Thoughts about a Grandis please
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Great White North
Posts: 926
Bikes: I have a few
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
104 Posts
Thoughts about a Grandis please
I bought this Grandis years ago for the SR parts on another build I was doing at the time and just put the frame away. Now with nothing to do I dug it out and had a closer look. It has been repainted sometime in the past. The lugs are uneven from when they were made/filed and there is a dent in the chainstay from where (I assume) someone made room for an ill fitting crank. I can fix everything else but the off center lugs look like crap (especially the head tube) The Person I bought it from said it was a super leggera but now I doubt that as there are fender tabs and the fork crown has the same shape as the lugs cut in it. My best guess is that it is a 77’ but the model is unknown.
Likes For daviddavieboy:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
It's definitely a repaint as it has the remnants of a Columbus Riverniciato decal. Personally, I'm thinking this is earlier, circa 1970-1974, as based on reports of original owner bicycles, Grandis had migrated tot the 'G' cutout on the lugs and fork crown by 1975. Prior to that it was not uncommon to still have eyelets on the dropouts, as fenders would installed for wet weather training.
I wouldn't worry a lot about the model. Based on the workmanship, it's a high grade frame. It's a tall frame, so I'd expect Columbus SP. Prior to 1978, Columbus didn't have anything lower than SL/SP and Italian mid-range models tended to use Falck or other tubesets. Consequently, I'd just ensure that it uses the 27.0mm seat post typical of SP and that it has a Columbus steerer tube with the five helical ridges or dove logo.
I wouldn't worry a lot about the model. Based on the workmanship, it's a high grade frame. It's a tall frame, so I'd expect Columbus SP. Prior to 1978, Columbus didn't have anything lower than SL/SP and Italian mid-range models tended to use Falck or other tubesets. Consequently, I'd just ensure that it uses the 27.0mm seat post typical of SP and that it has a Columbus steerer tube with the five helical ridges or dove logo.
Last edited by T-Mar; 06-15-20 at 07:08 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 331
Bikes: '68 Masi Special road, Grail bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 70 Times
in
58 Posts
the lower tip of the seat cluster lug has been tapered which is an unexpected nice touch
but the brake bridge reinforcements look to be upside down
the right chainstay crimp looks to have been modified with a hammer!
but the brake bridge reinforcements look to be upside down
the right chainstay crimp looks to have been modified with a hammer!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 331
Bikes: '68 Masi Special road, Grail bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 70 Times
in
58 Posts
the lower tip of the seat cluster lug has been tapered which is an unexpected nice touch
but the brake bridge reinforcements look to be upside down
the right chainstay crimp looks like it was modified with a hammer!
but the brake bridge reinforcements look to be upside down
the right chainstay crimp looks like it was modified with a hammer!
#5
self propelled lifer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 557
Bikes: 1962 Dawes Galaxy; 72 Gitane Interclub;73 Peugeot PR10;78 Torpado Luxe;73 Grandis; 81 Raleigh/Carlton Comp; 85 Bianchi Stelvio; 87 Bianchi Brava; 73 Bottechia Special; 1969 or70 Bob Jackson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
7 Posts
It's definitely a repaint as it has the remnants of a Columbus Riverniciato decal. Personally, I'm thinking this is earlier, circa 1970-1974, as based on reports of original owner bicycles, Grandis had migrated tot the 'G' cutout on the lugs and fork crown by 1975. Prior to that it was not uncommon to still have eyelets on the dropouts, as fenders would installed for wet weather training.
I wouldn't worry a lot about the model. Based on the workmanship, it's a high grade frame. It's a tall frame, so I'd expect Columbus SP. Prior to 1978, Columbus didn't have anything lower than SL/SP and Italian mid-range models tended to use Falck or other tubesets. Consequently, I'd just ensure that it uses the 27.0mm seat post typical of SP and that it has a Columbus steerer tube with the five helical ridges or dove logo.
