Speed sensors
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Speed sensors
Does anybody have 1 speed sensor they swap between multiple bikes? I have 3 bikes, trying to decide if I should get 3 speed sensors or just move around the one I have.
Dave
Dave
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I have a GPS speed sensor I used on my bike, skis, and on rental bikes. A wheel or hub magnet seems like it would be tedious to move around.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It is the Wahoo speed sensor. It wraps around the front or rear hub with a thick band that stretches. It is Ant + and Bluetooth.
#5
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Garmins are GPS so you don't need a speed sensor.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm actually using a Wahoo Elemnt Bolt. Right now 1 bike has the external sensor, the other two don't. We have a 95 mile bike trail down here that I ride often, and there is heavy tree cover. In some areas the speed will fluctuate (will be riding a steady pace of 16 mph, then the speed will drop down to 10 or 0 then go back up). Works better on the bike with the external speed sensor. I suspect the same will happen while mountain biking (had some dropouts riding gravel thru areas with heavy trees last weekend without an external sensor too).
Dave
Dave
#7
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
So unless you're training or a "Strava nut" does it really matter?
If it does then does moving the sensor from bike to bike more trouble than buying 2 more sensors?
I have 2 bikes and the Garmin supports multiple bike profiles. On my road bike i have a single sensor that does both cadence and speed. On my CX bike I only have a cadence sensor and speed is via GPS. I never noticed any inconsistent speed issues.
If it does then does moving the sensor from bike to bike more trouble than buying 2 more sensors?
I have 2 bikes and the Garmin supports multiple bike profiles. On my road bike i have a single sensor that does both cadence and speed. On my CX bike I only have a cadence sensor and speed is via GPS. I never noticed any inconsistent speed issues.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times
in
45 Posts
I'm sorry, I don't understand your objective. I have the same Bolt/sensor combination as you. You can swap sensors between bikes, or rely on GPS for the two bikes that don't have the sensor. Keep in mind that each time you swap, your Bolt has to recalibrate for differing wheel sizes (assuming you're on auto-calibrate) and this might lead to measurement errors until the calibration is complete.
I'm actually using a Wahoo Elemnt Bolt. Right now 1 bike has the external sensor, the other two don't. We have a 95 mile bike trail down here that I ride often, and there is heavy tree cover. In some areas the speed will fluctuate (will be riding a steady pace of 16 mph, then the speed will drop down to 10 or 0 then go back up). Works better on the bike with the external speed sensor. I suspect the same will happen while mountain biking (had some dropouts riding gravel thru areas with heavy trees last weekend without an external sensor too).
Dave
Dave
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm sorry, I don't understand your objective. I have the same Bolt/sensor combination as you. You can swap sensors between bikes, or rely on GPS for the two bikes that don't have the sensor. Keep in mind that each time you swap, your Bolt has to recalibrate for differing wheel sizes (assuming you're on auto-calibrate) and this might lead to measurement errors until the calibration is complete.
Dave
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT (Formerly Los Angeles, CA)
Posts: 1,145
Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Synapse -- 2014 Cannondale Quick CX
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
54 Posts
On my road bike I have speed and cadence sensors for my Garmin Edge 820. On my hybrid/commuter I do not. I do move the GPS from bike to bike, but I don't move the sensors: The cadence sensor is too hard to unmount and remount to do it frequently. The speed sensor is easier, but would require that the GPS recalibrate each time.
I considered getting a set of sensors for the hybrid/commuter but two problems: One, sometimes my brother borrows the hybrid to ride with me. My GPS would pick up both sensors whenever we're within fifteen feet of each other, and that would be really annoying. The other reason is... who cares. It's a hybrid/commuter. I do my fitness training on the road bike.
I considered getting a set of sensors for the hybrid/commuter but two problems: One, sometimes my brother borrows the hybrid to ride with me. My GPS would pick up both sensors whenever we're within fifteen feet of each other, and that would be really annoying. The other reason is... who cares. It's a hybrid/commuter. I do my fitness training on the road bike.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,825
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3185 Post(s)
Liked 2,020 Times
in
1,158 Posts
I use a Garmin 1000 on 5 different bikes. I have a speed sensor on my plastic road bike, as I often ride in a group where being able to maintain a constant and steady speed is important. A speed sensor in that scenario lends to more accurate speed indication when using a GPS only has a lag as to the current speed. I also use speed sensors on my mt. bikes, as riding in heavily wooded area's or when riding on trails that have a lot of tight and twisty turns, lends to a more accurate distance track. I do not have or need sensors on the 2 bikes I use for commuting.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times
in
4,663 Posts
#13
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
#14
SuperGimp
Yep - I gave up on them a while ago for precisely that reason. It smooths out your speed display on your head unit. Big whoop.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times
in
6,054 Posts
That's interesting. I guess if you think about it, be they need the GPS data to figure out when you came into the segment and when you left.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times
in
45 Posts
My Bolt gets data from my speed sensor and uploads the ride directly to Strava. The resulting data on Strava and my Bolt are 100% identical, so Strava IS pulling speed sensor data, at least in my setup.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times
in
4,663 Posts
Then again, KOMs and PRs are *everything*, so really... I'm still right.
#19
Senior Member
I personally don't see the need for speed sensors with a GPS head unit. The average speed results I get off of GPS are very consistent with those from people I ride with who have speed sensors. I get that there's a lag while accelerating / decelerating but this appears to work itself out over time. Instantaneous speed doesn't seem very important to me, especially given that I have instantaneous power and instantaneous heart displayed on my head unit, both of which are better measures of effort. Regardless, the speed updates in a second or so.
#20
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
I personally don't see the need for speed sensors with a GPS head unit. The average speed results I get off of GPS are very consistent with those from people I ride with who have speed sensors. I get that there's a lag while accelerating / decelerating but this appears to work itself out over time. Instantaneous speed doesn't seem very important to me, especially given that I have instantaneous power and instantaneous heart displayed on my head unit, both of which are better measures of effort. Regardless, the speed updates in a second or so.
#21
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times
in
45 Posts
I personally don't see the need for speed sensors with a GPS head unit. The average speed results I get off of GPS are very consistent with those from people I ride with who have speed sensors. I get that there's a lag while accelerating / decelerating but this appears to work itself out over time. Instantaneous speed doesn't seem very important to me, especially given that I have instantaneous power and instantaneous heart displayed on my head unit, both of which are better measures of effort. Regardless, the speed updates in a second or so.
#23
Heft On Wheels
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,124
Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times
in
346 Posts
I have a speed sensor on one bike, haven't seemed the need to put in on the others. I probably wouldn't buy another one either. Its nice when the GPS gets wanky from time to time but that is pretty rare anymore. Its more accurate but how accurate do you really need to be on the speed?
Power I want accurate, speed if its off just a touch, I am alright with that.
Power I want accurate, speed if its off just a touch, I am alright with that.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,192
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
Mine does too, however I have noticed on a few rides that have uploaded, that the average speed in Strava has been .1 mph on the low side. Example, sometimes a 20mph average on the Bolt with a speed sensor shows up in Strava as 19.9 mph. Not sure what is going on there.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times
in
4,663 Posts
The most likely cause is that Strava and your Bolt have different thresholds for what they consider to be moving, so average moving speeds will sometimes be different between the two.