Upright-ish position without the pedals so far forward?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
Upright-ish position without the pedals so far forward?
Hey guys, I've recently built up an upright-ish 3-speed on an old Panasonic 10-speed frame. I generally like the way it's set up, but the seat tube angle is a bit more slack than on my Volpe, and I've been feeling like I'm not getting as much power into the pedals as I'd like. I generally like the setup I have in terms of the saddle to bar relationship...the bars are a little below the saddle, approximately the same amount of drop as I have on the Volpe, but the reach is significantly shorter and I'm using the VO Milano bars instead of drop bars.
I'm wondering if it would make sense to get a longer stem, and move the saddle forward on the seatpost by the same amount (which may involve going to a zero-offset seatpost). I'm hoping to get more power for hills and riding against the wind, get some weight off the saddle (without also putting too much on my hands), and maybe get more typical road bike handling characteristics, while maintaining the basic riding position I have. Thoughts?
I'm wondering if it would make sense to get a longer stem, and move the saddle forward on the seatpost by the same amount (which may involve going to a zero-offset seatpost). I'm hoping to get more power for hills and riding against the wind, get some weight off the saddle (without also putting too much on my hands), and maybe get more typical road bike handling characteristics, while maintaining the basic riding position I have. Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While you may be adapted to the forward position of your saddle, I don't think that having your saddle forward on a road bike generally delivers more power. It may just be what feels right to you and what your muscles have adapted to. Saddle setbacks of 6 to 10 cm are pretty common on road bikes.
A couple of articles on setback are:
How to Fit a Bicycle (see heading "The Fore-Aft Saddle Position")
and
SEAT SET BACK: for road bikes » Bike Fit » Steve Hogg's Bike Fitting Website
A couple of articles on setback are:
How to Fit a Bicycle (see heading "The Fore-Aft Saddle Position")
and
SEAT SET BACK: for road bikes » Bike Fit » Steve Hogg's Bike Fitting Website
#3
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,533
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Thoughts . . . On the Panasonic, it looks like your saddle is all the way back on its rails. Try moving it forward. And leveling it. Unless there's something odd about the scaling of these photos, it looks like you should also raise it.
'Bent riders can pedal quite well from a nearly prone position. The difference is clipless pedals. Suggest you put them, or at least rattraps with toe clips, on the Panasonic. Those changes will make a huge difference.
'Bent riders can pedal quite well from a nearly prone position. The difference is clipless pedals. Suggest you put them, or at least rattraps with toe clips, on the Panasonic. Those changes will make a huge difference.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
Thoughts . . . On the Panasonic, it looks like your saddle is all the way back on its rails. Try moving it forward. And leveling it. Unless there's something odd about the scaling of these photos, it looks like you should also raise it.
'Bent riders can pedal quite well from a nearly prone position. The difference is clipless pedals. Suggest you put them, or at least rattraps with toe clips, on the Panasonic. Those changes will make a huge difference.
'Bent riders can pedal quite well from a nearly prone position. The difference is clipless pedals. Suggest you put them, or at least rattraps with toe clips, on the Panasonic. Those changes will make a huge difference.
No foot retention for me, ever. Period.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
Oh, worth mentioning - I took some measurements yesterday...the nose of the saddle on the Panasonic is about 3" behind the center of the BB, while on the Volpe the nose of the saddle is almost directly above the center of the BB. As mentioned in the previous post, the saddle to bar relationship on the Panasonic is very similar to riding on the tops of the bars on the Volpe, except that the whole saddle/bar position is shifted back by about 3".
#6
Banned
I set up My Trekking Bars higher than the saddle , on my Bike . You can do as you wish.
Saddle behind the BB axis is Setback .. that takes weight off my hands, riding..
Saddle behind the BB axis is Setback .. that takes weight off my hands, riding..
#7
Just ride.
The low point of your saddle on the P'sonic is almost over your rear brake, vs. the almost level saddle on the Volpe. Raising the rear of the saddle would put you forward, but also increase weight on your hands, and just plain might not be comfortable. You might try a different, flatter, saddle and see what that does to things.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Those two bikes look very different. The Bianchi has a steep seattube, shallwer head tube and a seatpost with very little offfset. This makes for a seat that is forward relative to the bottom bracket. The Panasonic has a very laid back seatyube and an seatpost with normal setback, placing the seat much further back. You could get a seatpost with no setback like a Thomas, then push the seat rails forward and I bet you could get a position close to the Bianchi. I"ll guess however that if you do that, yo may end up with a bike that handles less than ideally because it was clearly designed for a more laidback riding style.
(I am just looking at the photos. Seeing the bikes set up square to the camera and with the background vertical would tell me more. So take this wit a grain of salt.)
Ben
(I am just looking at the photos. Seeing the bikes set up square to the camera and with the background vertical would tell me more. So take this wit a grain of salt.)
Ben
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Ben
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
I think it would be difficult to duplicate the Bianchi position on the Panasonic. You'd have a reversed seatpost, super long stem . . . weird.
You could get partway there with a zero offset seatpost and bars that don't put your hands so far back, like moustache bars.
You could get partway there with a zero offset seatpost and bars that don't put your hands so far back, like moustache bars.
#11
Banned
I haven't heard of setback being the distance behind the BB
Reference: the classic Coaching Book [English translation from what was probably 1st in Italian]
C.O.N.I 'Cycling', circa 1972 for Rome Olympiad .. My copy is Paper, here is the PDF Sand Creek Sports - Mountain bike racing in Colorado
page 128, 2nd Pg in chapter 5.
you could say seat post choice options is part of setback as a total .
If the frame's seat tube angle is steeper, that may be what you must find.
if it's slacker then the choices may be to reduce the seat post and saddle rail adjustment options
Last edited by fietsbob; 11-24-14 at 07:05 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
This isn't the best picture, but it's the most current. Origin 8 ProFit zero offset seatpost + Nitto Dynamic II 120mm stem got me most of what I was after.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times
in
229 Posts
good luck
Last edited by dwmckee; 12-05-14 at 06:36 PM.
#14
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Certainly looks better now. How long are your cranks on the Panasonic, @agmetal? They look sort of long relative to the frame size, so if you switched to shorter ones, your feet wouldn't have to extend as far forward when applying power.
Of course, that would involve a whole package of adjustments afterward: raise saddle slightly to maintain proper leg extension, moving the saddle forward a tiny bit to maintain foot position. Raise the handlebars slightly to go along with saddle and keep weight off the hands, perhaps use a slightly longer stem or longer-reach bars to compensate for that adjustment. Since you're already using a long stem, you may think about switching to a mustache-type bar for more reach.
Just for what it may be worth...
- Scott
Of course, that would involve a whole package of adjustments afterward: raise saddle slightly to maintain proper leg extension, moving the saddle forward a tiny bit to maintain foot position. Raise the handlebars slightly to go along with saddle and keep weight off the hands, perhaps use a slightly longer stem or longer-reach bars to compensate for that adjustment. Since you're already using a long stem, you may think about switching to a mustache-type bar for more reach.
Just for what it may be worth...
- Scott
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
170mm, same as on the Volpe
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
After a couple weeks of riding without touching the saddle or bar positions/angles, I've finally decided I'm happy with the way I have the fit dialed in on this bike, and took some better pics yesterday.
#17
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,837
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12768 Post(s)
Liked 7,683 Times
in
4,078 Posts
Looks much better. Hand position with old stem seemed way too close to headtube for me. Hands closer to front axle is usually better.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
18 Posts
Yeah, it feels pretty close to riding on the tops of my Volpe's drop bars, too, which is pretty much what I was after.