Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Clyde in denial, until...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Clyde in denial, until...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-07, 02:29 PM
  #1  
RacerMike
Huge Member
Thread Starter
 
RacerMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ittybittycity, MD
Posts: 636

Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, Pedal Force RS2, Salsa Campeon, Jamis Nova, Trek 7000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Clyde in denial, until...

So I was cleaning up the bike today and noticed something I'd heard lots of talk about but thought would never happen to me; some stress cracks (pictures below) at the spoke holes on my rear wheel. Details:

- Me: 225lbs
- Wheels: Xero Lite XR-1s, 1200 miles (16h front, 20h rear)

I'm in for a new set of wheels now, but not sure what to do. I'd like to stay in the same ballpark for weight, but if I could avoid this from happening to me that would be just fantastic. I've emailed Mike Garcia to see what he has in his arsenal to offer, but I'll need something in the meantime that I can also use as a spare wheelset.

Is custom the way to go or would I be just as well served buying a manufactured wheel?

Two images below as attachments of one spoke, but the rest are similar.

Thanks,

Mike
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
wheel_crack1.jpg (96.7 KB, 235 views)
File Type: jpg
wheel_crack2.jpg (89.5 KB, 199 views)
__________________
--
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
If you're faster than me, you're fast. If you're not, you suck.

Last edited by RacerMike; 01-15-07 at 02:56 PM.
RacerMike is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 02:51 PM
  #2  
cuda2k
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 11,586

Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Surly Straggler

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 56 Posts
XR-1's are what, abut 1550g?

I'd go with a DTSwiss RR1.1 rim, 28 spoke front and rear, and what ever hubs you want to go with. They won't be 1550g, but probably less than 1700. Maybe use the RR1.2 rim with a few less spokes?

btw: pics aren't working.
cuda2k is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 02:55 PM
  #3  
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
don't know what level you're riding at, or what your riding style is, but considering your weight, i'd go for strength over light weight.
botto is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 02:57 PM
  #4  
RacerMike
Huge Member
Thread Starter
 
RacerMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ittybittycity, MD
Posts: 636

Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, Pedal Force RS2, Salsa Campeon, Jamis Nova, Trek 7000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
weird...I added them as attachments instead. Thanks for the headsup...they looked fine in my browser.
__________________
--
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
If you're faster than me, you're fast. If you're not, you suck.
RacerMike is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:12 PM
  #5  
slowandsteady
Faster but still slow
 
slowandsteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978

Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It would seem that Clyde + super light wheels = stress cracks

Why even bother with light wheels if you are overweight?
slowandsteady is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:17 PM
  #6  
galen_52657
Banned.
 
galen_52657's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020

Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As you found out, you are a little tooooo heavy for those wheels. I would suggest a standard 32-hole build from a reputable source.
galen_52657 is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:36 PM
  #7  
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056

Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
It would seem that Clyde + super light wheels = stress cracks

Why even bother with light wheels if you are overweight?
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:43 PM
  #8  
RacerMike
Huge Member
Thread Starter
 
RacerMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ittybittycity, MD
Posts: 636

Bikes: 2009 BMC Team Machine, Pedal Force RS2, Salsa Campeon, Jamis Nova, Trek 7000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just to clarify, I am 6'2" and I am carrying a bit of extra weight, but realistically without looking gaunt I don't think I could get under 205.
__________________
--
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
If you're faster than me, you're fast. If you're not, you suck.
RacerMike is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:45 PM
  #9  
terry b
Erstwhile Trogon
 
terry b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,032
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I weigh 155 pounds and I get an argument from Mike Garcia and every other reputable builder when I tell them I want 20H wheels. Mike has even argued with me on 24 and 28. When it comes to wheels, you have to put it into the right perspective. Rims are all similar, spokes weigh about 10 grams each. The big difference in is the hubs.

