Tubeless Question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 287 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
129 Posts
Tubeless Question
I’ve had tubeless tires on a gravel bikes over the years, I’ve also used tubes.
One question - at the same relatively low psi, does tubeless have more shock absorption over bumpy gravel?
I’ve had a Salsa Fargo since April and left it set up with tubes in 2.2” Sparwood tires. On the mixed surfaces where I ride I use 25-30 psi and it’s been great. Only reason I would consider tubeless is if the shock absorption would be like 25%+ better. My mixed surfaces are pretty easy going (champagne gravel trails and roads, roads with some small washboard sections; non technical single track; wood chips, wooden boardwalks; grass; paved paths and roads).
I’ve had tubeless 700-40 and 650-47. My current set up of tubes in 2.2” tires is way more comfortable over the bumpiest terrain where I ride.
One question - at the same relatively low psi, does tubeless have more shock absorption over bumpy gravel?
I’ve had a Salsa Fargo since April and left it set up with tubes in 2.2” Sparwood tires. On the mixed surfaces where I ride I use 25-30 psi and it’s been great. Only reason I would consider tubeless is if the shock absorption would be like 25%+ better. My mixed surfaces are pretty easy going (champagne gravel trails and roads, roads with some small washboard sections; non technical single track; wood chips, wooden boardwalks; grass; paved paths and roads).
I’ve had tubeless 700-40 and 650-47. My current set up of tubes in 2.2” tires is way more comfortable over the bumpiest terrain where I ride.
#2
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,855
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2059 Post(s)
Liked 1,557 Times
in
1,078 Posts
... set up with tubes in 2.2” Sparwood tires. On the mixed surfaces where I ride I use 25-30 psi and it’s been great. Only reason I would consider tubeless is if the shock absorption would be like 25%+ better. ...
I’ve had tubeless 700-40 and 650-47. My current set up of tubes in 2.2” tires is way more comfortable over the bumpiest terrain where I ride.
I’ve had tubeless 700-40 and 650-47. My current set up of tubes in 2.2” tires is way more comfortable over the bumpiest terrain where I ride.
Your 2.2" tires are wider and more voluminous, and thus can be run at a lower pressure, than your 700x40c and 650x47c tires, so of course are more comfortable. If the 2.2" tires are tubeless ready, running them tubeless would slightly increase their internal volumes and slightly improve their suppleness and rolling resistance, but nowhere near a 25% improvement.
#3
Full Member
The difference gets even smaller if you are comparing tubeless tires with tires that are not tubeless-ready, since the former will have more robust construction -- precisely to make up for the lack of support from the tube.
The smaller the tire, the larger this effect will be, on a percentage basis -- a tube inside a 25mm tire takes up a greater percentage of the volume than one inside a 45mm tire -- but I doubt very many people could tell the difference with either. I have Continental GP5Ks on two bikes, one tubed and one tubeless -- and I honestly forget which is which, sometimes.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 287 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
129 Posts
Thanks for the responses (so far). As I suspected, minimal improvement for me so I’ll stick with tubes. If I ever use this rig for bikepacking and/or gnarlier surfaces, then I’ll consider tubeless.
#5
Senior Member
I recently went tubeless with 2,4" tires on my MTB. I was surprised that the difference was very noticeable. I had assumed it wouldn't be unless I were to lower the pressure, but it was even at the same pressure,
I suspect how much so may depend to a large extent on the tire in question. The stiffer the sidewall the less noticeable the difference.
FWIW, that was over a very rough surface.
I suspect how much so may depend to a large extent on the tire in question. The stiffer the sidewall the less noticeable the difference.
FWIW, that was over a very rough surface.
Likes For staehpj1:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 287 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
129 Posts
I recently went tubeless with 2,4" tires on my MTB. I was surprised that the difference was very noticeable. I had assumed it wouldn't be unless I were to lower the pressure, but it was even at the same pressure,
I suspect how much so may depend to a large extent on the tire in question. The stiffer the sidewall the less noticeable the difference.
FWIW, that was over a very rough surface.
I suspect how much so may depend to a large extent on the tire in question. The stiffer the sidewall the less noticeable the difference.
FWIW, that was over a very rough surface.
#7
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,855
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2059 Post(s)
Liked 1,557 Times
in
1,078 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 287 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
129 Posts
Terrain
Mtb on very technical trails where low pressure gives traction on slick tree roots, rocks, dicey corners. Same pressure with tubes meant pinch flats. So I would have to run higher pressure to avoid pinch flats, and that meant a rougher ride and less traction and confidence.
Sparwood on the Salsa - Champagne gravel and non technical ‘dirt’ and I’ve been running 25-30psi (with tubes) and it’s been good.
Mtb on very technical trails where low pressure gives traction on slick tree roots, rocks, dicey corners. Same pressure with tubes meant pinch flats. So I would have to run higher pressure to avoid pinch flats, and that meant a rougher ride and less traction and confidence.
Sparwood on the Salsa - Champagne gravel and non technical ‘dirt’ and I’ve been running 25-30psi (with tubes) and it’s been good.
#9
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,855
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2059 Post(s)
Liked 1,557 Times
in
1,078 Posts
Terrain
Mtb on very technical trails where low pressure gives traction on slick tree roots, rocks, dicey corners. Same pressure with tubes meant pinch flats. So I would have to run higher pressure to avoid pinch flats, and that meant a rougher ride and less traction and confidence.
Sparwood on the Salsa - Champagne gravel and non technical ‘dirt’ and I’ve been running 25-30psi (with tubes) and it’s been good.
Mtb on very technical trails where low pressure gives traction on slick tree roots, rocks, dicey corners. Same pressure with tubes meant pinch flats. So I would have to run higher pressure to avoid pinch flats, and that meant a rougher ride and less traction and confidence.
Sparwood on the Salsa - Champagne gravel and non technical ‘dirt’ and I’ve been running 25-30psi (with tubes) and it’s been good.
To clarify my question: Since you are already familiar with tubeless on both gravel and MTB, and the Teravail Sparwood tires on your Salsa Fargo are tubeless ready (but currently setup with tubes), why not just setup these same tires tubeless on your Salsa Fargo, even though any improvement would be slight (<< 25%)?
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 287 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
129 Posts
I worded my last question using too few words and quoted only what you said (immediately before) about MTB, so you misunderstood me.
To clarify my question: Since you are already familiar with tubeless on both gravel and MTB, and the Teravail Sparwood tires on your Salsa Fargo are tubeless ready (but currently setup with tubes), why not just setup these same tires tubeless on your Salsa Fargo, even though any improvement would be slight (<< 25%)?
To clarify my question: Since you are already familiar with tubeless on both gravel and MTB, and the Teravail Sparwood tires on your Salsa Fargo are tubeless ready (but currently setup with tubes), why not just setup these same tires tubeless on your Salsa Fargo, even though any improvement would be slight (<< 25%)?
#11
Senior Member
All that said I did find the ride noticeably better at the same pressure on a loop that I ride often enough to really notice. First ride after the switch I wasn't looking for a difference, but a bit into the ride it was obvious. It is singletrack with tons of roots and the difference was significant enough to be very noticeable. Also I get by not carrying any spare tubes or patches for my daily rides, just a tiny bacon strip kit and mini pump. For a few years of riding I have had one flat that I could plug, and even that was slow enough that I could make it home first. Actually I probably wouldn't have needed to plug it if I had kept up on maintaining the sealant which it turned out was low.
For my use it is well worth the swap for any of several different reasons. I am riding a MTB though, but I'd not hesitate to use it on gravel.
The one caveate I'd have is that I have bikes that I seldom ride and maintaining sealant on bikes that sit unridden for long periods may be more trouble than it is worth. Running tubes in those bikes probably makes sense. For my daily ride it is a no brainer.
Likes For staehpj1:
#12
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,223
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2768 Post(s)
Liked 2,546 Times
in
1,437 Posts
In my experience running the same tires both tubless and with tubes, I don’t really notice a difference. Maybe if I could ride them immediately back to back on identical wheelsets I could, but not riding them a day or two apart.
#13
Full Member
Is your tubeless setup actually lighter, or do you just assume it is? Most of them are not.
To take one example with which I am familiar, the weight of a tubed Continental GP5K, plus tube, is basically identical to a tubeless Continental GP5K of the same size, plus valve, and 2 oz of sealant. (There's some variation in tube weights, but this relationship holds for a standard Continental Race tube. )
TANSTAAFL, and tubeless tires are heavier than their tubed counterparts, exactly because they need to be, to withstand the forces and maintain pressure.
To take one example with which I am familiar, the weight of a tubed Continental GP5K, plus tube, is basically identical to a tubeless Continental GP5K of the same size, plus valve, and 2 oz of sealant. (There's some variation in tube weights, but this relationship holds for a standard Continental Race tube. )
TANSTAAFL, and tubeless tires are heavier than their tubed counterparts, exactly because they need to be, to withstand the forces and maintain pressure.
Likes For TC1:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 829
Bikes: 2002 Trek 5200 (US POSTAL), 2020 Canyon Aeroad SL
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 317 Post(s)
Liked 686 Times
in
331 Posts
The main advantage for me is puncture protection, especially on rougher/sharper gravel.
A number of times I've finished a route and spotted a couple of drops of sealant on the frame or a small bit that's seeped out on the tyre. On a tubed setup that would have been a flat and a roadside repair, but these all sealed up with minimal pressure loss and me not even knowing during the ride. That's just the ones I've noticed too.
I've often wondered if many tubeless setups are actually lighter like is sometimes claimed by advertising and reviews. I doubt my tubeless setup is lighter (using the same tyres).
Probably within a small handful of grams in either direction. Minus tube, but add valve stem and a healthy dose of sealant.
A number of times I've finished a route and spotted a couple of drops of sealant on the frame or a small bit that's seeped out on the tyre. On a tubed setup that would have been a flat and a roadside repair, but these all sealed up with minimal pressure loss and me not even knowing during the ride. That's just the ones I've noticed too.
Probably within a small handful of grams in either direction. Minus tube, but add valve stem and a healthy dose of sealant.