Expanded Tern recall
#78
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Verge P9 snapped in two in May this year whilst riding it leaving me with quite bad injuries! Luckily I was on a quiet road when it happened...
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: Many Downtube Folders :)
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times
in
17 Posts
Thanks,
Yan
__________________
Designer of Downtube Folding Bike
Ph.D. Temple University ( Math )
Biked across the USA twice
Semi-active chess player ( two time Bahamas National Champion )
Sivananda ( Bahamas ) Trained Yoga instructor ( 2013 ) and ThetaHealer since 2013
Bicycle delivery worker for Jimmy John's. Delivering is the best workout I have ever had.
Designer of Downtube Folding Bike
Ph.D. Temple University ( Math )
Biked across the USA twice
Semi-active chess player ( two time Bahamas National Champion )
Sivananda ( Bahamas ) Trained Yoga instructor ( 2013 ) and ThetaHealer since 2013
Bicycle delivery worker for Jimmy John's. Delivering is the best workout I have ever had.
#80
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#81
LET'S ROLL
You can try a pic hosting site, like Flickr:
Van Cortland Park, da Bronx by 1nterceptor, on Flickr
__________________
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
People should realise both Tern and Dahon are so called performance folding bikes more inline with racing bikes and have lower weight limits. The EN/ISO 4210 standard seems to pretty much have normal bikes at 120kg and mountain bikes at 136kg but racing bikes tend to be stated as short life performance products and that seems pretty much what Tern and Dahon are aiming for. Personally that's reason enough for me to avoid these brands. I'm rather have a strong frame over a slightly lighter one.
There's a lot of good info here about weight limits of bikes by Specialized in their manual. It's the most comprehensive information I've seen about weight limits of bikes in a manual and is closely following the 4210 standard.
https://media.specialized.com/suppor...0000057489.pdf
I know its often stated that a high quality bike can be stronger and lighter than a cheap bike and to a degree this can be true based on high quality heat treated and superior materials components etc but also the reverse is true and simply making a lighter frame with a lot of butting does compromise strength and the lifespan of the frame will be shorter. The fact neither Dahon or Tern state the normal weight limit of about 120/115kg but are somewhat below that surely means compromises have been made. The weight limit of 120kg seems to be given by some as 115kg allowing 5kg for clothes and what is being carried but they are pretty much the same value. It's what most quality bikes seem to aim for and are certified for. I don't get or want the compromise in strength below that value. I don't want a short life bike or a bike that might cause me to die quite frankly. I'd be impressed if the Tern and Dahon bikes had the same weight limit and were lighter but they aren't they are weaker bikes than their competitors and many of these competitors are much cheaper and better value for the components offered but a little bit heavier and slower but only a marginal difference. I'd also point out that many bikes that claim the 120kg weight limit are not equal, one bike may have just scraped through the requirements after testing and another may have massively exceeded those requirements of strength but both Dahon and Tern are below the normal expected value. Yes a bike that exceeds the weight limits comfortably may not state an increased weight capacity over 120kg for commercial reasons. Of course good practice and an ideal weight capacity is recommended but the same certification will allow for lower weight capacity bikes. I've seen folding bikes as low as 60kg capacity which is hugely restrictive to who can ride them.
All bikes sold in Europe are tested and certified and probably the same is true in the states. The maximum rider weight is there for a reason and is a good indicator of overall strength of a bike.
There's a lot of good info here about weight limits of bikes by Specialized in their manual. It's the most comprehensive information I've seen about weight limits of bikes in a manual and is closely following the 4210 standard.
https://media.specialized.com/suppor...0000057489.pdf
I know its often stated that a high quality bike can be stronger and lighter than a cheap bike and to a degree this can be true based on high quality heat treated and superior materials components etc but also the reverse is true and simply making a lighter frame with a lot of butting does compromise strength and the lifespan of the frame will be shorter. The fact neither Dahon or Tern state the normal weight limit of about 120/115kg but are somewhat below that surely means compromises have been made. The weight limit of 120kg seems to be given by some as 115kg allowing 5kg for clothes and what is being carried but they are pretty much the same value. It's what most quality bikes seem to aim for and are certified for. I don't get or want the compromise in strength below that value. I don't want a short life bike or a bike that might cause me to die quite frankly. I'd be impressed if the Tern and Dahon bikes had the same weight limit and were lighter but they aren't they are weaker bikes than their competitors and many of these competitors are much cheaper and better value for the components offered but a little bit heavier and slower but only a marginal difference. I'd also point out that many bikes that claim the 120kg weight limit are not equal, one bike may have just scraped through the requirements after testing and another may have massively exceeded those requirements of strength but both Dahon and Tern are below the normal expected value. Yes a bike that exceeds the weight limits comfortably may not state an increased weight capacity over 120kg for commercial reasons. Of course good practice and an ideal weight capacity is recommended but the same certification will allow for lower weight capacity bikes. I've seen folding bikes as low as 60kg capacity which is hugely restrictive to who can ride them.
All bikes sold in Europe are tested and certified and probably the same is true in the states. The maximum rider weight is there for a reason and is a good indicator of overall strength of a bike.
#85
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,601
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1659 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,052 Posts
People should realise both Tern and Dahon are so called performance folding bikes more inline with racing bikes and have lower weight limits. The EN/ISO 4210 standard seems to pretty much have normal bikes at 120kg and mountain bikes at 136kg but racing bikes tend to be stated as short life performance products and that seems pretty much what Tern and Dahon are aiming for. Personally that's reason enough for me to avoid these brands. I'm rather have a strong frame over a slightly lighter one.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
I'd also point out the certification process probably only allows for a relatively short lifespan in their testing could be 3, 5 or 7 years expected lifespan. While a steel frame bike may remain at the same strength for decades an aluminium frame will likely reduce in strength over the years unless designed so strong and rigid it will not flex which is not normally the case with aluminium bikes. So a Brompton of 110kg today could be the same in 15 years but a Dahon of 105kg could be in the lower 90's of KG capacity after the same period. That is a complete estimate I have no way of knowing the reduction in strength but it is meant to be significant but unsure what that is in numbers. Many aeroplanes used to have a replacement regime for aluminium parts at regular intervals but advancements in scanning metals for fatigue plus a movement towards titanium and advanced composites in aeroplanes has removed aluminium from some critical areas. There is also the issue that if you exceed the weight limit of a steel bike the reduction in strength of the frame may be slow with the fatigue only gradually reducing the strength of the frame but with aluminium the same situation would result in a rapid reduction in strength of the frame. I'm only making that point because comparing a steel and aluminium bike of the same weight capacity is not equal over time.
I don't have access to the full 4210 standard. It is possible that they allow for aluminium fatigue and the claimed weight capacity in reality is actually the figure they calculate after 3 years of use. Perhaps someone in the trade who does could state whether that standard allows for fatigue and lifespan of frames in their testing processes. I suspect they don't and treat aluminium and steel pretty much the same and do a series of strength tests using weights mounted and hitting the frame, drop tests and bending tests to simulate actual use under controlled repeatable conditions.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
^ I once spoke with a guy who raced in the pro peleton and he also said that aluminium frames start out great but feel "pap" after a while; I don't have an equivalent English word for that but it loosely translates to weak, limp, soft. I suppose a strong pro would feel the frame to have a lot more flex and "give" after a while.
#88
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,601
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1659 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,052 Posts
Gotta love that magic Hi Ten steel Brompton uses, the only known metal that shows no fatigue.
carbon-and-lowalloy-steels-for-nonmetallurgists-26-728.jpg
carbon-and-lowalloy-steels-for-nonmetallurgists-26-728.jpg
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
Gotta love that magic Hi Ten steel Brompton uses, the only known metal that shows no fatigue.
Attachment 574598
Attachment 574598
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
Saw this advice on the Brompton site which means they are not immune from fatigue issues because some of their parts or upgrade parts are aluminium and so they have recommendations for mileage for replacing those parts.
https://brompton.zendesk.com/hc/en-u...r-rider-safety
https://brompton.zendesk.com/hc/en-u...r-rider-safety
Many components on a bike are highly stressed, and with high mileage, heavy loads or hard riding, will eventually reach the end of their design life; in particular, aluminium alloy has a limited fatigue life. Failure in use can cause injury. You should check all load-bearing parts for any signs of damage, corrosion, or cracking, and replace if necessary. Please visit an authorised Brompton dealer for expert advice if you are uncertain.
Like all lightweight machines, the Brompton features aluminium alloy parts which have a finite design life before failure; in normal use, the risk of aluminium fatigue failure is remote, even after many thousands of miles, but the risk of failure increases with use, especially with hard riding or severe loading.
As such a failure could cause injury, we recommend that these items are checked regularly and that the folding pedals, aluminium seatpost, hinge clamp plates, handlebar and chainset be replaced every 5,000 miles (8,000 kilometres), or more frequently on a bike subjected to particularly hard use.
Like all lightweight machines, the Brompton features aluminium alloy parts which have a finite design life before failure; in normal use, the risk of aluminium fatigue failure is remote, even after many thousands of miles, but the risk of failure increases with use, especially with hard riding or severe loading.
As such a failure could cause injury, we recommend that these items are checked regularly and that the folding pedals, aluminium seatpost, hinge clamp plates, handlebar and chainset be replaced every 5,000 miles (8,000 kilometres), or more frequently on a bike subjected to particularly hard use.
#91
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am new to buying a bike right now. I am looking at a used Tern X20, 2015 model and while doing some research, I came across this thread. Now I am a little hesitant. The price is in the same range as a used Brompton (all with very low use). The other bike I am considering it the Birdy. By the way, I am located in Hong Kong.
Any recommendations on which direction I should go. Mainly for riding around the neighbourhood and commuting on transit from time to time.
Thanks.
Any recommendations on which direction I should go. Mainly for riding around the neighbourhood and commuting on transit from time to time.
Thanks.
#92
Senior Member
I am new to buying a bike right now. I am looking at a used Tern X20, 2015 model and while doing some research, I came across this thread. Now I am a little hesitant. The price is in the same range as a used Brompton (all with very low use). The other bike I am considering it the Birdy. By the way, I am located in Hong Kong.
Any recommendations on which direction I should go. Mainly for riding around the neighbourhood and commuting on transit from time to time.
Thanks.
Any recommendations on which direction I should go. Mainly for riding around the neighbourhood and commuting on transit from time to time.
Thanks.
#93
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So....going back to the original topic, was it ever clearly determined what exactly caused the frames to fail on these bikes ?
The general consensus seems to be, the hinge becoming loose results in the frame sections moving in opposite directions which creates more stress on the welds that in turn fail.
It appears a newer design of frame hinge with a single shaft, the OCL 2.0 is now in use which should prevent the same thing happening again....or am I missing something ?
The general consensus seems to be, the hinge becoming loose results in the frame sections moving in opposite directions which creates more stress on the welds that in turn fail.
It appears a newer design of frame hinge with a single shaft, the OCL 2.0 is now in use which should prevent the same thing happening again....or am I missing something ?
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Pure and simple: There was insufficient welding to handle typical production quality spread. Newer frames have a hidden web inside that lengthens the weld.
#95
Senior Member
https://www.change.org/p/sgm-bikes-a...o-poor-welding
The frame looks similar to the Tern. Perhaps a rebadge, but the hinge latches looks cheaper. Recall petition was 3 years ago.
The frame looks similar to the Tern. Perhaps a rebadge, but the hinge latches looks cheaper. Recall petition was 3 years ago.
#96
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brompton would be great for that city - nice bicycling destinations/paths connected by extensive/cheap public transport, with high population density and theft concerns. IMHO, the Brompton's ultra-compact/quick/easy fold, integrated/quick release luggage, stands upright and wheels well while folded (rack & X-roller mod) will invaluable for multi-modal transport, taking inside restaurants, and shopping-cart/baby-stroller mode is even great for grocers and malls. I can comfortably occupy a single seat in train/bus/car with a Brompton (w/rack) standing upright on my lap.
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
https://www.change.org/p/sgm-bikes-a...o-poor-welding
The frame looks similar to the Tern. Perhaps a rebadge, but the hinge latches looks cheaper. Recall petition was 3 years ago.
The frame looks similar to the Tern. Perhaps a rebadge, but the hinge latches looks cheaper. Recall petition was 3 years ago.
#98
Senior Member
From what I understand about the Phillipines, it is a completely corrupt political system and many products sold there are illegal elsewhere. One product that comes to mind is a hot dog sausage that contains very dangerous chemicals that cause cancer which is freely sold in the country but illegal elsewhere. It is quite possible that they sell bikes that are uncertified and wouldn't be allowed in more developed markets like Europe, Japan and the US. It could be a local manufacturer that builds to a very low standard.
#100
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did just post a reply but it disappeared into the ether as these things do. Basically what I said was the welds shown on al the pictures of frame failures seem to be intact, it's the weld material itself that's given way.
Could it be as suggested by many, that if the hinges had been serviced regularly and tightened correctly there would have been no end to end frame movement which it appears caused these to fail.
Could it be as suggested by many, that if the hinges had been serviced regularly and tightened correctly there would have been no end to end frame movement which it appears caused these to fail.