Advantages of upgrading from 1980's bike?
#76
Kjas65
1985 Schwinn Traveler
Im working on the same bicycle. Head badge has 1615 Julian date. Receipt says it wasn't sold until 5/86. I prefer older low end roadbikes such as this to urban ride. I change out the bars and brake levers to mtb. Mtbs are just too heavy imo. And being low end it's easier to modify in this fashion. I wouldn't want to modify something nice like a Paramount. Pedals weigh a ton. I'll be replacing those soon. Haven't ridden it yet. It was stored indoors and only ridden once or twice
#77
Kjas65
Weight
Nine pounds is a lot. Yours has all the same equipment mine does. I take anything off that isn't needed. All reflectors and brackets. Kickstand of course. Pedals are real heavy steel rat trap. Other than that, I don't know. Unless you get lighter wheels. Or you could beat around town on a mtb for a week, then ride the traveler. 😄.lol. Not to offend the mtb people.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times
in
322 Posts
I have a Schwinn Traveler made in 1986. It has a butted 4130 chromoly frame. Over the years, I've updated it with a new seat, control cables, some handlebars from Velo Orange, and Schwalbe Marathon tires (27 1/4). Otherwise it's stock. It has Weimann alloy rims made in Belgium, Sun Tour derailleur, Sakae crankset, and Dia Compe brakes. 12-speed (2x6 with shifters on the down-tube). Total weight with the seat, bottle cage and everything is 29 pounds. What am I missing? If I get a new bike, will it be a lot better? If so, what would make it better?
Likes For Flip Flop Rider:
#80
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,986
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4946 Post(s)
Liked 8,087 Times
in
3,826 Posts
I find that talking 80's steel bikes is sort of similar to talking vinyl and vacuum tubes with audio folk. Whatever the bike riding equivalent of "euphonic" happens to be
gets applied to the mysteries of 35 year old steel, so it puts the discussion outside debates over conventional objective measures.
I do know that there are people who ride a variety of bikes who swear by old steel frames just as there are people who believe that 300B Western Electric tubes, vinyl records, and Bozak speakers were
the apogee of audio achievement. I don't think it's some sort of delusion. There is something different, but it's hard to say what's different in universally understandable terms and it's even
harder to say if that difference matters that much to everyone.
Bottom line, there are lots of reasons to just go with a new bike in the $1000 range and up. I think there are also some things that will get lost in the transition. It's a bit like the way modern high performance
sports cars will outperform a late 60's Porsche 911. There's still something about the old Porsche that's satisfying, unique, and difficult to replace.
gets applied to the mysteries of 35 year old steel, so it puts the discussion outside debates over conventional objective measures.
I do know that there are people who ride a variety of bikes who swear by old steel frames just as there are people who believe that 300B Western Electric tubes, vinyl records, and Bozak speakers were
the apogee of audio achievement. I don't think it's some sort of delusion. There is something different, but it's hard to say what's different in universally understandable terms and it's even
harder to say if that difference matters that much to everyone.
Bottom line, there are lots of reasons to just go with a new bike in the $1000 range and up. I think there are also some things that will get lost in the transition. It's a bit like the way modern high performance
sports cars will outperform a late 60's Porsche 911. There's still something about the old Porsche that's satisfying, unique, and difficult to replace.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
Likes For Kjas64:
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
I am not saying they are not true, its just that they are not inspiring. New bike, provided it is some significant upgrade, will seem to want to go almost by itself, it will be a pleasure to ride and you will ride faster not just because it will be lighter and more rigid where it matters etc., but because such improvements will inspire you to squeeze out of yourself what you wouldn't on the old tired iron horse more suited to pull a wagon than being fast. And its not just those improvements but the looks of the bike and how it is mechanically well tuned up for performance which also are inspiring.
My advice to the OP is to stick with his old bike and never look forward.
#83
Live not by lies.
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times
in
582 Posts
Im working on the same bicycle. Head badge has 1615 Julian date. Receipt says it wasn't sold until 5/86. I prefer older low end roadbikes such as this to urban ride. I change out the bars and brake levers to mtb. Mtbs are just too heavy imo. And being low end it's easier to modify in this fashion. I wouldn't want to modify something nice like a Paramount. Pedals weigh a ton. I'll be replacing those soon. Haven't ridden it yet. It was stored indoors and only ridden once or twice
I’m not very experienced- when I read “urban ride” I think about riding a MTB as a glorified BMX bike for grown ups(ish). Bunny hopping in and out of the street/sidewalk, things like that.
Do people do that stuff on road frames? Or do you mean more similar to a commuter bike or messenger bike?
Thank you.
#84
Live not by lies.
