Road Test/Bike Review (1987) Six Road Bikes for Tall People
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 2,011
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 3,397 Times
in
983 Posts
Road Test/Bike Review (1987) Six Road Bikes for Tall People
LOTUS Triomphe, NISHIKI International, CANNONDALE SR-1000, ALAN Record, PANASONIC DX-2000, and GUERCIOTTI Nuovo Record Carbonio are featured.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,673
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1158 Post(s)
Liked 439 Times
in
312 Posts
Ergonomic bike designs and evolution of high tech materials on modern bikes make these huge steeds look so crude and disproportionate! Thank God for clipless pedals, sloping top tube geometry and advanced shaping of frame tubes.
Thanks for the post though SpeedofLight
Thanks for the post though SpeedofLight
Last edited by masi61; 01-27-21 at 11:42 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 2,011
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 3,397 Times
in
983 Posts
I wondered why they chose to photograph these bikes from an angle that would tend to accentuate that.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#5
Port
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 9,496
Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 971 Post(s)
Liked 1,803 Times
in
1,037 Posts
I think many of look to our own bikes as "normal" looking, and some of these are indeed my size, but the photographs seem to be trying to make them all look freak-show huge. Since I am used to looking at 62-64 cm bikes as normal, only the Panasonic looks huge to me. The rest are just at the upper range of normal.
I am 6'04" and anywhere from 210-230 pounds. I could shop at the "big and tall" stores, but usually can find my sizes at normal stores. Same goes for bikes: most makers offer a 62 ctc (or equivalent).
So my point it this: none of these bikes are tall-specific. They are all just the larger end of sizing on existing bikes. I am sure every one of them also comes in a sub 50cm size too.
I am 6'04" and anywhere from 210-230 pounds. I could shop at the "big and tall" stores, but usually can find my sizes at normal stores. Same goes for bikes: most makers offer a 62 ctc (or equivalent).
So my point it this: none of these bikes are tall-specific. They are all just the larger end of sizing on existing bikes. I am sure every one of them also comes in a sub 50cm size too.
__________________
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
Last edited by Rocket-Sauce; 01-27-21 at 01:27 PM.
Likes For Rocket-Sauce:
#6
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,237
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times
in
3,183 Posts
"Hanging anything less than Campy on this fine Italian [Lotus] frame would be ... the equivalent of topping that perfect pizza crust with cheddar cheese and soy sauce."
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
I love how the comparison between the Cannondale and Alan being as close as it was with the huge difference in frame flex didn't lead them to the obvious (and correct) conclusion:
Frame stiffness is not a relevant factor in bicycle performance, unless the bike handles badly.
--Shannon
Frame stiffness is not a relevant factor in bicycle performance, unless the bike handles badly.
--Shannon
#8
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,680
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1553 Post(s)
Liked 2,006 Times
in
984 Posts
Thank you for posting this article. I agree with people's sentiments here. Garbage angle on the photography, even if it was "to make it look huge." Tall bikes have a tough enough time looking attractive to those that don't ride them, don't add to it. In reality, only the Panasonic is awkward when viewed at a normal angle. The rest of those bikes are actually all well-proportioned. Bicycling.....guhhhh.
The Cannodale's 59cm TT is not too short, IMO. Writer was complaining way too much about that. Man, this is how it is in the automotive industry. [I will refrain from a diatribe on that] Disappointing. 100-110mm stems on a bike that tall are just fine!
Also, if you have to duck through doorways, 5 out of the 6 bikes are rubbish for accurate testing. A 63cm????
6 bikes for tall tall people (for 1986) should have been something like:
1) Panasonic DX-2000 [already a part of the test] in 28" (71cm) size.
2) Lotus Challenger (or similar) in 66cm size.
3) Schwinn Le Tour in 27" (68.5cm) size.
4) Miyata 110 in 27" (68.5cm) size.
5) Fuji Del Rey in 27" (68.5cm) size.
6) ST800 (canti) or ST500 (caliper) in 27" (68.5cm) size.
Honorable mention: Trek 700 (05 500) in 25.5" (65cm) size.
The Cannodale's 59cm TT is not too short, IMO. Writer was complaining way too much about that. Man, this is how it is in the automotive industry. [I will refrain from a diatribe on that] Disappointing. 100-110mm stems on a bike that tall are just fine!
Also, if you have to duck through doorways, 5 out of the 6 bikes are rubbish for accurate testing. A 63cm????
6 bikes for tall tall people (for 1986) should have been something like:
1) Panasonic DX-2000 [already a part of the test] in 28" (71cm) size.
2) Lotus Challenger (or similar) in 66cm size.
3) Schwinn Le Tour in 27" (68.5cm) size.
4) Miyata 110 in 27" (68.5cm) size.
5) Fuji Del Rey in 27" (68.5cm) size.
6) ST800 (canti) or ST500 (caliper) in 27" (68.5cm) size.
Honorable mention: Trek 700 (05 500) in 25.5" (65cm) size.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel: