Biopace cranksets ? To change or not to change?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Biopace cranksets ? To change or not to change?
Any input on shamano 600 biopace crank sets. Do most get replaced by conventional sets ? The 1987 Schwinn super sport i just acquired has the 600 biopace. I was wondering if its better left on the bike or switched out for a conventional 600 crank set which i have in the parts box. All the info i seem to read about it is that it did not get good press when it was released. Any suggestions or thoughts would be great!!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
I’d just ride it. I doubt you’ll notice it much.
Likes For bikemig:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,391
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1559 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times
in
973 Posts
I purposely sought out Biopace chain rings to put on my Lemond and I think they are great. Very good for hard stomping and stand up pedaling. I wish Shimano didn’t give up on it so soon.
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
I'm a devotee. I experimented a bunch with them last winter after some knee hypermobility issues and they worked well enough that I installed them on a racing bike, a touring bike, and a tandem. Lon Haldeman and Pete Penseyres set the record for fastest bike ride across the USA on a tandem that was all Biopace. In 1987. And that time still hasn't been beaten.
Try them out. You may really like them.
Try them out. You may really like them.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,517
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,760 Times
in
634 Posts
Check to see if there good take apart if there are no major lips bad looking spots ride them if not feel free too mix a single bad ring with a conventional ring. I actually switched out a rough small normal ring 28t alloy for a 28t steel no issues actually got a bit better climbing.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,923 Times
in
2,552 Posts
Those chainrings use standard bolt patterns. If so you can simply buy circular chainrings and try them. That will tell you far more than pagers of answers to your thread will.
I took a quick look at Sheldon Brown's website and saw that Biopace was made in 130 BCD and 110 BCD. Very popular standards, Finding circular rings shouldn't be hard.
Ben
I took a quick look at Sheldon Brown's website and saw that Biopace was made in 130 BCD and 110 BCD. Very popular standards, Finding circular rings shouldn't be hard.
Ben
Last edited by 79pmooney; 09-01-20 at 08:26 PM. Reason: Better choice of words
Likes For 79pmooney:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
Those chainrings use standard bolt patterns. If so you can simply buy circular chainrings and try them. That will tell you far more than pagers of answers to your thread will.
I took a quick look at Sheldon Brown's website and saw that Biopace was made in 130 BCD and 110 BCD. Very popular standards, Finding circular rings shouldn't be hard.
Ben
I took a quick look at Sheldon Brown's website and saw that Biopace was made in 130 BCD and 110 BCD. Very popular standards, Finding circular rings shouldn't be hard.
Ben
It's the rings that are BioPace, not the cranks. Use the rings, swap them out for round ones; doesn't matter. The cranks can stay. I have two late 80s Schwinns with BioPace rings. I forget they are BioPace until I look down at them while I'm pedalling. I don't see any reason to change them out.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Likes For Lascauxcaveman:
#9
Death fork? Naaaah!!
I would change the 42t small ring for the hard to find 40t, but that's just me.
Love Biopace.
Top
Love Biopace.
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you for the posts. I have only had the bike out on one very short ride . Not long enough to really tell how they are. Its very good to know that i can just change out the rings if i do not like them. Depending on the weather today after work i plan on going out.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,703
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1947 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times
in
1,109 Posts
I have put quite a few miles on Biopace and go back and forth between them and round rings. I think I can feel the difference pedaling but I can't describe it. Same with front shifting. Leave em.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,371
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times
in
1,677 Posts
Biopace chainrings are optimized for riding with a moderate cadence. People who maintain a high cadence seem to prefer round rings (or Rotor rings, in the case of people like Chris Froome).
#13
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
I've been thinking about hunting down some Biopace II rings for a bike or 2.
FWIW- there's Biopace and Biopace II- and it's my understanding that the Biopace II have a more gentle elliptical shape. My High Sierra ATB has regular Biopace- at 28-38-48- and aside from seeing them, I don't notice that the big rings aren't round, but I do notice the small ring- because it is SO out of round. I had a set of the the SR Ovaltech rings on a bike- and I had to remember that they weren't round.
Also FWIW- I remember a thread here about someone flipping out about how whoever made their crappy bike couldn't even make the chainrings round and got angry when he looked down and saw them...
FWIW- there's Biopace and Biopace II- and it's my understanding that the Biopace II have a more gentle elliptical shape. My High Sierra ATB has regular Biopace- at 28-38-48- and aside from seeing them, I don't notice that the big rings aren't round, but I do notice the small ring- because it is SO out of round. I had a set of the the SR Ovaltech rings on a bike- and I had to remember that they weren't round.
Also FWIW- I remember a thread here about someone flipping out about how whoever made their crappy bike couldn't even make the chainrings round and got angry when he looked down and saw them...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#14
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,796
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2436 Post(s)
Liked 3,119 Times
in
1,962 Posts
Having had three different sets, I will tell you that the first iteration was uncomfortable (105 version), but the more pronounced Deore was great on MTB cranks. The second “600” version was gentler in ellipse, and I hardly notice it is there.
High cadences were messy.
High cadences were messy.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
#15
framebuilder
If I was out for a cruise by myself or with my wife and I was probably pedaling at 70/80 rpm (maybe a bit more), I liked Biopace rings just fine. If i was on a training ride and trying to stay with the big boys with my modest talent, I hated them. To control my speed so I could stay as close as possible to the wheel in front of me (every mm mattered to reduce my effort or I was off the back riding by myself) as well as be prepared to accelerate out of corners or when someone jumped, I had to keep my cadence way up.
