Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Trek Emonda SL 6 - 2016 - Sizing chart

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Trek Emonda SL 6 - 2016 - Sizing chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-16, 08:07 AM
  #1  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek Emonda SL 6 - 2016 - Sizing chart

Hi guys,

My Measurements are:
Total Body Height: 182 cm (6 feet)
Inseam: 85 cm
Trunk: 65.5 cm
Forearm: 35 cm
Arm: 66 cm
Thigh: 60 cm
Lower Leg: 54 cm
Sternal Notch: 146 cm

According to my height I should buy size 56.
But I have test driven Trek Emonda 58 and the bike felt perfect.
BUT... maybe I should get size 56 and just +1cm longer stem.
Because size 58 is 2 cm heigher.

Sorry if I am over-analyzing, but I can't seem to find Trek Emonda fitting charts.

Just and only this one, that says I should get 58:

Last edited by Rulzmaker87; 09-28-16 at 06:43 AM.
Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 09-20-16, 01:31 PM
  #2  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote from a guy who sells Emonda SLR H1 (2016):
I am 180 and I used 58, size 56 probably can be to small.
Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 09-30-16, 11:44 AM
  #3  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Another Trek Emonda 2016 sizing table I found:

Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 09-30-16, 12:09 PM
  #4  
nycphotography
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
I'm 6', 32 inseam. You probably have a slightly shorter torso, slightly longer legs, so raise the seat, next smaller frame size (by top tube).

For me, 58's (Trek 5200, Fuji Team Pro) were a bit stretched out, and the head tube a bit tall.

I'm on a 56 (Tarmac SWorks SL2 Team, Tarmac SWorks SL4) which fits well. 172.5 cranks.

I've flirted with 54 Tarmac (lower head tube, more drop, 1cm longer stem, 1cm farther back on the seat), and while they feel great and racy, I wasn't confident about how I'd feel about it on mile 75 to 100. I think the 56 is really good overall.

I wouldn't go larger, and the only reason I'd go smaller is for more drop on a racier fit, which would only really make sense if I went training crazy and was racing cat 1/2/3.

You are probably a good 56, with some stem and saddle tweaking to get it perfect. You may want to consider 175 cranks with your longer legs, but probably don't need to.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 10-02-16, 07:25 PM
  #5  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you nycphotography for reply.
I agree.
I also had Specialized Tarmac (2013) at size 56, that fit me just fine.
Btw. I have a feeling that when I've set the bar at the lowest position I would be more comfy having longer stem.
Cannondale at size 56 also fit me fine.

Anyway, I already ordered Emonda SLR 6 (H2 geometry) size 58 (was for better price) and am waiting for it to arrive, will post my impressions later.

It seems like Trek Emonda has different sizing than other Trek models (for example Madone at size 58 was much bigger and I'd be better at size 56).

Hopefully I'll be happy with that size.

Last edited by Rulzmaker87; 10-02-16 at 07:30 PM.
Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 11-17-16, 03:53 PM
  #6  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Okay, so I bought SLR 2016 (online), and the bike feels little too big crap...

It has Ride Tuned seat post, which at the lowest position is still high for me, I can touch the pedals, but I can't really ride like that. I know, I can cut it, but don't know if this itself is a sign the size is too big.

I will set up the bike fit appointment and see what they tell me.



Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 11-17-16, 06:22 PM
  #7  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 422 Posts
So, the seat needs the be that high to fit you and you are saying the bike is too big?
trailangel is offline  
Old 11-17-16, 11:44 PM
  #8  
Wildwood 
Veteran, Pacifist
 
Wildwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,327

Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?

Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3897 Post(s)
Liked 4,829 Times in 2,228 Posts
If you need to drop the saddle, there is plenty of space to lower the handlebars. The smaller frame would have you with more spacers or a jacked-up stem. If the cock-pit can be tuned to fit, which should be easy, you are in the right frame.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Wildwood is offline  
Old 11-18-16, 08:08 PM
  #9  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by trailangel
So, the seat needs the be that high to fit you and you are saying the bike is too big?
The seat as you see on the photo is like this at lowest position. And it is too high for me (bike size is 58, and I am 6 ft), I need to get it cut.
Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 11-18-16, 09:53 PM
  #10  
nycphotography
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
get the bike fit and you will be fine. they'll probably put a shorter stem on and cut the seat post.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 11-18-16, 10:02 PM
  #11  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,056

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4195 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times in 2,295 Posts
One more example why bike fitting isn't a mere numbers thing. As example no where in this thread is body flexibility mentioned. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 11-19-16, 05:56 AM
  #12  
nycphotography
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
perhaps because body flexibility 1) changes with training and 2) can be adjusted with stems and spacers?
nycphotography is offline  
Old 11-21-16, 10:23 AM
  #13  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Allright, so this is little embarassing (I am a noob), but I tryed to push the seatmast little harder and it went about 15mm down, so the position is perfect
I am very happy.

Also I want to note, that the seatpost says "DO NOT CUT", few people confirmed it would ruin the frame.

If I would want to get even lower, I could buy shorter seatmast.


Last edited by Rulzmaker87; 11-21-16 at 10:26 AM.
Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Old 04-15-17, 04:33 AM
  #14  
Rulzmaker87
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So, just to close the topic.

I have done a BG Fit Geometry (my height is 182 cm and other sizing are mentioned in my previous post) and they said the Emonda 58 is perfect fit for me.
I am in between sizes 56 and 58.

The 58 is perfect, the handlebars are in lowest position, seat is almost as low as it can be.
Of course overall the bike is much taller and bigger than 56.

I could get size 56, but I would need longer stem, so... it all depends right.
Rulzmaker87 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PoorInRichfield
Fitting Your Bike
39
07-19-17 08:10 PM
Kenneth Luis
General Cycling Discussion
5
04-24-16 06:21 AM
erwanco
Fitting Your Bike
0
11-11-15 05:19 AM
bettrave
Road Cycling
16
08-31-11 07:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.