Dahon Curl is nice looking...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dahon Curl is nice looking...
Here's a hi-res (well, bigger) of the Dahon Curl:
https://files.okbike.cn/photo/month_0...92b51effcb.jpg
Suffice to say: me wants.
https://files.okbike.cn/photo/month_0...92b51effcb.jpg
Suffice to say: me wants.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The picture referenced above is very revealing as to the quality of the Curl. I doubt this will sell for less than $1K.
-the folding pedals look nice (better looking than the one on my Brompton)
-it seems the seat rail "articulates" into the fold making for a more compact fold
-the integrated rear rack is very cherry
I predict this Curl will be lighter and more compact than the Brompton.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think that's a derailleur; it's a chain tensioner. From the looks of it, when the Curl is in unfurled, that long swingarm pivots to be parallel with the chainstay. If you picture it, that would result in a nice, clean look.
Me likey too.
Me likey too.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my opinion, the Curl makes short work of more expensive Bromptons, well known for their compact fold, assuming that it has a better configuration, which usually is the case (7 speeds). The essential make-or-break features would definitely be price, for me. To me, Dahon is a great brand - for what they cost - they provide 90% of an equivalent, but more expensive, folder. The future looks bright for this Dahon.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
You're right, that's the worlds smallest chainring! LOL!
I guess you're expected to ride in 8th gear all the time, spinning like a mad man! I counted 18 teeth on that chainring which means you need an even smaller cog to get some useful gears. I don't believe Shimano makes a 9 tooth cog and their smallest is 16! So using Sheldon's calculator, here's what I got!
Inches: (21 cog, 18 ring, 170 cranks, Nexus 8, 305 tire)
8th gear --- 24.5
7th gear --- 21.5
6th gear --- 18.5
5th gear --- 15.1
4th gear --- 12.9
3rd gear --- 11.3
2nd gear --- 9.8
1st gear --- 8.0
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Maybe they're using a geared up hub, like the Sturmey Archer SRF8.
Sheldon's calculator gives these inches for a 21t chainring and 18t cog with the SRF8:
60.1
46.9
41.4
36.6
32.3
28.6
25.2
19.7
That's still a little low, but with a slightly larger cog it wouldn't be that ridiculous.
Sheldon's calculator gives these inches for a 21t chainring and 18t cog with the SRF8:
60.1
46.9
41.4
36.6
32.3
28.6
25.2
19.7
That's still a little low, but with a slightly larger cog it wouldn't be that ridiculous.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW England/Aveiro
Posts: 638
Bikes: Joey Sport; Mezzo D9;Curve D3; Surly LHT self build cargoesque
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
how does one hold/move it folded. Better saddle fold is neat, but can the saddle still double as a handle?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: York UK
Posts: 3,027
Bikes: 2X dualdrive Mezzo folder,plus others
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
needs adatchable crank arm,or a special very high geared internal hub. Achiles heel of low gearing seem envitable.
#14
New usename ThorUSA
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern Illinois USA
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
maybe it has a geared bottom bracket a la schlumpf
OR a very special geared rear hub
OR a very special geared rear hub
#15
Female Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 915
Bikes: Citizen Tokyo (Silver), Schwinn Collegiate (1980's)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The fold of the Curl still looks messy and no where near as neat and compact as the Bromptons....
#16
Part-time epistemologist
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#17
New usename ThorUSA
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern Illinois USA
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
nobody will be forced to buy one ...
even if the fold is more compact ( ie smaller )
about " messy" that most likely depends on the owner ..... I havent associate messy with any folder .. they are usually pretty well housetrained ... unless you drive them through the mud....
and yes Brommies float over the dirt and never get messy ... lightweight as they are
enter a liberal amount of smileys into this post as it is obviously a hefty amount of sarkasm....
some posters have to understand that it is not one company against another, its us versus cars or silly rules, or stupid politicians , or this and that ... its NOT Brommie versus Dahon , or Birdy versus Downtube or anything versus ....
there are millions of causes to get active.... One folding company against each other is NOT one of them ....
thor
even if the fold is more compact ( ie smaller )
about " messy" that most likely depends on the owner ..... I havent associate messy with any folder .. they are usually pretty well housetrained ... unless you drive them through the mud....
and yes Brommies float over the dirt and never get messy ... lightweight as they are
enter a liberal amount of smileys into this post as it is obviously a hefty amount of sarkasm....
some posters have to understand that it is not one company against another, its us versus cars or silly rules, or stupid politicians , or this and that ... its NOT Brommie versus Dahon , or Birdy versus Downtube or anything versus ....
there are millions of causes to get active.... One folding company against each other is NOT one of them ....
thor
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
"Messy look" while folded is quite irrelevant...
