Gearing Help please
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Gearing Help please
Hello. Iam currently riding my recently purchased "vintagy" Litespeed. Its got a Sachs New Success drivetrain. Its 8 in the back, 2 in the front, so technically 16 speed. After todays ridiculous climb attempt, I realized I dont have enough gears. A steep climb is ended almost immediately cause there just arent enough gears.
So before I go the route of changing out the entire groupset, which I might in the future, does anyone know if I can just change the rear cassette? I am assuming I would also have to change the chain as well, to lets say an 10 or 11 speed chain? If so, anyone know what is compatible with Sachs New Success drivetrains? Shimano, Campy?
Thanks
So before I go the route of changing out the entire groupset, which I might in the future, does anyone know if I can just change the rear cassette? I am assuming I would also have to change the chain as well, to lets say an 10 or 11 speed chain? If so, anyone know what is compatible with Sachs New Success drivetrains? Shimano, Campy?
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
This thread is probably relevant to your interests:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...cess-info.html
To add gears to your cassette (i.e. change from 8 to 10/11 speed) you will need to change your shifter. Based on what people were saying 13 years ago, it sounds like finding a compatible shifter for your rear derailleur could be a challenge, so you might need to change that, too.
At the end of the day, if you want an easier time climbing, you should look at what your current gears provide you in terms of development or gear-inches, and then see what your preferred gear set could give you:
Bicycle Gear Calculator
Take note of the Derailleur Capacity that the calculator gives you, as that will determine whether or not your drivetrain can handle your desired setup. There will also be a limit to the largest cog size that a rear derailleur can handle, so do your research before making any purchases.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...cess-info.html
To add gears to your cassette (i.e. change from 8 to 10/11 speed) you will need to change your shifter. Based on what people were saying 13 years ago, it sounds like finding a compatible shifter for your rear derailleur could be a challenge, so you might need to change that, too.
At the end of the day, if you want an easier time climbing, you should look at what your current gears provide you in terms of development or gear-inches, and then see what your preferred gear set could give you:
Bicycle Gear Calculator
Take note of the Derailleur Capacity that the calculator gives you, as that will determine whether or not your drivetrain can handle your desired setup. There will also be a limit to the largest cog size that a rear derailleur can handle, so do your research before making any purchases.
Likes For BoraxKid:
#3
Full Member
Hello. Iam currently riding my recently purchased "vintagy" Litespeed. Its got a Sachs New Success drivetrain. Its 8 in the back, 2 in the front, so technically 16 speed. After todays ridiculous climb attempt, I realized I dont have enough gears. A steep climb is ended almost immediately cause there just arent enough gears.
So before I go the route of changing out the entire groupset, which I might in the future, does anyone know if I can just change the rear cassette? I am assuming I would also have to change the chain as well, to lets say an 10 or 11 speed chain? If so, anyone know what is compatible with Sachs New Success drivetrains? Shimano, Campy?
Thanks
So before I go the route of changing out the entire groupset, which I might in the future, does anyone know if I can just change the rear cassette? I am assuming I would also have to change the chain as well, to lets say an 10 or 11 speed chain? If so, anyone know what is compatible with Sachs New Success drivetrains? Shimano, Campy?
Thanks
If you're a recent beginner, you have to practice climbing. That is something that doesn't come naturally to most people. Personally I hated the Sachs components, but today you're pretty much stuck paying a small fortune for an Ultegra or Chorus group with 11 speeds with all of their disadvantages - cost, rapid wear and shifting many times to get where you want to go.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
If you've got indexed shifters, you can't just throw a 10-speed cassette on the hub. You've only got 8 clicks and the chain wouldn't find the cogs properly. (On the other hand, if you have friction shifters, you could likely make it work) I would start with just looking for an 8-speed cassette with wider range. How many teeth in the largest cog of your current cassette?
(Also, none of the relevant numbers here relate to your birthday)
(Also, none of the relevant numbers here relate to your birthday)
Likes For caloso:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
We have to know things like how old you are and what is the present gearing. In general, if you can't climb in a compact 34 front - 28 rear you need more practice. Going to very large gear normally doesn't help you because then you are going do slowly that you have trouble balancing the bike. 8 speed bikes have more than enough speed. The wild multiplying of gears came from Lance Armstrong who wanted an extra gear for really hard climbs in the European races. That triggered off this preposterous desire for more gears. If you're a racer they may give you a very slight advantage but the sports rider ends up using one top gear on the flats and 2 or three for climbing. So when you approach a change in the grade you're shifting three or four gears because the ratios are too close.
If you're a recent beginner, you have to practice climbing. That is something that doesn't come naturally to most people. Personally I hated the Sachs components, but today you're pretty much stuck paying a small fortune for an Ultegra or Chorus group with 11 speeds with all of their disadvantages - cost, rapid wear and shifting many times to get where you want to go.
If you're a recent beginner, you have to practice climbing. That is something that doesn't come naturally to most people. Personally I hated the Sachs components, but today you're pretty much stuck paying a small fortune for an Ultegra or Chorus group with 11 speeds with all of their disadvantages - cost, rapid wear and shifting many times to get where you want to go.
