Raising the front of my bike?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Raising the front of my bike?
I assume that the only way to do this is to add larger forks than I currently have but is there any other way of making the front end of my bike sit a little higher?
I have a Scott aspect fx 35 full suspension and it's a great ride but I do feel as though I am weight forward too much.
My pal who I ride with has a boardman team fs and whilst our bikes are very similar lengths, seatpost height etc his front end sits a good few inches higher.
Is there anything I can do other than getting longer travel forms?
I'm currently using rockshox dart 2 and they aren't great anyway so wouldn't mind replacing them but for now if there's anything.
Thanks in advance
I have a Scott aspect fx 35 full suspension and it's a great ride but I do feel as though I am weight forward too much.
My pal who I ride with has a boardman team fs and whilst our bikes are very similar lengths, seatpost height etc his front end sits a good few inches higher.
Is there anything I can do other than getting longer travel forms?
I'm currently using rockshox dart 2 and they aren't great anyway so wouldn't mind replacing them but for now if there's anything.
Thanks in advance
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
You should be looking ar riser bars, riser stem, steerer tube extenders instead.
Fitting a longer fork can change a lot of things best left unchanged.
Or simply a shorter stem.
Or try moving your saddle rearwards.
Fitting a longer fork can change a lot of things best left unchanged.
Or simply a shorter stem.
Or try moving your saddle rearwards.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Won't adding a larger fork make it a bit more "downhilly"?
I'm mostly trail riding and want a bit more travel than I've got anyway or does it really affect the ride quality?
I'm mostly trail riding and want a bit more travel than I've got anyway or does it really affect the ride quality?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Dunno about ”quality”.
Depends on what you mean by that.
Whether you like the change or not is up to you.
But it certainly affects ride characteristics.
Steering response will be slower.
It will also put more stress on the headtube/downtube junction.
Most bikes survive that, but it can’t be guaranteed.
It will raise the bottom bracket.
Reduce stand-over clearance.
Move your saddle and your handlebar towards the rear of the bike.
Depends on what you mean by that.
Whether you like the change or not is up to you.
But it certainly affects ride characteristics.
Steering response will be slower.
It will also put more stress on the headtube/downtube junction.
Most bikes survive that, but it can’t be guaranteed.
It will raise the bottom bracket.
Reduce stand-over clearance.
Move your saddle and your handlebar towards the rear of the bike.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
I usually tackle that weight-forward feeling by going to a riser bar and a shorter stem. Doing so moves my grip on the bars upward and backward, thereby rotating my torso to put more of my weight on the seat.
#6
mmm babaghanouj.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848
Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I assume that the only way to do this is to add larger forks than I currently have but is there any other way of making the front end of my bike sit a little higher?
I have a Scott aspect fx 35 full suspension and it's a great ride but I do feel as though I am weight forward too much.
My pal who I ride with has a boardman team fs and whilst our bikes are very similar lengths, seatpost height etc his front end sits a good few inches higher.
Is there anything I can do other than getting longer travel forms?
I'm currently using rockshox dart 2 and they aren't great anyway so wouldn't mind replacing them but for now if there's anything.
Thanks in advance
I have a Scott aspect fx 35 full suspension and it's a great ride but I do feel as though I am weight forward too much.
My pal who I ride with has a boardman team fs and whilst our bikes are very similar lengths, seatpost height etc his front end sits a good few inches higher.
Is there anything I can do other than getting longer travel forms?
I'm currently using rockshox dart 2 and they aren't great anyway so wouldn't mind replacing them but for now if there's anything.
Thanks in advance
Other than that, what dabac mentioned about why you probably shouldn't put a longer/larger fork on your bike is spot on. Most frames are designed with a certain crown to axle length in mind. Going outside this desired length will not only change the geometry of the bike, as dabac mentioned, it will add stresses to the frame that it wasn't exactly designed to handle, which could lead to the frame failing in one way or another.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For me, a shorter stem increases handling characteristics. Higher bars increase comfort but handling decreases as your weight moves up also.
No one mentioned but is a gimme, lower bars aid climbing, higher bars aid downhill. So if by chance you're struggling more on climbs i wouldn't raise anything.
No one mentioned but is a gimme, lower bars aid climbing, higher bars aid downhill. So if by chance you're struggling more on climbs i wouldn't raise anything.
#8
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
As others have said, the most straight forward way to raise the front end for purposes of your riding position is using a different stem or bar.
I would not switch forks simply as a means to change the height of the front end. Use a fork that gives you the performance and bike geometry you want, and then adjust the stem and bar to suit your riding position accordingly.
However if you are looking to replace your fork anyway (for which I don’t blame you, the Dart is mediocre at best), I would do that first, as it will likely change the feel of the front end. THEN mess around with a different stem or bar if need be.
As far as how tall a replacement fork should be: if you like the way your bike handles right now, I would look for one with about the same height (axle-to-crown distance). This is more relevant to handeling than the travel is.
If you would like something with a little more travel and a slighly slacker head angle, I would not think twice about using a fork up to 20mm taller than what came stock.
