Aluminum Is More Elastic Than Steel
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Aluminum Is More Elastic Than Steel
Comparing the modulus of elasticity, alloy is springier than steel. With the advent of downward sloping top tubes, we see a lot of road bike frames that significantly depart for the lines of vintage steel road bikes. My guess is, a modern road bike with a lot of exposed aluminum setback seat post probably provides as much road compliance as the traditional steel road bike with a short alloy or even CF seat post.
#2
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Aluminum schmaluminum.
The material is only part of it. An aluminum bike can be made as stiff or compliant as the designer wants.
I have a custom True Temper S3 steel frame which is as stiff as any bike. I also have a Bianchi Pista steel bike which is like riding a giant leaf spring. Both are steel and they have vastly different ride qualities.
-Tim-
The material is only part of it. An aluminum bike can be made as stiff or compliant as the designer wants.
I have a custom True Temper S3 steel frame which is as stiff as any bike. I also have a Bianchi Pista steel bike which is like riding a giant leaf spring. Both are steel and they have vastly different ride qualities.
-Tim-
#3
Non omnino gravis
No matter how well made the frame, aluminum has an indistinct fatigue limit. Used long enough, it will fail. Inevitable. Steel and titanium on the other hand have an endurance limit-- if they are exposed to cyclic stresses below the fatigue limit, they will last indefinitely.
So while framebuilding methods can make an aluminum frame as stiff or compliant as you'd like, at some point, it's going to fail.
#4
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Fail point, scmail point.
The fail point of aluminum is definitely past 16 years or 65,000 miles.
The fail point of aluminum is definitely past 16 years or 65,000 miles.
#5
Non omnino gravis
#6
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Comparing the modulus of elasticity, alloy is springier than steel. With the advent of downward sloping top tubes, we see a lot of road bike frames that significantly depart for the lines of vintage steel road bikes. My guess is, a modern road bike with a lot of exposed aluminum setback seat post probably provides as much road compliance as the traditional steel road bike with a short alloy or even CF seat post.
I would like to hear your thoughts and then will provide the reason. It isn't directly related to amount of seat post exposed.
#7
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Just don't agree. Fatigue limit can be tested and is in the laboratory by major manufacturers. I personally have been riding Al bikes a long time and have never seen a fatigue failure. I am sure they maybe out there but so incredibly rare. Force/deflection X's no. of cycles to fatigue. Any frame can be tested in the laboratory at higher forces and larger frame bending amplitudes than a frame would see in the field to failure. Likely some Al frames stroking in the lab throughout the world as I type this.
#8
Non omnino gravis
You can argue whatever you want, you'll still be wrong. The failure point of aluminum is indistinct. That's a basic fact. Out in my workshop, I have an aluminum frame with a snapped chainstay. It lasted 19,143.8 miles.
Nowhere in this thread have I stated anything resembling an opinion, nothing at all subjective. The failure point of aluminum is indistinct. My chainstay snapped at the above mentioned mileage. Facts.
Nowhere in this thread have I stated anything resembling an opinion, nothing at all subjective. The failure point of aluminum is indistinct. My chainstay snapped at the above mentioned mileage. Facts.
#9
Uber Goober
The modulus of elasticity is the stiffness per unit area. However, an aluminum frame inevitably requires more cross-sectional area in the members, so the stiffness of actual members may be greater than steel. Making members larger diameter makes them stiffer for bending and torsion, which may nor may not be a good thing.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Just don't agree. Fatigue limit can be tested and is in the laboratory by major manufacturers. I personally have been riding Al bikes a long time and have never seen a fatigue failure. I am sure they maybe out there but so incredibly rare. Force/deflection X's no. of cycles to fatigue. Any frame can be tested in the laboratory at higher forces and larger frame bending amplitudes than a frame would see in the field to failure. Likely some Al frames stroking in the lab throughout the world as I type this.
Ben
#11
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Modern bikes are not made out of aluminum.
#12
Senior Member
No matter how well made the frame, aluminum has an indistinct fatigue limit. Used long enough, it will fail. Inevitable. Steel and titanium on the other hand have an endurance limit-- if they are exposed to cyclic stresses below the fatigue limit, they will last indefinitely.
So while framebuilding methods can make an aluminum frame as stiff or compliant as you'd like, at some point, it's going to fail.
#13
Senior Member
As you say, fatigue limit can be tested for but with aluminum, that limit will not be found. So aluminum frames are overbuilt to ensure that the stresses stay so low that the bike will hopefully outlast the original owner. (Klein started the overbuilt model, closely followed by Cannondale. With careful engineering, it has been possible to slim things down a little. The ever increasing desire for super stiff makes the engineers' jobs a lot easier. None of this changes the fact that all aluminum bikes will fail, often suddenly, if ridden enough. There are a lot of aluminum bikes that haven't failed yet. By contrast, a non-high end steel or a ti bike constructed carefully without flaws will last until a big stresser (crash or the like) happens. My Peter Mooney has seen just short of 50,000 miles, Wouldn't surprise me to see it go that far again except it won't be me riding it. (It has not been babied. It has crashed hard several times. On its second fork. Now a modern, bigger tubed and stiffer/lighter modern steel bike would be pretty tired after the same abuse.)
Ben
Ben
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Ben
#15
Senior Member
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Those planes are on schedules so that aluminum is replaced before it has seen too many cycles. Now, some of the older planes are flown near forever by third world airlines and periodically some of them do fail.
Ben
Ben
#17
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times
in
218 Posts
Just don't agree. Fatigue limit can be tested and is in the laboratory by major manufacturers. I personally have been riding Al bikes a long time and have never seen a fatigue failure. I am sure they maybe out there but so incredibly rare. Force/deflection X's no. of cycles to fatigue. Any frame can be tested in the laboratory at higher forces and larger frame bending amplitudes than a frame would see in the field to failure. Likely some Al frames stroking in the lab throughout the world as I type this.
I am 400lbs though.
#18
Senior Member
and carbon supposedly have indefinite fatigue life, except just like steel, titanium and alloy, they too fail in real world application. All of them can be overbuild to the point of lasting forever.
#19
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Comparing the modulus of elasticity, alloy is springier than steel. With the advent of downward sloping top tubes, we see a lot of road bike frames that significantly depart for the lines of vintage steel road bikes. My guess is, a modern road bike with a lot of exposed aluminum setback seat post probably provides as much road compliance as the traditional steel road bike with a short alloy or even CF seat post.
aluminum is also weaker. It's overbuilt and oversized to account for it being a weaker metal. This then, in general, makes it stiffer since larger tubes flex less.
but regardless of that, frame geometry, tubing shape and butting, and tire width all play significant parts in how a bike feels. Stiff or flexible. Plush or harsh. Etc etc.
seatpost has something to do with it, sure, but indont think as much as the 3 variables I listed.
regardless of even all that now- so what? If a compact aluminum frame with an absurdly long seatpost is as compliant as a traditional level top tube steel frane with traditional seat post...so what? What's the reason for posting?
#20
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Im well aware some claim it doesn't happen. Except it does. Im sure you can build a steel bike that lasts forever and Im sure some do, but definitely not all of them. In that sense they are no different than alloy or what ever else you can think of.
#22
Senior Member
I cracked a dropout on a Cannondale CAAD7 after 12 years and Cannondale gave me a new CAAD10 as a warranty replacement (this was the year before CAAD12). I was surprised I got the warranty replacement because of the fatigue issue, but I guess Cdale expects their frames to last.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
True, true... e.g.,
The alloy composition of 6061 is: Silicon minimum 0.4%, maximum 0.8% by weight Iron no minimum, maximum 0.7% Copper minimum 0.15%, maximum 0.4% Manganese no minimum, maximum 0.15% Magnesium minimum 0.8%, maximum 1.2% Chromium minimum 0.04%, maximum 0.35% Zinc no minimum, maximum 0.25% Titanium no minimum, maximum 0.15%
(wiki)
The alloy composition of 6061 is: Silicon minimum 0.4%, maximum 0.8% by weight Iron no minimum, maximum 0.7% Copper minimum 0.15%, maximum 0.4% Manganese no minimum, maximum 0.15% Magnesium minimum 0.8%, maximum 1.2% Chromium minimum 0.04%, maximum 0.35% Zinc no minimum, maximum 0.25% Titanium no minimum, maximum 0.15%
(wiki)
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times
in
3,353 Posts
A lot of bicycles are made out of aluminum. Of course some are made of steel.
And then the "boutique" bikes made of Carbon Fiber. They catch people's attention, but the work horses are still aluminum and steel.
Does Cannondale make "modern" bikes?
Then of course, back to the components. Lots of aluminum components including aluminum seatposts mentioned by the OP.
And then the "boutique" bikes made of Carbon Fiber. They catch people's attention, but the work horses are still aluminum and steel.
Does Cannondale make "modern" bikes?
Then of course, back to the components. Lots of aluminum components including aluminum seatposts mentioned by the OP.
#25
Senior Member
Light steel frames where the stresses are above the fatigue limit are subject to minute cracks from those stresses and yes, may start feeling "soft" as the integrity is compromised. My (probably 531) Mooney is not that light and is fully as stiff as new 40 years ago.
Ben
Ben