Shimano Altus replacement?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Shimano Altus replacement?
Picked up a Trek FX1 and was curious what recomendations you all might have for an upgrade to the Altus setup that came on this bike.
I think there is some wiggle room to go up a step, im just not familiar enough with modern stuff to make an educated choice.
Any input is appreciated!
Spinay70
I think there is some wiggle room to go up a step, im just not familiar enough with modern stuff to make an educated choice.
Any input is appreciated!
Spinay70
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mountain Brook. AL
Posts: 4,002
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 136 Times
in
104 Posts
Any particular problem with Altus? Seems well matched to the bike and unless damaged there is little upside to a change.
Now if you intended to tighten up the steps on the 7 spd by going to 9 or 10 spd that is another but considerably more
expensive choice but Sora and Tiagra are still out as triples (Tiagra as NOS with the recent 11spd removing the triple).
There are ATB shifters for T bars that will work fine with road groups upto 9 spd.
Now if you intended to tighten up the steps on the 7 spd by going to 9 or 10 spd that is another but considerably more
expensive choice but Sora and Tiagra are still out as triples (Tiagra as NOS with the recent 11spd removing the triple).
There are ATB shifters for T bars that will work fine with road groups upto 9 spd.
Last edited by sch; 08-12-19 at 09:35 AM.
#3
Senior Member
I agree with sch, Shimano's Altus drivetrain is one of their best values. The Altus system on my Giant Sedona works flawlessly for the rear derailleur, and with a little patience the triple front does too. Even an expensive triple front derailleur can be problematic, That's one reason some prefer a single or even double front chainring.
You might do better replacing the tires with some faster (low rolling resistance) ones. They also have seat posts that absorb more road vibration, and perhaps a more comfortable seats. That Trek is a nice bike BTY.
You might do better replacing the tires with some faster (low rolling resistance) ones. They also have seat posts that absorb more road vibration, and perhaps a more comfortable seats. That Trek is a nice bike BTY.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 08-12-19 at 10:28 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I agree with sch, Shimano's Altus drivetrain is one of their best values. The Altus system on my Giant Sedona works flawlessly for the rear derailleur, and with a little patience the triple front does too. Even an expensive triple front derailleur can be problematic, That's one reason some prefer a single or even double front chainring.
You might do better replacing the tires with some faster (low rolling resistance) ones. They also have seat posts that absorb more road vibration, and perhaps a more comfortable seats. That Trek is a nice bike BTY.
You might do better replacing the tires with some faster (low rolling resistance) ones. They also have seat posts that absorb more road vibration, and perhaps a more comfortable seats. That Trek is a nice bike BTY.
SP70
Likes For Spinay70:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
I agree with sch, I see little upside to change for change's sake; Never Fix A Running Piece. Unless you have money burning a hole in your pocket, leave replacement until something wears out or breaks.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I decided to not include the why part of this project. Maybe later I will, assuming I can find suitable replacements to complete it. I might add pics too. I will not discuss my finances, however.
Spinay70
#8
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
I like good hubs and cheap derailleurs. My hubs spin all the time. I only shift gears every few minutes.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi Spinay70, sorry late to the thread, actually I am doing just that (upgrading Altus) - not because I have money to burn/or anything is broken but as a self-learning project (after attending a weekend bike tech course).
My boundary values are:
1. Go to 3x9 speed and stay within Altus/Acera/Alivio
2. Alivio shifters (wanted two-way release) <- the absolute worst possible reason to upgrade!
Lessons learnt:
1. This crankset range (7-speed, riveted) means that any upgrade to Alivio is major surgery: new cassette, bolted crankset etc.
2. Current incarnations of <10-speed Shimano MTB components(Altus, Acera, Alivio) are all-in on <= 40T cranksets; not hybrid friendly
3. Shimano created an off-shoot "Trekking" range for 44/48T cranksets
4. Front mechs: need to look for 63-66 degree chainstay angle FDs; most of them are for 66-69 degrees(standard for MTB frames)
Parts I chose (for upgrading to 3x9 speed)
1. Shifters: SL-M4000-L/R (two-way release - yay!!)_
2. Rear mech: RD-M4000 (wanted to see what is "Shadow" technology)
3. Front mech: FD-T4000-TS3 (this is a clamp-on; for 63-66 degrees chainstay angle)
4. Crankset: FC-T4060 (48/36/26T - notice the "T" in FC-T4060; i.e. Trekking range, not MTB range) with BB-MT800 (recommended is SM-BB52 but I had a BB-MT800 lying around)
5. My bike came with a brifter, to split off the v-brake - used some brake levers I had in the parts box
6. Cassette CS-HG400-9
My boundary values are:
1. Go to 3x9 speed and stay within Altus/Acera/Alivio
2. Alivio shifters (wanted two-way release) <- the absolute worst possible reason to upgrade!
Lessons learnt:
1. This crankset range (7-speed, riveted) means that any upgrade to Alivio is major surgery: new cassette, bolted crankset etc.
2. Current incarnations of <10-speed Shimano MTB components(Altus, Acera, Alivio) are all-in on <= 40T cranksets; not hybrid friendly
3. Shimano created an off-shoot "Trekking" range for 44/48T cranksets
4. Front mechs: need to look for 63-66 degree chainstay angle FDs; most of them are for 66-69 degrees(standard for MTB frames)
Parts I chose (for upgrading to 3x9 speed)
1. Shifters: SL-M4000-L/R (two-way release - yay!!)_
2. Rear mech: RD-M4000 (wanted to see what is "Shadow" technology)
3. Front mech: FD-T4000-TS3 (this is a clamp-on; for 63-66 degrees chainstay angle)
4. Crankset: FC-T4060 (48/36/26T - notice the "T" in FC-T4060; i.e. Trekking range, not MTB range) with BB-MT800 (recommended is SM-BB52 but I had a BB-MT800 lying around)
5. My bike came with a brifter, to split off the v-brake - used some brake levers I had in the parts box
6. Cassette CS-HG400-9
Last edited by amadeus88; 08-18-19 at 08:42 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maitreya
General Cycling Discussion
5
10-15-18 03:03 AM
robow
Bicycle Mechanics
26
06-01-12 08:15 PM