I would not switch forks simply as a means to change the height of the front end. Use a fork that gives you the performance and bike geometry you want, and then adjust the stem and bar to suit your riding position accordingly.
However if you are looking to replace your fork anyway (for which I don’t blame you, the Dart is mediocre at best), I would do that first, as it will likely change the feel of the front end. THEN mess around with a different stem or bar if need be.
As far as how tall a replacement fork should be: if you like the way your bike handles right now, I would look for one with about the same height (axle-to-crown distance). This is more relevant to handeling than the travel is.
If you would like something with a little more travel and a slighly slacker head angle, I would not think twice about using a fork up to 20mm taller than what came stock.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As others have said, the most straight forward way to raise the front end for purposes of your riding position is using a different stem or bar.
I would not switch forks simply as a means to change the height of the front end. Use a fork that gives you the performance and bike geometry you want, and then adjust the stem and bar to suit your riding position accordingly.
However if you are looking to replace your fork anyway (for which I don’t blame you, the Dart is mediocre at best), I would do that first, as it will likely change the feel of the front end. THEN mess around with a different stem or bar if need be.
As far as how tall a replacement fork should be: if you like the way your bike handles right now, I would look for one with about the same height (axle-to-crown distance). This is more relevant to handeling than the travel is.
If you would like something with a little more travel and a slighly slacker head angle, I would not think twice about using a fork up to 20mm taller than what came stock.
I would not switch forks simply as a means to change the height of the front end. Use a fork that gives you the performance and bike geometry you want, and then adjust the stem and bar to suit your riding position accordingly.
However if you are looking to replace your fork anyway (for which I don’t blame you, the Dart is mediocre at best), I would do that first, as it will likely change the feel of the front end. THEN mess around with a different stem or bar if need be.
As far as how tall a replacement fork should be: if you like the way your bike handles right now, I would look for one with about the same height (axle-to-crown distance). This is more relevant to handeling than the travel is.
If you would like something with a little more travel and a slighly slacker head angle, I would not think twice about using a fork up to 20mm taller than what came stock.
#10
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Trail would increase with a given offset anytime you slacken the head angle. So yeah, it does when you use a longer fork with the same offset.
Will it cause wheel flop? I think that has a lot more to do with how slack the HA and offset was to start with, but also the cockpit setup and rider technique. I've actually never had an issue with wheel flop since my earliest days riding in the late 90s. It could be that I just learned to compensate, but I am inclined to think it has a lot to do with going with wider handlebars,
Pretty much any fork model out there is only available with one offset, and you will find them speced on bikes with vastly different head angles. FWIW, increasing the fork length by 20mm slackens the HA by a little over 1 degree.
Looking at the fox website, I see that the rake measurement is identical between their 100mm and 170mm 27.5" forks. So, maybe it does not need to change with slacker head angles (longer travel bikes will generally have slacker head angles).
To be honest, I have never given fork offset much thought with mountain bikes, because in my experience, they all seem to work for me just fine. I know in the early days of 29ers, there were some wonky-handeling bikes before the fork offsets were dialed in, and it was something you used to read about in fork reviews, but I guess it got sorted out and you don't read much about it anymore.
Strange, because it is something I DO think and read about with road bikes.
The hard thing about a lot of geometry-related topics with mountain bikes is that geo is dynamic and imprecise to measure. Suspension is always moving, changing all the angles, and it is really hard to know where in the travel the fork is spending most of it's time.
#11
Senior Member
A new fork is expensive, would be my last resort.
If stem spacers aren't all below stem, move them under (or keep 1 5mm spacer above). If that doesn't fix it, consider a shorter stem and/or riser bar. Ritchey makes 30 degree stems (Comp or Pro), Salsa has a 25* stem. Lots of aluminum riser bars to choose from. Check with your friends - stems/bars are something a lot of people replace, so have extras in their parts bin.
I don't know what year your bike is, or what stem/bars it has, but until very recently, mountain bikes were selling with long stems and narrow bars.
If stem spacers aren't all below stem, move them under (or keep 1 5mm spacer above). If that doesn't fix it, consider a shorter stem and/or riser bar. Ritchey makes 30 degree stems (Comp or Pro), Salsa has a 25* stem. Lots of aluminum riser bars to choose from. Check with your friends - stems/bars are something a lot of people replace, so have extras in their parts bin.
I don't know what year your bike is, or what stem/bars it has, but until very recently, mountain bikes were selling with long stems and narrow bars.
#12
Senior Member
This has been going around the bike community for a long time. If you do the math of the stress leverage, any change 40mm or less is inconsequential. Giant even uses the same steerer head, welded the same way, to the same size down tube and top tube, on bikes with fork ranges from 100mm to 160mm with several different head angles.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
This has been going around the bike community for a long time. If you do the math of the stress leverage, any change 40mm or less is inconsequential. Giant even uses the same steerer head, welded the same way, to the same size down tube and top tube, on bikes with fork ranges from 100mm to 160mm with several different head angles.
And can you show me the math where an increase of ~10% in the arm length doesn't correspond to an increase of ~10% in the moment applied at the juncture? While we are at it, can you show a forces diagram that shows the resulting change in vectors due to the change in geometry will not affect the overall structure? I'm not saying it doesn't work the way you say. But I'd like to see the "math."