You have to buy what's appropriate for your size. You say hate to go lighter, but you're probably talking no more than and extra 200 grams for a set of wheels built for your needs vs. a set of light weight clinchers. That 200 grams is less than .22% of the total weight you bring to the bike if you were riding it naked and without water bottles.

36H open pros would last you a long, long time. And they wouldn't make a bit of difference in your performance. If the idea of weight is really killing you, buy the most expensive lightweight hubs you can find and build on those.
terry b is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:46 PM
  #10  
mattfeet
Le Garçon de Knoxville
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 278

Bikes: Searching

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yea, just because someone is 200+, doesnt mean theyre overweight. Im 6'4, 230 and while I am a little heavier than Id like to be, Im hardly very overweight...

-Matt
mattfeet is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:48 PM
  #11  
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by mattfeet
Yea, just because someone is 200+, doesnt mean theyre overweight. Im 6'4, 230 and while I am a little heavier than Id like to be, Im hardly very overweight...

-Matt
maybe, but you'd still be over the ideal weight for a lot of light weight wheels.
botto is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:50 PM
  #12  
bigbossman 
Dolce far niente
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
...... Mike has even argued with me on 24 and 28......

That's funny, he talked me into a set of 24/28 Niobium's, and I'm 230.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:56 PM
  #13  
terry b
Erstwhile Trogon
 
terry b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,032
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm surprised, because he's been darn conservative with me.

Keep an eye on them, because I've had 2 spokes shake loose on my 28s. Not sure it has anything to do with weight, but they're the lightest set I own and the only ones I've ever had problems with.

I'd never consider that low a spoke count if I weighed more than 200. When I was 175, Mike, Excel and CC all recommended 32H as the most bombproof build.
terry b is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:58 PM
  #14  
mattfeet
Le Garçon de Knoxville
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 278

Bikes: Searching

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
maybe, but you'd still be over the ideal weight for a lot of light weight wheels.

Good point, but I wasnt arguing whether or not Im a good candidate for a pair of lightweight wheels, I was just saying that since Im 200+, that doesnt automatically make someone overweight.

-Matt
mattfeet is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:01 PM
  #15  
terry b
Erstwhile Trogon
 
terry b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,032
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mattfeet
Yea, just because someone is 200+, doesnt mean theyre overweight. Im 6'4, 230 and while I am a little heavier than Id like to be, Im hardly very overweight...

-Matt

There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.

I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
terry b is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:23 PM
  #16  
bigbossman 
Dolce far niente
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
I'm surprised, because he's been darn conservative with me.

Keep an eye on them, because I've had 2 spokes shake loose on my 28s. Not sure it has anything to do with weight, but they're the lightest set I own and the only ones I've ever had problems with.

I'd never consider that low a spoke count if I weighed more than 200. When I was 175, Mike, Excel and CC all recommended 32H as the most bombproof build.
Yeah - I called originally with the 32/32 set in my mind, but after talking with me for over an hour, that it what he recommended. I was leary at first, but he really insisted thatthey would be fine. The wheels ride well. They are lighter and much less flexy than the Xero-3's that were on my bike (which were 20/24, incidentally). I've only got about 5,000 miles on them so far, but they are still true and I haven't lost spokes or noticed any stess cracks yet.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:25 PM
  #17  
mattfeet
Le Garçon de Knoxville
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 278

Bikes: Searching

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.

I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.

Oh no, I agree with you completely. I was just defending us bigger fellas. I wouldnt in my right mind buy wheels with anything less than 30 right now.

-Matt
mattfeet is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:32 PM
  #18  
SSP
Software for Cyclists
 
SSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 4,618

Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
That would be a BMI of 28.1 - well into the "overweight" category per current CDC guidelines. For most folks, a BMI of 28.1 would, in fact, be overweight.

Of course, if one has a heavy bone structure (i.e., your fingers won't touch when you try to hold one wrist with the opposite hand), and a measured body fat percentage near single digits, then the guidelines would not be applicable. But, from casual observation I think there are a lot more "Bubbas" than "Rocks".

