Endurance vs Climbing Bikes
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Endurance vs Climbing Bikes
I picked up a Trek Domane a few years ago and have really enjoyed it. I'm considering picking up another bike and wondered about the point at which someone should be looking into a different style of bike, especially with respect to climbing. Where I ride in the Texas Hill Country, I generally cover roughly 500-1000 feet of elevation each hour. It's certainly not the mountains by any stretch, but I've wondered if the next bike should be something like an Emonda. Obviously, there are a lot of other variables in play, but at least with the style of bike, is there any general wisdom on when a lighter machine becomes better?
#2
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
I picked up a Trek Domane a few years ago and have really enjoyed it. I'm considering picking up another bike and wondered about the point at which someone should be looking into a different style of bike, especially with respect to climbing. Where I ride in the Texas Hill Country, I generally cover roughly 500-1000 feet of elevation each hour. It's certainly not the mountains by any stretch, but I've wondered if the next bike should be something like an Emonda. Obviously, there are a lot of other variables in play, but at least with the style of bike, is there any general wisdom on when a lighter machine becomes better?
I
Likes For GlennR:
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Good thought! Unfortunately, I don't have easy access to a place where gravel is practical for me. Road is pretty much the only option, so my choices are more limited there.
#4
Banned.
No disrespect but that’s hardly any climbing.
I would go Madone all the way !
The domane is an excellent bike. Madone is a good total package for the roads out in Texas. Emonda SLR is a light climbing bike but before you lose lbs off the bike , make sure the ride lost all the necessary lbs first
I would go Madone all the way !
The domane is an excellent bike. Madone is a good total package for the roads out in Texas. Emonda SLR is a light climbing bike but before you lose lbs off the bike , make sure the ride lost all the necessary lbs first
#5
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 242
Bikes: 2020 Pinarello Dogma F12 Disc (Enve SES 3.4), 2021 S-Works Aethos (Roval Alpinist CLX II), 2024 Topstone Lab71 (Terra CLX II), 2006 Cervelo Soloist (10 speed Ultegra), 2021 S-Works Epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 74 Times
in
34 Posts
No disrespect but that’s hardly any climbing.
I would go Madone all the way !
The domane is an excellent bike. Madone is a good total package for the roads out in Texas. Emonda SLR is a light climbing bike but before you lose lbs off the bike , make sure the ride lost all the necessary lbs first
I would go Madone all the way !
The domane is an excellent bike. Madone is a good total package for the roads out in Texas. Emonda SLR is a light climbing bike but before you lose lbs off the bike , make sure the ride lost all the necessary lbs first
Around here, you get about 100 feet of climbing per mile if you stick to the hills. During our mountain biking practices, that could get up to 200 feet per mile on trails.
Anyway, it’s enough climbing that it would be fun to have a climbing bike. At least in my opinion. I have a 14.5 lb Canyon (with disc brakes) and it’s a ton of fun in the hills. Really light weight wheels will make the biggest difference in the feel of the bike when climbing, in my experience.
#6
Junior Member
The difference in weight between the Domane and the Emonda are negligible. I don't think that you'll be able to feel you are climbing any easier on the Emonda than on the Domane. For a second bike I would recommend going with a different brand, something that has a slightly different geometry. It will bring more variety and fun to your cycling, and may prove which bike is faster.
Last edited by hrdknox1; 06-12-20 at 02:48 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
No disrespect but that’s hardly any climbing.
I would go Madone all the way !
The domane is an excellent bike. Madone is a good total package for the roads out in Texas. Emonda SLR is a light climbing bike but before you lose lbs off the bike , make sure the ride lost all the necessary lbs first
I would go Madone all the way !
The domane is an excellent bike. Madone is a good total package for the roads out in Texas. Emonda SLR is a light climbing bike but before you lose lbs off the bike , make sure the ride lost all the necessary lbs first
I've also thought about the Madone, but haven't ever ridden a bike with that kind of geometry. It might be worth a look.