#6
Senior Member
The easy button here is putting on a larger compatible 8 speed cassette, assuming one is available, but you'd have to make sure the rear derailleur can accommodate the largest gear.
You could also change the crankset to one with smaller gears, again assuming you can find a compatible one. Either of these changes would require double checking your chain length.
Outside of the above, I think you're staring at changing out the entire groupset. The newer stuff is a lot nicer, more gears and better shifting, so I don't think you'll regret making the change.
You could also change the crankset to one with smaller gears, again assuming you can find a compatible one. Either of these changes would require double checking your chain length.
Outside of the above, I think you're staring at changing out the entire groupset. The newer stuff is a lot nicer, more gears and better shifting, so I don't think you'll regret making the change.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,925
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,693 Times
in
974 Posts
You have enough different gear ratios. The problem is that your lowest gears are not low enough. This can be addressed in 2 ways. First, a cassette with a larger large cog, and second a smaller small chainring
#8
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
If that was a legit 20% grade, you're going to have trouble with that pretty much no matter what gears you have.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
For sure, but having trouble is one thing. Literally not being able to pedal, even out of the saddle, is another. I know this cause I had some fellow riders on stock Cannondale Synapses with stock drivetrains, that were still able to pedal. Albeit very slowly
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
If you've got indexed shifters, you can't just throw a 10-speed cassette on the hub. You've only got 8 clicks and the chain wouldn't find the cogs properly. (On the other hand, if you have friction shifters, you could likely make it work) I would start with just looking for an 8-speed cassette with wider range. How many teeth in the largest cog of your current cassette?
(Also, none of the relevant numbers here relate to your birthday)
(Also, none of the relevant numbers here relate to your birthday)
#11
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
That’s old-school super-high gearing. I have 52/36 in front and 11-28 in the rear. I rarely use the small ring, but I live in Texas with just little rollers and very few real climbs. Your lowest gear is 50% harder than mine, and you face bigger hills. You can probably get smaller chainrings and a larger cassette without needing to change shifters and derailleurs.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Hoo boy, that is some old school classic gearing. That cassette is known as a corncob. Great for racing Paris-Roubaix in 1975. Maybe not optimal for hills in 2020.
So, yes, the 42 small ring up front is way too big, but just as important is the 21 in the back is way too small. The good news is that 8-speed cassettes are still available and you shouldn’t have any problem finding ones with a bigger spread. The other side of the equation is swapping out smaller chainrings on the front. If you have a standard 130mm crank spider, you won’t be able to mount anything smaller than 38. Which means you’ll probably want to get a whole new compact crankset. But that’s pretty doable.
So, yes, the 42 small ring up front is way too big, but just as important is the 21 in the back is way too small. The good news is that 8-speed cassettes are still available and you shouldn’t have any problem finding ones with a bigger spread. The other side of the equation is swapping out smaller chainrings on the front. If you have a standard 130mm crank spider, you won’t be able to mount anything smaller than 38. Which means you’ll probably want to get a whole new compact crankset. But that’s pretty doable.
Likes For caloso:
#13
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,898 Times
in
6,094 Posts
I ran Sachs brifters and derailleurs on a bike back in the 90s. IIRC, the brifters were essentially first generation Ergopowers, but the cog spacing was the same as Shimano (maybe?), so you should be able to put on a 12-25 cassette, and at the front, I'd swap out the 42 for a 39, which as others have noted is probably the smallest you can go, given the bolt circle.
Mind you, I could be remembering things COMPLETELY wrong!
Mind you, I could be remembering things COMPLETELY wrong!
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hoo boy, that is some old school classic gearing. That cassette is known as a corncob. Great for racing Paris-Roubaix in 1975. Maybe not optimal for hills in 2020.
So, yes, the 42 small ring up front is way too big, but just as important is the 21 in the back is way too small. The good news is that 8-speed cassettes are still available and you shouldn’t have any problem finding ones with a bigger spread. The other side of the equation is swapping out smaller chainrings on the front. If you have a standard 130mm crank spider, you won’t be able to mount anything smaller than 38. Which means you’ll probably want to get a whole new compact crankset. But that’s pretty doable.
So, yes, the 42 small ring up front is way too big, but just as important is the 21 in the back is way too small. The good news is that 8-speed cassettes are still available and you shouldn’t have any problem finding ones with a bigger spread. The other side of the equation is swapping out smaller chainrings on the front. If you have a standard 130mm crank spider, you won’t be able to mount anything smaller than 38. Which means you’ll probably want to get a whole new compact crankset. But that’s pretty doable.
#15
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,898 Times
in
6,094 Posts
I'd be surprised if your rear derailleur could handle that range. 12-25 or 12-26 plus a new small chainring would work, almost without question, but a 25 year old road derailleur with a capacity for a 32 tooth cog? Doubtful.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#16
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,898 Times
in
6,094 Posts
Look at it this way: 42/21 is a ratio of 2. 39/26 is a ratio of 1.5, so it should be a A LOT easier. 42x21, at 60 RPM, you're going about 9.4 mph. 39x26, at 60 RPM, you're going 7 mph. So about 25% easier.
