
thor
thor
#661
Senior Member
I'll miss being told how boring I am. I got used to it!
#662
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: Many Downtube Folders :)
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
17 Posts
I funded this project. However I would like to get out.
Last year I communicated with Peter, and offered help after I quit my teaching gig in Hawai'i. I understand he thought I was looking for a job...I wasn't.
At this point I don't think he should have taken money in this manner. I was hoping to help fund a new concept. I have no interest in continuing on this path.
Thanks
Yan
Last year I communicated with Peter, and offered help after I quit my teaching gig in Hawai'i. I understand he thought I was looking for a job...I wasn't.
At this point I don't think he should have taken money in this manner. I was hoping to help fund a new concept. I have no interest in continuing on this path.
Thanks
Yan
__________________
Designer of Downtube Folding Bike
Ph.D. Temple University ( Math )
Biked across the USA twice
Semi-active chess player ( two time Bahamas National Champion )
Sivananda ( Bahamas ) Trained Yoga instructor ( 2013 ) and ThetaHealer since 2013
Bicycle delivery worker for Jimmy John's. Delivering is the best workout I have ever had.
Designer of Downtube Folding Bike
Ph.D. Temple University ( Math )
Biked across the USA twice
Semi-active chess player ( two time Bahamas National Champion )
Sivananda ( Bahamas ) Trained Yoga instructor ( 2013 ) and ThetaHealer since 2013
Bicycle delivery worker for Jimmy John's. Delivering is the best workout I have ever had.
Last edited by downtube; 12-03-17 at 08:13 PM.
#663
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Tesla Model 3 and Helix sound quite similar in many respects.
* plays cards close to chest
* stuck in production hell
* hyped for 2 years
* buyers haven't seen the vehicle yet
* production line not working
* burning cash
Others i have missed?
Meant to be humorous not negative...
* plays cards close to chest
* stuck in production hell
* hyped for 2 years
* buyers haven't seen the vehicle yet
* production line not working
* burning cash
Others i have missed?
Meant to be humorous not negative...
#664
Widely Despised
Differences between Tesla & Helix....
- Helix doesn't get massive US Gov subsidies.
- Unlike Elon Musk, Peter doesn't become Homer Simpson's friend.
- Chinese hackers can't take over the Helix's brakes & other features.
- Peter doesn't plan a tractor trailer version of the Helix.
- Helix doesn't have a space program, & prattle on about Mars.
- Helix doesn't get massive US Gov subsidies.
- Unlike Elon Musk, Peter doesn't become Homer Simpson's friend.
- Chinese hackers can't take over the Helix's brakes & other features.
- Peter doesn't plan a tractor trailer version of the Helix.
- Helix doesn't have a space program, & prattle on about Mars.
Last edited by Revoltingest; 12-03-17 at 07:47 PM.
#666
Senior Member
#668
Senior Member
Is it two weeks yet?
#669
Senior Member
#670
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 783 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 233 Times
in
198 Posts
I think that it is not a prototype as a prototype has the characteristics of the final product.
I would call the bike shown in the Kickstarter campaign video a concept demonstration, not even a proof of concept because the bike needed a complete redesign.
The proof od concept step (that demonstrate that the concept works and prototype step (product very close to the final product but for instance hand built) were skipped.
Peter is in fact trying to make in one step both a proof of concept bike and a pre-production bike (= what validates the manufacturing process).
Now the chance for Peter to be first time right in any aspects, i.e. that there will be no need for any modification/improvement nor for the design of the bike, nor for the manufacturing process, so that this bike will really be a pre-production bike seems to me very low
I would call the bike shown in the Kickstarter campaign video a concept demonstration, not even a proof of concept because the bike needed a complete redesign.
The proof od concept step (that demonstrate that the concept works and prototype step (product very close to the final product but for instance hand built) were skipped.
Peter is in fact trying to make in one step both a proof of concept bike and a pre-production bike (= what validates the manufacturing process).
Now the chance for Peter to be first time right in any aspects, i.e. that there will be no need for any modification/improvement nor for the design of the bike, nor for the manufacturing process, so that this bike will really be a pre-production bike seems to me very low
#672
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 783 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 233 Times
in
198 Posts
I wrote this also to show clearly in what stage of the development process the project is and what steps have been skipped.
