What does a speed suit do?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
Aero resistance ramps up exponentially as speed increases so it takes a Lot more power to go from 30 mph to 32 mph than it does to go from 15 to 16. And at 15 mph aero drag, while still the biggest thing you back, is minuscule compared to drag a to drag at 20.If you are not expending that many watts to begin with, the savings are going to be pretty small—probably not noticeable. .
translation: pretty much nothing matters, aerodynamically speaking, at speeds below what pro racers average. So a skin suit is perfectly designed for the people it’s designed for. Therefore the cost is irrelevant. If you’re not one of those peoples, you have no reason to even care that they exist, much less wether they’re worth the cost.
I am not a mathematician. I do understand that aero drag increases at a rate in multiples of speed, not directly, so that id you go twice as fast, the drag quadruples ... or some such. I thought it went by the square of the irate of increase ... but the basic principle is the same. if you go slowly, drag is relatively low. If you go a little faster, drag increases even more quickly. if you go way faster, drag balloons and gets to be huge.
Therefore ... if you are riding at 15 mph, the aero drag isn't huge, but if you are riding at 25 it is. if you are trying to get from 30 to 32 mph, the wattage increase is proportional to the increase in drag, which is Way more than the increase in drag going from 15 to 16 mph. (And yes, I see where @asgelle claims it takes the same watt increase to go from 15-16 as from 30-32---but since the aero resistance is about three times as great or more, i don't see how that makes sense since you need power to overcome resistance and the resistance is not growing in a linear fashion... why would required wattage? Whatever.)
So, while anyone Can wear a skinsuit, it might not make much of a difference---spend the money on hiring a coach or something. or buy a skinsuit and wear it proudly--I don't care.
I have seen a couple different charts showing how much each alteration translates into a time advantage---but those all presuppose a person riding flat-out over a 40-k TT or some such.(I notice they all claim radically different numbers, which makes me totally doubt their accuracy. Science is performing the same experiment and getting approximately the same result. if one gets a number twice what the other got, someone is doing it wrong--maybe both.)
Also, this chart lists aero bars and an aero position ... but how can one achieve an full aero position without aero bars? Hmmmm .....
In any case ... even a hardcore pro TT expert isn't going to gain much from wearing a skinsuit when he is riding around the block with his kids on their bikes with training wheels. So, pretty much, at speeds below what the really fast riders ride, that skin suit is likely not the most effective investment.
Still might be the right purchase. That is a personal thing. I never see sea lions while out riding.
#27
Senior Member
Yes, oil definitely reduces friction.
__________________
Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
#28
aire díthrub
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: chatham-savannah
Posts: 553
Bikes: Raleigh Competition, Pashley Roadster Sovereign, Mercian Vincitore Speciale
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 259 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
35 Posts
woa there mate, first of all I wasn’t hiding behind anything. My entire post was jest. Secondly, I didn’t misunderstand anything. Again, my post was jest, it wasn’t meant as an actual explainer of your words.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Yes, someone averaging 15mph can go marginally faster with a suit, but they aren't consistent to the point where you can actually look at the suit and notice it making any difference. They may well beat their suit time in jean shorts and a cotton tshirt the next day, simply because that day they got into a better rhythm.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Posts: 4,695
Bikes: Masi, Giant TCR, Eisentraut (retired), Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo, Cannondale, 84 & 93 Stumpjumpers, Waterford, Tern D8, Bianchi, Gunner Roadie, Serotta, Serotta Duette, was gifted a Diamond Back
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 2,038 Times
in
604 Posts
#31
Senior Member
Ignoring all the other errors in the post, I’ll point out that you misunderstand these results. For the most part they aren’t from direct measurements, rather they come from a model (which has been thoroughly validated so there’s no question as to its validity) applied to different equipment sets. Since different people use different underlying assumptions/conditions, there’s really no contradiction in the results. There’s no one answer to how much time a skin suit saves. It depends on the rider’s power, the other equipment she’s using, and what she was wearing before.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
Sure, but when looking at performance "upgrades" in any speed sport, aero is the thing that bumps you from 99.5% to 99.9%, it is something that can bump up speed a bit when much larger contributions are running consistently as fast as they can. It is absolutely critical at top competition, because everyone else has the body tuned out, it can provide the marginal gains you need to win.