I wouldn't worry a lot about the model. Based on the workmanship, it's a high grade frame. It's a tall frame, so I'd expect Columbus SP. Prior to 1978, Columbus didn't have anything lower than SL/SP and Italian mid-range models tended to use Falck or other tubesets. Consequently, I'd just ensure that it uses the 27.0mm seat post typical of SP and that it has a Columbus steerer tube with the five helical ridges or dove logo.
Dear Peter,
Very nice masterpiece ! That models was manufactured between 1969-1974, so 1973 is correct.
Can we share your pics through social?
Thank you for your appreciation
Best regards from all the Grandis family
Alessandro Grandis
Grandis s.n.c.
via strada della giara, 11
37142 Verona (VR)
-ITALY-
Likes For sloar:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
I have one too.
the big silver frame I would have set at 1973
needs a proper Campagnolo headset.
it is probably the best bike in the room.
could use a proper repaint.
then return those Campagnolo components to it....
such a hard life these great frames lead... bought for the parts...
btw, wonder where Mario Confente picked up that seat stay cap detail that he applied to ONE Masi at the Carlsbad facility?
the big silver frame I would have set at 1973
needs a proper Campagnolo headset.
it is probably the best bike in the room.
could use a proper repaint.
then return those Campagnolo components to it....
such a hard life these great frames lead... bought for the parts...
btw, wonder where Mario Confente picked up that seat stay cap detail that he applied to ONE Masi at the Carlsbad facility?
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Great White North
Posts: 926
Bikes: I have a few
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
104 Posts
Great frame ? Hardly. After stripping and seeing sloppy brazing with much filing and crooked lugs, along with poor chrome and the dent I will just scrap this. I wonder if they were training someone new in the shop and they assembled it?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
This is not of that time.
The parts, bottom, bracket, fork crown, lugs were very crude as delivered. Everything here was probably hand cut. Maybe a drill press to start.
The headlug shape is not what I would have done, but is the shape of the Brand at that era.
Fair enough that it is not to your taste. It is not junk.
If you have tried to build a frame from parts of this period, the amount of effort would astound you.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Great White North
Posts: 926
Bikes: I have a few
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 340 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
104 Posts
Please do not put words in my mouth and I apologize if I gave the wrong impression. By "scrap" I am meaning I will probably not rebuild but possibly pass it on. Also, being presumptuous does nothing to further ones opinion. While true I have never built a frame during this time I have replaced damaged tubes and straightened frames / forks. I find it hard to believe that the crooked upper head lug is "the shape of the brand at that era" but after looking at others close up over the last couple days I believe you are correct at least on a Grandis.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Sometimes I think the Italians were so full of themselves when it came to frame building, that they were totally oblivious to Quality Control. One frame could be meticulous and the next could look like a dog's breakfast. I can appreciate this, up to the early 1970s, but once the Japanese arrived and raised the bar, many of the Italian builders still seemed to turn a blind eye. In the 1980s, some USA importers even turned to performing their own alignment, prep and finishing operations, in order to give the consumer what was being expected for a high grade bicycle.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Please do not put words in my mouth and I apologize if I gave the wrong impression. By "scrap" I am meaning I will probably not rebuild but possibly pass it on. Also, being presumptuous does nothing to further ones opinion. While true I have never built a frame during this time I have replaced damaged tubes and straightened frames / forks. I find it hard to believe that the crooked upper head lug is "the shape of the brand at that era" but after looking at others close up over the last couple days I believe you are correct at least on a Grandis.
Grandis did have variable effort.
no idea in the story behind that, in about 1975 they made a big splash at the Anaheim trade show. This frame looks before that, after I could see a strain to get product out the door.
T-Mar is correct that visible construction quality was notched up by the Japanese. Then the uniformity of investment cast fittings changed things a bit more, an adjustment as those lugs were often not filed thin as it previous eras, but hand work is variable.