Skipping steps is dangerous because as a rule of thumb, the later a problem is discovered in the development process, the heavier the consequences in term of delay and cost.
Skipping steps is dangerous because as a rule of thumb, the later a problem is discovered in the development process, the heavier the consequences in term of delay and cost.
#673
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Are you privy to the backers portal? From what you say I conclude not.
There is a final version bike built, just not by the robot welder. Except for that, it is exactly equal to the production bikes.
The proof of concept is what was shown in the KS video and pic. Go to the Helix.ca site and see for yourself that the pics there of the redesigned, refined version show subtle differences to the KS version.
The last 6 months Helix have struggled to get the welder going and the last news I had was that the welder is finally on line.
That's all based on what I know, not speculation. So if you have that backers access as well I cannot understand how you can justify your statement.
There is a final version bike built, just not by the robot welder. Except for that, it is exactly equal to the production bikes.
The proof of concept is what was shown in the KS video and pic. Go to the Helix.ca site and see for yourself that the pics there of the redesigned, refined version show subtle differences to the KS version.
The last 6 months Helix have struggled to get the welder going and the last news I had was that the welder is finally on line.
That's all based on what I know, not speculation. So if you have that backers access as well I cannot understand how you can justify your statement.
#674
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 783 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 233 Times
in
198 Posts
I do not agree with you what was shown on KS is not a proof of concept because it needed to be heavily modified, it was just a concept demo.
For the next one (and also the KS one), showing pictures is not a proof of concept, the proof of concept requires testing what as far as I know didn't happen yet ?
BTW, the bike to come is called "test bike" which seems also confirm that testing wasn't done yet unless "test bike" means testing the manufacturing process ?
For the next one (and also the KS one), showing pictures is not a proof of concept, the proof of concept requires testing what as far as I know didn't happen yet ?
BTW, the bike to come is called "test bike" which seems also confirm that testing wasn't done yet unless "test bike" means testing the manufacturing process ?
#675
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I do not agree with you what was shown on KS is not a proof of concept because it needed to be heavily modified, it was just a concept demo.
For the next one (and also the KS one), showing pictures is not a proof of concept, the proof of concept requires testing what as far as I know didn't happen yet ?
BTW, the bike to come is called "test bike" which seems also confirm that testing wasn't done yet unless "test bike" means testing the manufacturing process ?
For the next one (and also the KS one), showing pictures is not a proof of concept, the proof of concept requires testing what as far as I know didn't happen yet ?
BTW, the bike to come is called "test bike" which seems also confirm that testing wasn't done yet unless "test bike" means testing the manufacturing process ?
The team-up with the manufacturer did not last as there were differences in conviction as to what is the best way to manufacture - the company wanted castings and glue to be used, but while pursuing this angle, it became clear that the casting process was introducing unwanted constraints and dependencies. That was abandoned and the collaboration dissolved.
Peter went back to welding but found that tube cutting, CNC part manufacturing and welding by subcontractors was far more expensive than he thought it should cost. He then embarked on the long and painful process of procuring everything for a factory from scratch. You might appreciate that this is a HUGE undertaking and he thoroughly underestimated that project.
That seems to be all behind him now. The test bike isn't what you seem to think it is; it isn't a proof of concept, rather it is a bike built using normal production processes, submitted to a 3rd party testing company for testing against various ISO standards for compliance. This is a legally required step by some countries at least as I understand it; most countries only have something like a recommendation or require a self-certification.
A final version of the bike has existed for a long time now, I think perhaps a year. That was obviously welded by a subcontractor so is not suitable for testing. But it is essentially identical to the production bike.
The past 18 months or so has been spent on setting up the factory and if not already finished, is d*mned close.
So far from skipping steps, the opposite is true. The proof of concept which is a fully functional bike except a rear brake was refined, and new patents taken out. Manufacturing processes were explored. The final version which is what I would thoroughly stamp as a pre-production sample, exists. The last 18 months was spent with the single goal in mind of setting up the factory to produce that very same sample with in-house processes to control cost but importantly quality as well.
The only downside of all this history is the huge amount of time it is taking to do all these due diligence steps and Peter's drastic underestimate of doing it.