I figure I'm 5 lbs or so from getting rid of the necessary weight, so I'm feeling good about that!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 713
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 387 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
184 Posts
What year and model is your Domane? I had a 2014 Domane 5.2 with Aeolus 5 carbon clinchers and a few other carbon parts and quite frankly, there was no need for another bike as it was light and comfortable. Maybe not Emonda light, but close enough considering I don't live in the mountains either... just hills.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
165 Posts
According to Trek, the Domane Sl6 weighs 20lbs. and the Emonda Sl6 weighs 18. That seems like a significant difference to me. Besides, I'm a firm believer in N+1.
Likes For Jack Tone:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,258
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8265 Post(s)
Liked 9,000 Times
in
4,456 Posts
Nah, no disrespect taken at all! This is exactly the kind of answer I was looking for. If the elevation I'm working with really isn't that much climbing, then there's no need to consider something that isn't a whole lot lighter. It's helpful to hear this reply to help cut through the marketing-speak!
I've also thought about the Madone, but haven't ever ridden a bike with that kind of geometry. It might be worth a look.
I figure I'm 5 lbs or so from getting rid of the necessary weight, so I'm feeling good about that!
I've also thought about the Madone, but haven't ever ridden a bike with that kind of geometry. It might be worth a look.
I figure I'm 5 lbs or so from getting rid of the necessary weight, so I'm feeling good about that!
#13
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#15
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
#16
Non omnino gravis
No matter how steep the hill, you will never notice a difference of a few pounds between two bikes. I don't notice the difference between two bikes that are almost 10lbs apart.
If you wanna N+1, go for it. No one really needs an excuse to buy another bike. But it seems odd to buy another Trek that is overwhelmingly similar to the Trek you already have.
If you wanna N+1, go for it. No one really needs an excuse to buy another bike. But it seems odd to buy another Trek that is overwhelmingly similar to the Trek you already have.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
No matter how steep the hill, you will never notice a difference of a few pounds between two bikes. I don't notice the difference between two bikes that are almost 10lbs apart.
If you wanna N+1, go for it. No one really needs an excuse to buy another bike. But it seems odd to buy another Trek that is overwhelmingly similar to the Trek you already have.
If you wanna N+1, go for it. No one really needs an excuse to buy another bike. But it seems odd to buy another Trek that is overwhelmingly similar to the Trek you already have.
I am not saying they will be noticeably faster, just that it will feel different.
Likes For Dean V:
#18
Non omnino gravis
Ten pounds takes about 8% more effort to get to the top of the hill at the same speed. But if I don't worry about the speed, it's exactly the same.
Heavy wheels can feel significantly different compared to light ones. But a 6lb frame doesn't not feel appreciably different from a 2.2lb frame-- once it has a 200lb meatsack suspended over it. IME.
Heavy wheels can feel significantly different compared to light ones. But a 6lb frame doesn't not feel appreciably different from a 2.2lb frame-- once it has a 200lb meatsack suspended over it. IME.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gatorland and BlueRidge heaven
Posts: 774
Bikes: 2021 Trek Domane SLR 7, 2012 Giant Defy 0, 2012 Trek Domane 6.2 P1, Bianchi Infinito CV disc Di2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Liked 1,000 Times
in
250 Posts
Get something like a Giant Defy or Bianchi Infinito. I have the Domane 6.2, a super bike and a real comfortable road killer. But in the mtns. of VA, the stiff frame and light weight of the Giant are a real benefit. I ride it exclusively there.
The Bianchi is arriving next week, and I suspect that will be in between in terms of its riding characteristics.
FL is flat, as you can surmise, but VA is really mountainous. I do about 2,000 feet every ride, and some of the grades are insane!
The Bianchi is arriving next week, and I suspect that will be in between in terms of its riding characteristics.
FL is flat, as you can surmise, but VA is really mountainous. I do about 2,000 feet every ride, and some of the grades are insane!
__________________
Ride hard and ride on......
Ride hard and ride on......
