"Experimental:" Sturmey AW + 2 cogs = interesting machine
#26
www.theheadbadge.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Talk is easy, doing it is not so easy.
Shimano has never made an 8-speed freewheel, and freewheels don't fit splined drivers.
If you really want to get the big numbers, you use a second internal gear hub as a jackshaft.
The Sprinter would be a poor choice for this due to its fragility and the difficulty of obtaining spare parts.
Now you could use a threaded driver on a Sturmey-Archer 5-speed hub, stick an 8-speed freewheel onto that. If you used one at the wheel, another at the jackshaft, you would have theoretically 40 at the wheel X 40 at the jackshaft X 3 chainrings...4800 speeds.
If you could figure a way to extend the axle past all of the sprockets, you could use Rohloff 14 speeds instead...
My 63 speed actually works.
Sheldon "Mostly Riding Nexus 8 Speeds These Days" Brown
Shimano has never made an 8-speed freewheel, and freewheels don't fit splined drivers.
If you really want to get the big numbers, you use a second internal gear hub as a jackshaft.
The Sprinter would be a poor choice for this due to its fragility and the difficulty of obtaining spare parts.
Now you could use a threaded driver on a Sturmey-Archer 5-speed hub, stick an 8-speed freewheel onto that. If you used one at the wheel, another at the jackshaft, you would have theoretically 40 at the wheel X 40 at the jackshaft X 3 chainrings...4800 speeds.
If you could figure a way to extend the axle past all of the sprockets, you could use Rohloff 14 speeds instead...
My 63 speed actually works.
Sheldon "Mostly Riding Nexus 8 Speeds These Days" Brown
I had considered pointing out a jackshaft drive as an example, but I didn't - technically, so long as you can keep jamming hubs into makeshift dropouts on the frame, you'll wind up with a wholly ridiculous amount of speeds, not to mention a ridiculous bike.
I was attempting to keep things in proportion of the maximum amount of gears someone could possibly mount upon most bicycles with minor modification.
True, if Rohloff made an extended-axle model, a 14+7+4 would be possible, but they don't. I wouldn't care to find out what the stress on that axle would be. Heck, make it a cassette, and stick a Shimano 10-speed cluster on it. 14+10+4. Five-hundred and sixty gears. Enough to bring every boneheaded Craigslister within 560 miles crawling on their hands and knees to purchase it.
-Kurt
P.S.: How many internal gears does the SRAM Dual-Drive setup have? Would probably be easier to base a crazy conversion on that, provided there are 6/6+ internal gears - anything less, and the Sturmey S5 becomes the best base hub for such a project.
#27
On the road
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 2,174
Bikes: Old Schwinns and old Raleighs
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 373 Post(s)
Liked 852 Times
in
325 Posts
The more I hear, the more I like the simplicity of an S-A 3 or even a basic old 10 speed.
__________________
Classic American and British Roadsters, Utility Bikes, and Sporting Bikes (1935-1979):
https://bikeshedva.blogspot.com/
Classic American and British Roadsters, Utility Bikes, and Sporting Bikes (1935-1979):
https://bikeshedva.blogspot.com/
Likes For SirMike1983:
#28
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301
Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
No such thing as an 8 speed freewheel? I could have sworn that I heard someone say that 8-speeds are available in freewheel form, just not too common. Another legend...
Originally Posted by cudak888
How many internal gears does the SRAM Dual-Drive setup have? Would probably be easier to base a crazy conversion on that, provided there are 6/6+ internal gears - anything less, and the Sturmey S5 becomes the best base hub for such a project.
Sheldon "Talk Is Cheap" Brown
Code:
+-------------------------------------------+ | Ah, but I was so much older then, | | I'm younger than that now. | | -Bob Dylan | +-------------------------------------------+
#29
Full Member
9 speed old school cruiser
An older friend of mine built this many years ago. Not very practical, but still interesting.
Using a one 3 speed hub as a jackshaft running back to a 3 speed hub wheel.
Using a one 3 speed hub as a jackshaft running back to a 3 speed hub wheel.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
11 Posts
Extended axles? Eat you hearts out.
I'm happy with simple SA S5s on the 3 bikes I ride the most. And unless you have a small drive wheel, very low gears would probably convert the innards of an AW into guacamole.
But, if I ever succumb to this silliness, I have this little unit.
Shown below a stock AW axle, it moves the hub to the left giving clearance for at least 6 cogs. Probably more since Sheldon got 7 to work on the stock axle. I also have threaded drivers and a new 8 speed Sunrace FW so it would just be a matter of slapping it together. I've been running a quad on our 'bent tandem for about 15 years, so that wouldn't be a problem.
But, 3 x 8 x 4 = 96 = yawn. I'd rather spend the time riding.
BTW IMHO a TA Cyclotouriste is about the last crank I'd choose to make into a quad. Ramped and pinned 2nd and 3rd rings are a BIG help. I just sold a 24-36-48-60 155mm Dotek crankset to a gent in Colorado with a faired recumbent trike. Slow up the mountains, a rocketship down.
I've an NOS Cyclo 3 speed conversion, but the 15-19-23 cogs make for a lot of near duplicates with an AW or S5 so I haven't used it yet. Might be good with the FM I won on Ebay today.
BTW2 I've no experience with FMs. Do any of you know of anything I should watch out for?
IRRC Someone mentioned 2 SA cogs back to back not being a good fit. He must have forgotten the dust cover, because it works just fine. 19-22 splits the gears on an AW perfectly. I used that setup for 3 years, but I much prefer an S5.
Mark "Praying the new SRAM iDrive 9 speed proves relable and efficient" Stonich
But, if I ever succumb to this silliness, I have this little unit.
Shown below a stock AW axle, it moves the hub to the left giving clearance for at least 6 cogs. Probably more since Sheldon got 7 to work on the stock axle. I also have threaded drivers and a new 8 speed Sunrace FW so it would just be a matter of slapping it together. I've been running a quad on our 'bent tandem for about 15 years, so that wouldn't be a problem.
But, 3 x 8 x 4 = 96 = yawn. I'd rather spend the time riding.
BTW IMHO a TA Cyclotouriste is about the last crank I'd choose to make into a quad. Ramped and pinned 2nd and 3rd rings are a BIG help. I just sold a 24-36-48-60 155mm Dotek crankset to a gent in Colorado with a faired recumbent trike. Slow up the mountains, a rocketship down.
I've an NOS Cyclo 3 speed conversion, but the 15-19-23 cogs make for a lot of near duplicates with an AW or S5 so I haven't used it yet. Might be good with the FM I won on Ebay today.
BTW2 I've no experience with FMs. Do any of you know of anything I should watch out for?
IRRC Someone mentioned 2 SA cogs back to back not being a good fit. He must have forgotten the dust cover, because it works just fine. 19-22 splits the gears on an AW perfectly. I used that setup for 3 years, but I much prefer an S5.
Mark "Praying the new SRAM iDrive 9 speed proves relable and efficient" Stonich
#31
www.theheadbadge.com
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by MnHPVA Guy
IRRC Someone mentioned 2 SA cogs back to back not being a good fit. He must have forgotten the dust cover, because it works just fine. 19-22 splits the gears on an AW perfectly. I used that setup for 3 years, but I much prefer an S5.
Mark "Praying the new SRAM iDrive 9 speed proves relable and efficient" Stonich
Mark "Praying the new SRAM iDrive 9 speed proves relable and efficient" Stonich
-Kurt
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
11 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Mark, what era SA cogs were you working with? The outer cog I used was from the '50s.
-Kurt
-Kurt
Anyone have a clue why the 22s were so different from the other SA cogs?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
I'm reviving this old thread because I'd like to try something like this. Kurt, I assume you used 1/8" chain with this setup, since you didn't mention changing out the front chainring/crankset. Correct? And the 1/8 chain passed thorough the rd okay, although it was apparently designed for 3/32 chain?
When the two offset cogs are placed back to back, the spacing between them fortuitously turns out to be allow the chain to drop onto either cog cleanly, but not so wide that it skates around between gears or gets stuck? There's a stroke of luck...
Finally, is there any reason to think this wouldn't work with a wider range in back--something like a 23 and a 19? That would seem to give a usefully wide range of gearing with no duplication, given my 48-tooth chainring.
Jon V.
When the two offset cogs are placed back to back, the spacing between them fortuitously turns out to be allow the chain to drop onto either cog cleanly, but not so wide that it skates around between gears or gets stuck? There's a stroke of luck...
Finally, is there any reason to think this wouldn't work with a wider range in back--something like a 23 and a 19? That would seem to give a usefully wide range of gearing with no duplication, given my 48-tooth chainring.
Jon V.
#34
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
I built a commuter like this using an SA AW and two Shimano cogs (3/32) and spacers... the rear d was a Shimano 600 attached to a friction shifter. 1/8 chain does not have the same degree of lateral flex as does 3/32 chain so using the Shimano cogs solved this issue and made the chain run smoother on the 3/32 single chain ring.
This gives you 6 completely unique gears and aside from cluttering up the look of my bike, worked marvelously well..
I was pondering doing this on my Phillip's Twenty roadie as it would give me a low range for hillier areas and leave me with a decent high range for the flats as ell as address the chain length issues you get with Twenty's and their rather short dropouts.
With a 16/18 combo in the rear it would have a gear range from 36 to 72 gear inches as opposed to it's stock range of 43-77 with it's 15 tooth cog.
I am going to change the 15 to a 16 today and see how I like that as I have not been having issues with hills but getting that chain tension right is a bit of a pain... the 16 will solve that and give me a 40-72 gear inch range.
Another route is to run a double up front with a deraileur / tensioner as you can then get a wider gearing range than you can get with a double cog set up.
This gives you 6 completely unique gears and aside from cluttering up the look of my bike, worked marvelously well..
I was pondering doing this on my Phillip's Twenty roadie as it would give me a low range for hillier areas and leave me with a decent high range for the flats as ell as address the chain length issues you get with Twenty's and their rather short dropouts.
With a 16/18 combo in the rear it would have a gear range from 36 to 72 gear inches as opposed to it's stock range of 43-77 with it's 15 tooth cog.
I am going to change the 15 to a 16 today and see how I like that as I have not been having issues with hills but getting that chain tension right is a bit of a pain... the 16 will solve that and give me a 40-72 gear inch range.
Another route is to run a double up front with a deraileur / tensioner as you can then get a wider gearing range than you can get with a double cog set up.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
I built a commuter like this using an SA AW and two Shimano cogs (3/32) and spacers... the rear d was a Shimano 600 attached to a friction shifter. 1/8 chain does not have the same degree of lateral flex as does 3/32 chain so using the Shimano cogs solved this issue and made the chain run smoother on the 3/32 single chain ring.
Yes, I realize 3/32 chain flexes better and would be more practical with a derailleur, but I don't want to get into changing out the old cottered crankset and chainring made to accept 1/8" chain. I know I could do it if I wanted, but it's my dad's old bike and I'm kind of sentimental about keeping the existing parts--though I don't mind adding some new ones. I've seen the occasional old Raleigh Sports retrofitted with a cotterless crank and it just looks wierd and...well...wrong to me.
#36
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
I used Shimano 3 speed cogs which fit the SA hub.
I just finished swapping the 15 for a 16 on my Twenty and am going to see how that feels... it solved the chain length issue perfectly and the gearing change is minimal. If I don't need to run a dual I won't as I really do like the clean look of a 3 speed and with a folder, a derailer is just something that would be prone to getting bent / damaged.
Also interesting is that the cottered crank on the Twenty has a chain ring sized for 3/32 chain while the SA cog is 1/8... I guess they used one crank / chain ring for 3 speed and 5 speed bikes.
On my other conversion I fitted a 3 speed drive into a modern Raleigh road bike that already had a 3/32 chain ring and would agree that a modern crank on a vintage bike would look very odd although it is practical.
I just finished swapping the 15 for a 16 on my Twenty and am going to see how that feels... it solved the chain length issue perfectly and the gearing change is minimal. If I don't need to run a dual I won't as I really do like the clean look of a 3 speed and with a folder, a derailer is just something that would be prone to getting bent / damaged.
Also interesting is that the cottered crank on the Twenty has a chain ring sized for 3/32 chain while the SA cog is 1/8... I guess they used one crank / chain ring for 3 speed and 5 speed bikes.
On my other conversion I fitted a 3 speed drive into a modern Raleigh road bike that already had a 3/32 chain ring and would agree that a modern crank on a vintage bike would look very odd although it is practical.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,846
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,822 Times
in
1,541 Posts
Very cool, and I totally understand the fun of seeing what can be done with what is on hand and trying different combinations.
But if the goal is to have more speeds, and you are hanging a derailer, thus eliminating the advantage of the low maintenance internal hub, why not put on a wheel with a cassette or free wheel, keep it single up front and get 6 to whatever speeds, with only a single shifter.... Are there advantages, technical problems, style issues I am not seeing? thanks
I made a "japanese 8 speed" by converting an old nishki...it is 1x8 with some nitto bars that are very english 3 speed like. very comfy.
But if the goal is to have more speeds, and you are hanging a derailer, thus eliminating the advantage of the low maintenance internal hub, why not put on a wheel with a cassette or free wheel, keep it single up front and get 6 to whatever speeds, with only a single shifter.... Are there advantages, technical problems, style issues I am not seeing? thanks
I made a "japanese 8 speed" by converting an old nishki...it is 1x8 with some nitto bars that are very english 3 speed like. very comfy.
#38
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
From a aesthetic and functional point of view, not having a derailer on a folder is a good thing.
The gear ratios are 40.3 / 53.7 / 71.6 and I had no trouble doing an in the saddle climb on a 10-12% grade, the middle gear (direct drive) worked against the headwind really well, and the top gear will make the bike fly.
On a conventional bike the derailer would not be as problematic as they don;t fold and have a lot more ground clearance.
If I was to take the bike on long road trips with extended climbs and perhaps more gear (I'm thinking of that), adding another low cog and a derailer would make sense.
The gear ratios are 40.3 / 53.7 / 71.6 and I had no trouble doing an in the saddle climb on a 10-12% grade, the middle gear (direct drive) worked against the headwind really well, and the top gear will make the bike fly.
On a conventional bike the derailer would not be as problematic as they don;t fold and have a lot more ground clearance.
If I was to take the bike on long road trips with extended climbs and perhaps more gear (I'm thinking of that), adding another low cog and a derailer would make sense.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
But if the goal is to have more speeds, and you are hanging a derailer, thus eliminating the advantage of the low maintenance internal hub, why not put on a wheel with a cassette or free wheel, keep it single up front and get 6 to whatever speeds, with only a single shifter.... Are there advantages, technical problems, style issues I am not seeing?
I still don't know if 1/8" chain will fit through a derailleur. I guess I just have to try it and see what happens.
JV
#40
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
An SA 3 speed with a dual drive is still a very efficient drive as the hub gears remain efficient and the chain line is going to be pretty straight if you are only changing between two cogs.
Still thinking of a dual drive for my other Twenty as it is my utility bike and I would like to be able to tow my trailer with it and also have gearing suitable for unladen travel.
Getting 1'8 chain through a derailer might be tricky.
Still thinking of a dual drive for my other Twenty as it is my utility bike and I would like to be able to tow my trailer with it and also have gearing suitable for unladen travel.
Getting 1'8 chain through a derailer might be tricky.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
Way long ago, back when snakes had legs and dinosaurs walked the earth, isn't it a fact that people used to use 1/8" chain with derailleurs as a matter of course? As recently as the early 70s, I think you could buy an aftermarket conversion kit to convert English 3 speeds with SA hubs to 6 or 9 speeds. I think the kit included a 2- or 3-cog Cyclo freewheel and a rear derailleur--usually a Huret Allvit. It used the original crankset, so it must have worked with wide chain, no?
Those old Allvit RDs were on all kinds of cheap ten speeds early in the bike boom--my old Raleigh Record had one, and I think the Schwinn Varsities and their clones did as well. The were probably the same mechanism--don't know if they were reconfigured somehow for narrow chain.
It might not be difficult to use some very thin washers to space the halves of ANY derailleur cage out enough to handle wide chain. We're only talking 1/32" total, right? A couple of 1/64" thick washers on each side should do it. If I'm not mistaken, the man Sheldon Brown wrote about doing something like that somewhere in his writings.
So what about the Huret Allvit?
JV
Those old Allvit RDs were on all kinds of cheap ten speeds early in the bike boom--my old Raleigh Record had one, and I think the Schwinn Varsities and their clones did as well. The were probably the same mechanism--don't know if they were reconfigured somehow for narrow chain.
It might not be difficult to use some very thin washers to space the halves of ANY derailleur cage out enough to handle wide chain. We're only talking 1/32" total, right? A couple of 1/64" thick washers on each side should do it. If I'm not mistaken, the man Sheldon Brown wrote about doing something like that somewhere in his writings.
So what about the Huret Allvit?
JV
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
11 Posts
Way long ago, back when snakes had legs and dinosaurs walked the earth, isn't it a fact that people used to use 1/8" chain with derailleurs as a matter of course? As recently as the early 70s, I think you could buy an aftermarket conversion kit to convert English 3 speeds with SA hubs to 6 or 9 speeds. I think the kit included a 2- or 3-cog Cyclo freewheel and a rear derailleur--usually a Huret Allvit. It used the original crankset, so it must have worked with wide chain, no?
But now single speed 1/8" chains use modern thin plates and nearly flush rivets. At 7.75mm the SRAM PC-1 is narrower than many 20-30 year old derailleur chains.
BTW the slickest RD to use with the typical "2 cogs on an AW" setup is the Huret Svelto. The adjuster screws are plenty long enough to limit travel to 2 cogs. It looks "old timey" enough not to look out of place and it's tiny size makes it almost unobtrusive on a roadster.
Speaking of two cogs on an AW, the 6 speed Brompton folder has just such a setup. Yesterday I rode a prototype Brommie with Titanium fork, seatpost, rear triangle and stem. It had a prototype Sturmey/SunRace 3 speed, made to Brompton's specifications with a much wider jump between gears. Felt like an S5 locked in wide range, but you split the gears with the two cogs.
Last edited by MnHPVA Guy; 03-14-08 at 08:05 PM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
11 Posts
However, I needed a more extreme setup for my wife, who's knee is still recovering from her accident on last May's 3 Speed Tour of Lake Pepin. On her S5 I installed a Shimano dished 22t and a 34t Hyperglide cassette cog. Chain is a 20+ year old 2/32" Sedis and the derailleur is a Huret DupoPar. She needs 3 shifters to get 10 speeds.
Shifting isn't as crisp as the 8 tooth jump, but ain't half bad.
BTW SA/Derailleur hybrids are not allowed on the "3 Speed Tour of Lake Pepin" but she has been granted a special dispensation, as her injury occurred on last year's ride.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,218
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got in on this late, but here's my 2 cents - I have an 18/23 on my Clubman, along with the Svelto and it works like a dream. I really only need first gear on the 23T, and only for steep hills. But when I need it, boy am I glad it's there. A 22T doesn't work with an 18T, but it works fine with a 19T, which is what I have on my lightened Sports, along with a Cylo 3-speed derailler. It's not as handy as the 23T, but boy, anything more than 22T is REALLY hard to find. I am finding I really like the 19T, too, especially on a windy day.
It ruins the bikes lines, but having that one extra low gear means I can ride the bikes absolutely anywhere.
You have to have the derailler adjusted just right, or the chain overshoots and gets caught between the spokes and the cog and rips your derailer off. Whoops!
I've tried looking into getting a 24T or bigger Shimano cog, but I have no idea how to tell which kind can be adapted for an AW. Can someone point me in the right direction, like with a link? All those cassettes look alike to me.
It ruins the bikes lines, but having that one extra low gear means I can ride the bikes absolutely anywhere.
You have to have the derailler adjusted just right, or the chain overshoots and gets caught between the spokes and the cog and rips your derailer off. Whoops!
I've tried looking into getting a 24T or bigger Shimano cog, but I have no idea how to tell which kind can be adapted for an AW. Can someone point me in the right direction, like with a link? All those cassettes look alike to me.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
11 Posts
You have to have the derailler adjusted just right, or the chain overshoots and gets caught between the spokes and the cog and rips your derailer off. Whoops!
I've tried looking into getting a 24T or bigger Shimano cog, but I have no idea how to tell which kind can be adapted for an AW. Can someone point me in the right direction, like with a link? All those cassettes look alike to me.
With a 7 speed cog and one dished one you need a 1mm freewheel/BB spacer between them.
Various dished cogs have differing amounts of offset. The Shimano's work great with flat cassette cogs.
Likes For MnHPVA Guy:
#46
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Go to a nut and bolt supply for the longer low limit screws... I can't remember what size and thread they are but bought quite a few for little projects.
If you don't want the extra cable and lever you can always turn the derailer into a manual adjust by inserting a reversed shift cable into the derailer and using the barrel adjuster to set the D. This also works if you happen to snap a shift cable and don't want to be stuck in a high gear when you limp home.
If you don't want the extra cable and lever you can always turn the derailer into a manual adjust by inserting a reversed shift cable into the derailer and using the barrel adjuster to set the D. This also works if you happen to snap a shift cable and don't want to be stuck in a high gear when you limp home.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,778
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 660 Times
in
351 Posts
I love this forum. How did people figure out stuff like this before the internet?
Also, I think that "Svelto" is about the coolest product name of all time.
JV
#48
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Went down to the shop today and played with "Grace"... my utility Twenty.
Got the dual drive set up using two Shimano 3 speed cogs (3/32) and no spacers, a pretty vintage Shimano Lark derailer, and a basic Shimano thumbie to handle the shifting.
The only issue is how far I could set the wheel in the dropout with the old Shimano's built in hangar and I will change a few things tomorrow as I have a different hangar and derailer that I can set back farther... the hanger also has to be filed down and thinned a little so that the wheel nut and spindle nut can seat properly.
The other issue with a derailer on a folder with 20 inch wheels is when you have this much fresh snow (which the bike handles really well) ...
The conversion on a standard bike is far more straight forward and I wish I still had the pics I had taken of my old dual drive setup.
Got the dual drive set up using two Shimano 3 speed cogs (3/32) and no spacers, a pretty vintage Shimano Lark derailer, and a basic Shimano thumbie to handle the shifting.
The only issue is how far I could set the wheel in the dropout with the old Shimano's built in hangar and I will change a few things tomorrow as I have a different hangar and derailer that I can set back farther... the hanger also has to be filed down and thinned a little so that the wheel nut and spindle nut can seat properly.
The other issue with a derailer on a folder with 20 inch wheels is when you have this much fresh snow (which the bike handles really well) ...
The conversion on a standard bike is far more straight forward and I wish I still had the pics I had taken of my old dual drive setup.
Likes For Sixty Fiver:
#49
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
Bianchi used to sell a bike with a 7-spd nexus hub and a 3 cog cassette. You could shift using only the right hand.
Surly sells Dingles, which may come in handy for some of these projects.
Surly sells Dingles, which may come in handy for some of these projects.
#50
Senior Member
Looks great Kurt! I have a Scwhinn Collegiate with a single,long metal stem shifter that might work, but it probably wouldn't look right with all the British parts.