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 860 Post(s)
Liked 784 Times
in
582 Posts
I’m not necessarily an audiofile, but a few years ago I learned how wonderful a powered sub with the high line ins and outs are.
Especially with cheapish bookshelf speakers. Really cleans things up by relieving the little drivers from having to do the heavy work.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 774
Bikes: Trek 970, Bianchi Volpe,Casati
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
87 Posts
Back in the day
I had a Schwinn Continental , must have weighed 30 pounds . A buddy of mine had an Atala Italian bike and was into cycling. I finally bought a new , 1984 Rossin with all campy super record and campy c-record hubs. The wheels, frame, pedals , seat make a big difference. I realized I never road a real bike before I rode the Rossin . The Rossin was nimble , fast, comfortable ,could ride all day. The Schwinn continental was a make believe bike would bend and ride horrible , weighed a ton.. That being said i have an off the radar, Schwinn Passage touring bike , made in the USA , Columbus Tenax tubes and that's an amazing touring bike ...
Moral of the story, you will find a BIG difference depending on the bike you choose , and money isn't everything . You could score a minty Road racing bike for cheap , for uunder a grand . You just have to look and check condition closely . I paid $200 for that minty almost unused 1980s Schwinn Passage touring bike..
Moral of the story, you will find a BIG difference depending on the bike you choose , and money isn't everything . You could score a minty Road racing bike for cheap , for uunder a grand . You just have to look and check condition closely . I paid $200 for that minty almost unused 1980s Schwinn Passage touring bike..
Last edited by rossiny; 03-17-21 at 09:54 PM.
Likes For rossiny:
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Get yourself a set of 25 pound weights and a set of 15 pound weights. Do curls with each until you can go no further. Which were you able to curl longer?
Whether you know it or not that is a similar thing to what you experience when constantly riding in rolling terrain or when climbing the side of a mountain.
If you are on level ground or going down hill all the time, weight is not such a big deal. Though if you have a 30 pound bike, I'll probably beat you in a short sprint. And I'm not that great a cyclist. Just a legend in my own mind sadly.
Whether you know it or not that is a similar thing to what you experience when constantly riding in rolling terrain or when climbing the side of a mountain.
If you are on level ground or going down hill all the time, weight is not such a big deal. Though if you have a 30 pound bike, I'll probably beat you in a short sprint. And I'm not that great a cyclist. Just a legend in my own mind sadly.
Now, on limited funds, there is a lot you can do with that Schwinn that will feel very different and make it far more fun to ride. Lighter wheels. I don't know what Weinmanns you have but I don't think I have ever seen a light pair. 32 spoke wheels, Open Pro rims and nice tires will be a big step up. (Stick with steel spokes. If you are going to hand built wheels, seriously consider lighter butted spokes if the wheelbuilder thinks they are appropriate for your weight and riding.)
Pedals - there are decently light pedals if you are willing to go to clipless. The cheap avenue is the Wellgo/Nashbar/Performance pedals made to the LOOK Delta standard but there are many other options. If you are not already doing it, clipless is an easy way to up the performance of the bike.
If you have a bike coop nearby, go and bring your bike. Look at the display cases for used equipment and talk to an employee about what will make a real difference.
I took a 1990 sport Peugeot frame that I picked up for cheap, bought $100 of parts (French bike; a lot of my stuff wouldn't fit), put on the wheels I described (only fix gear), parts I had on hand and rolled out on a 20 lb bike that felt like the bike I raced many years before. A true blast to ride! (Brakes were a mishmash of calipers I paid $5 and $10 for and new Tektro levers for $35. Complete garbage to look at and real stoppers.)
The posters above will laugh at you but you get to keep riding a bike you like, put real fun in it and spend what, $500? (and you don't have to do it all at once). The other option is to drop thousands just to wheel the bike out of the shop. (If you decide to upgrade wheels - if you are sticking with your current gearing standard, ie number of cogs or you can upgrade your current hub, seriously consider getting new (used?) wheels instead up rebuilding your current. Why? You get a second pair. Really useful! Your current wheels can become city wheels, rain wheels, gravel wheels and just wheels to have when you grab the bike for that quick ride you gotta do and you have a flat.)
And in the long, long run - you decide to get that whiz bang bike. Don't toss or sell this one! Like those second wheels, this is your second, city, rain, gravel bike that's sitting quietly (and working) when the good one needs attention.
Edit: I have had a rain/city/winter/commute fix gear forever. Every few years something bad happens and I have to get a new frame. I go to a local shop with used bikes and look for one with an early '80s steel frame. Done this 4 times now. That first one was a Japanese built sport Schwinn. I got it for near free as it had been hit by a car. I never knew what model it was. With light wheels it was a fun ride! (With fenders year 'round, lock, LowRider rack and panniers!)
Last edited by 79pmooney; 03-17-21 at 11:05 PM.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#87
Kjas65
By urban riding, I meant basically just beating around town. On the street one minute then on the sidewalk the next. No tricks. I do go over curbs carefully on occasion. Riding conditions aren't the greatest in Lansing. Constantly have to watch surface conditions. All the unnecessary stuff I remove to lose whatever weight is so I can mount the new b17 saddle. At 57 and 155 lbs I find the old roadbikes light enough for my needs.
#89
Kjas65
Tangent alert.
I’m not necessarily an audiofile, but a few years ago I learned how wonderful a powered sub with the high line ins and outs are.
Especially with cheapish bookshelf speakers. Really cleans things up by relieving the little drivers from having to do the heavy work.
I’m not necessarily an audiofile, but a few years ago I learned how wonderful a powered sub with the high line ins and outs are.
Especially with cheapish bookshelf speakers. Really cleans things up by relieving the little drivers from having to do the heavy work.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
TBH, if I were the OP, wondering what a new bike might bring me, after reading such comments about energy and acceleration, I'd just stay with my old bike.
I am not saying they are not true, its just that they are not inspiring. New bike, provided it is some significant upgrade, will seem to want to go almost by itself, it will be a pleasure to ride and you will ride faster not just because it will be lighter and more rigid where it matters etc., but because such improvements will inspire you to squeeze out of yourself what you wouldn't on the old tired iron horse more suited to pull a wagon than being fast. And its not just those improvements but the looks of the bike and how it is mechanically well tuned up for performance which also are inspiring.
My advice to the OP is to stick with his old bike and never look forward.
I am not saying they are not true, its just that they are not inspiring. New bike, provided it is some significant upgrade, will seem to want to go almost by itself, it will be a pleasure to ride and you will ride faster not just because it will be lighter and more rigid where it matters etc., but because such improvements will inspire you to squeeze out of yourself what you wouldn't on the old tired iron horse more suited to pull a wagon than being fast. And its not just those improvements but the looks of the bike and how it is mechanically well tuned up for performance which also are inspiring.
My advice to the OP is to stick with his old bike and never look forward.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
I have a Schwinn Traveler made in 1986. It has a butted 4130 chromoly frame. Over the years, I've updated it with a new seat, control cables, some handlebars from Velo Orange, and Schwalbe Marathon tires (27 1/4). Otherwise it's stock. It has Weimann alloy rims made in Belgium, Sun Tour derailleur, Sakae crankset, and Dia Compe brakes. 12-speed (2x6 with shifters on the down-tube). Total weight with the seat, bottle cage and everything is 29 pounds. What am I missing? If I get a new bike, will it be a lot better? If so, what would make it better?
you need to test ride a new bike and decide for yourself
#92
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 183
Bikes: '93 Cannondale R500; '88 Centurion Ironman Expert, '97 Cannondale R900, '95 Serotta CSI, '83 Trek 700, '97 Lemond Zurich, '89 Bianchi Giro, '87 Schwinn Prologue, '83 Fuji TSIV + one perturbed wife
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked 154 Times
in
58 Posts
And newer bikes don't necessity ride better than older bikes, especially older steel bikes. Over the years I have had a lot of bikes, the one with the best overall comfort and performance was my Trek 660, which was an 80's 12 speed with a 531 frame. It was fitted with Campy Nuovo Record components and friction shifters. This bike was magic, and I have never been able to get as good a pedal stroke on any other bike as I could on this old Trek, and I would happily trade any of my newer (and much more expensive bikes) to get it back.
Would I upgrade an 80s or 90s bike? Yes, but I say that because that suits me. I would cry out a "Here, here!" with 50+Cycling's experience. One of my favorite bikes has to be my '83 Trek 700. It's similar to 50+'s Trek in that it has 531 frame and an old friction Suntour Superbe Pro drive train. It is one of the only bikes that "disappears" underneath me.
#93
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Likes For Kapusta:
#94
Senior Member
What is going to kill you (or make the bike feel heavy) is rotating weight. Specifically, those HEAVY Marathon tires weigh somewhere near 740 grams each for 700x28. A lighter 'road' tire weighs somewhere near 280gr in the same 700x28 tire size (just so we're tanking an apples-to-apples comparison here). That 460gr per tire difference is A POUND per tire! Every tire rotation you are lifting that weight, then accelerating it to 2x riding speed (tire velocity with respect to the ground at the top of the tire). F=MA Force equals Mass times Acceleration. Simple physics means you are doing a LOT of work to accelerate that rotating weight. Of course the weight is killing you. If you were to get a nine-pound lighter bike and shod it with those heavy-tire 'combat boots', would you expect it to ride significantly different? The truth says otherwise.
Here's a little side-story that may serve as an example for you...
When I bought my '86 Miyata 710 off Craigslist while on vacation at my mother's place in Phoenix, it had a flat rear tire (I can't remember the brand) and a very skinny 23mm Vittoria Zaffiro on the front. The local bike shop only had a single Vittoria Randonneur 28 (similar to your bike's Schwalbe Marathon) in stock - and even that was over 2x internet price - yikes! I put that Randonneur on the rear along with a new tube and made the bike rideable at least - but it felt like a slug. AND it rode like a truck.
On my next visit to AZ, I packed along a pair of VIttoria Rubino Pro Tech tires and new matching tubes. Tires are ~280g each, and tubes are ~105g each, so less than 400 grams for tire and tube per wheel. When I went to remove the front tire, it had the the 400 gram wire-bead Zaffiro tire AND a heavy 'thorn proof' tube that was filled with Slime.That tube with slime weighed more than a pound by itself! The Randonneur tire that I had put on previously weighed ~700g plus the ~150gr standard tube. So total weight for both old tires/tubes was somewhere near 1.8Kg or close to FOUR POUNDS. New tires/tubes weighed 1.75 pounds total or 2-1/4 pounds less!!!
The difference in ride quality was remarkable! The lighter/more supple 150tpi (threads per inch) tires absorbed the road irregularities much better than the stiff slime-filled thorn tube/ 33tpi stiff carcass tires. Same frame, same wheelset, same other components. The only variable was the tires/tubes.
Last year, I was forced to get a new wheelset, and is even lighter by another half pound of rotating weight. Let me just tell you that I am VERY happy with my '80s steel bike now. Under 22-1/2 pounds now. Would I trade it for a newer 'wunderbike'? Not on your life!
Here's a little side-story that may serve as an example for you...
When I bought my '86 Miyata 710 off Craigslist while on vacation at my mother's place in Phoenix, it had a flat rear tire (I can't remember the brand) and a very skinny 23mm Vittoria Zaffiro on the front. The local bike shop only had a single Vittoria Randonneur 28 (similar to your bike's Schwalbe Marathon) in stock - and even that was over 2x internet price - yikes! I put that Randonneur on the rear along with a new tube and made the bike rideable at least - but it felt like a slug. AND it rode like a truck.
On my next visit to AZ, I packed along a pair of VIttoria Rubino Pro Tech tires and new matching tubes. Tires are ~280g each, and tubes are ~105g each, so less than 400 grams for tire and tube per wheel. When I went to remove the front tire, it had the the 400 gram wire-bead Zaffiro tire AND a heavy 'thorn proof' tube that was filled with Slime.That tube with slime weighed more than a pound by itself! The Randonneur tire that I had put on previously weighed ~700g plus the ~150gr standard tube. So total weight for both old tires/tubes was somewhere near 1.8Kg or close to FOUR POUNDS. New tires/tubes weighed 1.75 pounds total or 2-1/4 pounds less!!!
The difference in ride quality was remarkable! The lighter/more supple 150tpi (threads per inch) tires absorbed the road irregularities much better than the stiff slime-filled thorn tube/ 33tpi stiff carcass tires. Same frame, same wheelset, same other components. The only variable was the tires/tubes.
Last year, I was forced to get a new wheelset, and is even lighter by another half pound of rotating weight. Let me just tell you that I am VERY happy with my '80s steel bike now. Under 22-1/2 pounds now. Would I trade it for a newer 'wunderbike'? Not on your life!
Likes For Cougrrcj:
#95
Senior Member
Every tire rotation you are lifting that weight, then accelerating it to 2x riding speed (tire velocity with respect to the ground at the top of the tire). F=MA Force equals Mass times Acceleration. Simple physics means you are doing a LOT of work to accelerate that rotating weight. Of course the weight is killing you.
Yes, at any given moment, there is a piece of the tire that is stationary against the ground. And yes, half a wheel rotation later, it will be going 2x your riding speed. And yes, the energy to accelerate that piece of the tire to that speed does need to have come from somewhere if the wheel is to maintain a steady rotating speed.
But that "somewhat" is not effort from the cyclist. It's the rest of the wheel. Remember that when the piece of the tire was stationary against the ground, there was another piece of the tire half a rotation away that was moving 2x the speed of the bicycle. When this piece of tire loses velocity as it spins down toward the contact patch, it gives it back to the wheel and bicycle.
Rotating weight does resist acceleration more than non-rotating weight (twice as much if it's at the rim), and it's easy to feel in how the bike rocks from side-to-side because of gyroscopic effects. But when rolling at a steady speed along level ground, it doesn't really add any resistance.
Super-heavy tire setups are usually slower than light tire setups, but the largest factor tends to be rolling resistance.