Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Advice: Bottom Bracket and Crank Arm Combo

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Advice: Bottom Bracket and Crank Arm Combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-20, 02:49 PM
  #1  
XE007
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Advice: Bottom Bracket and Crank Arm Combo

Hello everyone.

Some time ago I began looking into building my own bicycle. Throughout this time, I have put considerable effort into learning the inner workings of bicycle components so that I may not have to depend much on a mechanic.

Having said that, I have a Schwinn Loop folding bicycle stripped with just the frame alone and fork. Its a nice bicycle but at 33 pounds (15kg), its quite heavy when folded.

Anyhow, I have run into an issue. The bike originally had a square taper bottom bracket measuring 68mm and 118mm at the spindles. I am seeing the length as problematic as I am looking for a good set of crank arms using a new Shimano UN55 68mm, 118mm BB.

It seems that finding crank arms to fit these specs is quite hard. I just found a set of Andel crank arms 144BCD on Ebay but to my dismay, they require a BB of 110mm at the spindles with a chainline of 42mm. I think my chainline with the older components is 45-48mm. The loop has a rear frame spacing of 136mm which I think will not be much of an issue however the chain runs straight to my 7th gear which is what this bike has.

I want to cut this short and ask; Is there anyway to make this fit? I am afraid that if I get a Shimano UN with 110mm, I will have an issue with the chainring touching the frame. Is 118mm too long for most cranks?

Thank you for any help you can provide.

Last edited by XE007; 08-05-20 at 04:41 PM.
XE007 is offline  
Old 08-05-20, 05:00 PM
  #2  
dsbrantjr
Senior Member
 
dsbrantjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times in 723 Posts
Find a crankset which suits you and purchase a bottom bracket to fit if necessary. Trying to do otherwise is letting the tail wag the dog. In the event you find one which uses a 118mm BB you are fortunate, but it is putting an unnecessary constraint on your search. The current BB may end up not being any good, anyway.
dsbrantjr is offline  
Old 08-05-20, 05:27 PM
  #3  
XE007
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsbrantjr
Find a crankset which suits you and purchase a bottom bracket to fit if necessary. Trying to do otherwise is letting the tail wag the dog. In the event you find one which uses a 118mm BB you are fortunate, but it is putting an unnecessary constraint on your search. The current BB may end up not being any good, anyway.
Thanks for your reply. As I wrote above, my concern is that the spacing of the chainline will get smaller as I have almost no room because of the chainstay and my rear sprocket (lowest); If I get the UN 110mm will chainring spacers help with this offset?

Thx

Last edited by XE007; 08-05-20 at 05:35 PM.
XE007 is offline  
Old 08-05-20, 07:34 PM
  #4  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times in 2,305 Posts
It's a simple math problem to, on paper, design a crank/BB length combo and the resulting ring/frame clearance if you have the same crank mounted on a known BB length. Just measure the amount od current ring/stay clearance and subtract twice that (for symmetrical BB spindles) and add about 4 or 5mm for the 2-3mm of working clearance on one side. Of course in real life and with manufacturing tolerances being just goals and not constant facts a real fit up is the final say.

But the OP mentioned replacing the crankset with another. So my above isn't going to help unless that new crankset is mounted on the current BB spindle to test the fit/clearance/chainline. I will say that chainline is not an absolute but both ring/stay clearance is and the ability for the ft der to move through a range that will shift across the rings final position. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 08-05-20, 09:28 PM
  #5  
XE007
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for your reply Andrew. Yes, I will be replacing the ring and I only have a enough space for a 50T ring even by manually pushing the crank in on the drive side as a test. I cannot post any images unfortunately but if I could send images (not enough post count) through PM that would be amazing and you can post your findings.

Cheers,
Xavier
XE007 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.