One Man’s View Of Disc Brakes
#252
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
"You've ridden disc brakes, right?
"Yeah, yeah - totally."
"Yeah, yeah - totally."
Likes For WhyFi:
#253
Senior Member
Warning: wall of text to follow, primarily aimed at "on the path" as it mostly just confirms everything we've discussed as pros and cons of disc and rim brakes. Most don't need to read.
So @on the path yeah we all know "anyone can say anything". But let's see what some folks have to say on cycling sites where they have a reputation at stake, vs. Anonymous Keyboard Warriors like us. Yeah I know, the best part about Conspiracy Theories is that they can't be disproven. Any contrary evidence is just dismissed as "part of the conspiracy". So if that's your stance, you can stop reading here.
2016 article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/r...-need-to-know/
Remember this is in the early days of disc on road bikes, so many improvements have happened since this article was written, but even so here are some key points from it...
From a 2019 road.cc article which is relatively pro-rim (or maybe better classified as anti-disc): https://road.cc/content/feature/2562...ut-disc-brakes
Pretty balanced pro/con going to disc: https://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/ti...vs-rim-brakes/
Modulation, as discussed in this article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/h...ke-modulation/
Funny you should mention the importance of tires. From the 2016 bikeradar article:
So yeah, tires are important, and disc brakes allow you to put the very best tires and rims to suit your braking needs. Also not to be lost in the benefits: comfort
So everything we've been discussing has been borne out in those various links. You know what they all agree on? That disc brakes have better stopping power and modulation. You're the only one claiming rim are equal to disc brakes in braking performance.
So @on the path yeah we all know "anyone can say anything". But let's see what some folks have to say on cycling sites where they have a reputation at stake, vs. Anonymous Keyboard Warriors like us. Yeah I know, the best part about Conspiracy Theories is that they can't be disproven. Any contrary evidence is just dismissed as "part of the conspiracy". So if that's your stance, you can stop reading here.
2016 article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/r...-need-to-know/
Remember this is in the early days of disc on road bikes, so many improvements have happened since this article was written, but even so here are some key points from it...
- [Disc brakes] generate much more stopping power, meaning there’s less force required at the lever to generate the same amount of deceleration as on a rim brake
- An added bonus is that braking power can be quickly and easily boosted (or tempered, depending on your preferences) by changing rotor sizes.
- Disc brakes offer better modulation than rim brakes, meaning it’s easier for the rider to precisely meter out exactly how much clamping power is generated. Peak stopping power occurs just before the point of lock-up and disc-equipped bikes are better equipped to flirt with that edge without crossing over. Disc brake power also tends to be more linear and predictable than on rim brakes, and it’s far more consistent in varying weather conditions, especially when compared with using rim brakes on carbon rims – a combination that yields notoriously poor performance in the wet and yet is also prone to overheating when dry.
- Rim brakes still hold the upper hand in several key areas. Their biggest advantage is on the scale.
- Disc brakes are also less aerodynamic than rim brakes – although the exact degree of that difference is still up for debate. *note that in the years since, the aero aspect has improved for disc, and in the 2019 article I'll link to later an argument is made they're more aero than rim.
- The simplicity of cable-actuated rim brakes has plenty of upsides, too.
- Levers, brake calipers, hoses, fluid and rotors weigh more than an equivalent rim brake setup. Manufacturers often try to minimise the difference but don't forget that disc brake hubs are heavier too, and disc brake wheels are often built up with more spokes of a wider gauge, although the lack of a brake track means that disc-specific rims are generally lighter. The thru axles that are used with many disc systems are heavier than quick release skewers. [note: personally I don't factor in thru-axle as a weight penalty, because having both a QR and TA road bike...I greatly prefer the TA regardless of what braking system may be on a bike]
- Disc brake rub can be an issue. [I had it; but it took a 1-minute alignment procedure to fix]
- Disc brakes affect aerodynamics. Some manufacturers have stated that the rim brake version of a particular bike is more aerodynamically efficient than the disc brake model, but it's not as simple as saying that rim brakes are always more aero. When Giant revealed its Propel Disc in 2017, for example, it said, "Engineers found that, with proper integration, a disc-brake design can actually improve aero performance compared to rim-brake configurations. “This is because the location of traditional calipers (either in front or behind the fork crown/ legs) creates 'dirty' air'. Opening up the fork crown area (by placing the disc-brake calipers down at the hub) means that the air hitting the new disc-brake caliper has already been disrupted by the leading edge of the tyre/wheel. This effect is further enhanced by an asymmetric fork that helps smooth out airflow over the caliper.”
- Pro: Modulation / stopping power - The undeniable truth is that disc brakes allow you to stop over a shorter distance with more control.
- Pro: Wet brake rims (especially carbon) and brake pads aren’t a great mix. Even with the best weather radar apps and planning, eventually you will be caught out in the rain. Hopefully its not when your heading down a hill. Yes, they probably will squeal but as long as they stop.
- Pro: Inevitably rim brakes wear into the brake track on your rim, this reduces the stopping power and the life of the actual rim. Aluminum wheels are quite resilient but non the less they wear. Carbon rim wheels and the breaking heat generated wear down even quicker. Disc brakes remove all of that heat and friction wear from the rim and place it all on the disc rotor, a piece that can be easily replaced at a fraction of the cost of a complete wheel.
- Pro: Caliper brakes are essentially limited somewhere in the 28mm tyre size realm. Disc brake equipped bikes don’t have this limitation, allowing frame manufacturers to design and produce bikes capable of fitting much greater tyre sizes. This can significantly increase traction/grip and also means added comfort from the increased volume
- Con: Caliper brakes are essentially limited somewhere in the 28mm tyre size realm. Disc brake equipped bikes don’t have this limitation, allowing frame manufacturers to design and produce bikes capable of fitting much greater tyre sizes. This can significantly increase traction/grip and also means added comfort from the increased volume
- Con: Whether you are replacing individual components, full groupsets or complete bikes, the disc brake version is almost always more expensive. Although there is likely there is likely to be less disparity as tech improves and disc brakes become more common.
- Con: When comparing the different frame and fork construction methods, the weight difference can be anywhere between 300g to 500g. Though disc technology is advancing rapidly, it is still slightly heavier when looking at the complete system.
- Con: For years there has been a perceived risks of the rotor being dangerous in a crash. This was possibly true on the original styles of rotors, but technology is moving fast and edges are now much more smooth and rounded – as shown in this short video.
- I’m not at all going to argue with the notion that rim brakes and conventional braided cables have worked for ages. They’re also often very light, easy to service, and highly tuneable. But just because something has always worked doesn’t mean it’s the best way to do things. After all, there’s a reason we don’t use lead paint, asbestos, nailed-on cleats, or rotary phones anymore, either.
- Taken from an outsider’s perspective, squeezing a couple of chunks of rubber (or cork) against a rim is flat-out silly, particularly when you consider the exorbitant prices often attached to high-end bikes these days. Likewise, even the best rim brake calipers can be prone to flex with their relatively long expanses of material and multiple pivots.
- “The braking surfaces are more consistent and the friction material is a lot more sophisticated,” says Kantor. “I think the people that make rubber pads for a living would argue that they put a ton of work into it and I’d agree, but we’re able to achieve a more complex relationship with a disc brake pad.”
- Hydraulic lines take away much of the signal loss that occurs in mechanically actuated brakes due to line friction and housing compression plus they offer a greater mechanical advantage that reduces hand effort. “Any time you’re using less hand effort, you’re less likely to spike that lever. If you have to pull really hard to get a desired stopping force, you’re not able to control your hand effort as well.”
Um, I'll declare that rim brakes categorically are just as good as disc brakes. And disc brakes are good enough. And heavy. And expensive. And overly complicated for the application.
I realize that this is the 41, but how can a thread like this contain no meaningful mention of tires? Tires are the single most significant component of any vehicle braking system. Ever hear - "your car is only as good as its tires"? When you're done "modulating" it's all up to the tires.
I realize that this is the 41, but how can a thread like this contain no meaningful mention of tires? Tires are the single most significant component of any vehicle braking system. Ever hear - "your car is only as good as its tires"? When you're done "modulating" it's all up to the tires.
