Clyde in denial, until...
#1
Huge Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ittybittycity, MD
Posts: 636
Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, Pedal Force RS2, Salsa Campeon, Jamis Nova, Trek 7000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Clyde in denial, until...
So I was cleaning up the bike today and noticed something I'd heard lots of talk about but thought would never happen to me; some stress cracks (pictures below) at the spoke holes on my rear wheel. Details:
- Me: 225lbs
- Wheels: Xero Lite XR-1s, 1200 miles (16h front, 20h rear)
I'm in for a new set of wheels now, but not sure what to do. I'd like to stay in the same ballpark for weight, but if I could avoid this from happening to me that would be just fantastic. I've emailed Mike Garcia to see what he has in his arsenal to offer, but I'll need something in the meantime that I can also use as a spare wheelset.
Is custom the way to go or would I be just as well served buying a manufactured wheel?
Two images below as attachments of one spoke, but the rest are similar.
Thanks,
Mike
- Me: 225lbs
- Wheels: Xero Lite XR-1s, 1200 miles (16h front, 20h rear)
I'm in for a new set of wheels now, but not sure what to do. I'd like to stay in the same ballpark for weight, but if I could avoid this from happening to me that would be just fantastic. I've emailed Mike Garcia to see what he has in his arsenal to offer, but I'll need something in the meantime that I can also use as a spare wheelset.
Is custom the way to go or would I be just as well served buying a manufactured wheel?
Two images below as attachments of one spoke, but the rest are similar.
Thanks,
Mike
__________________
--
--
Last edited by RacerMike; 01-15-07 at 02:56 PM.
#2
Unique Vintage Steel
XR-1's are what, abut 1550g?
I'd go with a DTSwiss RR1.1 rim, 28 spoke front and rear, and what ever hubs you want to go with. They won't be 1550g, but probably less than 1700. Maybe use the RR1.2 rim with a few less spokes?
btw: pics aren't working.
I'd go with a DTSwiss RR1.1 rim, 28 spoke front and rear, and what ever hubs you want to go with. They won't be 1550g, but probably less than 1700. Maybe use the RR1.2 rim with a few less spokes?
btw: pics aren't working.
#4
Huge Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ittybittycity, MD
Posts: 636
Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, Pedal Force RS2, Salsa Campeon, Jamis Nova, Trek 7000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Faster but still slow
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It would seem that Clyde + super light wheels = stress cracks
Why even bother with light wheels if you are overweight?
Why even bother with light wheels if you are overweight?
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As you found out, you are a little tooooo heavy for those wheels. I would suggest a standard 32-hole build from a reputable source.
#7
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
It would seem that Clyde + super light wheels = stress cracks
Why even bother with light wheels if you are overweight?
Why even bother with light wheels if you are overweight?
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
#8
Huge Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ittybittycity, MD
Posts: 636
Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, Pedal Force RS2, Salsa Campeon, Jamis Nova, Trek 7000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Erstwhile Trogon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,032
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I weigh 155 pounds and I get an argument from Mike Garcia and every other reputable builder when I tell them I want 20H wheels. Mike has even argued with me on 24 and 28. When it comes to wheels, you have to put it into the right perspective. Rims are all similar, spokes weigh about 10 grams each. The big difference in is the hubs.
You have to buy what's appropriate for your size. You say hate to go lighter, but you're probably talking no more than and extra 200 grams for a set of wheels built for your needs vs. a set of light weight clinchers. That 200 grams is less than .22% of the total weight you bring to the bike if you were riding it naked and without water bottles.
36H open pros would last you a long, long time. And they wouldn't make a bit of difference in your performance. If the idea of weight is really killing you, buy the most expensive lightweight hubs you can find and build on those.
You have to buy what's appropriate for your size. You say hate to go lighter, but you're probably talking no more than and extra 200 grams for a set of wheels built for your needs vs. a set of light weight clinchers. That 200 grams is less than .22% of the total weight you bring to the bike if you were riding it naked and without water bottles.
36H open pros would last you a long, long time. And they wouldn't make a bit of difference in your performance. If the idea of weight is really killing you, buy the most expensive lightweight hubs you can find and build on those.
#10
Le Garçon de Knoxville
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 278
Bikes: Searching
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yea, just because someone is 200+, doesnt mean theyre overweight. Im 6'4, 230 and while I am a little heavier than Id like to be, Im hardly very overweight...
-Matt
-Matt
#11
.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
12 Posts
Originally Posted by mattfeet
Yea, just because someone is 200+, doesnt mean theyre overweight. Im 6'4, 230 and while I am a little heavier than Id like to be, Im hardly very overweight...