#14
mmm babaghanouj.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: toronto, canada.
Posts: 848
Bikes: 2003 norco fluid 3.0, 2016 Intense Tracer 275C Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This has been going around the bike community for a long time. If you do the math of the stress leverage, any change 40mm or less is inconsequential. Giant even uses the same steerer head, welded the same way, to the same size down tube and top tube, on bikes with fork ranges from 100mm to 160mm with several different head angles.
#15
Senior Member
No that is not what I said. And the whole triangle doesn't matter, only the steerer tube, the size and shape of the cross and down tubes, the welds where the tubes connect, and the angle of the forks to the line that passes through both axles.
To start with you are starting with a false axiom. Using a Rockshox 100mm to a 140mm total length goes from 480mm to 510mm which is a only a 6% increase in total length, then with the increase in travel (at bottoming out, where the forces are greatest) it is an effective 5% DECREASE in length. So unless the hit is at or near 90 degrees with the fork extended (which is virtually impossible) it is inconsequential.
And can you show me the math where an increase of ~10% in the arm length doesn't correspond to an increase of ~10% in the moment applied at the juncture? While we are at it, can you show a forces diagram that shows the resulting change in vectors due to the change in geometry will not affect the overall structure? I'm not saying it doesn't work the way you say. But I'd like to see the "math."
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by high4s
To start with you are starting with a false axiom. Using a Rockshox 100mm to a 140mm total length goes from 480mm to 510mm which is a only a 6% increase in total length, then with the increase in travel (at bottoming out, where the forces are greatest) it is an effective 5% DECREASE in length. So unless the hit is at or near 90 degrees with the fork extended (which is virtually impossible) it is inconsequential.
Now, you are correct that at full compression the difference is smaller. We won't get into the issue that it will obviously take more force to apply full compression to a 140mm than a 100mm fork.
But we will get into the issue that it isn't axial forces that are the problem, but forces perpendicular to the fork. Which will happen when you, for example case a jump. Fork at full extension.
Again, I'm not saying you are wrong. All I'm asking is for the "math." Now, if you can show me the forces diagram...
#17
Senior Member
What RockShox forks are we talking about? On the Reba RL 27.5 the AC changes from 487mm to 527mm when you go from 100 to 140mm of travel.
But we will get into the issue that it isn't axial forces that are the problem, but forces perpendicular to the fork. Which will happen when you, for example case a jump. Fork at full extension.
Again, I'm not saying you are wrong. All I'm asking is for the "math." Now, if you can show me the forces diagram...
But we will get into the issue that it isn't axial forces that are the problem, but forces perpendicular to the fork. Which will happen when you, for example case a jump. Fork at full extension.
Again, I'm not saying you are wrong. All I'm asking is for the "math." Now, if you can show me the forces diagram...
When you case a jump, most of the force is on the frame, or case (from motorcycle terms). Unless it is on a half pipe and you come down backward catching your front tire on the coping, or you nose dive into a jump face, at no time are the forces anywhere near 90 degrees (perpendicular) and at the end of an extended fork. For that matter, forces are almost always well less than at 45 degrees to the angle of the fork.
If you actually want the math, you will have to figure it out yourself. I've done the math before and I'm am not doing it again. And you putting math in quotes does not change the meaning or invalidate the information.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
OK using your own numbers, Reba 100mm are full compression is 387mm long, a Reba 140mm at full compression is 387mm long.
When you case a jump, most of the force is on the frame, or case (from motorcycle terms). Unless it is on a half pipe and you come down backward catching your front tire on the coping, or you nose dive into a jump face, at no time are the forces anywhere near 90 degrees (perpendicular) and at the end of an extended fork. For that matter, forces are almost always well less than at 45 degrees to the angle of the fork.
If you actually want the math, you will have to figure it out yourself. I've done the math before and I'm am not doing it again. And you putting math in quotes does not change the meaning or invalidate the information.
When you case a jump, most of the force is on the frame, or case (from motorcycle terms). Unless it is on a half pipe and you come down backward catching your front tire on the coping, or you nose dive into a jump face, at no time are the forces anywhere near 90 degrees (perpendicular) and at the end of an extended fork. For that matter, forces are almost always well less than at 45 degrees to the angle of the fork.
If you actually want the math, you will have to figure it out yourself. I've done the math before and I'm am not doing it again. And you putting math in quotes does not change the meaning or invalidate the information.
When it comes to casing a jump, yes nosediving into the face of the jump is the worse case scenario. Happens more than you'd think. Flat landings also will put some weird stresses that would be accentuated by a slacker angle and longer AC.
As for the math, you are the one claiming it is all OK. I think we need something better than "because I say so." Right now all you've demonstrated is that you don't really know much about frame design and manufacturing -claiming the Reign and Trance use the same head tube, top tube, and down tube. You don't know what the difference in axle to crown is between different forks. And you don't seem to fully comprehend the physics of how impacts affect the frame. Nor do you seem capable of performing an anaylis to evaluate whether it is safe to run a longer travel fork on a frame.