- Without having to worry about accommodating a caliper, disc-equipped road bikes can now more easily fit higher-volume tires and wider rims for improved traction on a more diverse mix of terrain. Since the seatstays no longer have to be reinforced to accommodate a rim brake, they can be made more flexible.
So everything we've been discussing has been borne out in those various links. You know what they all agree on? That disc brakes have better stopping power and modulation. You're the only one claiming rim are equal to disc brakes in braking performance.
#254
Seńor Blues
Warning: wall of text to follow, primarily aimed at "on the path" as it mostly just confirms everything we've discussed as pros and cons of disc and rim brakes. Most don't need to read.
So @on the path yeah we all know "anyone can say anything". But let's see what some folks have to say on cycling sites where they have a reputation at stake, vs. Anonymous Keyboard Warriors like us. Yeah I know, the best part about Conspiracy Theories is that they can't be disproven. Any contrary evidence is just dismissed as "part of the conspiracy". So if that's your stance, you can stop reading here.
2016 article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/r...-need-to-know/
Remember this is in the early days of disc on road bikes, so many improvements have happened since this article was written, but even so here are some key points from it...
From a 2019 road.cc article which is relatively pro-rim (or maybe better classified as anti-disc): https://road.cc/content/feature/2562...ut-disc-brakes
Pretty balanced pro/con going to disc: https://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/ti...vs-rim-brakes/
Modulation, as discussed in this article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/h...ke-modulation/
Funny you should mention the importance of tires. From the 2016 bikeradar article:
So yeah, tires are important, and disc brakes allow you to put the very best tires and rims to suit your braking needs. Also not to be lost in the benefits: comfort
So everything we've been discussing has been borne out in those various links. You know what they all agree on? That disc brakes have better stopping power and modulation. You're the only one claiming rim are equal to disc brakes in braking performance.
So @on the path yeah we all know "anyone can say anything". But let's see what some folks have to say on cycling sites where they have a reputation at stake, vs. Anonymous Keyboard Warriors like us. Yeah I know, the best part about Conspiracy Theories is that they can't be disproven. Any contrary evidence is just dismissed as "part of the conspiracy". So if that's your stance, you can stop reading here.
2016 article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/r...-need-to-know/
Remember this is in the early days of disc on road bikes, so many improvements have happened since this article was written, but even so here are some key points from it...
From a 2019 road.cc article which is relatively pro-rim (or maybe better classified as anti-disc): https://road.cc/content/feature/2562...ut-disc-brakes
Pretty balanced pro/con going to disc: https://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/ti...vs-rim-brakes/
Modulation, as discussed in this article: https://www.bikeradar.com/features/h...ke-modulation/
Funny you should mention the importance of tires. From the 2016 bikeradar article:
So yeah, tires are important, and disc brakes allow you to put the very best tires and rims to suit your braking needs. Also not to be lost in the benefits: comfort
So everything we've been discussing has been borne out in those various links. You know what they all agree on? That disc brakes have better stopping power and modulation. You're the only one claiming rim are equal to disc brakes in braking performance.
And you totally missed the point about tires. It's not about size or comfort. It's about grip. And it's the same with bicycles. The grip of the tires' contact patch has a lot more to do with stopping power than any type of braking system.
And please, spare us the term "modulation." That's just parroting industry speak and a go to response from someone who really doesn't understand what he's talking about. Have a great night!
#255
Senior Member
I look forward to your provision of independent testing. Until then you're doing the adult equivalent of a child plugging their ears with their fingers and yelling "nananananana" while namecalling because you are hearing things you don't want to hear.
#257
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
So now we're down to 'everybody says so' as our validation and proof? This is perfect for the 41!! How about independent testing? I'll take a look at results from a rigorous, thorough independent test. The rest is just nonsense.
And you totally missed the point about tires. It's not about size or comfort. It's about grip. And it's the same with bicycles. The grip of the tires' contact patch has a lot more to do with stopping power than any type of braking system.
And please, spare us the term "modulation." That's just parroting industry speak and a go to response from someone who really doesn't understand what he's talking about. Have a great night!
And you totally missed the point about tires. It's not about size or comfort. It's about grip. And it's the same with bicycles. The grip of the tires' contact patch has a lot more to do with stopping power than any type of braking system.
And please, spare us the term "modulation." That's just parroting industry speak and a go to response from someone who really doesn't understand what he's talking about. Have a great night!
#258
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Likes For seypat:
#260
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,936
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,284 Times
in
2,941 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#261
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
#262
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#263
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Ok, but most of it is a lot more skilled than just saying "up is down" over and over again.
#264
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,251
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8261 Post(s)
Liked 8,996 Times
in
4,455 Posts
When I used to live in the mountains I used a mountain bike with rim brakes a lot due to the weather. I could tell when the rim was gone because it would get a low spot near the seam and make a bad thump every time the pads squeezed it.
I did a century in a rainstorm in the mountains with lots of descending. The road grit turned the aluminum of the rim into a thick, black slurry which was flung all over everything. Not to mention I had to ride the brakes if I wanted to have any braking at all.
#266
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,251
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8261 Post(s)
Liked 8,996 Times
in
4,455 Posts
Rim brakes I have used go from pretty good to absolute crap. Being over 200 pounds I sometimes wish for more power on steep descents. Have not tried road discs yet but I'd like to.
#267
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#268
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
So now we're down to 'everybody says so' as our validation and proof? This is perfect for the 41!! How about independent testing? I'll take a look at results from a rigorous, thorough independent test. The rest is just nonsense.
And you totally missed the point about tires. It's not about size or comfort. It's about grip. And it's the same with bicycles. The grip of the tires' contact patch has a lot more to do with stopping power than any type of braking system.
And please, spare us the term "modulation." That's just parroting industry speak and a go to response from someone who really doesn't understand what he's talking about. Have a great night!
And you totally missed the point about tires. It's not about size or comfort. It's about grip. And it's the same with bicycles. The grip of the tires' contact patch has a lot more to do with stopping power than any type of braking system.
And please, spare us the term "modulation." That's just parroting industry speak and a go to response from someone who really doesn't understand what he's talking about. Have a great night!
#270
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#272
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,657
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1245 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times
in
673 Posts
I was with BF member RoadFix when the brake track blew off his front rim in the mountains. It was worn very thin. I have seen that on at least 2 other occasions, rim failure due to wear on road bikes.
When I used to live in the mountains I used a mountain bike with rim brakes a lot due to the weather. I could tell when the rim was gone because it would get a low spot near the seam and make a bad thump every time the pads squeezed it.
I did a century in a rainstorm in the mountains with lots of descending. The road grit turned the aluminum of the rim into a thick, black slurry which was flung all over everything. Not to mention I had to ride the brakes if I wanted to have any braking at all.
When I used to live in the mountains I used a mountain bike with rim brakes a lot due to the weather. I could tell when the rim was gone because it would get a low spot near the seam and make a bad thump every time the pads squeezed it.
I did a century in a rainstorm in the mountains with lots of descending. The road grit turned the aluminum of the rim into a thick, black slurry which was flung all over everything. Not to mention I had to ride the brakes if I wanted to have any braking at all.
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#273
Senior Member
#274
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
I make similar adjustments when riding my bike in the rain as I do when driving in the rain. It rains enough around here that many riders own rain bikes. Wet roads effect braking, No matter the system. We have ‘New Locals’ bouncing off the Jersey Barriers all the time late fall when the rainy season starts.
#275
Senior Member
Living in SoCal, I do not know about this "rain" of which you all speak. But I would hazard a guess that even the best disc brakes aren't completely unaffected by rain. Just less affected than comparable rim brakes.
Anyone who thinks they can ride (or drive, or heck, even run) at the exact same high speed and carefree manner as they do in dry weather is in for severe disappointment...and injury. Everything is impacted by rain: cars, bikes, shoes, etc. The better technologies minimize/reduce the effect, but nothing is going to perform identically in rain as it does in dry weather. Sheer physics. Even if your brake miraculously could be unaffected by rain, your tires won't be, and new rains always bring up road oils that make pavement slick.
Likes For CarloM: