Titanium grade 5 (6Al-4V) bolts in aluminum alloy frame - no corrosion?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Titanium grade 5 (6Al-4V) bolts in aluminum alloy frame - no corrosion?
Hi,
This seems like a great forum - will introduce myself in the introductions thread later.
I stumbled upon a few other threads on Ti bolts in this forum (sorry, can't post links), but have not found any threads describing the more technical details. My own experience with A2-70 (304) stainless steel bolts for a stem made of 7075 alloy (I believe) has been that the stem began to corrode after about half a year. Some years later I cleaned the corrosion off as well as I could and replaced the bolts with titanium alloy bolts ("grade 5" bolts). This is now many years ago, and the aluminum has not corroded since, or very little if any. I have now bought some more grade 5 bolts for a different bike project, but didn't think of this before now:
Shouldn't the titanium bolts make the aluminum alloy corrode even faster than with the stainless steel bolts? I mean, the titanium itself is supposed to be more cathodic than 304 stainless steel - or is the fact that aluminum is present in the grade 5 alloy (6Al-4V) making it much less cathodic and thus much less corrosive than 304?
This seems like a great forum - will introduce myself in the introductions thread later.
I stumbled upon a few other threads on Ti bolts in this forum (sorry, can't post links), but have not found any threads describing the more technical details. My own experience with A2-70 (304) stainless steel bolts for a stem made of 7075 alloy (I believe) has been that the stem began to corrode after about half a year. Some years later I cleaned the corrosion off as well as I could and replaced the bolts with titanium alloy bolts ("grade 5" bolts). This is now many years ago, and the aluminum has not corroded since, or very little if any. I have now bought some more grade 5 bolts for a different bike project, but didn't think of this before now:
Shouldn't the titanium bolts make the aluminum alloy corrode even faster than with the stainless steel bolts? I mean, the titanium itself is supposed to be more cathodic than 304 stainless steel - or is the fact that aluminum is present in the grade 5 alloy (6Al-4V) making it much less cathodic and thus much less corrosive than 304?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Not wild about small Ti fasteners - I heard too many (granted, anecdotal) stories of such fasteners failing. Whenever I buy a lightweight component with Ti screws (stems, usually, where screw failure is not an option), I replace the screws with quality black oxide-coated steel equivalents. Yes, they surface corrode over years, but that's all it is. I took a look at MacMaster-Carr, my "go-to" for fasteners, and they list Grade 5 (6/4) Ti as having a tensile strength of 130,000 psi, compared with 170,000 psi for good alloy steel, so there's no strength advantage. Anyway, you should be greasing your fasteners, and regreasing them every couple of years, which should negate any tendency to corrode
Likes For Litespud:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
My go-to treatment for dissimilar-metal joints is Tef-Gel: https://www.tefgel.com/contain.php?param=tefgel_infor
I am not a fan of Ti fasteners, they have issues such a fretting corrosion which requires the joining system to be specifically designed for them, and except for weight (which doesn't generally concern me) and "sexiness" I see little advantage over steel.
I am not a fan of Ti fasteners, they have issues such a fretting corrosion which requires the joining system to be specifically designed for them, and except for weight (which doesn't generally concern me) and "sexiness" I see little advantage over steel.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I've done the opposite and used aluminum alloy water bottle cage bolts in Ti frames for decades with no corrosion problems. My secret? Grease the bolts.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,546
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 580 Times
in
398 Posts
There is no real weight advantage, as dsbrantjr points out, unless you're counting grams. I don't know about "sexiness", but Ti hardware does look nice.
Stainless (L) and Ti (R) chainring hardware
Original stainless hardware (L) vs Ti (R)
Split image: SS hardware in the top half, Ti in the bottom.
#7
Junior Member
A stem corroding after six months seems really unusual. Is it used daily on an indoor trainer? Left outside exposed to salt water?