-Matt
-Matt
#12
Dolce far niente
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
...... Mike has even argued with me on 24 and 28......
That's funny, he talked me into a set of 24/28 Niobium's, and I'm 230.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
#13
Erstwhile Trogon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,032
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm surprised, because he's been darn conservative with me.
Keep an eye on them, because I've had 2 spokes shake loose on my 28s. Not sure it has anything to do with weight, but they're the lightest set I own and the only ones I've ever had problems with.
I'd never consider that low a spoke count if I weighed more than 200. When I was 175, Mike, Excel and CC all recommended 32H as the most bombproof build.
Keep an eye on them, because I've had 2 spokes shake loose on my 28s. Not sure it has anything to do with weight, but they're the lightest set I own and the only ones I've ever had problems with.
I'd never consider that low a spoke count if I weighed more than 200. When I was 175, Mike, Excel and CC all recommended 32H as the most bombproof build.
#14
Le Garçon de Knoxville
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 278
Bikes: Searching
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
maybe, but you'd still be over the ideal weight for a lot of light weight wheels.
Good point, but I wasnt arguing whether or not Im a good candidate for a pair of lightweight wheels, I was just saying that since Im 200+, that doesnt automatically make someone overweight.
-Matt
#15
Erstwhile Trogon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,032
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mattfeet
Yea, just because someone is 200+, doesnt mean theyre overweight. Im 6'4, 230 and while I am a little heavier than Id like to be, Im hardly very overweight...
-Matt
-Matt
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
#16
Dolce far niente
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
14 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
I'm surprised, because he's been darn conservative with me.
Keep an eye on them, because I've had 2 spokes shake loose on my 28s. Not sure it has anything to do with weight, but they're the lightest set I own and the only ones I've ever had problems with.
I'd never consider that low a spoke count if I weighed more than 200. When I was 175, Mike, Excel and CC all recommended 32H as the most bombproof build.
Keep an eye on them, because I've had 2 spokes shake loose on my 28s. Not sure it has anything to do with weight, but they're the lightest set I own and the only ones I've ever had problems with.
I'd never consider that low a spoke count if I weighed more than 200. When I was 175, Mike, Excel and CC all recommended 32H as the most bombproof build.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
#17
Le Garçon de Knoxville
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 278
Bikes: Searching
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
Oh no, I agree with you completely. I was just defending us bigger fellas. I wouldnt in my right mind buy wheels with anything less than 30 right now.
-Matt
#18
Software for Cyclists
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 4,618
Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
Of course, if one has a heavy bone structure (i.e., your fingers won't touch when you try to hold one wrist with the opposite hand), and a measured body fat percentage near single digits, then the guidelines would not be applicable. But, from casual observation I think there are a lot more "Bubbas" than "Rocks".
Regardless, anyone over 200 should probably avoid choosing lightweight mission-critical components like wheels, seatposts () and handlebars.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481
Bikes: Too many to list!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481
Bikes: Too many to list!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
36H open pros would last you a long, long time. And they wouldn't make a bit of difference in your performance. If the idea of weight is really killing you, buy the most expensive lightweight hubs you can find and build on those.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12194 Post(s)
Liked 1,497 Times
in
1,109 Posts
#22
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
#23
Making a kilometer blurry
Why do you care about wheel weight? I'm 185 and ride Deep Vs so they'll last forever. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You're a clyde training on race wheels...
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681
Bikes: Pedal Force QS3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by bigbossman
That's funny, he talked me into a set of 24/28 Niobium's, and I'm 230.
Originally Posted by terry b
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
__________________
15% Hammer Nutrition Discount Code
15% Hammer Nutrition Discount Code
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
In fact, I was pretty sceptical of my Ksyerium SL's until I tried them out. Now I ride either my custom wheels or Mavic wheels and nothing else. And I haven't had to realign wheels in several years now.
People make entirely too much out of light weight wheels. The reason probably is because the lighter weight wheels usually have high end hubs which roll better over a longer period of time. I can actually tell the difference in the rollout of my Mavics and another set of wheels with Ultegra hubs as the only difference.
If you're over 185 lbs and ESPECIALLY if you haven't been riding a long time so that you're heavy in the saddle or if you're one of those mountain bikers first converting to road and hence not paying any attention to potholes and curbs, you cannot ride "light" wheels.
Therefore you are a "heavyweight" which ain't saying you're fat. Do you suppose Nelson Vails would have ridden 1500 gram wheels?