Regardless, anyone over 200 should probably avoid choosing lightweight mission-critical components like wheels, seatposts () and handlebars.
SSP is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:38 PM
  #19  
bac
Senior Member
 
bac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481

Bikes: Too many to list!

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
The bike doesn't know/care if it's 225 of muscle, fat, or cardboard. The weight on the wheels is the same.
bac is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:40 PM
  #20  
bac
Senior Member
 
bac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481

Bikes: Too many to list!

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
36H open pros would last you a long, long time. And they wouldn't make a bit of difference in your performance. If the idea of weight is really killing you, buy the most expensive lightweight hubs you can find and build on those.
+2 (for both wheels)
bac is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 04:50 PM
  #21  
late
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12194 Post(s)
Liked 1,497 Times in 1,109 Posts
https://www.coloradocyclist.com/commo...762&TextMode=0
late is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 05:24 PM
  #22  
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056

Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by terry b
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.

I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
OK, that's what I thought you meant. I was just asking for clarification there. I generally recommend a high spoke count. I weigh in at 219 now and I run 40 spoke rear and 36 front. I'm not concerned with grams here or there because my bike in the summer is likely to be rolling down the road loaded with panniers and gear and can weigh up to 40-50 pounds by itself with the gear on. If the wife is along, I'll be rolling with a trailer instead since it'll be her first ever tour. I thought I'd let her ride light....not to mention touring racks for a delta recumbent trike are few and far between! Sorry about the reflexive response there, I've gotten a few nasty comments in the past about my weight (2 years ago, I had blown up to 581 due to a metabolic disease), especially when I first got back into cycling for the exercise and weight loss and much as I try to avoid it happening, that button still has a light trigger sometimes
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 06:15 PM
  #23  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Why do you care about wheel weight? I'm 185 and ride Deep Vs so they'll last forever. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You're a clyde training on race wheels...
waterrockets is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 06:39 PM
  #24  
Dubbayoo
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bigbossman
That's funny, he talked me into a set of 24/28 Niobium's, and I'm 230.
+1 and I was 240 when I asked. I was asking about 20/24 but he suggested more spokes and lighter hubs.


Originally Posted by terry b
There's "overweight" and then there's "overweight for the equipment." I'm pretty sure that 225 is a little on the high side for a 20H rear wheel, and the evidence presented seems to agree with me.

I'll never under stand why 200+ pound guys even think for a minute about 2 pound frames and 20ish hole wheels. The best and lightest is always nice to brag about but c'mon, it won't make a whit of difference in getting you up a hill.
We should all be happy with 4 lb frames unless we're built like Michael Rasmussen.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 07:06 PM
  #25  
cyclintom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900

Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
How do you define overweight....just curious. Bone structure and lean body mass dependent, 225 is well within norm for a 6'3" man with heavy bone structure and a lot of muscle mass.
That ain't an insult, it's a classification. I'm a meager 200 lbs and ride like I'm half the weight most of the time but I wouldn't THINK of riding on 1500 gram wheels.

In fact, I was pretty sceptical of my Ksyerium SL's until I tried them out. Now I ride either my custom wheels or Mavic wheels and nothing else. And I haven't had to realign wheels in several years now.

People make entirely too much out of light weight wheels. The reason probably is because the lighter weight wheels usually have high end hubs which roll better over a longer period of time. I can actually tell the difference in the rollout of my Mavics and another set of wheels with Ultegra hubs as the only difference.

If you're over 185 lbs and ESPECIALLY if you haven't been riding a long time so that you're heavy in the saddle or if you're one of those mountain bikers first converting to road and hence not paying any attention to potholes and curbs, you cannot ride "light" wheels.

Therefore you are a "heavyweight" which ain't saying you're fat. Do you suppose Nelson Vails would have ridden 1500 gram wheels?
cyclintom is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.