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 557
Bikes: 2021 Trek Checkpoint SL (GRX Di2), 2020 Domane SLR 9 (very green), 2016 Trek Emonda SL, 2009 Bianchi 928, 1972 Atala Record Pro
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 143 Times
in
55 Posts
I am fortunate to have both a Domane and an Emonda. Both have superlight wheels. The Emonda is snappier on short sharp climbs and a wee bit quicker. Slogging up a mountain pass, the 2.5 pounds I give up with the Domane makes virtually no difference on the clock or in my perception of effort. With the slight aero on the new Domane frame, it is marginally faster on flatter rides and significantly faster on rougher roads.
With approved clearance up to a 38s - I am actually running 40s on a second wheel set - Glenn is right: the Domane chews up gravel like it was made for it. Having the option is cool. When I put on the aero carbon wheels with 28s, it is a super fun and smooth road machine. I'm thinking the Emonda is going to see less and less action as time goes on, not because it is lacking at all, but because the latest generation Domane is so good and so versatile.
With approved clearance up to a 38s - I am actually running 40s on a second wheel set - Glenn is right: the Domane chews up gravel like it was made for it. Having the option is cool. When I put on the aero carbon wheels with 28s, it is a super fun and smooth road machine. I'm thinking the Emonda is going to see less and less action as time goes on, not because it is lacking at all, but because the latest generation Domane is so good and so versatile.
#22
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 242
Bikes: 2020 Pinarello Dogma F12 Disc (Enve SES 3.4), 2021 S-Works Aethos (Roval Alpinist CLX II), 2024 Topstone Lab71 (Terra CLX II), 2006 Cervelo Soloist (10 speed Ultegra), 2021 S-Works Epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 74 Times
in
34 Posts
For what it’s worth, I really enjoy my Canyon Ultimate EVO for climbing. The DT Swiss PRC 1100 wheels are very light (1280 grams or so).
#23
Full Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 425
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
163 Posts
The Domane geometry and whole reason for being is greater comfort vs Emonda and Madone. In terms of speed, it is relatively fine margins in general use in my experience of similar bike comparisons. The Emonda, like my Wilier Zero.6, will accelerate a bit quicker and pushing for every second, will be faster on steeper gradients, say 10% average, thanks to its lighter weight - the difference however depends upon how much value you place in the time advantage the lighter bike can help you achieve. It depends upon how you ride, the more leisurely you ride, the less you would notice any real difference. Chasing KOM's and/or racing? Emonda,
The Madone is my personal preference for a stablemate to a climbing bike and is the one I have made because speed is my goal and while I live in a very hilly area, it is not mountainous and a Madone will serve me very well when not doing climbing days.
If you aren't all that interested in marginal faster times at all and only after the occasional bit of fun on a club ride, the Domane is perfectly suited I think. If you do want some more speed but not living in a steep gradient zone, then Madone in my opinion as a +1 to the Domane but it is a far more aggressive riding position, so test ride first to see if you get along with it.
The Madone is my personal preference for a stablemate to a climbing bike and is the one I have made because speed is my goal and while I live in a very hilly area, it is not mountainous and a Madone will serve me very well when not doing climbing days.
If you aren't all that interested in marginal faster times at all and only after the occasional bit of fun on a club ride, the Domane is perfectly suited I think. If you do want some more speed but not living in a steep gradient zone, then Madone in my opinion as a +1 to the Domane but it is a far more aggressive riding position, so test ride first to see if you get along with it.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
If you aren't all that interested in marginal faster times at all and only after the occasional bit of fun on a club ride, the Domane is perfectly suited I think. If you do want some more speed but not living in a steep gradient zone, then Madone in my opinion as a +1 to the Domane but it is a far more aggressive riding position, so test ride first to see if you get along with it.
I have had Domane, Emonda, and Madone all with H2 geometry and I set them all up with the same riding position.
I would still have the same position with H1.5, just need a few spacers under the stem.
#25
Full Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 425
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
163 Posts
To add, this review I found seems to agree with my experience:
https://cyclingtips.com/2019/07/2020...t-ride-review/