Yes, someone averaging 15mph can go marginally faster with a suit, but they aren't consistent to the point where you can actually look at the suit and notice it making any difference. They may well beat their suit time in jean shorts and a cotton tshirt the next day, simply because that day they got into a better rhythm.
Yes, someone averaging 15mph can go marginally faster with a suit, but they aren't consistent to the point where you can actually look at the suit and notice it making any difference. They may well beat their suit time in jean shorts and a cotton tshirt the next day, simply because that day they got into a better rhythm.
How much that matters to someone is personal preference, but it doesn't change the fact that it will make a difference.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
Actually, @seamuis pretty much translated my post.
I am not a mathematician. I do understand that aero drag increases at a rate in multiples of speed, not directly, so that id you go twice as fast, the drag quadruples ... or some such. I thought it went by the square of the irate of increase ... but the basic principle is the same. if you go slowly, drag is relatively low. If you go a little faster, drag increases even more quickly. if you go way faster, drag balloons and gets to be huge.
Therefore ... if you are riding at 15 mph, the aero drag isn't huge, but if you are riding at 25 it is. if you are trying to get from 30 to 32 mph, the wattage increase is proportional to the increase in drag, which is Way more than the increase in drag going from 15 to 16 mph. (And yes, I see where @asgelle claims it takes the same watt increase to go from 15-16 as from 30-32---but since the aero resistance is about three times as great or more, i don't see how that makes sense since you need power to overcome resistance and the resistance is not growing in a linear fashion... why would required wattage? Whatever.)
I am not a mathematician. I do understand that aero drag increases at a rate in multiples of speed, not directly, so that id you go twice as fast, the drag quadruples ... or some such. I thought it went by the square of the irate of increase ... but the basic principle is the same. if you go slowly, drag is relatively low. If you go a little faster, drag increases even more quickly. if you go way faster, drag balloons and gets to be huge.
Therefore ... if you are riding at 15 mph, the aero drag isn't huge, but if you are riding at 25 it is. if you are trying to get from 30 to 32 mph, the wattage increase is proportional to the increase in drag, which is Way more than the increase in drag going from 15 to 16 mph. (And yes, I see where @asgelle claims it takes the same watt increase to go from 15-16 as from 30-32---but since the aero resistance is about three times as great or more, i don't see how that makes sense since you need power to overcome resistance and the resistance is not growing in a linear fashion... why would required wattage? Whatever.)
#34
Senior Member
In all threads like this there are people who’ve made up their mind that something isn’t important to them and then twist or straight out make up facts to show it isn’t important to anyone.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Not quite sure I'm following you here. Are you saying if you put a rider that could average 13mph and one that could ride 25mph on the same course, the presence or lack of a suit would affect the 13mph rider more?
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I'm an ex-college football player. If I get a skin suit it's going to say GOODYEAR on it.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
As i tried to say earlier ... as far as I have heard, aero advantages are greater proportionately for slow riders .... but that means you are going from 15.75 to 15.85 mph----and smaller proportionately but greater overall for fast riders. if a skin suit saves 5 watts and you are only putting out 100, it is a five percent gain. if you are putting out 400 watts, 5 watts is almost negligible ... but it might be the difference of beating the guy who didn't wear the skinsuit.
For someone who is riding at 40 percent output ... and not even timing his ride ... what metric matters? Wear a skinsuit if you like it.
For someone pushing for maximum performance in a race, the metric which matters is shortest time from start to finish ... and skinsuit will save a couple seconds.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
I have seen a couple different charts showing how much each alteration translates into a time advantage---but those all presuppose a person riding flat-out over a 40-k TT or some such.(I notice they all claim radically different numbers, which makes me totally doubt their accuracy. Science is performing the same experiment and getting approximately the same result. if one gets a number twice what the other got, someone is doing it wrong--maybe both.)
Ignoring all the other errors in the post, I’ll point out that you misunderstand these results. For the most part they aren’t from direct measurements, rather they come from a model (which has been thoroughly validated so there’s no question as to its validity) applied to different equipment sets. Since different people use different underlying assumptions/conditions, there’s really no contradiction in the results. There’s no one answer to how much time a skin suit saves. It depends on the rider’s power, the other equipment she’s using, and what she was wearing before.
So any one quoting thos e figures and applying them to any other rider in any other situation (“A skin suit will save you X, acas this chart shows”) is wrong. All it show s ihtat there is some saving to be had under certain conditions. And as I pointed out, we don’t even know how they did their experiments---how did they evaluate the benefit of a ‘wind-tunnel-refined aero riding position” which had to have been done with aero bars … and then determine a different value for the riding position and the aero bars? Can’t have one without the other. So … as I stated those are not scientifically derived and verified values …. And in themselves, all they say is that there seems to be some advantage to certain gear and practices. Glad we agree.
#40
Senior Member
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
As I understand it, the 13 mph rider will actually save more total time over a given distance. But, the percentage of time saved will be lower. So for example (I'm just making these numbers up) lets assume a 13 mph rider and a 26 mph rider. For a 13 mile course, the 13 mph rider might save 1 minute over an hour of riding. The 26 mph rider may save 40 seconds over half an hour of riding. Something like that.
But all this is just going by what I've read here.
Ultimately, it will make both riders slightly faster. It's up to you if that is worth the cost/expense of a speed suit. I don't own one, so it clearly isn't worth it to me.
#42
aire díthrub
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: chatham-savannah
Posts: 553
Bikes: Raleigh Competition, Pashley Roadster Sovereign, Mercian Vincitore Speciale
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 259 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
35 Posts
Depending on your perspective, yes.
As I understand it, the 13 mph rider will actually save more total time over a given distance. But, the percentage of time saved will be lower. So for example (I'm just making these numbers up) lets assume a 13 mph rider and a 26 mph rider. For a 13 mile course, the 13 mph rider might save 1 minute over an hour of riding. The 26 mph rider may save 40 seconds over half an hour of riding. Something like that.
But all this is just going by what I've read here.
Ultimately, it will make both riders slightly faster. It's up to you if that is worth the cost/expense of a speed suit. I don't own one, so it clearly isn't worth it to me.
As I understand it, the 13 mph rider will actually save more total time over a given distance. But, the percentage of time saved will be lower. So for example (I'm just making these numbers up) lets assume a 13 mph rider and a 26 mph rider. For a 13 mile course, the 13 mph rider might save 1 minute over an hour of riding. The 26 mph rider may save 40 seconds over half an hour of riding. Something like that.
But all this is just going by what I've read here.
Ultimately, it will make both riders slightly faster. It's up to you if that is worth the cost/expense of a speed suit. I don't own one, so it clearly isn't worth it to me.
so what does it do? It makes you look like you spent a bunch of money, while you’re still riding at an average speed. That’s about it. So if that’s what you’re going for, then crack on.
see how this all works? Continue on with the puffed egos and fact/figure chest pounding, lads. I’m sure you’ll make marginal gains in forum discourse.
Last edited by seamuis; 01-06-19 at 09:20 AM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
204 Posts
the rub is that if you’re riding at 13mph on average, it’s very unlikely that you’re actually trying to go fast, or save time. Because 13mph does neither for you. So while a skinsuit would actually save you more time over a set distance than a pro rider that’s averaging 25mph, it’s the pro rider that needs that marginal gain, more than the 13mph rider needs their larger gain. This is exactly why I said that the skinsuit was designed for the pro rider. The fact that an average rider, riding at a pretty average pace would get a bigger benefit from the reduction in drag that the skinsuit provides, is for the most part meaningless, precisely because the 13mph rider is highly unlikely to be trying to get any gains. And if they are, they would be better off getting up to the pro riders level first, before worrying about the skinsuit. Even though, at that level, the skinsuit gives a smaller gain. But if the 13mph rider wanted to wear a skinsuit, regardless of reason or cost, it would indeed be quite beneficial, just not in a way that practically matters, when you’re riding at 13mph.
so what does it do? It makes you look like you spent a bunch of money, while you’re still riding at an average speed. That’s about it. So if that’s what you’re going for, then crack on.
see how this all works? Continue on with the puffed egos and fact/figure chest pounding, lads. I’m sure you’ll make marginal gains in forum discourse.
#44
Full Member
resident 13mph PRO
the rub is that if you’re riding at 13mph on average, it’s very unlikely that you’re actually trying to go fast, or save time. Because 13mph does neither for you. So while a skinsuit would actually save you more time over a set distance than a pro rider that’s averaging 25mph, it’s the pro rider that needs that marginal gain, more than the 13mph rider needs their larger gain. This is exactly why I said that the skinsuit was designed for the pro rider. The fact that an average rider, riding at a pretty average pace would get a bigger benefit from the reduction in drag that the skinsuit provides, is for the most part meaningless, precisely because the 13mph rider is highly unlikely to be trying to get any gains. And if they are, they would be better off getting up to the pro riders level first, before worrying about the skinsuit. Even though, at that level, the skinsuit gives a smaller gain. But if the 13mph rider wanted to wear a skinsuit, regardless of reason or cost, it would indeed be quite beneficial, just not in a way that practically matters, when you’re riding at 13mph.
so what does it do? It makes you look like you spent a bunch of money, while you’re still riding at an average speed. That’s about it. So if that’s what you’re going for, then crack on.
see how this all works? Continue on with the puffed egos and fact/figure chest pounding, lads. I’m sure you’ll make marginal gains in forum discourse.
#45
aire díthrub
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: chatham-savannah
Posts: 553
Bikes: Raleigh Competition, Pashley Roadster Sovereign, Mercian Vincitore Speciale
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 259 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
35 Posts
Pure racers and Egos with money to burn.
Last edited by seamuis; 01-06-19 at 10:32 AM.
#46
Senior Member
One thing to mention regarding greater time saved for slower riders, if you look at results for a time trial, the absolute time gaps between riders is about the same for the slower groups as it is for the faster ones. That means a slower rider is likely to move up more places by optimizing equipment than a faster one.
#47
Full Member
not imposing values.. and agree
Again with the special physics just for cycling. Skin suits lower drag and hence are effective for all riders at all cycling speeds. whether the cost is worth the gain is up to each rider to decide for themself. Don't impose you values on others. And what do you mean by a pure racer? What separates the pure from the impure?
One thing to mention regarding greater time saved for slower riders, if you look at results for a time trial, the absolute time gaps between riders is about the same for the slower groups as it is for the faster ones. That means a slower rider is likely to move up more places by optimizing equipment than a faster one.
One thing to mention regarding greater time saved for slower riders, if you look at results for a time trial, the absolute time gaps between riders is about the same for the slower groups as it is for the faster ones. That means a slower rider is likely to move up more places by optimizing equipment than a faster one.
First race, once a year, Pro, whatever. It is the dedication to the task that defines "racer".
Or maybe that is just my age giving into the new age "participation trophy" thinking?
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
Well .... evolution is proven. This is what grew out of the "Does weight matter" debates.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
But naked would be pretty fast, just that hard to pedal in bare feet, also most would fidget vs a good set of shorts with correct pad. The compression on the kits (technically UCI illegal, they just ignore speed suits) is likely better than being naked.
So my guess is a naked person would put in a slower speed than one in a speed suit.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts