35 or 32
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
35 or 32
I currently have 700 x 38 on my hybrid. I ride 99% pavement. Going to go to Schwalbe Marathon Supremes. Should I replace with 35 or 32?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
I guess it depends on what you value. I presume you're trying to reduce your rolling resistance. This is an interesting test using the basic Schwalbe Marathon (not the Supreme), so take it for what it's worth:
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...on-32-37-40-47
It found the 37, 40, and 47mm versions to all have about the same rolling resistance, and notably less rolling resistance than the 32mm version. The author suspects the 32mm tire uses a different (less supple) casing than the other sizes.
https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...on-32-37-40-47
It found the 37, 40, and 47mm versions to all have about the same rolling resistance, and notably less rolling resistance than the 32mm version. The author suspects the 32mm tire uses a different (less supple) casing than the other sizes.
#4
Deraill this!
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 618
Bikes: 18 Cdale Quick 1, 94 S-Works M2, 98 730 Multitrak, and a few others
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 428 Times
in
249 Posts
Thanks for this thread. I am looking to upgrade tires on my '18 Quick 1 Disc and have been reading up going from the 700C-30s to 32s, 35's or 37/38s. That article is great as I have been consider Schwalbe Marathons of some sort to replace the Schwalbe Spicer KGuards that came on it.
If you are starting with 40s then a jump to 32s could be a real eye opener if you don't have experience on a narrower tire. I never considered tire size much until I starting shopping for a new bike in 2019. Before I picked up my Quick 1, I tried out a Trek FX2 and FX3 back to back and I found a noticeable difference between the 35's on the FX2 and the 32s on the FX3. The 700c-30's on my Quick 1 make for a fast bike but not the most comfortable ride when covering surface streets to get to the trails. At this point, I'm going with 35s when they are available again.
If you are starting with 40s then a jump to 32s could be a real eye opener if you don't have experience on a narrower tire. I never considered tire size much until I starting shopping for a new bike in 2019. Before I picked up my Quick 1, I tried out a Trek FX2 and FX3 back to back and I found a noticeable difference between the 35's on the FX2 and the 32s on the FX3. The 700c-30's on my Quick 1 make for a fast bike but not the most comfortable ride when covering surface streets to get to the trails. At this point, I'm going with 35s when they are available again.
#5
Member
This is obviously a lot of personal preference, But I would personally go with a 35. I regularly ride 32/38/43 tires on my road and gravel bikes. When I am riding the 38s on pavement, I rarely ever feel like it is overkill, and the smoother ride and ability to handle rough roads is a godsend.
The difference between 32 and 35 is so minimal I would opt for the larger tire and smoother ride. Comfort=speed!
The difference between 32 and 35 is so minimal I would opt for the larger tire and smoother ride. Comfort=speed!
Likes For twowheeldesign:
#6
Senior Member
I went from 28 specialized tires that originally came with the bike to panaracer t-serve 35s, then went to panaracer tour 42s and now back to 35s. The 28's were uncomfortable, the 42's very supple but slow, the 35's feel the best compromise. Of course same size tire may feel differently from different makers.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,475
Bikes: Canyon Endurace
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1041 Post(s)
Liked 923 Times
in
540 Posts
Try several sizes and see what you like. You can always keep the ones you didn't like as spares or put them on another bike. Selling them for a small loss on C/L "as new" wouldn't be that hard.
#8
aka Phil Jungels
OR, opt for both! A 35 on the rear for comfort and capacity, and a 32 on the front for quicker steering, and a more nimble bike.
#9
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
#10
aka Phil Jungels
I think you would be happy with the 35s, or even a 40 on the back for comfort. MHO
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
The gravel sector is injecting some nice tires and wheels into the hybrid sector.