Last edited by genejockey; 09-16-20 at 04:47 PM.
Likes For genejockey:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times
in
571 Posts
I have no advice, but I sympathize. I just bought a bike with with a similar set up. And a 144 BCD crank, so I can't put anything smaller than 42 on the front. I have mostly rollers (this part of Florida is not flat) and they've been manageable but I haven't yet tried the few tougher hills in the area. I don't think I can take this one to the mountains.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Likes For jon c.:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#20
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I have no advice, but I sympathize. I just bought a bike with with a similar set up. And a 144 BCD crank, so I can't put anything smaller than 42 on the front. I have mostly rollers (this part of Florida is not flat) and they've been manageable but I haven't yet tried the few tougher hills in the area. I don't think I can take this one to the mountains.
Good luck.
Good luck.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,288
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8279 Post(s)
Liked 9,034 Times
in
4,472 Posts
On my Shimano 7 speed bikes with standard double Ultegra crank I ran a 39 in front and a 28 in back with a short cage derailleur and had no problems. I had 3 different bikes set up like that and I climbed everything then with those gears, except earlier when I used a 42 in front. I was in my 30s then and 220 pounds.
#22
Senior Member
1-Slower because they were bottomed out and their pedaling form went lumpy.
2-They often just didn't. Letting your bicycle dictate your routes is a path of less resistance than fixing the bicycle to facilitate the rides you want to do. It's not like that doesn't still happen today, even with modern road gearing; the line is merely drawn at weaker riders and/or steeper hills.
3-If they really wanted lower gears on their road bikes, it was entirely possible. Wider-range drivetrains existed and worked great, and this has basically always been the case: derailleurs spent their first several decades being marketed primarily at cyclotourists. It just wasn't fashionable to use wide-range drivetrains on racing bikes.
If by "no matter what gearing you have" you're assuming that the rider is sticking with standard road offerings, perhaps. But if you literally mean "no matter what gearing you have", then I'd disagree. 20% on pavement normally isn't a very big deal if you're not bottomed out. Maybe if you're down in the <2W/kg range and your speed has plunged down into the realm of 2mph or lower and you have balance issues. But most people can keep a bicycle balanced at those speeds pretty well if they're rolling power through the cranks.
2-They often just didn't. Letting your bicycle dictate your routes is a path of less resistance than fixing the bicycle to facilitate the rides you want to do. It's not like that doesn't still happen today, even with modern road gearing; the line is merely drawn at weaker riders and/or steeper hills.
3-If they really wanted lower gears on their road bikes, it was entirely possible. Wider-range drivetrains existed and worked great, and this has basically always been the case: derailleurs spent their first several decades being marketed primarily at cyclotourists. It just wasn't fashionable to use wide-range drivetrains on racing bikes.
If by "no matter what gearing you have" you're assuming that the rider is sticking with standard road offerings, perhaps. But if you literally mean "no matter what gearing you have", then I'd disagree. 20% on pavement normally isn't a very big deal if you're not bottomed out. Maybe if you're down in the <2W/kg range and your speed has plunged down into the realm of 2mph or lower and you have balance issues. But most people can keep a bicycle balanced at those speeds pretty well if they're rolling power through the cranks.
Last edited by HTupolev; 09-16-20 at 06:42 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times
in
571 Posts
It helped that back in the day I was much younger.
I started riding again about 8 years ago after a break of 30+ years. I've often wondered what the gearing was on the bike I rode when I was a teen. Riding around the finger lakes region of New York I recall that even with youth on our side we did occasionally encounter grades that forced us to walk. And otherwise I think no one expected to take hills at the cadence people do today. It was a low cadence grind. Now I worry a bit about what that might do to my knees.
I started riding again about 8 years ago after a break of 30+ years. I've often wondered what the gearing was on the bike I rode when I was a teen. Riding around the finger lakes region of New York I recall that even with youth on our side we did occasionally encounter grades that forced us to walk. And otherwise I think no one expected to take hills at the cadence people do today. It was a low cadence grind. Now I worry a bit about what that might do to my knees.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well we will have to see. I already ordered a 11-32 cassette from Amazon, but its a free return. So if anything Ill trade it in for a 11-28 or 26.
And yes the particular hill i was on was 20% grade, at least according to the internet. Its a known hill in the cycling community here (Mountain Gate road, LA).
And regarding the front chain rings, I feel like I should first try and change out rear cassette before trying to mess with the front chain ring, crank setup. That will be more costly and I would need to research what is compatible with my bike, drivetrain etc.
And yes the particular hill i was on was 20% grade, at least according to the internet. Its a known hill in the cycling community here (Mountain Gate road, LA).
And regarding the front chain rings, I feel like I should first try and change out rear cassette before trying to mess with the front chain ring, crank setup. That will be more costly and I would need to research what is compatible with my bike, drivetrain etc.
#25
Senior Member
The pro's really need the 53 chainring to keep up with the peloton, and can usually maintain 10-12 kph even up a 15% grade.