Dura Ace made some Biopace rings for a short period which only had a modest amount of ovalness that were designed for the fast crowd. I'll attach a picture.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 777
Bikes: Raleigh Classic 15, 84; Miyata 912, 85; Miyata Ridge Runner SE, 85; Miyata 610, 86; Miyata 100M, 86; Miyata Valley Runner, 88; Miyata Triple Cross, 89; GT Karakoram, 90; Miyata Elevation 300, 91; Marinoni Touring, 95; Long Haul Trucker, 2013
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times
in
80 Posts
I'm a recreational rider: I have biopace on several of my bikes, and like them fine. I certainly wouldn't bother changing them out...I don't really notice them in use.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 883
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 869 Times
in
416 Posts
A short ride probably isn't enough time to decide on them. Just looking down at the silly thing while riding makes my comfort level go down.
The longer ride should show you more. I've noticed a bit more noise when chain angle is high, and slight inconsistency on FD shifting.
I still have not decided to keep mine Biopace or change them after 60 miles or so.
Good luck,
Dave
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
367 Posts
I have replaced the bio pace chain rings (not the whole crank) on one bike and I have left them in place on another and I am not sure I can really tell the difference, as bikemig said ride them first then worry about changing them. New Sugino chain rings cost about $30 a piece so swapping them out isn't cheap but you could probably find rings at the co-op if you really felt the need to go round versus oval.
#19
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Try 'em. I did last year and liked 'em.
For me, it worked best when I slowed down my cadence and pushed harder gears. And it felt better with a shorter crank than I'm accustomed to.
Normally I'm comfortable with cranks from 170 to 175, and usually spin around 90 rpm.
With the 52/42 Biopace rings, it felt better with 170 cranks and cadence around 60-75 rpm.
I also tried the trick of reorienting the Biopace rings to move the lobes around. But eventually I went back to standard orientation. Same trick with other eccentric chainrings -- some folks prefer to reorient them to move the lobes around to better suit their power/rest strokes. Just gotta experiment and see what works for you.
For me, it worked best when I slowed down my cadence and pushed harder gears. And it felt better with a shorter crank than I'm accustomed to.
Normally I'm comfortable with cranks from 170 to 175, and usually spin around 90 rpm.
With the 52/42 Biopace rings, it felt better with 170 cranks and cadence around 60-75 rpm.
I also tried the trick of reorienting the Biopace rings to move the lobes around. But eventually I went back to standard orientation. Same trick with other eccentric chainrings -- some folks prefer to reorient them to move the lobes around to better suit their power/rest strokes. Just gotta experiment and see what works for you.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,391
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1559 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times
in
973 Posts
Now if you have a perfect circular pedaling motion, then you don't need Biopace. For the rest of us, Biopace+ short cranks takes the harshness out of riding.
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 2,089
Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, René Herse tandem
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
723 Posts
Yeah I noticed that with Biopace I could maintain a higher cadence without my knees giving me trouble. I know I know, your knees are supposed to hurt less with a high cadence, but I'm not normal. Hypermobility sucks. But spinning with biopace is good for me. I can use longer cranks with biopace than without, because my feet move slower through the points where my joints are at extreme flexion, and things stay together better.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
Owner & co-founder, Cycles René Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
#22
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,846
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2297 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times
in
1,254 Posts
Yeah I noticed that with Biopace I could maintain a higher cadence without my knees giving me trouble. I know I know, your knees are supposed to hurt less with a high cadence, but I'm not normal. Hypermobility sucks. But spinning with biopace is good for me. I can use longer cranks with biopace than without, because my feet move slower through the points where my joints are at extreme flexion, and things stay together better.
#23
on the wheels of steel
Cool! I'm just getting into vintage bikes and I've been riding around on biopace chainrings on a new old bike (a miyata triplecross) and didn't even notice they were ovalized. I have an oval chainring on my modern mountain bike and I love it. I mainly notice it on steep sandy climbs, which on round chainrings I would tend to spin out and have to put a foot down, maybe even hike-a-bike. I wouldn't even consider taking the triplecross on a trail like that though. I wonder what Shimano's motivation was for putting them on the bike. Maybe in the 90s people really were crazy enough to take such bikes up those steep sandy trails...
#24
lurking nightrider
Just acquired my first Biopace crank. I've been away from steady riding for a few years now and looking to get back into shape. Have always been a masher so I thought I'd give 'em a try. My 60 year old knees might appreciate the change.
Saw a short vid on youtube where the rings were rotated clockwise (IIRC) 72 degrees. Was supposed to improve the power stroke? Might give it a shot.
Saw a short vid on youtube where the rings were rotated clockwise (IIRC) 72 degrees. Was supposed to improve the power stroke? Might give it a shot.
__________________
"If there hadn't been women we'd still be squatting in a cave eating raw meat, because we made civilization in order to impress our girl friends. And they tolerated it and let us go ahead and play with our toys." Orson Welles
"If there hadn't been women we'd still be squatting in a cave eating raw meat, because we made civilization in order to impress our girl friends. And they tolerated it and let us go ahead and play with our toys." Orson Welles
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I went for a short ride today on the Schwinn and did not see much difference between my Bridgestone with round rings. The big thing was when i would look down and see the rotation. Its a bit odd and am not used to that. I am going to leave them on for now and see where it goes. The bike is a dream to ride and its the highest level bike i own now. 1987 Schwinn super sport. Columbus tenax frame . 600ex group. It is very good to know that i can swap out only the rings if i have to. I have thought about moving the rings around to see if any changes can be felt. But for now she will stay stock. Lol
Likes For Glennr134: