Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Help! Noob Seeking buying advice on: Specialized S-Works HT Medium

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Help! Noob Seeking buying advice on: Specialized S-Works HT Medium

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-13, 08:59 PM
  #1  
uiriamu
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Help! Noob Seeking buying advice on: Specialized S-Works HT Medium

Hi guys,

I don't know much about specs of bikes etc for mtb and just wanted to get an opinion on this particular bike if its worth it. I want to get a decent mtb that will last me a while.

I also heard there were fake specialized bikes in the market and that freaked me out a bit. Thanks a millions in advance for any advice. Pictures below!

SPECS:

For Sale Specialized S-Works HT Medium Excellent Condition with following specifications:
Price 1500USD
Frame Construction Bonded/monocoque
Frame Tubing Material S-Works FACT 10m carbon Az1
Fork Brand & Model Fox F90RLC, 90mm travel
Component Group Shimano XTR, Sram X0
Brakeset Magura Marta SL brakes, Magura Marta SL Carbon levers
Shift Levers Sram X0
Front Derailleur Shimano XTR, dual-pull/clamp-on 34.9mm
Rear Derailleur Sram X0
Crankset Shimano XTR, 22/32/44 teeth
Pedals Not included
Bottom Bracket Shimano XTR
BB Shell Width Unspecified
Rear Cogs 9-speed, 11 - 34 teeth
Chain Shimano XTR, 1/2 x 3/32"
Seatpost S-Works, 30.9mm diameter
Saddle Selle Italia
Wheelset Easton XC

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bike8.JPG (35.6 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg
bike7.JPG (37.6 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg
bike6.JPG (49.0 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg
bike5.JPG (40.8 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg
bike4.JPG (70.7 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg
bike3.JPG (65.7 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg
bike2.JPG (60.2 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg
bike1.JPG (56.6 KB, 17 views)
uiriamu is offline  
Old 10-19-13, 09:56 PM
  #2  
Dannihilator
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Worth it.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 10-19-13, 10:01 PM
  #3  
roccobike
Bike Junkie
 
roccobike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Dannihilator
Worth it.
+1, What he said
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
roccobike is offline  
Old 10-20-13, 12:10 AM
  #4  
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Yup, I agree -- although I'm curious about the spec on the chain -- 3/32 is 8-speed width, and you have a 9-speed drivetrain....

9-speed chains are thinner, by necessity, because the cogs (rear gears) are closer together.
DX-MAN is offline  
Old 10-20-13, 01:21 AM
  #5  
wcngu1
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies!

Originally Posted by DX-MAN
Yup, I agree -- although I'm curious about the spec on the chain -- 3/32 is 8-speed width, and you have a 9-speed drivetrain....

9-speed chains are thinner, by necessity, because the cogs (rear gears) are closer together.
Thanks for the reply guys! gives me confidence!

I have no idea about the chains to be honest. I guess I should ask if they have been modified or changed from stock standard?

This is the specs of the stock standard bike https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...onhtdisc#specs

right now it doesn't mean too much to me.... much to learn haha
wcngu1 is offline  
Old 10-20-13, 04:59 AM
  #6  
jimc101
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 87 Posts
For the chain, if it's an XTR chain, it's an XTR chain, they only made one spec per speed, looking at the bike, slightly strange build with the Shimano/SRAM mix & some misses in the attention to detail, the stem face plate is upside down, a minor thing, but is there anything else wrong with the build. (the face plate may be minor, but it jumps out)

Would look closely at the forks, Fox forks have a tendency for stanchion wear, if there is any, that's a new CSU needed, they are also maintenance intensive forks, so be aware of this

Would have a good look at the crank, XTR are normally a proprietary BCD, you need to research this, if so, if the chain rings are worn, getting replacements may be hard, as that version of XTR is several generations old now.

What is you intended use, as that bike looks very XC orientated?
jimc101 is offline  
Old 10-20-13, 06:01 AM
  #7  
wcngu1
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimc101
For the chain, if it's an XTR chain, it's an XTR chain, they only made one spec per speed, looking at the bike, slightly strange build with the Shimano/SRAM mix & some misses in the attention to detail, the stem face plate is upside down, a minor thing, but is there anything else wrong with the build. (the face plate may be minor, but it jumps out)

Would look closely at the forks, Fox forks have a tendency for stanchion wear, if there is any, that's a new CSU needed, they are also maintenance intensive forks, so be aware of this

Would have a good look at the crank, XTR are normally a proprietary BCD, you need to research this, if so, if the chain rings are worn, getting replacements may be hard, as that version of XTR is several generations old now.

What is you intended use, as that bike looks very XC orientated?
thanks for the reply Jim, I think you've scared me off from this purchase! He did say that all original parts from the stock standard were included but when compared to the specialised website they have clearly been changed since there is no SRAM parts in the stock standard! https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...onhtdisc#specs

I'm aiming for a good allrounder mtb to take on anything (except maybe hardcore downhill). I like to buy things once and buy it well so that I dont have to keep upgrading. I guess this deal was too good to be true! Since I'm not a bike genius yet I dont think i'd be able to tell if things were out of place when inspecting closely =/
wcngu1 is offline  
Old 10-20-13, 06:07 AM
  #8  
jimc101
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 87 Posts
Thinking if you are looking for an all rounder, it's probably not the best choice, would probably be looking for a short travel (120mm F&R) full suspension bike, for wheel size, that a whole other debate. Good luck in your search.
jimc101 is offline  
Old 10-20-13, 11:36 AM
  #9  
IthaDan 
Senior Member
 
IthaDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,852

Bikes: Click on the #YOLO

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by DX-MAN
Yup, I agree -- although I'm curious about the spec on the chain -- 3/32 is 8-speed width, and you have a 9-speed drivetrain....

9-speed chains are thinner, by necessity, because the cogs (rear gears) are closer together.
3/32" is the width of the HOLES in the chain. As chains got narrower, the difference was created by thinning the plates and reducing the amount of pin protruding.

You're somewhat right though, for 10s drivetrains and up the standard has shifted again to something really goofy, like 11/128".

https://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_ch.html
__________________

Shimano : Click :: Campy : Snap :: SRAM : Bang
IthaDan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Drides
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
11
12-02-18 04:12 PM
napiur
Mountain Biking
7
06-19-14 11:19 AM
ilovehotshot
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
5
06-09-13 10:00 AM
Aychdub
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
11
05-11-13 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.