$1k... I predicted a while ago (before the economic woe) that you'd be looking at no less than $1.2k. Now, I think $1.5k is probably a minimum point.
Unfolded, it looks weird due to a snaky top tube. It snakes from left to right to accommodate the wheels when folded.
I suspect the reason why we haven't seen them properly is that small chainwheel problem. In the prototype in that pic, the chainwheel problem was insurmountable, so a small one was all they could fit in. The patent drawings also show a small chainwheel, so it would seem a very very tough problem.
With a Schlumpf and a SA-8, it's going to drag quite a bit. Plus the price would be $2k+... things could be simplified a bit by not making the BB a Schlumpf, but a fixed step-up. But the chain wear would be very quick indeed with sprockets that small. I hope they designed in a replaceable front sprocket.
I hope all these problems are/have been tackled and solved by a team of competent engineers, not the art students who came up with some of the more memorable "features" of Dahons of late.
$1k... I predicted a while ago (before the economic woe) that you'd be looking at no less than $1.2k. Now, I think $1.5k is probably a minimum point.
Unfolded, it looks weird due to a snaky top tube. It snakes from left to right to accommodate the wheels when folded.
I suspect the reason why we haven't seen them properly is that small chainwheel problem. In the prototype in that pic, the chainwheel problem was insurmountable, so a small one was all they could fit in. The patent drawings also show a small chainwheel, so it would seem a very very tough problem.
With a Schlumpf and a SA-8, it's going to drag quite a bit. Plus the price would be $2k+... things could be simplified a bit by not making the BB a Schlumpf, but a fixed step-up. But the chain wear would be very quick indeed with sprockets that small. I hope they designed in a replaceable front sprocket.
I hope all these problems are/have been tackled and solved by a team of competent engineers, not the art students who came up with some of the more memorable "features" of Dahons of late.
Last edited by jur; 03-14-09 at 03:01 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Notice how that front sprocket seems to be eccentrically mounted, though? I suspect there's more going on there than meets the eye....
ECB
ECB
#20
hipster traffic dodger
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 596
Bikes: IRO Mark V Pro, home made bamboo track bike, eddy merckx corsa extra, Airnimal Joey commute, UGADA Tikit
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
woah, crazy!
any news from the Taipei show?
any news from the Taipei show?
#21
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,628
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1671 Post(s)
Liked 1,831 Times
in
1,064 Posts
This picture of the Curl with normal chainring is all over the 'net, folks. Scheesh.
BTW - that's not a "derailleur" - it's a chain slack take up for the fold, much like the Brompton has.
tcs
BTW - that's not a "derailleur" - it's a chain slack take up for the fold, much like the Brompton has.
tcs
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
So the question is, which one is more recent? Do you have privy info which one is closer to production? Why put out a bigger pic of a bike WITH Dahon logos, with a smaller chain"ring", if there wasn't an issue?
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the photo from the 1st post there is considerable slack in the chain at the bottom. A bigger chainring will pick up that slack quite nicely thank you. Surely this isn't a final form for the curl and Dahon might be keeping some things close to the chest until all the kinks are worked out.
#24
Part-time epistemologist
In the photo from the 1st post there is considerable slack in the chain at the bottom. A bigger chainring will pick up that slack quite nicely thank you. Surely this isn't a final form for the curl and Dahon might be keeping some things close to the chest until all the kinks are worked out.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
All those chains, chain wheels and cogs add a lot of complexity to bikes, especially in folders. I wonder when we will see a direct drive foldie. For example, something similar to this:
https://bobs-bikes.com/images/library...le_ma_06_m.jpg
but with only two wheels and an internal gear in the front wheel (similar to those gears that you can put in the bottom bracket, don't remember who makes them).
Kam
https://bobs-bikes.com/images/library...le_ma_06_m.jpg
but with only two wheels and an internal gear in the front wheel (similar to those gears that you can put in the bottom bracket, don't remember who makes them).
Kam